DawgTalkers.net Forums Active Threads This Week

There's a very long list of things within the political system that lack common sense. Is that the converstaion or is the conversation the bogus claim that Democrats are trying to flood the country with illegals in order to gain votes? That's two different converstaions.

I mean it would be common sense to eliminate pork barrel spending. It's commons sense to eliminate lobbying and the $4.5 Billion dollars spent on bribing politicians of all/any party. Stopping the PoTUS pardoing convicted criminals (Dems or Rep) would be common sense. . . . 3 off the top of my head without even thinking about this.

JMO but I think it would be beneficial and helpful to have a "Head Coach Defined" video or article - either from ex-players of Championship caliber teams or possibly former HC's. Becasue being a good coordinator or a good college HC does not translate to always being a good HC.

I suspect it would be hard to keep Schwartz if a new GM/HC is brought in - so I guess a Def minded HC is a possibility. I'd prefer to keep Schwartz if at all possible. And yes - I'd have him on a short list for HC.

Brian Flores, Mike LaFleur and Schwartz might be my top 3 if I had to come up with a short list. It'd all be about the individual and how they lead people and an organization more than any other element. Developing talent and working with a young roster would be a second priority - Jesse Minter might be of interest if you wanted to build on your D with the best defensiive lineman in the NFL on your team and a lot of supporting talent.

How many games did our defense win us this year? That's the potential regression.

Antiquated?? Nothing that a FQB and a good O-Line couldn’t cure 😊

j/c...

If Mendoza fails in the NFL he should have an exceptional career as a charismatic cult leader. He speaks likes he's running down a checklist of things he's been programmed to say in a very peculiar way.

Hope he freaks some GMs out and that lunatic falls to the Browns!

Also, Cignetti is the best coach in college football. Incredible what he has done with that program in such a quick amount of time regardless of the transfer portal era.

Donald trump keeps saying he wants to see Biden in prison.

Meanwhile Biden can't figure out why the hell trump thinks he would visit him in prison.

So you still managed to dodge every question. Your party had plenty of people to choose from in the primaries who had pretty much the same platform as trump. Yet you rejected them all for the most hateful, nastiest and only convicted criminal in the lot of them. And now all you have in defense of that are excuses. We had 8 years of Clinton, 8 years of Obama and 4 years of Biden. Despite all of your crazy rhetoric, we still didn't have a communist or socialist government nor did anybody come to take your guns as you have been claiming they would do for decades now.

You are so afraid of your own shadow you can't stop thinking someone is trying to deny you of something or take your rights away. When the fact of the matter you wish to inflict your religion and your own personal view of morals on the whole of society. The saddest part is you can't even see that.

Then you claim it's the other side that are #triggered and #snowflakes

I see SS as a QB with potential. We have seen improvement which tells me he is teachable.

What SS does in the offseason to improve himself will be critical if he has the desire to be the Browns QB of the future. Hopefully that is his goal this offseason and we see a much improved Shedeur Sanders when training camp starts this year.

[video:youtube][/video]

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said he’s dropping — for now — his push to deploy National Guard troops in Chicago, Los Angeles and Portland, Oregon, a move that comes after legal roadblocks hung up the effort.

Trump said in a social media post Wednesday that he’s removing the Guard troops for now. “We will come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form, when crime begins to soar again – Only a question of time!” he wrote.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott previously deployed the state’s National Guard to Chicago. The U.S. Supreme Court earlier this month denied an application to pause a lower court’s ruling that bared the National Guard troops’ mobilization in the Chicago area.

Troops had already left Los Angeles after the president deployed them earlier this year as part of a broader crackdown on crime and immigration. They had been sent to Chicago and Portland but were never on the streets as legal challenges played out.

The president has made a crackdown on crime in cities a centerpiece of his second term — and has toyed with the idea of invoking the Insurrection Act to stop his opponents from using the courts to block his plans.

He has said he sees his tough-on-crime approach as a winning political issue ahead of next year’s midterm elections.

In November, U.S. Northern Command had said it was ” shifting and/or rightsizing ″ operations in Portland, Chicago and Los Angeles, but there would be a “constant, enduring and long-term presence in each city.”

Trump’s push to deploy the troops in Democrat-led cities has been met with legal challenges at nearly every turn.

The Supreme Court in December refused to allow the Trump administration to deploy National Guard troops in the Chicago area as part of its crackdown on immigration. The order was not a final ruling but was a significant and rare setback by the high court for the president’s efforts.

In the nation’s capital, District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb sued to halt the deployments of more than 2,000 guardsmen.

Hundreds of troops from California and Oregon were deployed to Portland, but a federal judge barred them from going on the streets. A judge permanently blocked the deployment of National Guard troops there in November after a three-day trial.

California National Guard troops were removed from the streets of Los Angeles by Dec. 15 after a court ruling. But an appeals court had paused a separate part of the order that required control of the Guard to return to Gov. Gavin Newsom.

In a Tuesday court filing, the Trump administration said it was no longer seeking a pause in that part of the order. That paves the way for the California National Guard troops to fully return to state control after Trump federalized the Guard in June.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the development a “major litigation victory” in a press release Wednesday.

“For six months, California National Guard troops have been used as political pawns by a President desperate to be king,” Bonta said. “There is a reason our founders decided military and civilian affairs must be kept separate; a reason that our military is, by design, apolitical.”

Trump also ordered the deployment of the Tennessee National Guard to Memphis in September to combat crime, a move supported by the state’s Republican Gov. Bill Lee and senators. A Tennessee judge blocked the use of the Guard, siding with Democratic state and local officials who sued.

https://www.texastribune.org/2025/12/31/texas-donald-trump-national-guard-chicago/

Once again he has no understanding or willingness to tell the truth. He didn't decide anything. The courts did.

To all of us on DawgTalkers........

Merry New Year....................

Agreed. None of us on here know if we are or will be right. I mean there are certain facts we can use to base our opinions on. But unless you consider all of the factors that contributed to those facts you can still manipulate those facts to present the picture you want to paint. It's the factors and how those factors are perceived and accounted for when forming our opinions that I think lead to the bulk of the conflict on here.

That's the way it works... They blame others for doing the exact thing they themselves are doing.

Thanks son.

To add to your and Pits point, I don't think we could ever entertain keeping Sanders as a back up. His fanbase would be a major problem. That just wouldn't work.

None.

The Trump administration is investigating diversity initiatives at major companies under the False Claims Act, a federal law the Justice Department uses to take action against contractors that defraud the government.

As USA TODAY reported in October, the DOJ earlier this year began issuing civil investigative demands to employers across a broad range of industries, directing them to turn over information about their diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

The use of CIDs – a legal tool that allows the government to gather information during a civil investigation and that usually is reserved to pursue government contractors that submit fraudulent bills for their services – has rattled corporate America because it leaves companies vulnerable to claims that could reach into the millions of dollars.

Among the companies that have received Justice Department investigative demands are Alphabet’s Google and Verizon Communications, the Wall Street Journal reported. Google could not be immediately reached for comment. Verizon declined to comment.

DOJ intensifies DEI scrutiny

Just hours after he took the oath of office, President Donald Trump issued executive orders to dismantle diversity programs and directed federal contractors to end "illegal DEI discrimination." Fearing lawsuits and the loss of government contracts, dozens of the nation’s largest companies from McDonald’s to Facebook owner Meta rolled back or eliminated DEI programs.

In May, the Justice Department signaled its intention to investigate federal contractors and grant recipients by creating the "Civil Rights Fraud Initiative," which threatens legal action under the False Claims Act, a civil law that allows the government to recover funds lost to fraud.

Government scrutiny has only intensified as the Trump administration moves aggressively to pressure employers into overhauling hiring practices to align with the president’s political agenda.

While testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee in July, Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, issued a warning about the Trump administration’s crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. During her testimony, Dhillon promised the Trump administration would bring "numerous investigations and lawsuits against institutions that continue to offend our federal civil rights laws."

"Either DEI will end on its own," Dhillon told senators, "or we will kill it."

False Claims Act lawsuits can be costly

Damages and penalties can quickly add up in False Claims Act lawsuits, lawyers told USA TODAY. Defendants are at risk of being held liable for three times the damages the government alleges.

What’s more, the DOJ is encouraging whistleblowers to file DEI lawsuits on the government’s behalf and potentially receive a portion of the windfall. Last year, the DOJ took in nearly $3 billion in False

Claims Act settlements and judgments.

Just the mere threat of a False Claims Act investigation is a powerful cudgel, lawyers say. And becoming a target of the Trump administration carries significant business risks, from reputational damage to shareholder class action lawsuits.

"I’ve had many leaders say to me, 'we are very confident from a purely legal perspective in what we are doing,'" David Glasgow, executive director of the Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging at the NYU School of Law, told USA TODAY in October. "And then a lot of them will say to me, 'none of that really matters if we have been dragged through the mud by this administration.'"

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/12/29/dei-fraud-trump-investigations/87947879007/

Trump Yelled 'My Friends Will Get Hurt' at Marjorie Taylor Greene for Threatening to Name Epstein Abusers, She Claims
The Republican congresswoman, who is resigning her House seat on Jan. 5, claims her advocacy for Jeffrey Epstein's survivors is the reason President Donald Trump ultimately abandoned his support for her
Kyler Alvord
Mon, December 29, 2025 at 1:18 PM EST
7 min read


Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene says her last conversation with President Donald Trump was about Jeffrey Epstein

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene went into depth about her falling out with President Donald Trump in a new profile for The New York Times

The soon-to-be-former congresswoman said that her advocacy for survivors of Jeffrey Epstein drove the final wedge between them, claiming, "Epstein was everything"

A White House spokesperson responded to Greene's profile in a statement to PEOPLE, saying, "we don’t have time for her petty bitterness"

Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is offering more details about her falling out with President Donald Trump, saying the final straw revolved around her push for more government transparency surrounding sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.

In an exhaustive new profile for The New York Times that chronicles the longtime MAGA ally's fracture with her former leader, Greene told journalist Robert Draper that her small disagreements with Trump throughout the year likely got on his nerves, "but it was Epstein" that drove the ultimate wedge between them. "Epstein was everything."



“The Epstein files represent everything wrong with Washington,” Greene, 51, told the Times for the Dec. 29 profile, which was based on multiple interviews with the outgoing Republican congresswoman. “Rich, powerful elites doing horrible things and getting away with it. And the women are the victims.”

In September, Greene spoke directly to Epstein survivors during a closed-door House Oversight hearing, which moved her to fight for accountability on their behalf. After leaving the hearing, she rallied reporters and publicly threatened that, if necessary, she would work with victims to reveal the names of Epstein's associates who perpetrated sexual abuse against women and girls.

That threat, she said, resulted in a hostile phone call from the president — their last proper conversation.

According to the Times, which heard about the call through both Greene and one of her staffers, Trump, 79, rang her Capitol Hill office to voice his frustration with her public advocacy on the issue. The whole office could allegedly hear him yelling at her on speakerphone, according to her staffer.



Greene claimed that when she expressed confusion to Trump on the call over his resistance to outing Epstein's potential conspirators, the president told her, "My friends will get hurt."

When she suggested that the president could invite Epstein survivors to the Oval Office to show that their stories were being heard, the president allegedly said that they had not done anything to earn such an honor, according to Greene's account of the conversation.


Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene speaks alongside Epstein survivors at a Sept. 3 press conference in support of the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act
More
When reached by PEOPLE for comment, the White House dismissed Greene's comments to the Times as "petty bitterness."

“President Trump remains the undisputed leader of the greatest and fastest growing political movement in American history — the MAGA movement," White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said in a statement. "On the other hand, Congresswoman Greene is quitting on her constituents in the middle of her term and abandoning the consequential fight we’re in — we don’t have time for her petty bitterness.”

Greene — who is formally resigning from Congress on Jan. 5 over her refusal to be a so-called "battered wife" to Trump — previously described her explosive phone call with Trump during a recent 60 Minutes interview.

Marjorie Taylor Greene Goes Scorched Earth on Trump in Splashy NYT Feature — Claims ‘He Does Not Have Any Faith’ and Her Epstein Stand Was Last Straw


“We did talk about the Epstein files, and he was extremely angry at me that I had signed the discharge petition to release the files,” Greene told CBS News' Lesley Stahl at the time, referring to her decision to sign a U.S. House petition pushing the government to release all documents related to Epstein.

When Stahl asked Greene to further describe what Trump said, she paused. “He said that it was going to hurt people,” the congresswoman replied.

Davidoff Studios/Getty  Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump pose together at Mar-a-Lago in 1997
Davidoff Studios/Getty

With Greene's help, the House passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in a stunning 427-1 vote on Nov. 18, and the bill was unanimously approved by the Senate.

Trump signed the bill into law the following day, which gave the federal government 30 days to release all remaining files related to the sex trafficking investigation into Epstein. The bill allowed for some exceptions — such as withholding anything that is classified, or that could identify victims or interfere with an active federal investigation — giving the Department of Justice the ability to be selective about what they release and what information is redacted.

The DOJ missed the deadline to release all files by Dec. 19, and has been uploading thousands of pages of files on a rolling basis, often with major redactions that omit significant context.

So far, information that has been released includes photos of Epstein with powerful men like Trump, Bill Clinton and Michael Jackson — none of whom have been accused of wrongdoing in relation to Epstein — and an uncorroborated rape claim made against Trump shortly before the 2020 election, which the DOJ characterized as "untrue and sensationalist."

Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for PEOPLE's free True Crime newsletter for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases.

There were also some dubious pieces of visual evidence that ended up on the DOJ website, including a clearly fake video of Epstein's jail-cell suicide that was uploaded and later removed.

On Dec. 23, PEOPLE discovered an unauthenticated suicide note from "J. Epstein" to sex offender Larry Nassar among the files, which accused Trump of sharing their "love of young, nubile girls."

The White House initially declined to comment on the unverified note, instead referring PEOPLE to a DOJ statement about how the Epstein files include some "unfounded" allegations against the president.

Hours after PEOPLE and other outlets had reported on the strange note that appeared in the files, the White House reached back out to PEOPLE with new statements from the DOJ that said an FBI investigation had just determined the note was "FAKE" and warned not to trust the legitimacy of all documents included in the Epstein files, seemingly casting doubt on the newly unsealed evidence as a whole.



Epstein survivor Haley Robson, center, stands beside Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene at a Nov. 18 press conference on Capitol Hill
More
Reacting to the messy rollout of the files, Epstein survivor Haley Robson, a Republican, told CNN, "I am no longer supporting this administration. I redact any support I've ever given to him, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel. I am so disgusted with this administration."


"I think that Pam Bondi and Kash Patel both need to resign, and I would love to see No. 47 get impeached over this," Robson added.

She then appeared to reference comments from Trump made on Dec. 22, when the president said it's a "terrible thing" that photos of famous people were being released in the Epstein files, because some "had nothing to do with Epstein" and simply happened to cross paths with him at some point.

"If you're telling the public and the world and the survivors that just because somebody is in a picture with him doesn't automatically mean they were involved in the crimes against children — which I understand, and I get that fully — then why are you so scared to release the files and why has there been so much resistance?" Robson wondered aloud.

"If it's just a picture, why are you going above and beyond to hide the identities of these men?"

https://www.the-sun.com/news/15703189/china-encircles-taiwan-live-fire-drills-invasion/

156 tackles, 2.5 Sacks, 2 INT, 11 TFL, 9 QB Hits, and he called the defense since day 1.

I wish that all of our draft picks could "bust" like that.

I'm curious, then, how you feel about the deal Trump cut with the Taliban that had us pull out of Afghanistan?

Hey Purp -

Is it the actual board that is malfunctioning at times, or something else? Because I was thinking if it was the actual message board maybe it's time to try taking dawgtalkers to another board?

The old 'official' Cleveland Browns dot com board was nice. Never had any problems with it. I don't know who hosted it though.

Depends if you hit the lung... So yeah, it can. I've had it done. For me, it didn't work.... But yeah, done wrong, it can be dangerous. But don't take my word for it.. Google it.