Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Our National Parks Bull_Dawg 05/15/26 03:43 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Increasing protections on land already owned and controlled by the federal government has no "financial gain" involved. And unless you think the National Park Service has some kind of slush fund that their employees are taking for themselves I have no idea what kind of financial gain you think there is in that department.

If it was just reversed how can you call it irreversible? The only thing you've been able to maintain in all of this has been made up possibilities and scenarios. Even after showing you that nobodies property was taken and nobody had to be relocated now you pivot in yet another direction. This harmed no one and only served to help forther protect land owned by the federal government. But since Obama did it, Trump had to undo it.

Or is that an obvious pattern you have missed in all of this? and since you're always searching for the truth, why don't you look at least far enough into the topic to see the reasoning of why they did this?

And it's quite odd that you raised a false flag about people having their property taken by eminent domain, which never happened, you then take issue with me asking if we should wait until irreversible harm is done to take actions to prevent it?

Here's the issue. You haven't actually presented anything the actions of Obama did to harm anything. You haven't shown anything to show it hurts the land or harmed any people. But there is certainly a chance that if protections are taken away from our federal lands and cuts made to our national parks things may very well be harmed.

It's as if you have just made things up as you've gone along that hold no substance.

The initial post was about budget cuts. Someone that works for an organization (the person that wrote the linked article) that is getting its budget cut has personal financial considerations.

I didn't say it was irreversible. People are arguing that designations should be. I disagree with that. Existing roads and sites are/were/will be no longer accessible. It's not all past history. Some had active practices (religious significance) from the locals. No longer being able to drive to sites deeper in the area makes them essentially impossible to get to in anything resembling a reasonable time frame. The Trump did it because it was Obama's is a lame narrative, and keeps taking us further from the initial post that was on budget cuts, work force reduction, and changing displays.

Where exactly is the reason "they did this" written out? Not some biased op ed or your made up opinion.

You haven't shown anything that shows the harm Trump is doing in this instance. Saying something "may very well be harmed" isn't evidence, it's conjecture and speculation.

Are only you supposed to be allowed to make up hypothetical harm?
I'd argue that promoting tourism is as likely to cause damage as leaving things as they were.

The history of federal mismanagement of national parks is its own separate issue.

Look I'm for preserving nature. I'm not a big fan of agenda driven narratives and selling knickknacks.

Personally, I'm weird and find the whole idea of owning land that the "owner" hasn't actually walked distasteful. Yes, claiming things is what governments do, but I don't have to like it.
72 2,050 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: I Thought Canada Was Going to be the 51'st State? PitDAWG 05/15/26 02:32 PM
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
JC

Only idiots thought he was being serious.

Carry on.

Only idiots elect a man that says stupid nonsensical things on a consistent basis. These countries have no idea if trump is being serious or not if you look at his track record.

He is the same person that said if you elected the democrats they would start a war in the middle east but not if you elected him because he was a president of peace. He even pointed out that he didn't start any wars in his first term to back up what he was saying.

I suppose only idiots thought he was being serious then too?

That's been the standard line every time this fool says something stupid. Which is almost daily. "He was just joking." He wasn't being serious."

And you people keep repeating that BS. Right up until he actually tries to do it. rolleyes
6 195 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns announce 2026 schedule BADdog 05/15/26 01:59 PM
Originally Posted by Bull_Dawg
I actually think it worked out pretty well for us.

...We can see what Watson does before we have to worry about the home crowd boo birds wrecking his fragile ego.

Then we can switch to Shedeur during the mini-bye after Pittsburgh.

Then we can get Taylen Green ready over the actual bye.

thumbsup Sounds like a plan
9 221 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cavs/NBA 2.0 bonefish 05/15/26 12:58 PM
I sure hope that the Cavs can close the deal tonight.

It would be hard to win a seventh game in Detroit.

389 54,600 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: How much money is enough? GMdawg 05/15/26 08:51 AM
Originally Posted by GMdawg
Wait let me check.


Well if $13.69 is enough I'm all set.


OK up to $13.94 now brownie
26 677 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Defense PitDAWG 05/14/26 06:35 PM
Bill Belichick lost three Super Bowls as a head coach too. naughtydevil
29 978 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Strength Of Schedule IrishDawg42 05/13/26 06:09 PM
We live in a world of "What have you done for me lately", but we have arguably invested more in the QB room than any of those teams, signing Watson. To date, he has been the worst trade and sign player in the history of the league. However, the short history he has here is irrelevant to 2026. The one thing that Watson does care about is money. I don't think he will ever have enough and he wants another pay day. The only way he gets that is by winning the starting job this off season and balling out. If HE balls out, this team wins a lot of games, it's that simple. We know he has done it before, it just isn't something we know if he can ever do again.

Last words for me on this:

If Watson wins the job, I EXPECT that large turn around because of the investment.
If Sanders wins the job, it is more likely that is because they have no future plans for Watson and would rather see where Sanders can progress before designing a way to get one of the QBs in 2027.

The second scenario, it's hard to call it a loss... If Shedeur progresses into a franchise guy, we win, we can use draft capital to continue a progressive build overall. If Sanders ceiling has already been hit(which is pretty low), then the Browns enter 2027 off season with a top 5 draft pick to go get the QB they covet. It will be a lot easier to move up from a top 5 than from a mid-teen on down...

FOR ME, worst case scenario is that Sanders is so bad this off season, Monken sees no other option than Watson. Watson plays just well enough to get 2nd in the division, no playoff, leaves in free agency and we have zero chance at a QB in the draft. I love winning 7 games over 4 games, but the way this team is built right now, all it needs is a QB. I would rather sacrifice this season to get one, if Sanders is incapable.
10 385 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: More Music Ballpeen 05/13/26 02:40 PM
Some smooth Van Morrison
159 11,027 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Arcadia mayor to plead guilty to promoting Chinese propaganda, DOJ announces Bull_Dawg 05/12/26 07:40 PM
That's not dawgtalkers, that's the federal government. She's in witness protection now. They told AI to redact her old name from the internet.
3 156 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns News 6.0 Day of the Dawg 05/12/26 02:56 PM
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Being totally bluntly honest, I'm more surprised that he hasn't retired and is simply going on Reserve/PUP.

Maybe the Browns are doing him a solid from a healthcare perspective as well by this designation as opposed to outright retiring?

I am not sure the Browns can cut him, and he isn't going to retire until he isn't going to get paid any longer.

Solid points, both. $6 million of his 2026 salary is guaranteed; 2025 was fully guaranteed.... and there is a LOT of Dead Cap pushed into Void Years from 2028 thru 2031. He will still represent $11.7million in Dead Cap in 2027, so he may spend the entire remainder of his contract on PUP.

Keeping him on the roster allows the Browns to file for cap insurance relief for him being out.
356 36,008 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: The Dems... again MemphisBrownie 05/11/26 10:01 PM
Oh, memories........

179 7,259 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II PitDAWG 05/11/26 04:56 PM
Trump Says Iran Ceasefire ‘On Life Support’ After Bragging He Has ‘The Best Plan Ever’

President Donald Trump said Monday that the ceasefire with Iran is not in a great place at the moment because he believes Iran’s proposals to end the war have been “unacceptable.”

“It’s unbelievably weak,” Trump said of the ceasefire. “It’s on life support.”

"Life support is not a good thing," he continued. "I would say the ceasefire is on massive life support where the doctor walks in and says, 'Sir, your loved one has approximately a 1% chance of living.’”

Speaking before reporters and allies gathered in the Oval Office moments earlier, he boasted about his "plan" to end the war.

“You know, a lot of people said, ‘Well, does he have a plan?' Yeah, of course I do have a plan. I have the best plan ever," Trump said. “I have a plan. It’s a very simple plan.”

Trump then laid out his plan, which is no plan at all: “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.”



https://www.huffpost.com/entry/late...3Q&brid=YWdncwGqwKmG8cReBnbkchAEu24r
124 4,935 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 05/11/26 02:24 PM
Trump Rejects New Iran Peace Offer as ‘Totally Unacceptable’

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump and Iran rejected each other’s latest peace proposals to end the 10-week conflict as the two sides struggle to maintain a fragile ceasefire.

“I have just read the response from Iran’s so-called ‘Representatives,’” Trump said in a social media post. “I don’t like it — TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!”

Iran offered to transfer some of its stockpile of highly enriched uranium to a third country, but rejected the idea of dismantling its nuclear facilities, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier. Iran disputed the report, according to the country’s semi-official news agency Tasnim.

It was unclear whether the exchange of proposals would offer a path to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Under its latest proposal, Iran would dilute some of its highly enriched uranium and have the rest sent to a third country, the WSJ said, citing people familiar with the response, but it also called for guarantees the transferred uranium would be returned if talks fail and ruled out dismantling its facilities.

Iran’s semi-official news agency Tasnim said the WSJ’s reporting on proposals for handling nuclear material was “not true.” The statement emphasized Iran’s desire for an immediate end to the war, the release of its frozen assets, a lifting of US sanctions on oil sales, an end to the US blockade of the Gulf of Oman, and ultimately Iranian management of the strait. State-run IRIB News added that Tehran rejected Trump’s plan as tantamount to surrender and insisted the US must also pay war damages.

Trump had proposed that Iran permit passage through the Strait of Hormuz and Washington end its blockade on Iranian ports in the next month, with nuclear talks to follow.

Oil rose with the dollar after Trump rejected Iran’s latest proposal. Brent was up about 3.5% to above $104 a barrel, recovering some of last week’s losses. US equity-index futures edged lower as the standoff weighed on risk sentiment.

Iran has been “playing games” with the US and other countries, Trump said in a social media post earlier Sunday. “They will be laughing no longer!”

Trump and his advisers have repeatedly suggested the war is over, even while threatening to escalate attacks if Tehran does not agree to a peace deal. Trump is scheduled to travel to China this week despite the ongoing conflict.

The president has said repeatedly that Iran must not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and claimed as recently as last week that the country had already agreed to give up its nuclear ambitions.

The president did not say in his social media post what the consequences, if any, of his dissatisfaction with Iran’s response would be. In recent weeks, Trump has appeared eager to draw a line under the conflict as he faces rising political pressure to bring down gasoline prices across the US ahead of the November midterm elections, when his fellow Republicans hope to hold on to control of Congress.

The conflict has killed thousands of people across the Middle East and upended oil and gas markets, with soaring fuel prices piling pressure on governments and consumers worldwide.

Here’s more related to the war:

Saudi Aramco, the world’s largest oil company, warned it would take several months for the market to return to normal even if the Strait of Hormuz reopened immediately.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes that he would like to end US financial support for Israel’s military over the next decade. The US currently provides Israel with $3.8 billion a year in military assistance under a 10-year agreement originally negotiated by the Obama administration that lasts through 2028.

Despite the ceasefire in place since April 8, a drone strike briefly set a cargo vessel ablaze off Qatar in the Persian Gulf, marking the latest shipping attack in the region. The United Arab Emirates and Kuwait both said they had intercepted hostile drones.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trum...r-as-totally-unacceptable-013346837.html
298 27,228 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 MemphisBrownie 05/11/26 11:42 AM
134 5,881 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Carson Schwesinger DROY Ballpeen 05/11/26 11:17 AM
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
Originally Posted by oobernoober
My apologies if this takes us off in a tangent...

But I would love to know the discussions that went into this pick. According to most on draft day, this guy was massively overdrafted, and supposedly not on any team's radar. For all we know, that could all be smoke... but I'd love to know what led Berry to draft a LB who walked on to his college team and had limited playing time before his late breakout season.

Notable players taken right after CS include Tyler Shough, the safety Seattle got, Treyveon Henderson (though we picked Judkins right before), Jayden Higgins and Luther Burden.

I think Berry and staff were desperate for a linebacker with JOK's injury. Jihaad Campbell at LB taken late in the 1st round 31 overall. It would have been interesting to see who they would have selected if he was still on the board at 33. Was Carson their top linebacker on their board or was he 2nd. The fact they selected him 3 picks before they selected Judkins shows they feared waiting 3 picks they would possibly lose out on him.

I agree. Carson was on the NFL radar.
26 1,752 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Iceland BrownsBabe 05/09/26 10:32 PM
My sister and her boys loved Iceland! She's been twice and is itching to go back.
15 717 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Bobby Cox and Ted Turner bonefish 05/09/26 10:07 PM
Bobby was old school all the way.

His players loved him.

You were expected to conduct yourself like a professional.

No clubhouse music allowed. Wear headsets so you don't infringe on others. No kids in the locker room. Not all kids behave well.

Show up on time and play your ass off. Dress was sports coats and collared shirts.

He kept everything inside the locker room. And he supported his players like they were his own kids.

I will always remember him on the top step cheering his players on. He was all baseball.

Sad day in Braves land.
2 116 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cleveland Guardians 2.0 waterdawg 05/09/26 05:51 PM
I just realized , that is " Tugboat " we traded !
148 12,655 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Quarterback Defined PitDAWG 05/09/26 02:35 PM
Since their current problem child QB is on the last year of his contract they are going to need someone to come in and fill that role on the roster. naughtydevil
314 23,732 Read More
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5