|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
LOL.............I see at least considering the list of first round qbs I presented isn't working. Why let facts get in the way of an agenda? So no team should ever draft a QB in the top two? Are you guys deliberately twisting my words around? Did you read my OP on this topic? If so, how in the heck could you come to that conclusion?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
And then I discussed...but you chose tp make it into something else.
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
I think it's pretty clear that Vers' point is that just because people talk up QB prospects to be first round or top 5 players doesn't mean there is a better than 50/50 shot that they will be good.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
LOL.............I see at least considering the list of first round qbs I presented isn't working. Why let facts get in the way of an agenda? So no team should ever draft a QB in the top two? Are you guys deliberately twisting my words around? Did you read my OP on this topic? If so, how in the heck could you come to that conclusion? How many #2 overall picks who are defensive ends win the Super Bowl?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
My brain is shutting down at this one, lol. I can't find your angle on it yet with such an obvious answer.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197 |
Let's review:
Is there any dispute that quarterback is the most impactful position in football? If there is check the salary structure by position.
Is there risk of failure in drafting any position high in the draft? Check WR, DL, OL, LB or any position. Failures can happen at any position.
When I see "arguments" about drafting a player like JJ. Watt and Super Bowls, or top WR and Super Bowls, or any argument along those lines it proves only one thing: football is a team game. Great teams win Super Bowls.
Do the Browns have a need at quarterback? If you believe that a quarterback on the roster is an answer then you are in the minority. Hue Jackson has already said they intend to explore all avenues in search of a quarterback.
So now the question that must be asked is; is there a quarterback in this draft worth the second pick?
Most of the people in the media believe that Goff or Wentz are the two best quarterbacks in the draft. Most list Goff and Wentz in the top 15 players of all positions of the draft.
If a quarterback is actually one of the top ten players in the draft is it wrong to take him at slot #2 if he was say the tenth best player?
Well maybe that depends on how accurate the rankings really are. At the end of each draft year and then the regular season how do the rankings actually hold up?
In conclusion, what matters here is the Browns are going to get a quarterback. Will the Browns be right in their analysis? I think they will be right if they select Carson Wentz.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
LOL.............I see at least considering the list of first round qbs I presented isn't working. Why let facts get in the way of an agenda? So no team should ever draft a QB in the top two? Are you guys deliberately twisting my words around? Did you read my OP on this topic? If so, how in the heck could you come to that conclusion? How many #2 overall picks who are defensive ends win the Super Bowl? How many DE's have been drafted #2 overall in the last 30 years? 3 2008 Chris Long 2002 Julius Peppers 1988 Neil Smith Of those 3, Peppers and Smith both went to the Super Bowl. Smith's team won the Superbowl twice. So based off of highly accurate infallible analytical statistics... If you draft a DE at #2 you have at worst a 66.6% chance of going to the Super Bowl and you have a 33.3% chance of winning multiple Super Bowls. I say at worst because Peppers and Long are still playing and it could be a 100% chance of winning multiple Super Bowls simply by drafting DE's. The safest conclusion I can come to is that we should draft anyone named Neil Smith at #2 because then we would have a 100% chance of winning multiple Super Bowls. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
If you're going to limit your draftable players because the players at that position haven't won a Super Bowl in the past, then you are not going to pick the player is best for your team.
Versatile Dog is adamantly against drafting a QB at pick #2. One of his reasons is that QBs picked at #2 haven't won many Super Bowls. That fact has no predictive value over future QBs that are selected at pick #2.
Edit: I am totally fine with someone not liking/wanting to draft Goff or Wentz. This specific reason for not wanting to draft one of them is ludicrous.
Last edited by cfrs15; 03/03/16 03:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
If you're going to limit your draftable players because the players at that position haven't won a Super Bowl in the past, then you are not going to pick the player is best for your team.
Versatile Dog is adamantly against drafting a QB at pick #2. One of his reasons is that QBs picked at #2 haven't won many Super Bowls. That fact has no predictive value over future QBs that are selected at pick #2. Does he know that Goff started as a Freshman? 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189 |
I think it's pretty clear that Vers' point is that just because people talk up QB prospects to be first round or top 5 players doesn't mean there is a better than 50/50 shot that they will be good. Maybe to say the same thing in a different way is that if the QB class is not very good the fact that one QB is rated as the best of that bunch doesn't automatically make him worthy of a top 5 pick.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
LOL.............I see at least considering the list of first round qbs I presented isn't working. Why let facts get in the way of an agenda? So no team should ever draft a QB in the top two? Are you guys deliberately twisting my words around? Did you read my OP on this topic? If so, how in the heck could you come to that conclusion? How many #2 overall picks who are defensive ends win the Super Bowl? I thought you were trying to bait someone into saying Von Miller, since he played significant DE for Denver when he was drafted and they were running a 4-3, but I didn't understand why.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
This specific reason for not wanting to draft one of them is ludicrous. And this is why you are a poor poster. I never made any such claim. You put words into my mouth simply to deflect attention away from the topic and use ridiculous words like "ludicrous." My thinking on this is multi-faceted and it is far from ludicrous. I have tried to spell it out for you and the other guys who insist we have to take a qb this year, but you don't wanna hear it, so you make things up to discredit my opinions. It's lame and it is the norm w/too many posters.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674 |
no doubt we need a QB but no and I mean NO QB in this draft is worthy of a top ten selection...barely first round talent as far as I can tell. but that's just my opinion..."imo" Best play available is the road i would travel this year and grab a QB when the value is there for one.
I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674 |
But hey. I have been known to be wrong...from time to time
I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,826
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,826 |
Perhaps you are remembering throws from someone else and attribute them to Goff
It was right there I think crfs provided the links one for Wentz one for Goff. I watched the Goff one and after I questioned your "PERFECT" I described from that video the throws that weren't perfect right there on this thread. And it was a small sample less then 10 throws?
Instead of going to that video and have a disagreement of what I saw, right away I'm wrong, must of been somebody else.
I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you were a Goff guy and bias was the reason of your claim. Sorry, I think you are a good poster but heck I saw like 10 throws and 2 were bad...sort of cuts into that claim of "PERFECT"
Just the facts of what I saw, if I am wrong please show my errors - my descriptions would be obvious to what pass I was talking about. I didn't look at those links. My review was from what I saw on NFLN's coverage of the combine. I didn't even know those links were out there and I look forward to reviewing them when I get the chance. Likely next week if I can find those link in the middle of a massive thread that far after after they were posted. I stated "all the throws I saw" and qualified by saying that I didn't see all his throws. If you or anyoneelse says there are throws he made at the combine that weren't perfect I wouldn't argue that. I would argue that I didn't see those throws. The "may have been someone else" comment I made was based on your comment of "this is going on memory" that you posted 3/2/16 at 9:32 - Not sure how to post that link for you.
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,826
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,826 |
I never really bought into this using a radar gun on football throws but found this interesting that Lynch, Goff and Wentz were so close. Subjectively, I would have thought Lynch was by fat the strongest arm and Goff by ar the slowest of those 3 with Cook above Goff but below WEntz.
Michigan State's Connor Cook registered a velocity measurement of just 50 miles per hour on the radar gun at the NFL Combine.
Paxton Lynch (59 MPH), Jared Goff (58), and Carson Wentz (57) all exhibited strong velocity at the Combine. Per Rotoviz's Jon Moore via Ourlads' Dan Shonka, Cook's miles-per-hour measurement was the weakest of all quarterbacks invited to Indianapolis. Cook also opted out of the Senior Bowl, which is where NFL scouts assess throwing strength live. A big-named passer in college, Cook is likely headed for a draft-day plunge. And there are several additional red flags on Cook not related to his underwhelming passing ability.
Last edited by Jester; 03/03/16 08:03 PM.
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
Just a note. Wentz and Cook are nursing their arms from recovering injuries.
Wentz - who came back too soon from a wrist injury to participate in the Championship game.
Cook - who was playing injured the last few weeks of the season. Recovering from a Shoulder injury.
Just to put that in perspective.
Oh and the videos that I believe cfrs provided on those throws are a real short video...as mentioned around 10 throws each. And looked like it was done from somebodies Phone...
On the Highlights film from the combine, didn't see it but wondering if it in anyway was edited???
jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
The rumor was shot down very quickly by well sourced people. The original rumor came from someone at Walter Football. If the Browns wants us to know that Goff bombed his interview, then we will know and the source of that information will not be Walter Football.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,332
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,332 |
It's smoke and mirror season. It's impossible to tell what is truth and what is fiction this time of the football calendar.
![[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]](https://i.ibb.co/fkjZc8B/Bull-Dawg-Sig-smaller.jpg) You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns. Fiercely Independent.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
It's smoke and mirror season. It's impossible to tell what is truth and what is fiction this time of the football calendar. Not only that, but reporters just throw stuff out there not knowing if they are right or not.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197 |
Ridiculous.
How do you know if any of them cut it loose?
How accurate can that be when the throws they made were minimal.
If they were asked to all line up on a yard line and throw a measurable distance say 40 yards at full velocity then maybe you could measure it.
Even if you did that what would it really prove?
Derek Anderson and Brandon Weeden might win that contest.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197 |
When it comes to analysis of the quarterback position one guy that I place in high esteem is Ron Jaworski.
Not only did he play the position but when his playing days ended he studied the position.
Here is a quote on what he thinks about Wentz:
As far as the draft goes, Jaworski seems to be highest on Carson Wentz of North Dakota State as a top quarterback.
"He got hurt, so he only threw 216 balls this year," Jaworski said. "Not a great sampling for his last year of [college] football. But man, the kid's got talent, the kid's got talent."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
LOL..............Jaws has been terrible when it comes to evaluating QBs. Who can forget this brilliant analysis and prediction? For the Cleveland Browns to take the next step, quarterback Brandon Weeden must improve on his uneven rookie campaign from a season ago. ESPN's Ron Jaworski believes that's about to happen. Jaws, cycling through his annual quarterback rankings, watched every one of Weeden's throws from 2012 and came away impressed, going so far as to say the 29-year-old passer "will be a rock-solid NFL starter in Norv Turner's offense," per Evan Silva of Rotoworld. "For a rookie, Weeden showed uncommon poise and calm in the pocket," said Jaworski, who called Weeden's mechanics "consistently solid" and touted the quarterback's ability to "sit on his back foot and drive the ball with velocity." It's a surprising assessment. On the surface, Weeden's rookie season was a hot-and-cold affair that showed off his strong arm but exposed his poor decision-making. Jaws has been closely analyzing signal-callers for decades, so his stamp of approval is encouraging for Weeden. Moving from Pat Shurmur's paint-by-numbers West Coast offense to Turner's aggressive downfield passing attack should help. Weeden is more of a gunslinger-type passer, and new Browns coach Rob Chudzinski has promised to make the most of his quarterback's deep-ball ability. Any one of Weeden's games from last season reveals plenty of negatives to go along with the positives, but Jaws -- along with NFL.com's Bucky Brooks -- believes Weeden will flip the switch in his second NFL season. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000...n-jaworski-saysHere is another example of his genius: It was two years ago, I said Colin Kaepernick had the skillset to become one of the greatest quarterbacks ever. I watched him against Dallas in week one 2014 and I saw consecutive plays with traits I really like. Pocket movement and the ability to deliver accurately knowing he’s going to get hit. How about maintaining his balance and poise and his downfield focus moving out of the pocket? These are high-level attributes. http://espnmediazone.com/us/no-15-colin-kaepernick/Click on that link for more.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 623
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 623 |
LOL.............I see at least considering the list of first round qbs I presented isn't working. Why let facts get in the way of an agenda? So no team should ever draft a QB in the top two? Are you guys deliberately twisting my words around? Did you read my OP on this topic? If so, how in the heck could you come to that conclusion? How many #2 overall picks who are defensive ends win the Super Bowl? How many DE's have been drafted #2 overall in the last 30 years? 3 2008 Chris Long 2002 Julius Peppers 1988 Neil Smith Of those 3, Peppers and Smith both went to the Super Bowl. Smith's team won the Superbowl twice. So based off of highly accurate infallible analytical statistics... If you draft a DE at #2 you have at worst a 66.6% chance of going to the Super Bowl and you have a 33.3% chance of winning multiple Super Bowls. I say at worst because Peppers and Long are still playing and it could be a 100% chance of winning multiple Super Bowls simply by drafting DE's. The safest conclusion I can come to is that we should draft anyone named Neil Smith at #2 because then we would have a 100% chance of winning multiple Super Bowls. And Deputy drops the mic and walks off stage with that one.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 623
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 623 |
I remember Jaws assessment of Kapernick being one of the greatest QBs of all time, I laughed. How can you say such a thing with such a small sample to go from.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
I remember Jaws assessment of Kapernick being one of the greatest QBs of all time, I laughed. How can you say such a thing with such a small sample to go from. Because you are on ESPN and you have to make outrageous statements to get any real air time.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
I don't normally pay attention to the guy, but I wished we would have listened when he said "I wouldn't take JFF in the first 3 rounds."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674 |
Cardale Jones: I want a career, not a job Cardale Jones' strained hamstring didn't just cost him an opportunity to throw at the NFL scouting combine. It cost him an opportunity to make people sit up and take notice. Not that folks hadn't seen Jones before, but watching up close and personal would have been something else. Jones' size, arm strength, speed and raw ability would combine the pieces of every quarterback designed by an NFL personnel guy. But his performance and inexperience make him a risk. Jones has the 2014 experience after starting three games and leading Ohio State to a national title. Then he has 2015, when he was given the job to start the season and lost it. Even with that roller coaster, he left Ohio State 11-0 as a starter. Had he come out for the draft after '14, it's possible he could have been a second-round pick. Now?( He's been working with quarterback guru George Whitfield in San Diego to try and improve his fundamentals. But according to ESPN's Mel Kiper, he's also looking at being selected in the fourth or fifth round, especially since he didn't throw at the combine due to the hamstring. Jones' focus turns to his pro day at Ohio State on March 11. But Jones doesn't even think throwing will matter that much. If teams have studied him, they know his arm. "I’m really looking forward to the running part of it, the 40 and the vertical," he said at his combine workout before the hamstring injury. "I mean, dropping back and throwing the ball to guys in shorts and shirts, I don’t think that’s going to ‘wow’ many people when I don’t have any pressure, [and] I don’t have to avoid anything." Jones has so many positives in terms of size and arm strength so he can't be ignored in this draft. At 6-5 and 250 pounds, he has a cannon for an arm and isn't afraid to run over people. He also has a refreshingly honest approach to his game. Asked at the combine if he's NFL ready, he said: "Only time will tell." Asked about his final season at Ohio State, he said: "It was a disappointment for the personal goals and things I wanted to accomplish. But everything that happened was for the betterment of the team." Even when he turned down the NFL after winning the national title, Jones shrugged and said there really was no reason to leave, given he had played so little up to that point. Jones attributed his 2015 struggles -- when he threw five interceptions in five games -- to inexperience. He had just three starts and less than 200 snaps in his career going into the season. He took unnecessary chances, and in some cases, he forced some throws into coverage. However, Jones insists that he has a greater understanding of the game than he's been given credit for. "I don’t think I get a lot of credit for how cerebral I am when it comes to being the quarterback," he said. He said people may think of him as a goofball given his personality, but he added that they don't see the hours he puts in to prepare for games. He even said he was eager to shock teams in his interviews. "I don’t get a lot of credit for my knowledge of the game. I don’t think OSU gets a lot of credit for the things and the responsibilities they put on a quarterback," he said. Jones' Twitter account (@CJ12_) is an interesting mix of inspiration and self-promotion. His statement by his handle states "Nothing Worth Having Comes Easy." On Thursday, he posted that "Everyday you get better or worse, you don't stay the same." He has several photos with fans at a charity event, and a slow motion replay of his 36" vertical (pre-hamstring) leap at the combine. He also re-tweeted a post from NFL.com's Daniel Jeremiah, who wrote that when you watch Jones throw, "he's elite." What, then, to do with Jones? Does a team focus on the ability and take him in the second round? Is he better off in spot where he can learn and grow behind an established starter (say, Dallas)? Or does the lack of production in 2015 push him down to the third day? Some call Jones the forgotten quarterback in the draft. Except for this: Ability like his is hard to forget, or ignore. "I don't want a job," Jones said. "I want a career." Browns chances: Low in the early rounds, high in the fourth or fifth. The Browns can't afford to take a chance on a project with their first three picks. But if Jones is on the board in the fourth, fifth or sixth round, it would make sense for the Browns to take him. It doesn't matter if he's the second quarterback they draft. It would be a smart move. Browns main question: Same as it is for every team: Is Jones a lesser version of Cam Newton, or is he the next Jamarcus Russell? http://espn.go.com/blog/cleveland-browns/post/_/id/18108/cardale-jones-i-want-a-career-not-a-jobI dont know why I like him so much...maybe I am too much of a Buckeye guy. but if he is still around in the fourth or fifth round I want this kid...and why not if our #2 QB does not work out we have another option. But I am pulling for him
I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,211
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,211 |
I'm pulling for him because I'm a Buckeye fan. I hope the Browns don't draft him because I'm a Browns fan.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674 |
I'm pulling for him because I'm a Buckeye fan. I hope the Browns don't draft him because I'm a Browns fan. I hear ya loud and clear...but...just maybe...juusst maaybe
I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
If he were sitting there in the 5th round I's take him in a heartbeat.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197 |
Man I am sure glad that we have so many experts on this board who's football resume's can match Jaworski's. In addition to matching his number of hours of film study.
When I need expertise I will just go to this Board because I know we all have never been wrong in player evaluation.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Man, I am glad that we have so many posters that actually think their opinions are more important than facts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197 |
What I said about Jaworski is that I respect "his" opinion.
If you do not; that is your prerogative.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
And I posted his "actual" evaluations. Sorry that they got in the way of your agenda.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197 |
One guy in this quarterback class that I think will be interesting to follow is Hackenberg.
I don't want him as a Brown but he is a guy that if I were a team I might take a flyer at him in the third round or so.
His tape is terrible. At the same time so was his team. His OL was really bad and as an offense in whole they were really bad.
Hackenberg has arm talent. In his freshman year under O'Brian he played well.
He got worse from there though. Hard to tell if he got shell shocked from all the sacks. Even when he had time his accuracy was not good.
At the same time you wonder what will happen with good instruction and time. He has a really good arm and seems like a guy who will work.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
Well the fact that I know is that QBs are the hardest positions to evaluate...that is a fact. Whether you are Jaws, Bonefish or Vers...there will be a lot of evaluations that will be wrong.
What I do know is making the roster long term there are the Rare parity breakers. QB, LT, Pass Rusher elite, Cover Corner...just not enough for everyone. Anytime we get a chance to get an opportunity at a parity breaker we should take it. Doesn't all have to be this year.
Another thing I know to have a Franchise QB you should have an OL that can prevent said QB from becoming damaged goods.
Another is that Defenses DO WIN CHAMPIONSHIPS I don't care what the pundits state that it has changed...sorry not what I see.
Hue and crew will make their best evaluation at the QB they won't reach for one because of need.
Of course if we do not go QB in the first round more than possible is the chances we obtain RG3 for the short term along with McCown. Davis and Shaw are irrelevant - I have yet studied "REPORTS" I'm not a lawyer making a case and have to bring up Johnny A vs Johnny B to prove that my view is correct.
I eyeball each one. I don't look at accomplishments as much as how they made their accomplishments. Sometimes you have to study hard...if you are lucky you watch and you just know you are looking at greatness. Then you keep watching and get support of that greatness. Only reason why I'm pimping Wentz...if I didn't feel that way I wouldn't have.
Its the biggest of the Parity Breakers. But it doesn't mean you ignore the others. To me and this 2016 Draft its about QB and the DEFENSE...we will not fix it all this year. But as a fan those are my keys.
jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101 |
Hackenberg has arm talent. In his freshman year under O'Brian he played well.
He got worse from there though. Hard to tell if he got shell shocked from all the sacks. Even when he had time his accuracy was not good.
At the same time you wonder what will happen with good instruction and time. He has a really good arm and seems like a guy who will work.
I suspect he will go to the Texans in the 3rd. O'Brien's history with him probably helps him recover to reclaim his promise. There is a security of familiarity that no other coach can match. I think that is his best chance.
1. #GMstrong 2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb 3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa 4. ClemenZa #1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Hue and crew will make their best evaluation at the QB they won't reach for one because of need. You made a good post, but we really don't know what they will do. This is the first go-around for these guys. One can't say w/any sense of objectivity if they will do a good job or a bad job. I worry that their inexperience will lead them to reaching for a qb that really isn't all that. We also know that it isn't Hue and his crew. Rather, it's Sashi and his crew, which Hue is a part of.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums The Archives 2016 NFL Season 2016 NFL Draft Quarterback Shopping
|
|