Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: What Now Pt. 2 FATE 02/22/26 06:09 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
I never at any point suggested the Browns spend two picks to draft a LT.

He didn't say you did. Maybe read again.
322 15,013 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: 2026 Winter Olympics FATE 02/22/26 06:08 PM
21 1,002 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Live updates: Supreme Court rules against Trump's tariffs, limiting president's power to impose taxes PitDAWG 02/22/26 05:09 PM
What I find so amusing is it seems their biggest excuse is as to why the SCOTUS should not have deemed trump's "national security" import taxes illegal is because of this horrible mess it will create.

So rather than blame the man that created the mess with illegal tariffs they blame the SCOTUS for ruling correctly.

Then there's trump's excuse. "They didn't do what's right for America!"

As if the law doesn't matter as long as they do what he says and what he wants.

Someone needs to tell trump that the job of the SCOTUS is based on the law and not kissing his ass.

I'm shocked so many people can't grasp such a simple concept. Okay, so I'm not shocked.
22 332 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Quarterback Defined IrishDawg42 02/22/26 03:38 PM
Originally Posted by Razorthorns
Honstly if watson got good we couldn't afford to resign him unless he gave us a deal to make up for screwing the browns over so bad. Since that won't happen it's better to let sanders start and see what we have in him. I don't think Sanders is all that great either though because of his slow decision making. I would trade dyloan to atlanta for whatever we can get and then draft Taylen Green. Green is the kind of QB that would excite Monken and who we could nab in the 4th or 5th round. He is big, fast on his feet, and has a rocket arm. he needs to be developed though so let Sanders start this year while Green rides the bench and gets coached.


Why do you want to “fix” the QB room by replacing the 3rd and 5th round QBs with a 4th/5th round QB? We have plenty of developmental QBs on this team already. Sanders CAN be a running QB if that’s what you want. I don’t see them doing anything worth discussing with the QB room in 2026. Gabriel, if nothing else, proves he is the quintessential backup and will probably be in the league for the next 12 years without starting more than a dozen more games over that long career.

I want either Carnell Tate or a trade down for a 2027 1st or 2nd round pick minimum. It’s going to be tough to find that trade in this weak draft class, but I don’t want to waste a high pick on a right tackle.
174 7,946 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns News 6.0 Razorthorns 02/22/26 02:31 AM
I hate to see players get hurt but that risk is one of the reasons they get paid a lot of money.
188 13,650 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 02/21/26 08:10 PM


Murica! Freedumb of speech only counts for us!
204 18,507 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: What The Trump Administrartion and CBS Didn't Want you to See PitDAWG 02/21/26 07:30 PM
FCC’s Carr urges broadcasters to air ‘patriotic, pro-America’ content

The agency chair’s call is tied to administration efforts to foster celebrations of American exceptionalism ahead of the nation’s 250th anniversary.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr wants broadcasters to air “patriotic, pro-America content” to support the White House’s plans to celebrate the nation’s 250th anniversary.

“As America’s 250th anniversary approaches, it is important to reflect on the ideals and events that have defined our past while keeping an eye towards our country’s bright future,” Carr said in a statement Friday. “I am calling on broadcasters to pledge to provide programming that promotes civic education, national pride, and our shared history.”

But Carr’s message to broadcasters comes as his critics are already uncomfortable with the agency’s incursion into policing media content, which they say is an attempt to please President Donald Trump while infringing on the First Amendment.

Several broadcasters also have pending mergers and regulatory requests before the FCC, which could influence their response to Carr’s request. In the latest flare-up this week, CBS late-night host Stephen Colbert accused corporate lawyers at his network of unduly capitulating to new equal time guidance from Carr and sidelining his interview with Democratic Senate contender James Talarico — claims that CBS later denied and Carr dismissed, saying Colbert had other options to air that interview.

Carr’s new initiative takes the form of a voluntary “Pledge America Campaign” that broadcasters can join.

The agency said the initiative is part of a broader White House effort to encourage festivities celebrating the nation’s 250th anniversary during this Fourth of July holiday. Trump has taken a personal interest in celebrating the anniversary, and his administration has reviewed Smithsonian exhibits to ensure they align with the White House’s directive to celebrate American exceptionalism.

Broadcasters could participate in the pledge, Carr suggested, by running public service announcements or specials devoted to civic education and U.S. history, peppering such historical content into news programming or including daily broadcasts reciting the Pledge of Allegiance or playing the national anthem. The FCC said participation could also entail playing music from U.S. composers such as John Philip Sousa, Duke Ellington and George Gershwin.

In his statement, Carr said civic education is in decline, noting that “classic programming such as Schoolhouse Rock! is now only found in online archives.”

Carr has also used his gavel to integrate certain patriotic activities into government proceedings, such as beginning each monthly open meeting by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.

Commissioner Anna Gomez, the agency’s lone Democrat, took to X to criticize Carr’s announcement: “Nothing is more American than defending our constitutional rights against those who would erode our civil liberties. If broadcasters choose to participate in this FCC campaign, they can do so by defending their First Amendment rights and refusing government interference.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/...r-patriotic-pro-america-content-00791260
17 396 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 MemphisBrownie 02/21/26 06:50 PM
48 1,374 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Our Economy is Collapsing northlima dawg 02/21/26 03:50 PM
Analysis: These two new economic numbers blew a hole in Trump’s rosy narrative
By
Daniel Dale

A vessel passes a container ship loaded with shipping containers at the Port of Los Angeles on February 20, 2026. Mario Tama/Getty Images
Two new pieces of economic data, one released Thursday and one released Friday, blew another hole in President Donald Trump’s triumphant narrative about the effects of his tariffs.

The figures released early Thursday showed Trump had wildly overstated the impact of the tariffs on the trade deficit. The figures released early Friday showed he also had wildly exaggerated economic growth in the fourth quarter of 2025.

The Supreme Court struck down many of Trump’s tariffs later on Friday. But other tariffs remain in place, and Trump quickly said he plans to replace the ones the court declared illegal with new tariffs under a different law.

The trade deficit was down 0.2% in 2025, not down ‘78%’
Trump has for years highlighted the trade deficit – the difference between the value of US imports and exports – as a supposed example of how the US is being “ripped off” by other countries. (Many economists disagree with his characterization.) On Wednesday evening, he posted a celebratory message on social media.


“THE UNITED STATES TRADE DEFICIT HAS BEEN REDUCED BY 78% BECAUSE OF THE TARIFFS BEING CHARGED TO OTHER COMPANIES AND COUNTRIES,” the all-caps post began.

The next morning, though, the Bureau of Economic Analysis revealed the actual 2025 trade deficit in goods and services. It was nearly identical to the 2024 deficit, down just 0.2% — nowhere close to Trump’s professed “78%” decline. And the trade deficit in goods, the items subject to Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, was up 2.1% compared to 2024.

Trump didn’t make up the “78%” figure out of thin air, but it was still deceptive. He was citing an out-of-date and short-term number from October 2025, when the trade deficit was 78% lower than it was in January 2025. Experts cautioned at the time that the sharp October drop would be fleeting, the result of temporary fluctuations in gold and pharmaceuticals trade, and it was.

Trump’s Wednesday post was also inaccurate in suggesting his tariffs are paid by foreign countries. Tariff payments are made by US importers, not foreign exporters, and those importers often pass on some of their costs to consumers. While foreign exporters may sometimes drop their prices to try to keep their products competitive, various  analyses have found that the overwhelming majority of the costs of the tariffs Trump has imposed this term are being covered by a combination of US businesses and US consumers.

Economic growth in fourth-quarter 2025 was 1.4%, not ‘5.6%’
The Bureau of Economic Analysis on Friday released another key set of figures — estimates on real gross domestic product (GDP) growth. These figures, too, were far from the number Trump had been touting.


Trump told the World Economic Forum in late January that “fourth-quarter growth is projected to be 5.4%, far greater than anybody other than myself and a few others had predicted.” He specified in a Cabinet meeting and a Wall Street Journal op-ed later in January that he was referring to a projection for the fourth quarter of 2025 from a model run by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Then, in an early-February interview with NBC, he made it sound like 5.6% growth had already been achieved, saying, “I’m very proud of it: 5.6%. You know, we have a GDP of 5.6 despite a shutdown.”

By the time of the op-ed, the Cabinet meeting and the interview, though, the Atlanta Fed’s model was down to a projection of 4.2% fourth-quarter 2025 growth. Various other forecasts were even lower than that. And contrary to Trump’s comment to NBC, forecasts aren’t reality.

The figures released Friday show just how far from reality his “5.6%” claim was. The economy actually grew at an annualized rate of just 1.4% in the fourth quarter of 2025, much slower than the 4.4% growth in the third quarter of 2025.

The fall government shutdown was a significant factor in the weak figure. Still, Trump claimed growth was 5.6% despite the shutdown, which wasn’t close to correct.

And what of Trump’s vague claim from a speech on the economy Thursday in Georgia, that “our country was dead” a year ago under former President Joe Biden, but “now we have the hottest country”? The US economy grew at just 2.2% in 2025, new full-year figures showed — lower than in every year of the Biden administration and every year of the first Trump administration other than 2020, when the Covid-19 pandemic hit.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/21/politics/economy-gdp-trade-deficit-trump-tariffs
90 4,764 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cavs/NBA 2.0 bonefish 02/21/26 11:50 AM
Harden is a great passer.

Super impressed by what Ellis and Schroeder bring.

The Cavs are deep and have many options for matchups.

This is going to be a fun ride watching them.
363 42,986 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Halftime show GMdawg 02/21/26 07:04 AM
Originally Posted by BADdog
Many people including myself have other non english recordings we listen to. They are enjoyable to listen to.


I am glad we all have choices.
51 1,212 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: 3-D Printers? FATE 02/20/26 06:24 PM
BTW, have you printed any carbon fiber blends or nylon with your Bambu X1C?
14 385 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Tennessee House passes bill saying same-sex marriages do not have to be recognized oobernoober 02/20/26 06:04 PM
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
That is Awesome!!! Good for Tennessee. I hope it passes.

Why do you care who other people marry? If you don't like gay marriage don't get gay married. Why do you think others who believe differently than yourself don't deserve the same rights as you do?

I just ant to see if you'll be honest about it.

People choose to be gay. They are nothing more than sexual deviants and should not be celebrated and given special rights. Marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman. Who someone sleeps with is none of my concern but condoning marriage outside of the boundaries it was created to have is a problem. How is that for honesty?

Marriage (in the sense we're discussing here) is the legal process of getting married. Not the religious. We have separation of church and state, so the Bible has no legal standing in deciding who can and can't be legally married.
8 144 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns hire new Special Teams Coach oobernoober 02/20/26 05:51 PM
Originally Posted by IrishDawg42
Taking specialists out of the pay equation, Kicker, Punter, Long Snapper. They have roles, but they are minimal... In this case of punt coverage, Bojorquez was only 24th in punt average, so we were low as a punter AND low as a coverage team.
Average pay per special teams player:
$1,561,168 - Commanders
$1,393,707 - Colts
$1,109,901 - Browns

League minimum for 3yrs or less accrued experience in 2025 - $1,100,000

While I didn't put a ton of time into it, this is what I was searching for the other day and kept running into the numbers of our specialists (kicker/punter/LS). So thank you for finding and posting that up.

Also, your post about penalties was illuminating. I did not realize we were on the one end of the ST penalty rankings. Thank you for posting that.


I can definitely see how those two things point to roster vs coaching regarding our ST woes. Now I'm wondering if that $400k difference in average pay was us not having that "ST ace" on the roster (ex. Cribbs, who was as good a gunner as he was a returner).
59 2,806 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: The last two lawsuits against Deshaun Watson have settled PitDAWG 02/20/26 03:29 PM
I don't know who cares. Maybe a lot of people who have daughters? People who don't want a sexual predator wearing a Browns uniform? You know, people like that.

I guess you don't consider watson's sexual assault law suits news anymore. I mean who did it hurt? Am I right? rolleyes
4 269 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns Hire Mike Rutenberg as DC DeisleDawg 02/20/26 12:18 AM
Originally Posted by oobernoober
I do think the defense takes a step back... if nothing else then because we have struggled to get our talented groups to perform consistently year-to-year

Huh ?

The defense is going to take a step backwards , because the Browns have struggled to get their talented groups to perform consistently year to year is what you just said.


Well if that is what happened under Stephanski and Schwarts then glad they are gone.

Who in the heck wants coaches who make the team struggle ?

I love the shake up


I hope there is a new energy in the building

Will it pan out, No one knows
24 1,530 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: DOJ, FBI conclude Jeffrey Epstein had no "client list," committed suicide Damanshot 02/19/26 10:57 PM
Originally Posted by northlima dawg
Former Prince Andrew was arrested this morning. And

The state of New Mexico has begun an investigation into Epsteins ranch in New Mexico and is also investigating whether emails in the files are true that there are young girls buried at his ranch. They have asked the doj for unredacted files for their investigation

There is also new reporting today that indicates that the DOB hid Trumps involvement on a Rape..... Stay tuned....I'm betting it will ether be debunked or will end up as Front Page News
248 19,875 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cleveland Guardians 2.0 Milk Man 02/19/26 10:17 PM
80 5,844 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Goofy Immortal Part Deux PitDAWG 02/19/26 10:04 PM
What did they think was going to happen after they elected Mamdani? naughtydevil
96 13,449 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Player News Hammer 02/19/26 08:32 PM
Agreed.
126 11,536 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: White wash mgh888 02/19/26 03:15 PM
So just to be sure of what we all already knew - Trump's racist remarks about Obama were his and his alone.

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/she-said-karoline-leavitt-just-050951878.html

And just so we're clear - if you say and post racist things ... it makes you a racist. I mean, as if not allowing black employees in certain positions in your businesses wasn't enough, or ordering them off the casino floor and for them to be non-visible when you visit.
46 1,265 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: More Music TTTDawg 02/19/26 04:46 AM
Might have already been posted.

Genesis....Squonk

103 4,121 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Robert Duvall bonefish 02/18/26 10:13 PM
Since his passing many in the movie business have come forward and given tributes.

I have seen him interviewed many times. The one role that was hard on him was The Great Santini.

He came from a strict military father and the role haunted him. He was so good as the character Bull Meechum.

He loved "Tango" the dance and married a gal who is a terrific tango dancer. He wrote and directed the movie Assassination Tango and it was during the filming he met his future wife.

He said it took him ten days to read Lonesome Dove and 16 weeks to film it. And that was the best time in his life and his favorite role.

He will always remain in my eyes as the character Augustus McCrae.
12 363 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: GOP lawmaker joins Democrat-led effort to limit Trump's pardon power PitDAWG 02/18/26 07:41 PM
Yeah, that's exactly what I posted directly above your post.

Quote
In actuality it will most likely never happen. Actually highly unlikely to ever happen. I'm certainly no constitutional expert, but from my understanding it would take an amendment to the constitution in order to change this.

To amend the constitution requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate (or a convention called by two-thirds of state legislatures) to propose, followed by ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures.

We can't get both parties to agree what color the sky is on any given day.
7 226 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump urges Republicans to 'take over' and 'nationalize' voting PitDAWG 02/18/26 06:22 PM
I think that would heavily depend on what your definition of "stole" is. It certainly wouldn't fit the definition of the word.
43 1,369 Read More
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5