Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iranian War FATE 03/26/26 06:08 AM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
I will just say this. A military performs as well as its leaders. Proper planning and execution prevent a lot of terrible things from happening. One example is the bombing of that school. At one point in time it had been a military installation but it hadn't been for years. Nobody bothered to check if it was a proper target at the time it was bombed. Instead they depended on old intel without any updates or current verification.

I will not however isolate this to the trump administration. This is not all that uncommon. The thing I find most odd about the current situation seems to be the consistent moving of the goal posts and the mixed messages. In June trump said that Iran's nuclear program had been obliterated and set back decades if not years. In March, the US intelligence community assessed that Iran was “not building a nuclear weapon.”

Yet it was presented that Iran was an "immanent threat". 2+2 does not equal 6. Unless it's the White House version of new math. There is zero evidence to support that Iran was an immanent threat when he decided to attack.

The first time he struck Iran he said our goal was to eliminate their nuclear threat. This time it is their nuclear capability he claimed he obliterated just months before plus destroying their missile capability which is no threat to the U.S., their drones and a regime change.

Now he claims to be in talks with Iran but it's not the new supreme leader while claiming he has achieved a regime change even though it is still being run by the same group that ran it before and the revolutionary guard.

I can't make sense out of any of it because none of it makes any sense.

But just like other examples of our wars in the middle east he grossly underestimated the resolve of the enemy and there was no clear exit strategy.

I'm glad I stopped by here to read, for a change. I'm not sure I can agree with this post much more than I do.

There are some caveats and "yeah, but maybe" moments, but ^ that's ^ the nutshell version.

What pisses me off, literally, is that there was never any real exit strategy *if* there was no plan to chop off the head. And no plan can be effective without one.

If there isn't already a new regime lying in wait, you're just spoon-feeding a never-ending cycle. Only thing that changes is being "nuke-ready" will take place on an ever-quickening timetable.

We didn't think this whole thing through very well. We convinced ourselves that overwhelming force and the "epic fury" at which we administered it would be enough. The snake is still slithering.

And now Trump is caught with his pants down. His only hope to avoid "forever war" is to root out the snake by installing a new regime. I'm not sure how that's possible without boots on the ground.
283 7,727 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Browns News 6.0 MemphisBrownie 03/25/26 11:41 PM


Hmmmm.
316 23,560 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 03/25/26 07:49 PM
BREAKING NEWS: Pete Hegseth Touts 'Historic Recruiting' At The Recruiting Excellence Forum



Effective March 2026, the U.S. Army has officially raised its maximum enlistment age to 42, up from the previous limit of 35, to widen its recruiting pool amid ongoing recruiting challenges. Concurrently, the Army is relaxing its drug policies by removing the requirement for a waiver for recruits with a single conviction for marijuana possession or drug paraphernalia.

There's that new White House math again.
217 20,559 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump urges Republicans to 'take over' and 'nationalize' voting BADdog 03/25/26 03:44 AM
Maybe the republican would have won If he didn't mail on his ballot
93 3,058 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Player News superbowldogg 03/24/26 11:21 PM
Originally Posted by IrishDawg42
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
I really don't think Tate is going to be a #1 in the NFL. To me, he looks like a great #2 that will catch the ball.

If this was other years, he would probably be drafted late in the first or second round.


He is a great #2 to Jeremiah Smith, but JS is going to enter the league like Ja'Marr Chase did. He is generational, which is why Tate might "look" a little less when seeing them on the field together. However, Carnell Tate is equal or better than many of the receivers that have recently come into the draft. He is a better prospect than Jaxon Smith-Njigba, who was drafted #20 overall because he was in a loaded draft class. He was the first of four receivers taken in his draft in the first round.

Curious question, what in his game leads you to being a #2 receiver?

If this were other years, he would be exactly where he is today. He is a top WR candidate, which barring prospects like Jeremiah Smith or Ja'Marr Chase, he would still be in the talk as the best receiver in his class coming out.

First WR off the board the last ten years:
2025 Tet McMillan #8, Tate is rated higher
2024 Marvin Harrison Jr. drafted #4 overall, Tate would have been #3 receiver in 2024, Nabers was 2nd receiver drafted at #6 overall and Tate is rated just below him, both predicted year 1 starter.
2023 Jaxon Smith-Njigba #20, Tate is rated higher
2022 Drake London #8, Tate is rated higher
2021 Ja'Marr Chase#5, pretty obvious, Jaylen Waddle #6 was top ten pick #2 receiver, Tate is on par with Waddle
2020 Henry Ruggs #12 and Jerry Jeudy #15 were the first two WRs, Tate is rated much higher
2019 Bad draft class, but Tate would unquestionably be the top receiver in this draft, best of the class was Marquise Browns #25 overall
2018 Another bad draft, DJ Moore #24 was the first WR taken, but was rated much lower than Tate
2017 Corey Davis drafted #5 overall, Tate is rated higher
2016 Corey Coleman #15 was the first WR drafted, Tate is rated higher

All of these receivers were taken mid first or higher. All of those of those rated higher than him went top ten, many he is rated higher than still went top ten.

In this case, which I know it happens a lot, we don't have rose colored glasses on a Buckeye. He deserves the accolades he is getting. Having Smith and Tate on the field at the same time was a blessing for OSU, but it did take away individual stats. Tate is one of the best WR prospects of the last ten years.


To me he is a guy that will do great in the X vs the Y and I think he will do well working the middle of the field while making contested catches. I don't think he will thrive on the edge where he needs toe tap/ sideline catches often. I also feel like he won't do that great if he is moved around often.

in 2025 he would have been drafted after Emeka Egbuka | Travis Hunter Tetairoa McMillan Emeka Egbuka Matthew Golden Jayden Higgins Luther Burden Tre Harris Jack Bech
In 2024 he would have been drafted after Brian Thomas and before Xavier Worthy | Marvin Harrison Malik Nabers Rome Odunze Brian Thomas Xavier Worthy Ricky Pearsall Xavier Legette Keon Coleman Ladd McConkey Ja'Lynn Polk Adonai Mitchell
2023 right after Jordan Addison | Jaxon Smith-Njigba Quentin Johnston Zay Flowers Jordan Addison Jonathan Mingo Jayden Reed Rashee Rice Marvin Mims
2022 probably drafted right after Jameson Williams | Drake London Garrett Wilson Chris Olave Jameson Williams Jahan Dotson Treylon Burks Christian Watson Wan'Dale Robinson
2021 right after DeVonta Smith and before Kadarius Toney | Ja'Marr Chase Jaylen Waddle DeVonta Smith Kadarius Toney Rashod Bateman
2020 after Tee Higgins maybe after Michael Pittman. | Henry Ruggs Jerry Jeudy CeeDee Lamb Jalen Reagor Justin Jefferson Brandon Aiyuk Tee Higgins Michael Pittman Laviska Shenault
277 20,341 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Robert Mueller, former FBI director who led Trump investigation, dies at 81 mgh888 03/23/26 07:59 PM
I think your summary is pretty spot on. He was put into an unwinnable position - he did the job as he saw it correctly and thoroughly and with an unbiased, non political agenda. Politics swept him up and vilified him which given his straight as an arrow reputation, military service and having been a registered Republican, was just sad and I guess an indication of the times and the impact of MAGA and the likes of Steve Bannon and company.

It is worth remembering that the reason for the inquiry/report was justified. Many people were prosecuted on the back of the report. As someone above mentioned Mueller always maintained it was not the reports purpose to say the PoTUS committed obstruction but to report the facts and let Congress decide.

With regards specifically to Trump the report did not exonerate him and stated: "If we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so" ... The report then provided what were 11 examples of behaviour exhibiting "Potential Obstruction". . . . including: Ordering White House Counsel Don McGahn to have Mueller fired (McGahn refused and threatened to resign). AND Privately sending messages of support to Flynn and Manafort; suggesting pardons to discourage them from cooperating.
11 295 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 PitDAWG 03/23/26 04:04 PM
News from the future!

Immediately after being elected as president in 2028 Gavin Newsom officially changed the name of the Trump National Doral Miami to the Golf of Mexico.
86 2,792 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Quarterback Defined PitDAWG 03/23/26 03:20 PM
I'm not actually sure. I think it certainly has to be an improvement but how much of an improvement is yet to be seen. It seems the signings so far have been players strong in either pass protection or run blocking but not what would be considered well rounded players. I know that scheme also plays a part so it could be that the scheme will make up for some of that.

In the past I've gotten either far too positive or far too negative in terms of FA signings. It's caused me to be much more in a wait and see pattern than a projection pattern.
278 15,254 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: R.I.P. Chuck Norris Ballpeen 03/23/26 11:31 AM
Originally Posted by YTownBrownsFan
Aw man. RIP Chuck.


One huge way that getting old sucks is that so many of the stars I grew up watching are now fading away. frown

I always thought getting old would take longer.
6 270 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: DOJ, FBI conclude Jeffrey Epstein had no "client list," committed suicide northlima dawg 03/22/26 02:43 PM
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article315131144.html



Exclusive: Bags of shredded documents at NY jail after Epstein’s death, officer tells FBI

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article315131144.html#storylink=cpy
254 21,991 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: More Music bonefish 03/21/26 09:13 PM
These guys are from Iceland. Really good musicians.

130 6,751 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Random NFL News PitDAWG 03/21/26 05:41 PM
Since we're stuck with AB what choice do we have but to hope he does well? We're not going to be competing for the division this year. We don't even have a QB.

And if you want to have a shot at answering the QB position in next years draft you better hope they don't do that well.

Hope is what you have when you have when all else has failed.
20 872 Read More
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5