Re: The Starter
bonefish
09/10/26 05:02 PM
Thursday and I am wondering if DW is capable of playing at least average?
Can he get through a game with no turnovers? Will he be able to get the ball out on time?
Clearly after six years of idleness and two Achilles. His mobility is not what it once was.
Mobility he depended upon to play his game.
Can he execute the Monken offense?
Major doubts.
147
7,214
Read More
|
|
Re: Post office complicit in plans to deny millions of mail in ballots
Bull_Dawg
09/10/26 04:48 PM
There is zero evidence that anyone tried to "steal an election". That's the entire point. If you're going to audit some states, audit them all or none at all. In case you missed it, I explained the answer to every question you just asked before. It's not my fault you have chosen to ignore it. Externally auditing them all sounds like a great idea.
69
1,928
Read More
|
|
Re: Trump, hoping to salvage midterms, makes a dubious pledge to give every US adult $5,000 if GOP wins
PitDAWG
09/10/26 04:35 PM
Moreno vows to push for Trump's $5,000 checks President Donald Trump promised every adult U.S. citizen would receive a $5,000 check if Republicans retain their majorities in Congress during the party's first-ever midterm convention in Dallas on Sept. 9. And U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, said he would take the lead to make it happen. "I will get a bill ready so that we can get the Trump Dividend passed immediately after the November 3rd election … because Republicans (and America) will win!" Moreno posted on X. The president capped off the event, which competed with the NFL regular season kickoff on television, by attacking Democrats while rallying supporters in the Lone Star State in a bid to boost GOP enthusiasm across the country. At a time when Americans are ranking cost of living as a top concern ahead of the November contests, the president's comments echo a promise that people would receive $2,000 tariff checks in late 2025. "Because of our tremendous economic success... I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000," Trump told supporters assembled at the American Airlines Center. Trump's remarks come as Republicans are holding two days of political pageantry aimed at blunting Democrats' momentum in the battle for control of Congress. Top GOP lawmakers, commentators and conservative voters during speeches on Wednesday addressed issues ranging from immigration across the Texas border to transgender athletes. Still, the president's approval rating has sagged as the Iran war continues and affordability remains top of mind for many voters. https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/moreno-vows-push-trumps-5-132738748.html
3
61
Read More
|
|
Re: Random NFL News
FATE
09/10/26 03:31 PM
Oh, please. Baker is tough as nails and has an Iron Man track record of availability. I don't think he's even been injured in TB, you're just making stuff up.
123
11,954
Read More
|
|
Re: Expectations
PitDAWG
09/10/26 02:46 PM
I thought something was up. That post didn't sound like you at all. Hope everything gets worked out.
82
3,395
Read More
|
|
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ????
PitDAWG
09/10/26 02:17 PM
How Many of the Founding Fathers Went to ‘Seminary’? A staple of “Christian America” history is the claim that “half,” or “twenty-nine” of the signers of the Declaration of Independence had “seminary” or “Bible college” degrees. This claim unfortunately shows up in Fourth of July sermons and even the occasional megachurch pastor’s tweet. The claim is, on a literal basis, easy to refute. In fact, there were no seminaries in America, in a modern sense of a graduate school of theology, until 1807, when Andover-Newton Theological School was founded. (ANTS was originally a traditionalist Calvinist school founded in opposition to Harvard’s theological liberalism. In 2016, having long since become theologically liberal, the ANTS campus was closed, and the school was folded into Yale Divinity School.) Princeton Theological Seminary, arguably the most influential American seminary of the 19th century, was founded as a separate institution from Princeton’s undergraduate college in 1812. If you wanted “graduate” theological education in the 1700s in America, you could stay on for extra study with someone like Princeton’s John Witherspoon, which is what James Madison did (he may have been considering the pastorate at the time). But Witherspoon is really the only signer who had a recognizable seminary education, since he did graduate study in theology at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland prior to coming to America. The idea of Founders going to a “Bible college” is a more slippery concept, but it is also easy to refute on a simple factual basis. “Bible colleges” began to appear in the late 19th century, as part of the early fundamentalist-modernist controversy. Nyack College (originally called the Missionary Training Institute) was arguably the first such college, founded by A. B. Simpson in 1882 in New York City, before relocating to the New York village of Nyack in 1897. The most recognizable Bible college in America was probably Chicago’s Moody Bible Institute, founded in 1887. So in the modern sense of the term, no Founding Father went to a Bible college, either. It is hard to know whether Christian America polemicists are intentionally misleading their readers about these claims, or whether they simply don’t understand or care that they’re being anachronistic. These types of overinflated assertions obscure the profound, if quieter, role that Christianity and Christian education did actually play among the Founders. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/evangelical-history/many-founding-fathers-went-seminary/
161
6,352
Read More
|
|
Re: Criminalise politicians who lie?
OCD
09/09/26 04:16 AM
What a phenomenal idea. https://www.bangor.ac.uk/news/2024-...untry-to-criminalise-politicians-who-lieUnder the proposals it would be a criminal offence for a member of the Senedd, or a candidate for election to the Senedd, to wilfully, or with intent to mislead, make or publish a statement that is known to be false or deceptive. Proceedings would have to be brought within six months from the date on which the statement was made. It would be considered a defence if it could be “reasonably inferred” to be a statement of opinion, or if it were retracted with an apology within 14 days. Being prosecuted for such a law would disqualify a person from being a Senedd member. Lmao… politicians would have to pass this. Find one on either side that never lies.
27
1,036
Read More
|
|
Re: Fano
Bull_Dawg
09/08/26 05:00 PM
I'm not entirely sure what to make of the Jaguars. They ended on an 8 game winning streak in the regular season, but it was the opposite of a murderer's row. LAC (Lance replaced Herbert in game behind an OL mash unit), @ARI, @TEN, IND (Riley Leonard mostly at QB), NYJ, @DEN, @IND (off the couch Rivers at QB), TEN. Re Hines-Allen specifically how much are his numbers about him being good vs the OTs he faced being "bad" and vice versa? How much were Ersery and Dan Moore Jr being "bad" about Hines-Allen (and the Texans DEs) being good? I can't say I watched much any of the Jaguars. Only thing that stands out in my recollection is the kicker booting bombs. Personally, I think the biggest matchup for the Browns is probably Watson vs himself. Whether he can win that one when it counts now remains to be seen.
23
1,465
Read More
|
|
Re: Quarterbacks
PitDAWG
09/07/26 04:45 PM
I get what you're saying but often times teams that are mismatched do give QB's opportunities they do not get against better opponents. It's much easier for a QB to do the things you speak of when they are comfortable, not pressured and have more time in the pocket. When you're not being pressured your game will flow in your own comfort zone. Not saying that's the case here because I didn't watch the game.
If you play a much weaker team your WR's aren't facing top end defenders. It makes it much easier for your WR's to get open than they may be against much better opponents. Your OL isn't facing top tier DL and LB's which also makes their jobs easier to protect the QB.
Top CB's, DL, OL and every position on the field whose aspiration and talent makes their goal playing in the NFL go to schools where they get the most attention and the most exposure. Many of those who don't go to the top schools do so because they aren't sure they could win the starting position so it's easier for them to be starters and get more exposure at a smaller school than sitting on the bench at a better school.
It does make it easier to see what they can and will do when they're in their comfort zone. What their natural tendencies are when you have the luxury of playing against inferior players. It doesn't tell you what they will do when their teams talent has to face similar talent and they're thrown out of their comfort zones. How a QB will react or what he may revert to when his WR's don't get open on a regular basis and he has to throw into traffic more often. How his mechanics may change when regularly pressured. How he reacts when he has to lead his team on late, game winning drives. The judge of a great QB is how they react when the heat is on. You don't win it all in the NFL based on playing inferior teams.
And yes you can bring up Josh Allan. On rare occasions even QB's who play on lower tier teams can develop into more. It's just not a very common occurrence.
29
1,782
Read More
|
|
Re: What if it is Arch?
IrishDawg42
09/07/26 12:43 AM
For me, I am more curious about Monken's "type" of QB vs any particular name and how Monken et al will be able to prop up the QB position this year.
I like what I'm seeing out of the skill groups (Judkins and Fannin as well as the earliest returns from the rookie WRs), and I'm cautiously optimistic about our Oline... so if all goes well our rookie QB should have a nice (if young) supporting cast going into next season. I could care less what Monken's "Type" is. The QB will more than likely out last Monken. As for his career, he inherited Jameis Winson, he inherited Baker Mayfield and he inherited Lamar Jackson.. I don't see a pattern, except he coached what he was given. I want the best possible player to build an offense around, not just a type to run Monken's offense. I don't expect a lot out of this season. It depends heavily on this rebuilt O-line as you already mentioned. It typically takes some games to gel when you get a new guy or two.. they have 5 who have never played together. If they can learn to play effectively early, we could get some surprise wins if the QB doesn't lose games for us. I agree, growth is the most important ingredient here, nothing helps a young QB more than an experienced team around him... I certainly am not honing in on Manning though, too much talent at the college level right now to focus on one player.
24
1,092
Read More
|
|
Re: Border Crossings
oobernoober
09/04/26 04:46 PM
Can't say I blame you. You were a smartass, I was flat-out rude. No excuse for that. My apologies, I let frustration get the best of me. I apologize as well, and will go a step further to say I sometimes vent frustration on here when work is getting to me (this is one of those times). That type of energy really isn't needed (to put it mildly) in these threads.
35
1,073
Read More
|
|
|
|