|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435 |
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your logic, but our run defense last year was BEYOND embarrassing and ranked dead last in the league at #32. If our front office is convinced that Shelton is a can't miss prospect that can help us from the word go, then sure, move up and take the kid. If he's going to be the next Haloti Ngata or the next Vince Wilford I would rather not miss out on him.
I'm not disagreeing that we could certainly use both first round picks, but if Shelton is a stud and helps us stop the run and makes our defense better this up coming season, who the hell is going to care what we traded to get him? We'll just be glad we have him.
Maybe it's all a smoke screen too.
I'm with the majority of you all here, the safest thing to do is hang on to all of our picks and draft smartly. I just merely stated that as long as we land an impact player who can start and help us from day one, I would be OKAY with a trade to move up.
It was our first year in a new system and our front seven was decimated by injuries. I'm not as concerned about our run defense as some. It clearly needs to improve, but I see our need for pass rush pretty much equally. I don't see Shelton as can't miss. With Dupree climbing up mock drafts (and I believe draft boards) and other pass rushers falling, I could see us trading up for him at five if it plays out Winston, Williams, Beasley, Fowler and the price was right. I'm not saying it's what I would do, but I see it as a possibility. Dupree has the versatility Pet and Farmer seem to look for, and there is the Joker tie. Pass rusher is more of a high value position than DT from what I can glean. Dupree doesn't seem to have any character red flags. Dupree article I found interesting I particularly liked the fact that Dupree was a film junkie even in high school. You might be on to something with Bud Dupree. Randy Gregory and Shane Ray have now put themselves out of the top ten, thus automatically increasing Bud Duprees stock. I feel like we had a solid chance at landing a pass rusher at either #12 or #19 though. You know, in theory that has some logic to it. But I simply don't see that in the cards. While I'm not trying to turn this into a QB thread, I think having the two 1st round picks should be included in that conversation.
As long as we have two 1st round picks in any draft, we are in contention to move up for a QB. Without two first round picks the odds decline drastically.
While I agree with you about Williams and Leonard, I believe the wise thing to do would be to trade one of those picks for a future 1st rounder if at all possible. Unless this FO feels confident we have our future QB on the roster, which I don't see how they could, moving that investment forward seems to make the most sense. If we hold onto the #12 and #19 picks it wouldn't shock me one bit to see us trade back. I could see a team such Indianapolis, Green Bay or Carolina want to move up and select a good defensive player. If we get offered a 3rd rounder this year, and a 1st rounder next year to swap and trade back, I'm seriously considering that move. Who are they trying to get at 5? who's the target Million dollar question though. My guess is they would hoping for either Marcus Mariota, Leonard Williams or Dante Fowler to fall into their laps. After last year, I'm not sure I believe that Farmer wants to trade up for a wide receiver. It is a pretty deep class and one could be had at #43.
Last edited by MrKelso; 04/28/15 01:17 PM.
"You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030 |
The only player I would trade up for in this draft is Williams. If we trade up for a WR I give up on this FO and will sit back and wait for them to get fired. Seriously, think of how stupid it would be to basically give up Watkins for a 1st this year (a good trade imo), only to trade the pick and your own to draft a guy who wouldn't have went ahead of Sammy last year.........Browns logic...lol.
I wouldn't like a trade up for Mariota (because I don't believe in him fully), but at least I understand the logic behind it. Trading up for Cooper/White just seals the deal that they don't know what their doing......jmho.
Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435 |
The only player I would trade up for in this draft is Williams. If we trade up for a WR I give up on this FO and will sit back and wait for them to get fired. Seriously, think of how stupid it would be to basically give up Watkins for a 1st this year (a good trade imo), only to trade the pick and your own to draft a guy who wouldn't have went ahead of Sammy last year.........Browns logic...lol.
I wouldn't like a trade up for Mariota (because I don't believe in him fully), but at least I understand the logic behind it. Trading up for Cooper/White just seals the deal that they don't know what their doing......jmho. That's exactly it. You nailed it. That's why I don't really think Amari Cooper or Kevin White would be the target at #5. I believe the target would be Mariota, Fowler or Williams. It would be REALLY interesting to see who they take if all three are off the boards.
"You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030 |
Yep....if anything I want us to trade out of the 1sts for future ones. This draft isn't very good imo, and Pitt touched on something earlier about needing to keep multiple 1sts while waiting for that "Franchise" type of guy, and I agree with that as well. Either trade them both for MM if you think he is "the" guy, or trade 12 for a 2nd a 1st next year. I really hope that is how we proceed.
***Note** I don't want Mariotta, but if the Browns deem he's the guy they want to hitch their collective careers to then again at least there is logic in the move.
Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 |
They traded up for Gilbert? Oh my gosh!
I don't want Mariotta. I just want the two picks.
Oh my, they got Manziel, and cut after 1 game.
Some decision maker needs to get inebriated, so they can SOBER UP! And Wake up! and come to their senses.
Two picks for Mariotta, Blah Two picks for Shelton, Oh my goodness freakin bad!
You want a Qb, wait and take Manion You don't want a Qb, then let McCown, Manziel, or Thaddeus Lewis play the year.
Restore some sanity. Don't make any trades, just pick decent prospects and coach them a chance to succeed.
There's GOLD in them there picks, and you want to chase Snipe at #5. Oh my, don't get big leagued by the big markets again.
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,037
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,037 |
So if we have a choice between a great player, or 2 decent players, we should take the 2 decent players because the great player might leave one day? No. I very unsuccessfully was trying to support cfrs's notion that you do not trade up for a non-QB. I was using Suh as an example of a dominant DL prospect that was dominant in the pros and didn't impact his team the way a QB would. And per DC's comment, it has nothing to do with putting pieces around a DL. You don't put pieces around a DL. You put pieces around a QB. It would be dumb to move up and give up picks for a DL, IMO.
LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
Look at the non-QB players who teams traded up into the top 7 to get in recent years...
Sammy Watkins Dion Jordan Trent Richardson Morris Claiborn Julio Jones Then you also have RGIII and Mark Sanchez
(Weird how many of those we were involved in)...
Those may not be all of them, and some haven't been in the league all that long but it's not a distinguished list when it comes to making teams into winners.
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,037
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,037 |
I think we are saying the same thing.
LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
I think we are doing our due diligence (I know that term is getting over used but it fits) so that draft day if a player we are targeting drops and is there at 5 we want to be able to talk serious with them.
jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
I think when it comes to defenders, the ironic thing here is that for example.. No one was trying to trade up for JJ Watt..
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635 |
Look at the non-QB players who teams traded up into the top 7 to get in recent years...
Sammy Watkins Dion Jordan Trent Richardson Morris Claiborn Julio Jones Then you also have RGIII and Mark Sanchez
(Weird how many of those we were involved in)...
Those may not be all of them, and some haven't been in the league all that long but it's not a distinguished list when it comes to making teams into winners. Just heard Dion Jordan will be suspended the full year, too.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 3
Rookie
|
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 3 |
I see zero value in trading two first for anyone other than a qb. Especially in this draft, there is no clowney or joe Thomas like prospect at their position worthy of trading two first for. I can live with trading up for mariota because it makes sense.
I'd much rather take Shelton at 12, and if he isn't available, Parker. And at 19, BPA or trade down.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341 |
No Joe Thomas is right, BUT CLOWNY what has he done in the NFL except to collect pay checks 
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Just heard Dion Jordan will be suspended the full year, too. That draft class gets worse by the day.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 567
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 567 |
The only player I would trade up for in this draft is Williams. If we trade up for a WR I give up on this FO and will sit back and wait for them to get fired. Seriously, think of how stupid it would be to basically give up Watkins for a 1st this year (a good trade imo), only to trade the pick and your own to draft a guy who wouldn't have went ahead of Sammy last year.........Browns logic...lol.
I wouldn't like a trade up for Mariota (because I don't believe in him fully), but at least I understand the logic behind it. Trading up for Cooper/White just seals the deal that they don't know what their doing......jmho. That's exactly it. You nailed it. That's why I don't really think Amari Cooper or Kevin White would be the target at #5. I believe the target would be Mariota, Fowler or Williams. It would be REALLY interesting to see who they take if all three are off the boards. I think everyone is off base here... I think you are looking at the wrong compensation. It is being reported that the Titans are looking for #12, #19 and #43 for #2 overall...after that pick (when Mariota goes off the board) the compensation drops DRASTICALLY with each pick..and without a QB to get top compensation. When talking about Washington, I think you are looking more to a compensation package of like #12 and #43 (possibly a player or low draft pick included) I think if they make the move to #5 to get their guy, they still have #19 to fill another hole. NOW, if you don't lose your second 1st round pick, does that move up seem a little more logical? Last year, the Bills wanted to move up in order to get the player they felt was the consensus best player at his position. They way overpaid, imho, to move from #9 to #4, we made out on that trade. Sometimes you have to do that in order to get the player you know won't be there when you pick. This year, there are a few players worth giving up #12 and #43 for imho...Dante Fowler, Danny Shelton, Kevin White and Amari Cooper..ANY of those 4 would be worth the #12 and #43 picks. IF you made that trade to move up to the Redskins spot and came away with either Kevin White or Amari Cooper, you win BIG time from that trade last year. Although I still feel Sammy Watkins was the best receiver in last year's draft, both of these receivers are BETTER than Watkins, and Devante Parker may be as well. So if you look back, the Bills get Sammy Watkins, the Browns would get Justin Gilbert, say Kevin White and a player at #19...even with Gilbert's rough start, the Browns have won that trade. I don't see any player in the draft where the Redskins can cash in on both of our first round picks for us to move up and take...It just doesn't make sense with all of the players rated so closely together. Of course, if Mariota doesn't go #2 overall, this could all change. But I believe the ball will be in Manziel's hands in 2015. If he fails yet again, miserably, then you go for a QB in 2016. Neither Mariota or Winston are worth the risk. There are several QBs to look for in college football over the 2015 season that will more than likely become better prospects than either...If I had my druthers, I would take a chance on Mariota though...Winston, wouldn't pick him if he were available at #19...now #43, yeah, now I would take the risk.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030 |
The only player worth giving up 43 on your list is Fowler. There are 5 WRs with a 1st round grade this year. You don't give up a high pick to get one that isn't that much higher rated than what you can get at 12 or 19 even. Furthermore, it is at a position where you can find good guys throughout the draft.
The only way this makes any sense is if it is for a top notch defensive guy like Fowler or Williams......or Mariota (although I don't like him it still makes since if they do). The Bills were beyond dumb to trade what they did for a WR, but us giving up less doesn't make us geniuses either. The only position this draft has depth at is WR and it would be utterly idiotic to trade up to obtain one when very good ones will be on the board in the 2nd/3rd rounds.
So whether it is 19 or 43 it is still beyond dumb to trade up for a WR in a draft that is full of quality WRs.....jmho.
Last edited by BigWillieStyle; 04/29/15 08:50 AM.
Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,514
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,514 |
Who are they trying to get at 5? who's the target Any bust will do. not any bust... the only bust
Meh.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,035
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,035 |
Latest I have heard was that the cost for us to move up to #2 would be #12, #19 and a 4th rounder this year. For whatever that is worth. We all know final compensation comes down to how much a team wants that particular player.
The difference between Jesus and religion Religion mocks you for having dirty feet Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
It comes down to this. For that 12, 19 n 4th rounder.
If we have deemed Mariota/Winston as THE GUY and we are definite and believe that to be a fact! We will go for it and probably should (if you are certain, its worth it). I personally would not but I don't have the info they do nor privey to our QB Coach in what he assesses.
If we are not "SURE" 99% Sure. We will not do it...not for Mariota. Williams yes, Beasley maybe, Fowler maybe. jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,280
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,280 |
Who are they trying to get at 5? who's the target Marriota would be the target. If Marriota isn't selected by Tennessee, he could easily drop to #5 because The Jags have Bortels and the Raiders have Carr. I doubt they go QB. The 5 slot is the key slot for us. That said, I hope we don't do that. I'd rather stay where we are and select two good players.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333 |
I'm not trading #12 and #19 to go to #5 if Marriota is there. #12 and #43 should be enough.
After 55 years, I'm walking away from this dumpster fire. Good luck to everyone who continues to hang on. You'll need it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
Unfortunately we have no say in this. Just a question and note - I don't want to move up at all for Mariota.
But if you think its ok and we should trade 12 & 19 to get Mariota (don't know if you do or not) Why would it not be ok to trade 12 & 19 to 5 to get the exact same player that it is ok with.
If we truly truly believe Mariota is THE GUY regardless of what I think or not...I hope we have the balls to do what needs to get done! I could care less if its 2, 4, 5 - if Mariota is the target there is no Yes for 12 & 43 but no to 12 & 19...then you don't realy really want the guy.
QB normally is a Over payment. But if its not the settling for investment and you (meaning GM, HC, OC n QB Coach) all believe he "IS" THE GUY....please then go get him!
jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums The Archives 2015 NFL Season The NFL Draft 2015 Report: Browns have been in touch
with Washington about No. 5
overall pick
|
|