Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Solo Musicians Clemdawg 04/26/24 05:33 AM
Quote
Yeah, he doesn't play guitar, he reinvents the damned thing every time he touches it. Ridiculous performance, thanks for posting.


I've been following this brother since we both had no gray hair.
He's never failed to amaze me, since Day One.

One of the deepest blessings of my life has been to have spent my days making 'organized noise' with ppl who have inspired me- heart, mind and soul.
I'm always on the search for those who have dedicated their lives to saying what cannot be expressed through any other art form.

Sound rules my life more than sight (Art Tatum/Stevie Wonder/Ray Charles/Ronnie Milsap).
One of my deepest 'later in life' dreads is losing my ability to hear. Ironic, since I've spent my last 40 years in an environment that subjects my ears to temporary sound pressure levels that approach a jet engine at startup, from a distance of 1,000 feet.

To live like Beethoven, deaf for the last half of his life, would be my personal version of hell on earth. What others express with their music is the thing I live for. It is, and has always been, the center of my soul's existence.

_____________________


I'm thankful that my music-related posts reach others....
... and I'm thankful that you DT posters choose to engage with me about it.

This niche job that I do can sometimes be isolating. Few ppl actually appreciate what we do... especially on the level at which we're required to do it.
I appreciate the support I find at this address.



.02,
clem.
33 314 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Player News Continued..... Ballpeen 04/26/24 04:28 AM
Guys, this has been in motion for several years now. Why are you so surprised?

It started with the drafted rookies being placed on a rookie limit. The money has gone to proven players. It has taken away from the mid level player. They now get cut as they go to a 2nd contract.

Difference makers get paid handsomely, the others get cut in favor of rookies. The way it should be unless an 8-8 team is the desire.

That's the reality.
172 7,245 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: The Economy Part 2 EveDawg 04/26/24 03:17 AM
28 377 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cleveland Guardians Milk Man 04/26/24 02:21 AM
Quite possibly my new favorite Guardian in the farm system. The name screams HoF.



60 2,101 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Israel at war again. jfanent 04/26/24 01:37 AM
Some of these idiots don't even know what they're protesting.

305 8,116 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: CAVS/NBA leadtheway 04/26/24 12:21 AM
They are getting run out of the gym. Cavs ain’t going anywhere. Still no playmakers or coach
171 8,985 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: SCOTUS Hears Trump Imunity Case bonefish 04/25/24 10:35 PM
You either have Law or you don't.

The basic principle of our Constitution is "nobody is above the law."

The Appeal Court made it clear. So, is it ok for a president to have his political opponents killed?

How about some common sense.

I will do me. Nobody is above the Law. Nixon challenge.

In a 5–4 decision, the Court ruled that the President is entitled to absolute immunity from legal liability for civil damages based on his official acts. The Court, however, emphasized that the President is not necessarily immune from criminal charges stemming from his official or unofficial acts while he is in office.
18 170 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Music Video Thread #3471 PitDAWG 04/25/24 09:26 PM
That will give them a crazy amount of exposure! Good for them!
229 6,938 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump hush Money Trial Set to start On April 15th. Bull_Dawg 04/25/24 09:25 PM
Originally Posted by OldColdDawg
No, he doesn’t. Nice try though, now mount that broom and fly away.

You can be hard to comprehend. It's hard not to "know" (of) you on these boards in the colloquial sense.

Also kind of seems like your witch allusion would lend the post you replied to some credence. Just saying.
166 2,938 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Cuckoo Dems-Part 6 OldColdDawg 04/25/24 08:25 PM
MAGAts playing victim, what’s new?
26 243 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Cicada Invasion? FATE 04/25/24 07:20 PM
At first I'm like "calling the police??" saywhat 🤣


I never realized there were so many different broods until looking into this about a month ago. They are also very geographical, so it's a "right place/right time" thing, almost like the eclipse.

The great news for me is we booked our large family reunion at a resort in Virginia, in late June, which could be on the edge of some serious chicanery. rofl

Quote
In 2037, Brood VI of the periodical cicadas is expected to emerge in the United States. Brood VI is another one of the 17-year cicadas. There are 15 broods of 17-year periodical cicadas (Magicicada species) in the United States. These broods are designated by Roman numerals and emerge in different years across various regions of the country. Each brood has a distinct geographic range and emergence schedule. Additionally, there are three broods of 13-year periodical cicadas, making a total of 18 broods of periodical cicadas in the United States.

(Two seperate questions I posed to Chat GPT, which saved me 38 hours of scouring Giggle)
1 30 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Abortion issue will be on the Nov. Ballot PitDAWG 04/25/24 06:48 PM
j/c

Arizona House votes to overturn 1864 abortion ban, paving way to leave 15-week limit in place

The Arizona House of Representatives voted Wednesday to overturn the state’s 160-year-old abortion ban, setting the stage for a repeal that would leave the state’s 15-week restriction on the procedure in place.

The vote comes after two failed attempts by lawmakers in the Republican-controlled state House to bring the bill to the floor last week, as Democrats sought to strike down the ban after the state Supreme Court revived it earlier this month.

Three Republicans voted with all 29 Democrats Wednesday to advance the legislation. The state Senate is expected to pass the repeal measure in early May. And Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs is expected to sign the bill if lawmakers advance it to her desk.

“This has been a long time coming,” said Athena Salman, the executive director of Arizona campaigns for Reproductive Freedom for All, formerly NARAL Pro-Choice America.

In its April 9 ruling, the Arizona Supreme Court said that the state must adhere to the 1864 law that bars all abortions except in cases when “necessary” to save a pregnant woman’s life. The law also carries a prison sentence of two to five years for abortion providers.

Wednesday’s vote is a boon to reproductive rights advocates and some Republican candidates, including former President Donald Trump, who have tried to distance themselves from the court ruling.

Within the Arizona House, however, the repeal measure drew angry remarks from several Republicans.

“I am disgusted today,” state Rep. Rachel Jones said. “Life is one of the tenants of our Republican platform. To see people go back on that value is egregious to me.”

Arizona House Speaker Ben Toma, who said he opposes all abortions except to save a pregnant woman’s life, said lawmakers had rushed into repealing the ban.

State Rep. Matt Gress, one of the Republicans who voted with Democrats, said the ban – which was first introduced when Arizona was still a US territory – didn’t reflect the values of most Arizona voters. Repealing it should have been a simple proposition, he said.

“I think it was more difficult than it needed to be,” Gress told CNN.

As the session ended, state House leadership removed Gress from the chamber’s Appropriations Committee, a move that was seen as punishment for bucking the party. Gress said it was “unfortunate and potentially unprecedented,” but he didn’t regret his vote.

“I campaigned against the territorial ban and made it very clear to my voters that I don’t support it,” said Gress, who represents a Phoenix-area district.

Hobbs told CNN’s Abby Phillip Wednesday night she was “relieved” by the repeal’s passage in the state House.

“There have been untold levels of chaos and fear across the state since this Supreme Court decision. So now the Senate needs to vote to send this repeal to my desk, so we can get rid of this 1864 ban once and for all,” the Democratic governor said on “NewsNight.”

If a repeal vote fails in the state Senate, the 1864 law could take effect as early as June 8, making Arizona one of more than a dozen states that bans abortion at virtually all stages of pregnancy with few exceptions.

If it succeeds, Arizona’s 15-week restriction on abortions will continue to be state law. However, officials warned that the territorial ban could be briefly enforceable because nonemergency bills passed in Arizona don’t take effect until 90 days after the Legislature adjourns.

In neighboring California, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom praised a state bill that would allow Arizona medical professionals to perform abortions for Arizona patients in California through the end of the year, arguing that it could help Arizonans even if the 1864 ban is repealed.

“With its urgency clause, SB 233 would fill a critical gap for care during a meaningful period of time before an Arizona repeal could be implemented,” a news release from the governor’s office said. “Swift action helps combat the confusion and chilling effect this back-and-forth creates.”

The Civil War-era abortion ban, which dates to before statehood, was codified in 1901. It remained in effect until 1973, when it was blocked by a court injunction after Roe v. Wade created a federal constitutional right to an abortion.

In March 2022, months before the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Republican Gov. Doug Ducey signed into law the state’s 15-week ban, which has no exceptions for rape or incest. That legislation stated explicitly that it did not overrule the 1864 law.

Democrats have made clear that they still plan to emphasize abortion policy heading into the general election. Arizona Republicans hold one-seat majorities in the state House and Senate, and the state will be a US Senate and presidential battleground this fall.

Sam Paisley, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, which works to elect Democrats to statehouse seats, called Wednesday’s vote a “clear victory for Arizona House Democrats” but pointed out that the 15-week restriction would still exist after a repeal.

“The only way to protect reproductive freedoms is to elect Democrats to the legislature to repeal this (15-week) ban too,” Paisley said in a statement.

Abortion rights advocates are currently working to place a constitutional amendment proposal on the state’s November ballot that would protect abortion access up to fetal viability, which doctors believe is around 22 to 24 weeks of pregnancy. Arizona for Abortion Access, the group backing the amendment, has gathered more than 500,000 signatures. Advocates must submit 384,000 valid signatures by July 3 to make the general election ballot.

Prior to the Arizona House vote, the chamber’s rules committee voted along party lines to approve the late introduction of three House resolutions, largely believed to be Republican-backed ballot measures designed to compete with the abortion rights amendment.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/24/politics/arizona-house-abortion-law/index.html
69 2,324 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump starts the Appeals process PitDAWG 04/25/24 06:14 PM
Federal judge upholds verdict in E. Jean Carroll case and denies Trump’s motion for a new trial

A federal judge on Thursday upheld the verdict and award in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case against former President Donald Trump and denied Trump’s motion for a new trial.

Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a written opinion, said Trump’s legal arguments are without merit. The judge also found that the punitive damages the jury awarded to Carroll “passes constitutional muster.”

Carroll, a former magazine columnist, alleged Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman department store in the mid-1990s and then defamed her when he denied her claim. In a separate case, a jury last year found Trump liable for the sexual assault.

The second case stems from remarks Trump had made denying Carroll’s allegations in 2019. He was found liable for defamation last year, and a jury earlier this year ordered him to pay $83.3 million in punitive and compensatory damages.

Trump’s legal team had argued that the damages awarded to Carroll in the defamation case were excessive. Kaplan dismissed that argument in his opinion released Thursday.

“Mr. Trump’s malicious and unceasing attacks on Ms. Carroll were disseminated to more than 100 million people,” Kaplan wrote. “They included public threats and personal attacks, and they endangered Ms. Carroll’s health and safety.”

“The jury,” Kaplan added, “was entitled to conclude that Mr. Trump derailed the career, reputation, and emotional well-being of one of America’s most successful and prominent advice columnists and authors.”

Trump has maintained that he did not sexually assault Carroll, and in 2019, said that Carroll was not his “type.” Those denials formed the basis of the defamation lawsuit.

He sat in court for portions of the defamation trial, earning rebukes from the judge after he was heard making comments during Carroll’s testimony. As Carroll’s lawyers delivered their closing arguments, Trump abruptly and dramatically stood up and left the courtroom.

Kaplan referenced that episode in his opinion: “Mere minutes after (Carroll’s) counsel began her closing argument, Mr. Trump conspicuously stood and walked out of the courtroom for no apparent reason save to evidence his disapproval.”

Aside from the eye-popping monetary amount, the judgment brought another point into stark clarity: A jury of regular citizens – not the politicians or their appointees that Trump constantly claims mistreat him – held him accountable.

The judgment comes as Trump sits in another courtroom – this time, a criminal one – awaiting another jury of regular New Yorkers to decide his fate on charges that he falsified business records to cover up an affair ahead of the 2016 election.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/25/politics/federal-judge-upholds-e-jean-carroll-verdict/index.html
158 2,055 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Goofy Immortal 2 FATE 04/25/24 02:43 PM
Watched it again with my wife last night. Whenever I cast YT to the TV, it's usually met with an eye roll and a strong "no thanks"... I told her we could stop whenever she says the word. She was glued to the screen for the entire 40+. rofl
377 19,330 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Spring is coming.. mac 04/25/24 01:48 PM
Here are some of the facts concerning the BG Falcons...
link

2024 Milestones:
First egg laid: April 2, 2:58 p.m.
Second egg laid: April 5, 3:15 a.m.
Third egg laid: April 7, 9:23 a.m.
FOURTH egg laid: April 10, time unknown

The incubated period for Falcons is 29 to 33 days...therefore, we are approx. 1 week from the beginning of the hatching period for the BG falcons.

Today is 'day 23' from the date of the first egg being laid (on Apr. 2nd)...


34 1,404 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: January 6th Fallout Part 8 bonefish 04/25/24 10:59 AM
The only problem is as Mark Twain stated:

"No amount of evidence will ever convince an idiot."

And there are plenty of them.
19 452 Read More
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5