Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Strength Of Schedule IrishDawg42 05/13/26 01:09 PM
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
SOS means a little, but not all that much. Teams have a way of getting better from on year to the next and last year could have been a bad injury year for a team or two.

I think the schedule comes out tomorrow. I think the order in which you play teams has a little more impact on things over the calculated SOS.
Originally Posted by bonefish
SOS I take with the proverbial grain of salt.

So many factors come into play as a season unfolds.

Start with the fact that teams change a lot each year. About a third of the roster turns over.

Players on the roster don't always perform the same. New players can have huge impacts.

Records can be deceiving. The NFL is tied to parity. Games are very close. Teams are very close in talent.

The difference between a ten win team and a seven win team can be very slight.

I rarely look at a team and think "automatic win or loss."

I look at each week like it is never a given.

I agree, I don't usually put much emphasis on SOS. But the article made some compelling reading over the past 3 seasons. One can hope that the schedule is an advantage going in. We have a lot of new faces on the offensive side of the ball and the clip board holders. We are going to need all the help we can get.

One thing we do know is, who we are playing:

Home
Baltimore Ravens
Cincinnati Bengals
Pittsburgh Steelers
Houston Texans
Indianapolis Colts
Atlanta Falcons
Carolina Panthers
Las Vegas Raiders

Away
Baltimore Ravens
Cincinnati Bengals
Jacksonville Jaguars
Pittsburgh Steelers
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Tennessee Titans
New York Giants
New York Jets
New Orleans Saints

We have a lot of top ten draft pick games (7) in there...Only (5) games against teams that made the playoffs, including Carolina who finished at 8-9 but won their division.

Again, a lot changes year over year, but a lot stays the same as well...
5 122 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: How much money is enough? Ballpeen 05/13/26 12:30 PM
Originally Posted by Bard Dawg
Another problem is the "surprise" budget issue that wasn't planned for. Illness, sure. House repairs, those not covered by insurance, like roof, furnace, major car repairs, larger ticket fixes. We tried to drop some major money on our home before we both retired. Doing that will help the withdrawal number. We have pensions, and other sources we are building slowly. Point of this post is to encourage anticipating a variety of unexpected costs that will demand attention. Most of my friends have stated they want to have one to two million available. I wish everybody luck! We intend to keep investing as long as we can. Comfortable, but not massively flush by any means.

Housing costs is another. For my wife and I we sold our home a few years ago and have moved in to an apartment. For us the cost of renting falls well below our monthly income. I calculate monthly income as SS and an annuity we bought 30 years ago. We get the check every month. Things like 401K minimums, interest income, and anything we withdraw from our retirement acccounts I count as yearly income. I don't factor that in as living expense money. We call that our entertainment money.

Having a house brings some security, but it does have expense. Taxes, maintenance, landscaping costs, the cost of any security you might have, insurance. Renting bundles all of that in to one simple payment...you do have some liability and personal property cost, but that is pretty cheap.

You eliminate the unexpected home costs ( most can be expected) like replacing a water heater or roof, or deck, or paint the place, HVAC unit or whatever. There are some trade offs but for us it was the perfect solution to make our life simpler, and simple is the name of the game as you get older.
23 519 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Defense Homewood Dog 05/13/26 12:25 PM
Agreed. I hope our new DC does a good job and he very well may, but I would feel a little better if Schwartz was still here.
17 514 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Our National Parks oobernoober 05/13/26 01:29 AM
Originally Posted by Bull_Dawg
If we don't service the debt our economy will collapse entirely. I'm not a huge fan of wars, either. I'd much rather the federal government cut down on spending everywhere.

I could get on board with this argument if there was at least a shred of consistency. Looking back over this admin, saving money and promoting efficiency has largely just been words. Accumulation of federal debt has accelerated since the beginning of this admin. OBBBA is adding significant debt that will continue to accelerate, costs of this war that shows no signs of slowing or stopping (quite the opposite at this point), repercussions of the tariff nonsense, so on and so forth. It appears that the outcome of DOGE (this feels like decades ago) is going to end up being a cost with having to hire back significant portions of the federal workforce laid off.
60 1,663 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Arcadia mayor to plead guilty to promoting Chinese propaganda, DOJ announces Bull_Dawg 05/12/26 07:40 PM
That's not dawgtalkers, that's the federal government. She's in witness protection now. They told AI to redact her old name from the internet.
3 120 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
I Thought Canada Was Going to be the 51'st State? PitDAWG 05/12/26 07:10 PM
Venezuela’s acting president defends country’s territory and rejects Trump’s 51st state remarks

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Venezuela ’s acting President Delcy Rodríguez told journalists Monday that her country had no plans to become the 51st U.S. state after President Donald Trump said he was “seriously considering” the move.

Rodríguez was speaking at the International Court of Justice in The Hague on the final day of hearings in a dispute between her country and neighboring Guyana over the massive mineral- and oil-rich Essequibo region.

“We will continue to defend our integrity, our sovereignty, our independence, our history,” said Rodríguez, who assumed power in January following a U.S. military operation that ousted then-President Nicolás Maduro. Venezuela is “not a colony, but a free country,” she added.

Speaking to Fox News earlier on Monday, Trump said he was “seriously considering making Venezuela the 51st US state,” according to a post by Fox News’ co-anchor John Roberts on social media. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the matter.

Trump has made similar comments about Canada.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly later declined to comment on Trump’s plans in an interview of her own with Roberts on Fox News. Kelly said the president is “famous for never accepting the status quo,” and praised Rodríguez for “working incredibly cooperatively” with the U.S.

Rodríguez went on to say that Venezuelan and U.S. officials have been in touch and are working on “cooperation and understanding.”

Before addressing Trump’s comments, Rodríguez defended her country’s claim to Essequibo at the United Nations’ highest court, telling judges that political negotiations — not a judicial ruling — will resolve the century-old territorial dispute.

The 62,000-square-mile territory, which makes up two-thirds of Guyana, is rich in gold, diamonds, timber and other natural resources. It also sits near massive offshore oil deposits currently producing an average 900,000 barrels a day.

That output is close to Venezuela’s daily production of about 1 million barrels a day and has transformed one of the smallest countries in South America into a significant energy producer.

Venezuela has considered Essequibo its own since the Spanish colonial period, when the jungle region fell within its boundaries. But an 1899 decision by arbitrators from Britain, Russia and the United States drew the border along the Essequibo River largely in favor of Guyana.

Venezuela has argued that a 1966 agreement sealed in Geneva to resolve the dispute effectively nullified the 19th-century arbitration. In 2018, however, three years after ExxonMobil announced a significant oil discovery off the Essequibo coast, Guyana’s government went to the International Court of Justice and asked judges to uphold the 1899 ruling.

Tensions between the countries further flared in 2023, when Rodríguez’s predecessor, Maduro, threatened to annex the region by force after holding a referendum asking voters if Essequibo should be turned into a Venezuelan state. Maduro was captured Jan. 3 during a U.S. military operation in Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, and taken to New York to face drug trafficking charges. He has pleaded not guilty.

Rodríguez did not address the referendum in her remarks, but she told the court that the 1966 agreement is designed to allow negotiations between Venezuela and Guyana to resolve the territorial dispute. And she accused Guyana’s government of undermining the agreement with the “opportunistic” decision to ask the court to address the dispute.

“At a time when the mechanisms established in the Geneva agreement were still fully in force, Guyana unilaterally chose to shift the dispute from the negotiating arena to a judicial resolution,” she said. “This change was not accidental; it coincided with the discovery in 2015 of the oil field that would become world-renowned.”

When hearings opened last week, Guyana’s foreign minister, Hugh Hilton Todd, told the panel of international judges that the dispute “has been a blight on our existence as a sovereign state from the very beginning.” He said that 70% of Guyana’s territory is at stake.

The court is likely to take months to issue a final and legally binding ruling in the case.

Venezuela has warned that its participation in the hearings does not mean either consent to, or recognition of, the court’s jurisdiction.

https://apnews.com/article/venezuel...ump-oil-89f55dc0049617e81bfbad49c4bed777

I suppose when his initial opponent didn't end up being so easy to push around he felt the need to find a weaker target.
0 46 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns News 6.0 Day of the Dawg 05/12/26 02:56 PM
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Being totally bluntly honest, I'm more surprised that he hasn't retired and is simply going on Reserve/PUP.

Maybe the Browns are doing him a solid from a healthcare perspective as well by this designation as opposed to outright retiring?

I am not sure the Browns can cut him, and he isn't going to retire until he isn't going to get paid any longer.

Solid points, both. $6 million of his 2026 salary is guaranteed; 2025 was fully guaranteed.... and there is a LOT of Dead Cap pushed into Void Years from 2028 thru 2031. He will still represent $11.7million in Dead Cap in 2027, so he may spend the entire remainder of his contract on PUP.

Keeping him on the roster allows the Browns to file for cap insurance relief for him being out.
356 35,524 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cavs/NBA 2.0 Bard Dawg 05/12/26 01:53 PM
Last night was better. Tied at two apiece. We decided to play harder. Better player mix, better defense, fewer turnovers. We had our heads together in the game. Our D needs to limit shots more. We still have a long walk to achieve an improbable series win. Last night the second half was fun to watch.
Do not weaken.
385 53,934 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: The Dems... again MemphisBrownie 05/11/26 10:01 PM
Oh, memories........

179 7,021 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II PitDAWG 05/11/26 04:56 PM
Trump Says Iran Ceasefire ‘On Life Support’ After Bragging He Has ‘The Best Plan Ever’

President Donald Trump said Monday that the ceasefire with Iran is not in a great place at the moment because he believes Iran’s proposals to end the war have been “unacceptable.”

“It’s unbelievably weak,” Trump said of the ceasefire. “It’s on life support.”

"Life support is not a good thing," he continued. "I would say the ceasefire is on massive life support where the doctor walks in and says, 'Sir, your loved one has approximately a 1% chance of living.’”

Speaking before reporters and allies gathered in the Oval Office moments earlier, he boasted about his "plan" to end the war.

“You know, a lot of people said, ‘Well, does he have a plan?' Yeah, of course I do have a plan. I have the best plan ever," Trump said. “I have a plan. It’s a very simple plan.”

Trump then laid out his plan, which is no plan at all: “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.”



https://www.huffpost.com/entry/late...3Q&brid=YWdncwGqwKmG8cReBnbkchAEu24r
124 4,832 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 05/11/26 02:24 PM
Trump Rejects New Iran Peace Offer as ‘Totally Unacceptable’

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump and Iran rejected each other’s latest peace proposals to end the 10-week conflict as the two sides struggle to maintain a fragile ceasefire.

“I have just read the response from Iran’s so-called ‘Representatives,’” Trump said in a social media post. “I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!”

Iran offered to transfer some of its stockpile of highly enriched uranium to a third country, but rejected the idea of dismantling its nuclear facilities, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier. Iran disputed the report, according to the country’s semi-official news agency Tasnim.

It was unclear whether the exchange of proposals would offer a path to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Under its latest proposal, Iran would dilute some of its highly enriched uranium and have the rest sent to a third country, the WSJ said, citing people familiar with the response, but it also called for guarantees the transferred uranium would be returned if talks fail and ruled out dismantling its facilities.

Iran’s semi-official news agency Tasnim said the WSJ’s reporting on proposals for handling nuclear material was “not true.” The statement emphasized Iran’s desire for an immediate end to the war, the release of its frozen assets, a lifting of US sanctions on oil sales, an end to the US blockade of the Gulf of Oman, and ultimately Iranian management of the strait. State-run IRIB News added that Tehran rejected Trump’s plan as tantamount to surrender and insisted the US must also pay war damages.

Trump had proposed that Iran permit passage through the Strait of Hormuz and Washington end its blockade on Iranian ports in the next month, with nuclear talks to follow.

Oil rose with the dollar after Trump rejected Iran’s latest proposal. Brent was up about 3.5% to above $104 a barrel, recovering some of last week’s losses. US equity-index futures edged lower as the standoff weighed on risk sentiment.

Iran has been “playing games” with the US and other countries, Trump said in a social media post earlier Sunday. “They will be laughing no longer!”

Trump and his advisers have repeatedly suggested the war is over, even while threatening to escalate attacks if Tehran does not agree to a peace deal. Trump is scheduled to travel to China this week despite the ongoing conflict.

The president has said repeatedly that Iran must not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and claimed as recently as last week that the country had already agreed to give up its nuclear ambitions.

The president did not say in his social media post what the consequences, if any, of his dissatisfaction with Iran’s response would be. In recent weeks, Trump has appeared eager to draw a line under the conflict as he faces rising political pressure to bring down gasoline prices across the US ahead of the November midterm elections, when his fellow Republicans hope to hold on to control of Congress.

The conflict has killed thousands of people across the Middle East and upended oil and gas markets, with soaring fuel prices piling pressure on governments and consumers worldwide.

Here’s more related to the war:

Saudi Aramco, the world’s largest oil company, warned it would take several months for the market to return to normal even if the Strait of Hormuz reopened immediately.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes that he would like to end US financial support for Israel’s military over the next decade. The US currently provides Israel with $3.8 billion a year in military assistance under a 10-year agreement originally negotiated by the Obama administration that lasts through 2028.

Despite the ceasefire in place since April 8, a drone strike briefly set a cargo vessel ablaze off Qatar in the Persian Gulf, marking the latest shipping attack in the region. The United Arab Emirates and Kuwait both said they had intercepted hostile drones.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trum...r-as-totally-unacceptable-013346837.html
298 26,875 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 MemphisBrownie 05/11/26 11:42 AM
134 5,778 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Carson Schwesinger DROY Ballpeen 05/11/26 11:17 AM
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
Originally Posted by oobernoober
My apologies if this takes us off in a tangent...

But I would love to know the discussions that went into this pick. According to most on draft day, this guy was massively overdrafted, and supposedly not on any team's radar. For all we know, that could all be smoke... but I'd love to know what led Berry to draft a LB who walked on to his college team and had limited playing time before his late breakout season.

Notable players taken right after CS include Tyler Shough, the safety Seattle got, Treyveon Henderson (though we picked Judkins right before), Jayden Higgins and Luther Burden.

I think Berry and staff were desperate for a linebacker with JOK's injury. Jihaad Campbell at LB taken late in the 1st round 31 overall. It would have been interesting to see who they would have selected if he was still on the board at 33. Was Carson their top linebacker on their board or was he 2nd. The fact they selected him 3 picks before they selected Judkins shows they feared waiting 3 picks they would possibly lose out on him.

I agree. Carson was on the NFL radar.
26 1,700 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: More Music GMdawg 05/10/26 11:30 AM
158 10,923 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Iceland BrownsBabe 05/09/26 10:32 PM
My sister and her boys loved Iceland! She's been twice and is itching to go back.
15 670 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Bobby Cox and Ted Turner bonefish 05/09/26 10:07 PM
Bobby was old school all the way.

His players loved him.

You were expected to conduct yourself like a professional.

No clubhouse music allowed. Wear headsets so you don't infringe on others. No kids in the locker room. Not all kids behave well.

Show up on time and play your ass off. Dress was sports coats and collared shirts.

He kept everything inside the locker room. And he supported his players like they were his own kids.

I will always remember him on the top step cheering his players on. He was all baseball.

Sad day in Braves land.
2 101 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cleveland Guardians 2.0 waterdawg 05/09/26 05:51 PM
I just realized , that is " Tugboat " we traded !
148 12,509 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Quarterback Defined PitDAWG 05/09/26 02:35 PM
Since their current problem child QB is on the last year of his contract they are going to need someone to come in and fill that role on the roster. naughtydevil
314 23,292 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: FBI Raids Office of Top Democratic Leader in Redistricting Wars PitDAWG 05/06/26 07:22 PM
Maybe you can tell me what crimes they have been convicted of and how many felony counts they were found guilty of? I can show you 34 felony counts trump was convicted on. Let me guess. The fact trump was convicted on 34 felony counts is the fault of the democrats, right? Tell me how it was those evil dems who convicted him and not a jury. Or how it wasn't a jury who found he was libel for sexually assaulting a woman? Let me guess, you have a list of excuses for that one too? Tell me how every election trump or republicans win isn't rigged but every time a democrat wins an election you people claim it was rigged?

Or maybe you can explain this one though I know you will ignore it and just post more BS.... After Trump ordered the bombing on Iran's nuclear facilities in June of 2025 he proclaimed that they, "obliterated Iran's nuclear program setting it back several years if not decades." Then just eight months later he claimed that Iran was less than a month away from having a nuclear weapon. So which of those two times was he lying?

And let's not forget this one. On April 18th, 2026, President Trump claimed Iran "agreed to everything" in negotiations, including removing enriched uranium, ceasing proxy support, and keeping the Strait of Hormuz open.

Once again you prove that every accusation you make is just a confession. Do you call the fact I pointed out that trump has been convicted on 34 felony counts "hate"? Do you call me pointing out that trump made two opposite claims about Iran's nuclear program one of which has to be a lie hate? Because that's usually what you call it when we presented with the facts.

You have TDS. Trump devotion syndrome. No matter what he does, no matter what he says, no matter how many times he lies to you, you remain devoted to him.
2 163 Read More
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5