For the record, none of the agents were masking up like this until the useful idiot paid protestors started doxxing the agents and threatening/harassing their families.
and Ice didn't have morons throwing temper tantrums and trying to stop them from doing their job because it was a Democratic President.
Now that it's Trump... people have lost their dayum minds
This is a tribute cover done the day Bobby died. One of my favorites of his songs. A song about heartbreak and loss. Of letting go no matter how much it hurts.
I just want to take a moment to point out that we are nearly a full month into 2026 and the Cleveland Browns have not lost a single game this year.
As far as the head coach search, I think that because our FO is set and we are set on Schwartz staying as DC (provided he doesn't leave to be the HC elsewhere), we have the luxury of sitting and waiting to see who might become available as the playoffs go along. Whomever it is that comes in will really only need to bring their head coach organizational skills and an offense. Most of the rest of the staff is already set.
Trying to lump everyone into one group is the real problem on both sides. I understand the difference between a Republican and a trumpian. I also understand the difference between a trumpian and a right wing extremist.
Same for me. As you know, I'm in one of those communities now, While I engage in very small-scale agriculture, I sell all of my stuff locally so these things don't affect me much, but I see it all around me. Even the local beef ranchers who also sell everything local are hit by it all because the input costs on everything are higher. Fertilizer, lime, diesel, seed... those things are the pillars of an operation, so even if you can sell everything locally, your cost-to-consumer is going to be higher because you still have a mortgage and tractor payments to make in addition to all those other inputs. Fertilizer for 100 acres can easily hit $15k-$20k depending on your soil type and the target crop.... then it takes a fair bit of diesel to run the tractor to till, seed, and spread that fertilizer. It's tough to make those costs back.
Zero seems just a little low, but not much, for a man who is so unpredictable with such a huge ego that thinks "only his own morality" dictates his actions.
Germany, UK, Nordic countries... Most of Europe are far far left of where the Democrats are. None of them are communist or kissing cousins to communism.
Donald Trump did not go into politics to make China great again. But that is what the latest poll of global public opinion from the European Council on Foreign Relations suggests he has done in the eyes of the world.
A year on from Trump’s return, in countries across the globe, many people believe China is on the verge of becoming even more powerful. Even before Trump’s dramatic intervention in Venezuela, his aggressive “America First” approach was driving people closer to China. Paradoxically, his disavowal of the liberal international order may have given people licence to build stronger links to Beijing, since they no longer feel the need to fall in line with a US-led alliance system. Meanwhile, “the West” seems to be a spent geopolitical force for the foreseeable future. America’s traditional enemies fear it less than they once did—while allies now worry about falling victim to a predatory US.
This splitting of the West is most visible in Europe, and in what others think of Europe. Russians now regard the EU as more of an enemy than they do the US; and Ukrainians look more to Brussels than to Washington for succour. Most Europeans no longer consider America a reliable ally, and they are keen to rearm. These are the main findings of a new poll of 25,949 respondents across 21 countries conducted in November 2025—one year after Trump’s triumphant victory in the last presidential election—for ECFR and Oxford University’s Europe in a Changing World research project, the fourth in a series of such global surveys. While the data predate Trump’s operation in Venezuela, many of the trends identified here seem to prefigure it, and one imagines they might even be reinforced by thisintervention.
The world appears to be becoming more open to China; or at least not fear it—an evolution that is in keeping with dominant Chinese interpretations of global geopolitics. As ECFR set out in The Idea of China last year, Xi Jinping and others believe the world is experiencing “great changes unseen in a century”, entailing (although not confined to) a power shift from West to East. One way the Chinese are dealing with this—and with America’s hegemony—is to work with other countries to “democratise international relations” by giving non-Western countries more of a voice. In a global order in which (as this year’s survey shows) publics feel their countries are freer than ever to choose their friends, the results of the poll will be music to the ears of decision-makers in Beijing. For decision-makers in Europe, however, the question is how to live in the truly multipolar world many Europeans have long dreamed of, but perhaps never imagined would take shape in quite this way. They also worry the Venezuela intervention legitimises the idea of China and Russia having their own spheres of influence.
The deadline set by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law in November 2025, for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release the files was December 19, 2025, though the DOJ stated it would need "a few more weeks" to complete the release due to newly discovered documents. Which they admitted in the article above was "less than 1% of the Epstein files."
The last major batch of documents released by the Department of Justice (DOJ) came on December 23, 2025, consisting of nearly 30,000 pages.
So their "claim is" they will release them in batches as they go through them. It's been 22 days since a single file has been turned over.
Since Republicans are issuing contempt of congress charges, where is the contempt charges against the DOJ? How much longer will they exempt from following congressional orders?
I think you are getting to the meat of it. Disagreeing with the fed chair isn't unprecedented. Calling him names and attacking him verbally in public took it to another level. And now with investigations by using the DOJ as a tool against him has far exceeded anything close to normal and is a very dangerous precedent.
Rodgers is going to wander into the Peruvian jungle, drink the Yagé and decide his best move is some strong indica and six months of couch-lock.
If someone calls him to get off the couch, long after the grind of TC and the early season, he'll decide if that city if worthy of putting his cape back on and playing Super Hero.
I heard Lindsey Halligan is available to fill in. That's how things usually end up when the DOJ tries to cover things up or prosecute cases that hold no merit for political reasons. People who try to uphold the law and act above board can no longer contribute to the bastardization of the justice system.
They don't have people acting like storm troopers randomly stopping people and acting like thugs on their streets either or you would see very similar protests to what you're seeing in targeted blue states.
Trump does this during a meeting with oil executives.............
Which budget would that be? The original 200 million dollar budget? The revised 300 million dollar budget or your latest revised 350 million dollar budget?
Donald Trump Declares Himself "Acting President Of Venezuela" In Viral Post
Styled like an edited Wikipedia page, an image, posted on social media, displayed Trump's official portrait and listed him as the "acting president of Venezuela".
Over the last few months, browsing isn't usually a problem. I usually see nothing wrong until I preview, click to full edit or actually try to execute a reply.
Same. Browsing is generally fine, it is only when posting/editing that I see the issue (typically) and that reinforces the deadlock theory.
So you can't see that posting that list without any other context would create a reaction from anyone else in response. How they see it as actions you want taken in and of themselves at this time.
I'm not sure how much more clear it can be. We know each others posting styles very well by now.
Quote
I'm not sure. Sometimes I don't think you are. Sometimes I do. Not so much you are really like that as a person per se but that it is more the type of thing you wish to convey in your posts. More that you use such tools as means of instigation rather than out of sincerity.
This game of semantics you're playing is pretty obvious here. I know you aren't so dense that you can't see I'm talking about your overall posting style and not a singular post. Are you really so intent on playing the semantics game? It's becoming quite the trend with you.
