Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II Bull_Dawg 05/30/26 05:35 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Let's get down to the brass tacks here.

You have been engaging in making an argument for war. I have been arguing that there is not at least some immediate case for war.

My argument is based on several reasons. First I am not in favor of being the world police. Iran has no method of deploying long range missiles anywhere close to capable of reaching the U.S nor our allies in Europe. As such they are currently of no imminent threat to us. Yes I understand that there is some very remote possibility that someone could somehow sneak a dirty bomb through an airport in Iran to some neutral country, since we accept no direct flights from Iran, then pass customs in that nation, then again when it is reloaded on a connecting flight and yet once again pass customs in the U.S. However that sounds much more like something form a fictional spy novel than it does reality. Some remote possibility isn't a legitimate cause for war.

You have seemed to indicate that the reason our NATO allies have not gotten involved is because of political reasons and that war is not popular to their people. Yet from a political standpoint and from a popularity perspective war was no more popular when we went to war with both Iraq and Afghanistan. Both times our allies fought beside us. I do believe that Iran taught them not be so blindly trusting of the U.S. and has made them more cautious.

But if anything they have even greater reason to capitulate in helping us now than they did then. Trump has threatened the NATO alliance. He has struck them financially with tariffs. He is the most vindictive and punitive president in my lifetime. They fully realize the grave possible consequences of telling him no. Yet they have done so anyway.

We know that Iran and Israel have been "warring it" for decades now. We know if anyone is at risk from Iran it's Israel. As of now Israel is fighting Iran's proxies in both Lebanon and Gaza while we're fighting them in Iran. Something Netanyahu has been trying to achieve for decades now.

The world sees these things. The world understand these things. And the world isn't prepared to fight an entire war for Israel. Not even our own allies.

I've been engaging in making an argument for keeping nuclear weapon capability out of the hands of a government that supports terrorists however is necessary. No one can make them do anything through diplomacy. If they agreed to get rid of their capability to refine HEU above civilian grade, turn over/destroy all the HEU they already have, and allow uninhibited inspections country wide, in a peaceful decision tomorrow, great. I don't see them agreeing to that no matter what we offer. Every day the HEU is unobserved is another day it could get into the hands of terrorists.

You seem to assume a plane has to land at an airport and/or be commercial. You seem to assume terrorists have to obey the law. None of those things are true. A Gulfstream G700 (private business jet) has a range of ~8,360 miles. A straight line flight between Tehran and Caracas, Venezuela is 7,321 miles (and it doesn't have to be a straight flight, Libya could make some sense as a connecting point, ISIS and AQIM still operate camps in the Fezzan Region.) It doesn't have to be an airport. It could be a crude (if somewhat lengthy) airstrip in the middle of nowhere. From Caracas, a G700 could reach anywhere in the continental US. And it doesn't have to fly to the US. They could offload a weapon in remote Mexico and finish delivery through other methods.

Yes, you believe a reason that you are making up. That doesn't make it true. I never claimed a specific reason as fact. I presented other potential reasons for their deciding not to go to war.

They also have more reasons not to. An active conflict right on their "borders." Dissension at home. Trump is an idiot. Our military leadership is inept. They are much more reliant on oil imports. Not their problem as Israel and the US are more likely potential targets. While we're allies, we're led by a bully. I don't think hardly anyone likes helping out bullies. Some "like" standing up to them (or feel obligated to.)
247 8,304 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 05/30/26 05:06 PM
Tennessee GOP governor candidate says he would ban Islam, outlaw same-sex marriage

State Rep. Monty Fritts, a self-described 'Christian nationalist,' also says he would criminalize abortion in all cases — including rape — and deny the morning-after pill to women who are raped.

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WTVF) — State Rep. Monty Fritts, a Republican candidate for governor, calls himself a "Christian nationalist."

In a nearly one-hour interview, Fritts was candid in his admissions that, while he does not — in his words — believe in beating someone over the head with his Bible, he does believe it would be his job to enact policies that reflect his personal religious beliefs.

The Roane County Republican rejected some of the more extremist views associated with Christian nationalism, such as arguments that America should mainly be reserved for white people and that Adolf Hitler was a "Christian prince."

But he acknowledged that he would like to outlaw Muslim calls to prayer and, if possible, ban Islam itself, along with Buddhism, Hinduism and "other pagan religions." He wants to treat abortion as murder and would deny the morning-after pill to rape victims.

He would also outlaw same-sex marriage and criminalize some sexual acts between consenting adults of the same sex.

"I just kinda boiled the two words down to a 'Christian' — I am that, I will not deny Christ — and I am a nationalist. I am an America-first, Tennessee-first person. So I didn't think that was a detrimental term," Fritts said, explaining his use of the term Christian nationalist.

When asked why enacting religiously driven policies is not effectively imposing his beliefs on others, Fritts said it comes down to wanting what is best for his fellow citizens.

"Well, again, it's back to the we want the best for our fellow citizens," Fritts said.

What quickly became apparent in my nearly hour-long interview is that Fritts is confident he has the right interpretation of the Bible.

"I do think God's law is clear," Fritts said.

When pressed on the fact that widespread disagreement among Christians — evidenced by the existence of many denominations — suggests the Bible is not universally clear, Fritts responded with a laugh.

"Well, Phil, you're gonna get me in trouble with that question if we get off into denominations," Fritts said.

Same-sex marriage

Fritts said he believes same-sex relationships should be illegal and that he would outlaw same-sex marriage.

"I would, yes. And based on the authority of God's word and the natural design of it," Fritts said.

When pushed about it being his interpretation of God's word, Fritts said, "I think God's word is pretty clear there, yes."
Abortion

Fritts said he would criminalize abortion in all cases, including pregnancies resulting from rape, and compared the punishment to that given to murderers. He also said he opposes allowing rape victims access to the morning-after pill.

"So, as I understand it, that chemical, that medication can also become an abortifacient. And so to administer those either with tax dollars or without when there's a chance that you could be ending a life, I think that's murder. I think we shouldn't do it," he explained.

Four years ago, the FDA clarified that the morning-after pill does not cause abortion — it prevents pregnancy.

Fritts said he is not convinced.

When asked whether his position amounts to forcing a rape victim to carry a pregnancy to term based on his religious interpretation, Fritts pushed back.

"I don't think so. I think it's, I would state it that it's trying to be a light in what has become a very dark thing," Fritts said.
Islam and religious liberty

Fritts said he would outlaw Muslim calls to prayer and would like to ban the construction of mosques. He extended that position to Buddhism, Hinduism and what he called "pagan religions."

"And I'm not picking on just Islam. I would offer that for Buddhism or Hinduism or many of these other pagan religions. I would like to see them not exist in the United States of America. I would like to see that everyone would refer to Christ as King. That would be my goal," he said.

Fritts argued that Muslims are not protected under the First Amendment because, in his view, Islam is a political worldview rather than a true religion. Courts have repeatedly rejected that argument.

When asked whether his position would also apply to Judaism, since most Jewish people do not recognize Jesus as king, Fritts said he would not outlaw Judaism. He pointed to Messianic Jews — a group that combines Jewish identity with belief in Jesus — as a distinction, but declined to directly address the question of traditional Jewish practice.

"I think to to try to split the hair to get to to get me to say that, I'm not willing to say that," Fritts said.
On compromise

Fritts acknowledged that his positions may alienate some voters, but said he is not interested in softening his message.

"We've found ourselves all too often in America today that we're willing to compromise just to get a vote or to say something that might be less offensive. And I've just decided I'm gonna try to finish strong and not behave that way," Fritts said.

https://www.newschannel5.com/news/n...would-ban-islam-outlaw-same-sex-marriage

#notarando
307 28,876 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Justice Department indicts former FBI Director James Comey for a second time PitDAWG 05/30/26 04:26 PM
Lead prosecutor on former FBI Director Comey's 'seashells' case withdraws without explanation

The department did not include any explanation for the move.

The lead prosecutor tasked with overseeing former FBI Director James Comey's prosecution stemming from his post of seashells that the Justice Department claims amounted to a threat against President Donald Trump has withdrawn from the case, according to a court filing.

Matthew Petracca was the lone prosecutor from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina assigned to the case when it was unsealed late last month.

On Friday evening, however, the Justice Department filed a notice with the court indicating that Petracca has been replaced by assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy Severo.

The department did not include any explanation for the move in the high-profile case.

Comey's attorneys are expected to make a vigorous push to have the case dismissed before it can go to trial through a variety of legal challenges.

A Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment from ABC News.

Comey was charged with threatening to kill Trump by posting a photo on Instagram of seashells on a beach arranged in the numbers "86 47." Citing the slang meaning of "86" as to "nix" or "get rid" of something, allies of the president allege that the post was a veiled threat against Trump, who is the 47th president.

Following backlash over the post, Comey removed the photo from Instagram and said he was unaware that the post could be associated with violence.

Critics of Trump say the indictment is another effort by the administration to punish the president's perceived enemies after a judge last year threw out an indictment against Comey on unrelated charges.

At a press conference announcing the charges last month, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche argued that Comey's post crossed the line between First Amendment-protected speech and speech that warrants prosecution.

Comey's trial is scheduled to begin Oct. 21.

https://abcnews.com/Politics/lead-p...comeys-seashells-case/story?id=133437435

This entire thing seems contrived, botched, manufactured and mishandled in at least 8647 different ways.
8 381 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: What If? Homewood Dog 05/30/26 04:26 PM
After reading how far into gambling Sorsby was I would pass on him too. We've had enough drama over the years.
38 1,319 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: I Thought Canada Was Going to be the 51'st State? WooferDawg 05/30/26 04:01 PM
The problem with adding states is that the ones on the list would likely be democratic in political preference.
13 525 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: DOJ launches criminal probe into E. Jean Carroll: Sources PitDAWG 05/30/26 04:00 PM
I had no idea you were homophoneic. Man that must be tough. naughtydevil
21 278 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Quarterback Defined PitDAWG 05/30/26 02:37 PM
Nowhere is "many" defined as half. That's just something you feel or believe. At least half would be half of them and anything over that would be the majority of them.

Policing morality is not the same as willfully ignoring it.

If he was purposefully seeking out non licensed massage therapists, 9 out of the 26 wouldn't have been licensed massage therapist. I suppose one could say he wasn't specifically seeking out licensed massage therapists but it looks more like he took the "When the urge hits pick up the phone" method.
360 26,407 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: U.S. creates $1.7B ‘lawfare’ fund in exchange for Trump dropping $10B IRS suit PitDAWG 05/30/26 02:07 PM
Judge halts Trump ‘anti-weaponization’ fund after Jan. 6 prosecutor sues

A separate judge, who oversaw the Trump-IRS case that led to the fund’s creation, launched an inquiry after 35 retired federal judges asked the court to re-open the case.

A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, created as part of an unprecedented settlement with the president, his family and the Trump Organization.

U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema of the Eastern District of Virginia entered the order Friday after a Jan. 6 prosecutor and others sued to block the fund last week.

The fund is being operated out of the Justice Department. Both Democrats and Republicans have criticized the fund. Opponents have labeled it a massive “slush fund” for President Donald Trump’s allies. Its existence has alarmed some legal experts, in part because there will be very little public oversight over how it is managed. Senate Republican leaders last week punted a vote on a GOP package to fund ICE and the Border Patrol until June in part because of concerns over the fund, NBC News reported.

The Trump administration cannot take any further action on the fund while legal motions are pending, “which includes the transferring of money to the fund; the consideration of any claims submitted to the fund; and the disbursing of any funds from the fund,” according to the order.

The judge said the order was necessary to “ensure that no funds are irreversibly disbursed from the Anti-Weaponization Fund” while there are motions pending to block the distribution of funds. She set a hearing for June 12.

Democracy Forward President and CEO Skye Perryman, who heads the group that filed the suit, said the judge’s order “recognized the urgent need to prevent taxpayer dollars from being distributed through a secretive and unprecedented political compensation scheme” that needed to be fully reviewed by a court.

“This is a victory for transparency, the rule of law, and the American people,” Perryman said in a statement. “No administration has the authority to spend public money through a political rewards program that Congress never authorized.”

The process to apply for money can’t officially begin until five commissioners are chosen to decide how the money is doled out, though people who claim they were targeted by the government have already requested money. The White House referred questions to the DOJ.

“The Department remains extremely confident in the legality of the Anti-Weaponization Fund which is supported by ample precedent, including Obama-era settlements,” a Justice Department spokesperson said in a statement. “We will not allow the policy preferences of judges to interfere with our efforts to provide restitution to victims of lawfare.”

It’s also not clear how people would formally apply. The pool of possible applicants is substantial, according to the DOJ.

Andrew Floyd, who headed a task force in the now-closed Capitol Siege Section of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, before he was dismissed in July, filed a declaration in connection with the lawsuit on Thursday. Floyd prosecuted cases related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

The Trump administration “is gifting the people I helped investigate and prosecute after January 6” access to what he described as an illegally created process designed to “rush money out the door to perceived political allies, while treating me and people like me as disfavored enemies.”

Describing the firing of dozens of law enforcement officials as “appalling,” he wrote that no president should be able to abuse their authority to target those who did their jobs.

“The president’s targeting of me and others involved in January 6 prosecutions leaves our country in a very dark place, sending a message that insurrection and sedition will be protected (and even encouraged) as long as it is on behalf of this administration,” Floyd wrote.

The Trump administration moved to set up the fund just ahead of court deadlines over a $10 billion lawsuit Trump filed against the executive branch he controls in connection with a years-old leak of his IRS records.

A federal judge in Florida had questioned whether a court could even hear the case, given Trump’s control over the Justice Department attorneys who would be responding to the lawsuit. Trump’s private attorneys dismissed the case and announced a settlement of other claims against the government the day the fund was announced.

U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams, the judge who oversaw that case, requested a further briefing Friday after 35 retired federal judges asked the court to re-open the case.

She wrote that a “party’s decision to file a frivolous lawsuit for the sole purpose of forcing a settlement may qualify” as the kind of impropriety that allows the court to investigate and determine “whether an attorney has abused the judicial process.”

The fund is facing other lawsuits in Washington.

Trump mass pardoned roughly 1,500 Jan. 6 defendants on his first day back in office last year. Last week, the Trump administration began erasing news releases about Jan. 6 prosecutions from the Justice Department’s website, which it described as “partisan propaganda.”

“We will do everything in our power to make whole those who were persecuted for political purposes,” read a statement posted from a Justice Department social media account.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...d-jan-6-prosecutor-files-suit-rcna347539

Once again we see proof that when it comes to trump, every accusation ends up being a confession.
40 1,061 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: The Dems... again MemphisBrownie 05/30/26 01:51 PM
Oh, memories......

201 8,922 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Aging Ballpeen 05/30/26 09:49 AM
Originally Posted by bonefish
Keith is a medical wonder story.

I have said for years that I have to outlive Keith Richards.

It cannot be fair that someone who has lived his life gets to keep it for so long.


Fair is a fairy tale. We like the idea of things being fair and mostly equal, but the reality doesn't play out that way, be it pretty much in anything.
21 473 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: ICE agent charged in Minneapolis shooting of Venezuelan man PitDAWG 05/29/26 02:08 PM
That sounds credible. rofl
2 88 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: More Music BCbrownie 05/29/26 01:23 PM
I spent most of the past weekend at the VFW hall.Now,I am a military man,with a great appreciation for the pomp and ceremony.I was,maybe a little too critical of the Honor Guard,which led to "if you can do it better" In hindsight I should have been suspicious because they had Guiness and let me play music,both things the guys don't like.Anyway,this song got a few smiles from the sly old foxes.

163 12,334 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 PitDAWG 05/28/26 06:42 PM
Reports are circulating that after trump's latest medical examination at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, during his colonoscopy doctors discovered that just over half of congress was planted firmly up his ass. The earliest they said treatment may become available would be shortly after the mid term elections.
148 6,847 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cavs/NBA 2.0 Bard Dawg 05/27/26 09:30 PM
Depends. Can he shoot the trey? I like the idea. Cavs need some "bad assery."
414 58,144 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Memorial Day jacksondawg 05/26/26 02:38 AM
Thank you everyone my dad
Died in Vietnam November 23 1968
3 192 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cleveland Guardians 2.0 Ballpeen 05/25/26 09:11 AM
Originally Posted by ScottPlayersFacemask
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by ScottPlayersFacemask
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
From my perspective, Atlanta is a horrible place.


Please clarify what you mean, because this can go many ways lol

You can probably take it in all ways, but primarily traffic, sprawl, crime.

Ah, ok. I didn’t know if you meant the city or the Braves Truist Park area.

I like the Braves just fine.
172 14,231 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Fun with ai PitDAWG 05/24/26 04:55 PM
In that case I wish you all the best moving forward with your consulting service. AI may help your business be much more profitable and efficient.
7 176 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns News 6.0 PitDAWG 05/24/26 03:18 PM
But you have to admit this is rather humorous in and embarrassing kind of way........

March of 2022 watson was signed by the Browns. They claimed they had their QB of the future and finally had a franchise QB.

March of 2025 Browns co-owner Jimmy Haslam said the team "took a big swing-and-miss" in acquiring QB Deshaun Watson.

May of 2026 watson is #1 on the QB depth chart.

It's as if this team has a bad case of being bipolar.
367 38,951 Read More
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5