Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie
Quote:
i think there is a good chance of him staying. i think he really likes playing with JT and the rest. depends on brown really. he will get paid where ever he go.


Well, well.....

Quote:
After communicating with Alex Mack's agent, Tim Younger, today, I really believe he wants to remain with #Browns. Price will be set March 7


https://twitter.com/MaryKayCabot/status/705115268612284420


I love it! thumbsup

Get it DONE!

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Quote:
“My estimation would be if he’s going to be in Cleveland, we’ll get to a deal before his opt-out date,” Brown said.


http://www.ohio.com/sports/browns/pro-bo...d-here-1.665937

My guess is that Mack's agent is using the Browns as leverage in negotiations with other teams.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
fingerscrossed

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Originally Posted By: eotab
Yes that was noted...the last numbers were from the top 3 Centers contracts from NFL Teams.

It was originally suggested that the Franchise tag was 13mil then Mack would be looking for 15mil...I then stated - tell Mack Good Bye.

That last figure where I was stating a possible contract from the 3 top Center contracts...not OL Franchise which are the Left Tackle Contracts. Not Center.
but thanks anyways.

'
'
Eo, sorry, but that was me that suggested the franchise tag was 13 mill. But that's not just Centers. It's all OL including LT. So it's inaccurate. My bad and sorry for sending you down the wrong path.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
We were told we couldn't cut Manziel until March 9th do to us not having the money until the New League Year started.

Can we even sign a player before 3/9 if we don't have the money? or do we make the offer but they just can't sign the contract until after 3/9?


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,313
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,313
Originally Posted By: GratefulDawg
We were told we couldn't cut Manziel until March 9th do to us not having the money until the New League Year started.

Can we even sign a player before 3/9 if we don't have the money? or do we make the offer but they just can't sign the contract until after 3/9?
now I my be wrong, but the way I understand it is that we can negotiate after 3/7,but can't sign him till 3/9. Now I don't know how that pertains too our own fa's.

Last edited by nordawg; 03/02/16 07:27 PM.

The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

#gmstrong
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Originally Posted By: GratefulDawg
We were told we couldn't cut Manziel until March 9th do to us not having the money until the New League Year started.

Can we even sign a player before 3/9 if we don't have the money? or do we make the offer but they just can't sign the contract until after 3/9?


New contracts don't go into effect until the new league year... contract would be for the 2016 season (which starts March 9th) on.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,692
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,692
Farmer, once again, looks like an idiot for dealing an opt out clause in a contract to one of the best centers in the NFL. Who knows, maybe this was that was the only way to retain Mack considering his only other option was Jacksonville.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,468
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,468
the opt out clause was part of the Jacksonville contract that the transition tag forced the Browns to accept.

Last edited by Halfback32; 03/02/16 07:07 PM.

The Cleveland Browns - WE KNOW QUARTERBACKS ( Look at how many we've had ... )
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Nope. Too Bowe-legged.

Come back, Mack.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
Originally Posted By: HewDawg
Farmer, once again, looks like an idiot for dealing an opt out clause in a contract to one of the best centers in the NFL. Who knows, maybe this was that was the only way to retain Mack considering his only other option was Jacksonville.


The deal was set up by Jacksonville. Our choices were to sign that contract or let him go to Jacksonville. It would have been the only alternative to franchising him for two years in a row and ending up in the exact same place we are now.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
Originally Posted By: HewDawg
Farmer, once again, looks like an idiot for dealing an opt out clause in a contract to one of the best centers in the NFL. Who knows, maybe this was that was the only way to retain Mack considering his only other option was Jacksonville.


The deal was set up by Jacksonville. Our choices were to sign that contract or let him go to Jacksonville. It would have been the only alternative to franchising him for two years in a row and ending up in the exact same place we are now.


no. can still do a long term deal after some one is under franchise tag.


being a browns fan is like taking your dog to vet every week to be put down...
mac #1085107 03/03/16 12:35 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Originally Posted By: mac
Mack and Swartz were among the top 5 in the NFL, at their position.


Wait ... what? Wasn't the general consensus this time last year that we needed to draft a RT because Schwartz was a total bum? Didn't a lot of people say just this year that Mack hasn't looked the same since his injury? But now they are top 5 players, to go along with Pro-Bowlers Thomas and Bitino?

How'd we give up the 2nd most sacks in the league if the majority of our line is this elite?

I'm not saying they're bums either, but there seems to be this consensus, that unless we tie these guys up to contracts that are highest for their position, then the front office isn't doing their job.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,163
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,163
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Quote:
“My estimation would be if he’s going to be in Cleveland, we’ll get to a deal before his opt-out date,” Brown said.


http://www.ohio.com/sports/browns/pro-bo...d-here-1.665937

My guess is that Mack's agent is using the Browns as leverage in negotiations with other teams.

Yep! That is a lot of George Washingtons to give a center.

I think Schwartz is looking at $8 million. Is a Center worth $2 million per season more than a RT?

Mack is very good. Signing Mack to that kind of money will make it difficult signing other OL new contracts.

At that price you would think teams start drafting Centers top ten in the draft.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,267
I
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
I
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,267
The way I see it is Mack should be worth more to the Browns than any one else. They need to prove they are serious about winning.Letting good players walk is a bad start.
Second the Browns will most likely draft a QB again.Is anyone comfortable with Buttplant Erving at center?
Finally they have the cap space. Looking at this team who are they saving the cap space for? It's not like there is Star QB on the horizon they need the cap space to sign.
The Browns should offer Mack a contract equal to or just above the highest paid center in the NFL. Then if he walks he walks.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Originally Posted By: ExclDawg
Originally Posted By: mac
Mack and Swartz were among the top 5 in the NFL, at their position.


Wait ... what? Wasn't the general consensus this time last year that we needed to draft a RT because Schwartz was a total bum? Didn't a lot of people say just this year that Mack hasn't looked the same since his injury? But now they are top 5 players, to go along with Pro-Bowlers Thomas and Bitino?

How'd we give up the 2nd most sacks in the league if the majority of our line is this elite?

I'm not saying they're bums either, but there seems to be this consensus, that unless we tie these guys up to contracts that are highest for their position, then the front office isn't doing their job.


We had QBs who were slow decision makers, and held the ball too long last year.

Remember back in 2007, when we gave up 5 sacks in 15 passing times dropping back with Frye under Center?

Then DA threw 527 times, over the rest of the season, and he was sacked only 14 times.

In 2006, Frye was sacked 44 times in 392 attempts. Now that was before we had a guy names Joe Thomas at LT, but even so, that line was still an average NFL line. However, Frye was an awful QB, who some though helped his line because he could run, but he actually ran himself into trouble at least as often as he ran out of trouble.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Here's a question, if we can keep either Mack or Schwartz but not both which do you keep?


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Originally Posted By: HewDawg
Farmer, once again, looks like an idiot for dealing an opt out clause in a contract to one of the best centers in the NFL. Who knows, maybe this was that was the only way to retain Mack considering his only other option was Jacksonville.


He put the transition tag on Mack, that allowed Mack to seek other offers which the Browns had the right to match.

Now if I have this right, the Jags gave Mack a contract that allowed him to opt out after 2 years. The Browns matched it.

Matching that contract isn't the offense, Putting the transition tag on him was.

The Franchise tag would have cost us a ton of money, We had/have the money. So for me, the smarter move was a franchise tag, keep him here until we could work out a long term deal.

What farmer did wrong IMO, is not franchising him.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Agreed. There's a reason no other GM uses the transition tag.

Last edited by Jester; 03/03/16 08:26 AM.

Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Originally Posted By: Jester
Here's a question, if we can keep either Mack or Schwartz but not both which do you keep?


?

Originally Posted By: Jester
Agreed. There's a reason no other GM uses the transition tag.


?


You Jestin?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Mack vs Schwartz - Just curious to who people value more.


Transition tag - How often is it actually ever used?


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Originally Posted By: Jester
Agreed. There's a reason no other GM uses the transition tag.


No there is a time and place to use the transition tag. Bengi would have been a good example. Is he valuable to us and perhaps some other teams, sure he is. But if we lose him, it's not the end of the world.

So you place a 3rd round tag on him, someone says, yeah, he's worth that,,, they get bengi we get a 3rd pick (I used 3rd round as an example)


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Originally Posted By: Jester
Here's a question, if we can keep either Mack or Schwartz but not both which do you keep?


https://www.dawgtalkers.net/ubbthreads.php/topics/1072845/schwartz-or-mack#Post1072845

The link is to CFRS15's poll in the K9 Consensus forum. Right now, the vote is 21-20, Schwartz over Mack. I voted Schwartz.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
Just let them go. Start fresh


Start fresh? This isn't a laundry commercial. Who are we going to "start fresh" with? How do we attain these "fresh" players?

Dropping good players and creating more needs on a team that has a plethora of needs doesn't sound "fresh" to me.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
Wait ... what? Wasn't the general consensus this time last year that we needed to draft a RT because Schwartz was a total bum? Didn't a lot of people say just this year that Mack hasn't looked the same since his injury? But now they are top 5 players, to go along with Pro-Bowlers Thomas and Bitino?


YTown answered your post very well.

I would also like to add that it wasn't a general consensus. There are posters on here who say such things and they can be vocal, but I believe that most of us have maintained that both guys are very good players.

Btw..........Mack is the pro bowler, not Bitonio.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Thanks Dave. I never go into K9 consensus


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
Remember how bad our line looked while Mack was out?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,989
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,989
Originally Posted By: Dave
Originally Posted By: Jester
Here's a question, if we can keep either Mack or Schwartz but not both which do you keep?


https://www.dawgtalkers.net/ubbthreads.php/topics/1072845/schwartz-or-mack#Post1072845

The link is to CFRS15's poll in the K9 Consensus forum. Right now, the vote is 21-20, Schwartz over Mack. I voted Schwartz.


That's one of the better polls we've had on here in my opinion. I voted for Schwartz too.

I still think it's more likely that Mack leaves on his own but I cannot help but think about how this FO views allocating so much money to the offensive line. If we kept Thomas/Mack/Schwartz, that could be somewhere around $30MM annually. Two of the three are North of 30yrs and this team is rebuilding.

Maybe there is a way to get Mack to stay based on the guaranteed money instead of average per year, but I think this FO would rather pay Schwartz (younger and cheaper)than Mack at a position that is seemingly growing in it's importance based on how teams are scheming their pass rush, at least recently. I lean in that direction too, quite honestly. I felt this way about tagging Ward over Mack. I guess I don't value the Center position with that high of a price tag.

Maybe someone like a Stephen Wisniewski can come in if the FO isn't sold on Erving (can't blame them). He's 26 and is pretty good.





At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,989
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,989
Originally Posted By: Arps
Remember how bad our line looked while Mack was out?


Mack's first handful of games this year weren't very good, from what I recall. However, he did improve as the season wore on and was back to his normal self.

Still think he wasn't 100% off that injury to start the season.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Serious question:

Does anyone think Bitonio can play right tackle?


I hope it doesn't come to that, but you pose a good question. He played LT at Nevada. Here is one report on him:


Quote:
2014 NFL Draft Scouting Report - Joel Bitonio, OT Nevada
by Peter Smith 114w ago
7 TWEET SHARE 0 COMMENTS
In spite of the quality of play in the conference that keeps improving, the Mountain West can still hide some great NFL talent. Nevada’s left tackle Joel Bitonio looks like he could be a name that really moves up boards the more people catch up with the Wolf Pack tape and see him. Bitonio has been a terrific blocker for Nevada for the past three years and really been a nice blind side protector for Cody Fajardo while being a powerful run blocker who just keeps getting after it on every play.

When it comes to the NFL, there is no question that Bitonio has the ability to contribute in the NFL; the question is where. When it comes to his athletic ability, strength and technique, he looks like can be an effective tackle in the NFL, but there is a chance that he could end up playing left guard. He should get every chance to fail at tackle before he would move to guard, but it is nevertheless possible. Bitonio projects as a top 50 pick that could end up slipping into the first round if there is a run on tackles and a team does not want to miss out in addition to what Bitonio brings to the table. If he falls farther than the top 50, it is likely the NFL has made the decision collectively that he will be a guard.

Vitals & Build

Bitonio is listed at 6’4” 315lbs and has a solid build for the position without a ton of weight around his midsection. There will probably be a lot of eyes to see how tall he actually measures in and his arm length as some judge whether they believe he can play tackle at the next level. He has good functional strength and can demonstrate a good amount of power, seeming to make the most of what he has. His feet are impressive and he has good balance that seems able to move as much as needed. Bitonio looks as though he can keep getting better physically, adding more muscle and improving his overall body composition.

Athleticism

Bitonio looks good athletically and he has shown he can slide really well with short, quick steps. He maintains balance effectively and is pretty light on his feet. Bitonio has shown the ability to get to the second level with ease but has some issues with breaking down effectively and making blocks in space. He does a great job in terms of his ability to move and get to the positions the Nevada system asks him to do, but it is not an overly ambitious blocking scheme that gives him a ton of opportunities to show off what all he can really do.

Run Blocking

The first thing that stands out about Bitonio is he plays with a mean streak, looks to beat up his opponent and win whenever possible Bitonio fires off of the ball, looks to lock on to a defender and drive them down the field or into the ground. He has caused a number of pancake blocks and had examples where he put opponents on skates going down the field.

Bitonio does a pretty good job of locking on and using technique to keep the opponent in front of them, but there are times when he will get off balance, leaning too far forward and opponents can get past him using a push pull move or slip off of the block. At times, Bitonio will end up on the ground as a result.

He will occasionally end up on the wrong shoulder of the opponent but does do a nice job of working to get to the proper one as the play develops, working to cut them off from the play. Bitonio is always working his feet and he can drive opponents down the field, but will also make sure he gets in position to shield defenders from the ball carrier.

Bitonio does a good job of working through the whistle. He can get to the second level, but he has really inconsistent results when it comes to making blocks in space. There are definitely times when he is able to make one block and get off and make a second one down the field, but again, has trouble hitting opponents in space.

Bitonio is really awkward when it comes to cut blocking. It just never looks comfortable and he ends up too short of the target. He always looks like he would better off going and just blocking them straight up when it comes to the running game.

Pass Protection

Bitonio has the agility and footwork to slide and protect the edge even if he does not have the ideal length for the position. He has quick, choppy steps that are able to cover a good amount of ground, enable him to keep his balance and control to block opponents. Rarely, he will get caught flat footed and surprised by the opponent.

He does a nice job of playing tall and anchoring well against power. There are times when he can get caught with power under his pads, but he is able to adjust and re-anchor effectively.

Bitonio also does a nice job of protecting the edge effectively against speed, is able to go basically as fast as he needs to in order to seal off the opponent and has the power to keep them from getting inside. He also does a good job of adjusting to various moves, opponents switching their angle and is able to protect the quarterback.

Technique

For the most part, Bitonio does a great job with his hands, displays a solid punch and is able to use it without putting himself at a huge disadvantage. When he gets control of opponent, especially in pass protection, he is able to take away momentum and really stifle them, eliminating them from the play.

One of the areas he can work to improve is working to maintain his balance as he drives an opponent down the field as well as doing a better job of hitting opponents in space. Perhaps as a result of not having ideal height for the position, he has really worked to have good technique. He trusts it, he stays with it and he has a ton of success as a result.

Footwork

Bitonio’s footwork is largely impressive, especially when it comes to pass blocking. He is good at using quick steps while maintaining his balance and body control, so he is rarely caught in a bad position. There are occasionally times when he will get caught flat footed as he gets caught over shifting his weight, but they are rare and hardly an issue.

Bitonio does a nice job when it comes to leg drive and continuing to move his feet when landing blocks in the running game, both to drive opponents down the field but turn them out from the running play. He needs to work on doing a better job when it comes to angles at the second level, getting his hips low and making the proper adjustment to the opponent.

System Fit

Some people might question Bitonio’s overall height and length for the position, but he really does look the part of a good tackle, whether it is on the left or right side. He is able to protect the edge but also really gets after it in the running game, so he could be attractive to a significant number of teams. Zone blocking schemes who like blockers who can move may like him the most, but in spite of the fact he is not enormous, he can be a bully and play with a lot of power, so power schemes certainly cannot be eliminated from the conversation.

Bitonio appears to be a player that will get every chance at tackle and only if he fails in that capacity might he be moved to left guard. He should still excel in that position with all of his talent. Bitonio looks like he should be able to contribute immediately when he is drafted somewhere on the line, be it at tackle or guard.

NFL Comparison

Bitonio’s game might be similar to that of Duane Brown of the Houston Texans. Like Bitonio, Brown did not have ideal size coming out of Virginia Tech and the fact he was picked in the first round came as a surprise to many. He has developed into an extremely effective left tackle even if he is not necessarily in the conversation of the elite tackles. Brown just does his job consistently and effectively, which is largely how Bitonio plays.

Draft Projection

Joel Bitonio really does a nice job with his technique to maximize his physical ability, but there will be questions about his length. The good news for Bitonio is he has accepted an invitation to participate in the Senior Bowl and those drills should help make it clearer where he should ultimately end up when it comes to drills. He appears to be NFL ready and should only get better with added strength and improved overall body composition at the next level. Bitonio projects as a top 50 pick as long as teams view him as a tackle and there is a chance he could slip into the first round if teams make a run on offensive tackles. If they view him as a guard, he might slip further down, but he should not have to wait long.

http://withthefirstpick.com/2013/12/20/2014-nfl-draft-scouting-report-joel-bitonio-ot-nevada/


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Regarding the transition tag, the Dolphins used it this year on Olivier Vernon.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Point taken but the Dolphins front office isn't anything to aspire to.

Plus we have yet to see how this turns out for them.


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,989
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,989
Re-signing Alex Mack would be great, but can't come at expense of Browns losing Mitchell Schwartz: Tom Reed

BEREA, Ohio – Browns offensive linemen Alex Mack and Mitchell Schwartz represent two of the brightest athletic minds in Cleveland.

Both are University of California graduates. Each excels as much with his brain as his brawn. I'd pay to watch them play Scrabble – Stanford grad Johnson Bademosi gets the winner.

Here's what a pair of smart free agents have to figure out with the assistance of three Harvard-educated executives in the Browns front office. How can the club afford to keep Mack and Schwartz and still have salary-cap room to sign a few more free agents come March 9?

As expected, Mack opted out of the remaining three years of his deal Wednesday afternoon and will hit the open market next week. The three-time Pro Bowler becomes the most coveted center available.

Mack should have no shortage of suitors and some believe the 30-year-old could be the league's first $10 million-per-year player at his position. With the cap climbing to a record $155.27 million, a nearly $12 million increase from last season, Mack might hit that figure.

But it likely will come elsewhere, or at least not at the expense of Schwartz, an ascending right tackle just entering his prime. Among the Browns' top four free agents -- receiver Travis Benjamin, free safety Tashaun Gipson and the two offensive linemen – Schwartz is the most valuable because of his age (26), improvement and the growing importance of the right-tackle position.

The Browns should re-sign all four players, but that's probably not realistic even with a reported $48.85 million of cap space.

Mack's agent Tim Younger told Cleveland.com the center is impressed with new coach Hue Jackson and the chance of returning to the franchise that drafted him No. 21 overall in 2009 "remains on the table." The center owns a home here. He's dating a local woman and enjoys playing with the likes of Schwartz and long-time friend Joe Thomas.

But he's also acknowledged winning – something he's never done with the Browns -- is important to him. Drafting the top quarterback with the No. 2 overall pick probably gets the Browns closer to that goal. Mack has to know, however, losing Schwartz would be a serious setback.

Defenses are moving their top pass rushers all over the formation in recent seasons as evidence by the work of Von Miller in the Broncos' Super Bowl run. He terrorized his share of right tackles, but had a difficult day against Schwartz last October. The fifth-year pro is coming off his best season and has never missed a snap.

With more rookie tackles struggling to make the transition from college spread offenses, the Browns would be wise to get a long-term deal done with Schwartz. It might cost them at least $8.5 million per season.

The sum would be more palatable had the franchise's contingency plan at center not blown up in their faces like one of Wile E. Coyote's mail-order products from ACME. Cameron Erving was touted as Mack's heir apparent, but the 2015 first-round pick struggled mightily in limited duty at guard.

The Browns would be taking a significant leap of faith in expecting Erving to step in as opening-day center. Which is not to say Mack had his best year coming off a broken leg suffered early in the 2014 campaign.

Although his game improved as the season unfurled, Mack made his third Pro Bowl as much on reputation as performance. The Browns (3-13) finished 30th in scoring offense. Nevertheless, losing a player of his quality would produce another crater on a roster resembling the lunar surface.

Mack won't hurt for options. If the Seahawks could swing it moneywise, he would be an ideal fit in Seattle. The Jaguars, who signed him to a five-year, $42 million offer sheet the Browns matched in 2014, probably still have interest. Same goes for the Colts.

His agents can begin fielding offers Monday. For comparison's sake, the Dolphins' Mike Pouncey is the league's highest-paid center on average annual salary ($8.95 million).

If Mack, who opted out of his final three years of his deal at $8 million per season, wants to break the bank it's likely to come elsewhere. My hunch is he's gone.

But if the center is willing to compromise, leave some money on the table, the Ivy Leaguers in the front office should be smart enough to devise a way to keep Mack and Schwartz together.

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2016/03/re-signing_alex_mack_would_be.html

This is essentially how I feel as well.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
Originally Posted By: ExclDawg
Originally Posted By: mac
Mack and Swartz were among the top 5 in the NFL, at their position.


Wait ... what? Wasn't the general consensus this time last year that we needed to draft a RT because Schwartz was a total bum? Didn't a lot of people say just this year that Mack hasn't looked the same since his injury? But now they are top 5 players, to go along with Pro-Bowlers Thomas and Bitino?

How'd we give up the 2nd most sacks in the league if the majority of our line is this elite?

I'm not saying they're bums either, but there seems to be this consensus, that unless we tie these guys up to contracts that are highest for their position, then the front office isn't doing their job.


Your players who have improved year to year under their rookie contract, deserve to be paid when that rookie contract is done.

To be successful at building your team via the draft, a team must draft well and retain those players who have developed into the type of players you want on your team. This front office will be judged on their ability to draft well and retain their own top talent.

If the Browns can't keep their own players, the chances of them building a team that can win a Super Bowl are very slim.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
So this guys are supposed to be one of the best players in the 2nd worst team in the league,they are getting millions already, and they are asking to get paid?

I say, screw them, let them go.

Paying them would be a validation of bad play. Do you think they are going to put the extra effort, play better then they played last year?

KS was always a big question mark, very irregular performances, and when Mack went down last year, for sure our lack of play wasn't due to him, this year proved it. Mack or no Mack, we still play the same....

We need to start fresh. If they are reasonable and show the will to play here, re-sign them, if not just let them go.

Last edited by rastanplan; 03/03/16 10:14 AM.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
Paying them would be a validation of bad play.


You should not judge/value an individual based on overall team record. The player should be evaluated on (only) his performance at his position and relative to other similar players around the league. Pay da man...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 880
B
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 880
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
KS was always a big question mark, very irregular performances, and when Mack went down last year, for sure our lack of play wasn't due to him, this year proved it. Mack or no Mack, we still play the same....


The minute he went down two seasons ago, our running game was GONE. Take that away and Hoyer looked like an UFA QB again. It was a remarkable difference.

We have to keep our home grown talent and Cam doesn't look even comparable out there to Mack. It's a big risk to lose Mack, rely on Cam (who looks like a terrible bust) then have to use another draft pick down the road to get a good center. Cost more now, yes; cost us in terms of draft flexibility later, yes too.


[Linked Image from thumb0.webshots.net]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,989
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,989
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
So this guys are supposed to be one of the best players in the 2nd worst team in the league,they are getting millions already, and they are asking to get paid?

I say, screw them, let them go.

Paying them would be a validation of bad play. Do you think they are going to put the extra effort, play better then they played last year?

KS was always a big question mark, very irregular performances, and when Mack went down last year, for sure our lack of play wasn't due to him, this year proved it. Mack or no Mack, we still play the same....

We need to start fresh. If they are reasonable and show the will to play here, re-sign them, if not just let them go.




At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
He returned to the team this year, the line was improved and the running game was still gone. He went down on the Steelers game and after that we were still producing.

I'm sick of the arguments that when the things are clicking its because of the OL, but when things go wrong they have no fault. Just make up your minds on who is responsible.

I'm not against Mack, just think it is absurd to pay him after the miserable play we showed.

If you are one the best players in the 2nd worst team in the league, you don't amount to much... Improve the team record and then demand the money.

If they pay 10M to Mack, how much is Von Miller worth 40M a year?


Last edited by rastanplan; 03/03/16 10:33 AM.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
I'm looking at the OL stats for 2015, and I don't quite see what people are talking.

We are ranked #22 in rushing yards, #31 on Sacks allowed, and #32 on Hits on the QB.

How is this the sign of a top 5 OL, beats me...

Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Alex Mack Opts Out

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5