Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Originally Posted By: Milk Man
J/c...

Why do we (some, not all) root for the team to lose out so the Browns secure a top draft choice, but when the draft rolls around all of a sudden everyone wants to trade down?

Quantity over quality.

I'm against a trade down.



What quality have we picked? We have many holes, so factoring our history of whiffing picks and the amount of players we need - trade down seems the way to go. Acquire many players and weed out the crap instead of acquiring what you think is gold but is crap.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,427
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,427
We haven't picked quality. We've chosen quantity in the past. I won't hold past failed draft picks against this regime, however. I prefer quality vs quantity and just 'filling holes'.

We aren't winning for 3-4 years, so let's fill the holes with the best talent available.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
You're right, it's unfair for me to use the past mishaps and squandering of high picks against this new staff and new system.

If I felt even in the slightest of fashions we could burn a top pick and get a product worthwhile out of it - I'd be 100% on board.

Maybe we can =)

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,427
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,427
This article seems appropriate here. (Apologies for length)

The day the Browns passed on Big Ben

Jeremy Fowler
ESPN Staff Writer

"When Cleveland passed on me, technically my hometown team, that was it. I couldn't wait to have a team and play the Browns at some point."

-- Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, who is 19-2 in his career against Cleveland.

The most decorated quarterback jersey in Cleveland contains 24 names. The list could have stopped at six: Couch, Detmer, Wynn, Pederson, Holcomb, Roethlisberger.

The Browns should be drafting a playmaking safety or wide receiver for a playoff-caliber team instead of potentially the franchise's 25th starting quarterback since 1999. This reality made one longtime NFL coach nearly spill his craft beer just thinking about it at the NFL combine. He was with the Browns 12 years ago. He knew what happened in that draft room in Berea, Ohio, with the Browns on the clock with the No. 6 pick in the 2004 draft.

"He was right there," the NFL coach said. "Once Sean Taylor was off the board, everything got crazy. Ben was discussed."

Before Roethlisberger began to terrorize the Browns twice a year for more than a decade, he was a lanky kid from Findlay, Ohio, who would have gladly played for Cleveland. Why is the Browns' universe too cruel to let this happen? In talks with people involved with the process from all angles, ESPN examines the mechanics of how Roethlisberger never did put on the orange and brown, how the Steelers stumbled into a gem and what it says about the draft process.

The rain-soaked workout

Ryan Tollner, Roethlisberger's agent: "They were very secretive about it. They shot in and worked him out at Miami (Ohio). I don't believe they were at his pro day, where everyone walked away saying that was one of the best throwing sessions they'd ever seen."

Butch Davis, former Browns head coach and executive vice president, 2001-04: "Everybody recognized he was an enormous physical talent. There couldn't have been a worse day during his workout. It became apparent he could put on a show. It was cold, it was blustery, kind of drizzly, like every Sunday in that division. He threw it extremely well. I like working out guys because you can see firsthand what they can really do."

Ben Roethlisberger, Steelers quarterback: "I had other similar workouts, but I remember they brought receivers. The weather wasn't ideal but I liked showing teams I could perform well in bad weather. I felt good about how I did for them, but I guess it didn't matter."

Frisman Jackson, former Browns receiver, 2002-05: "Coach Davis and the rest of the staff, the GM and some other people said we want you to fly with us to work out this kid. I had no idea who it was. I realized we were in Ohio, and they said, we're going to work out Ben Roethlisberger. We got our cleats on and ran routes for him for about 30 to 45 minutes. We ran the whole route tree. Everything he was throwing was accurate, hitting you in stride. He put on a show. I told him, 'Your arm is strong as hell.' He threw a heavy ball."

The Browns were impressed enough that former Davis lieutenant Pete Garcia told Fox Sports Ohio in 2014 the team was "very, very close" to selecting Roethlisberger. But the quarterback was fighting the small-school stigma coming out of Miami (Ohio), which still fuels him today. The stigma was definitely a factor for Cleveland too. After three seasons and sporadic results under Davis, the Browns wanted a sure bet.

Shane Montgomery, former Miami (Ohio) offensive coordinator: "Once people got around him and saw him in person, his stock rose. He just kind of won everybody over [at his pro day]. He responded to pressure really well, and he could throw the ball from any angle. I know [then Packers coach Mike Sherman] loved him. He said he really wanted him but had no chance. He said that in our weight room."

Jackson: "He'd say, 'Run this route, get to this step, and I'm going to throw the football to you.' Everything was smooth. [Browns officials] were raving about him, saying how strong his arm was, how mobile he was in the pocket. I pretty much thought we were going to get him."


Mel Kiper, ESPN draft analyst: "I had Ben as my No. 5 overall player, Kellen Winslow No. 7 (rummages through notes from that year, starts reading reports). 'Browns could bring a young signal-caller into the fold. ... No denying his skills as a quarterback. There's an awful lot to be excited about. Teams will be impressed by his accuracy and mobility.' So, all three quarterbacks basically had the same grade. The small-school thing absolutely played against Ben. Some people were uneasy about those four interceptions against Iowa."

Matt Williamson, Browns scout, 2004: "That was before I arrived ... but I went back and read Ben's reports, all the reports each scout wrote on Ben, and they really liked him. Not positive on this, but I'm pretty sure the Browns had him ranked over Eli [Manning] and [Philip] Rivers."

Davis: "I guess we probably had them Philip 1, Ben 2, Eli 3 if I had to guess. That's totally off the top of my memory. All three had great qualities. I just know there were so many good feelings about Philip. We put Philip on the dry board and spent a good 3-4 hours absolutely dissecting everything, reading coverages and audibles and changing protections. It's easy to see why he had a great career."

The Browns' environment has swallowed up plenty of well-intentioned players. Largely, though, people close to the former Miami (Ohio) quarterback believe he was a can't-miss prospect for any team, a notion he has since validated.

Phil Savage, Baltimore Ravens director of player personnel, 2002-04 (and Cleveland's GM from 2005-08): "We had Roethlisberger rated ahead of those two [Manning and Rivers]. It might have been a mixed bag [leaguewide]. Some people had a problem to some extent getting past Philip's throwing motion. And with Ben, for some evaluators, you're a lot more comfortable when these players had gone through quality competition."

Carmen Policy, Browns CEO/president, 2000-04: "The one thing that seemed to always be on the forefront of all of their [scouts'] comments was, 'Yeah, he's a big guy, a strong guy, but will he get too big, and he comes from such a small system and such a small program, it's questionable whether or not he'll be able to compete in the NFL. I do recall those specific generalizations."

The Jeff Garcia/Philip Rivers effect

The story of Ben and the Browns runs deeper than a team simply preferring another player. It's a case study for the complexities of drafting a quarterback in the top 10, with factors that seem silly years later but weren't in the moment. The team signed Jeff Garcia that offseason as a buffer from the exhaustive Tim Couch experiment. The franchise faced transition at the top as then-CEO Carmen Policy had announced he would step down in May 2004. The Browns needed playmakers, and not just at quarterback.

Roethlisberger: "I just wanted a team to believe in me. I didn't expect to go first and I knew there could be a number of outcomes after that."

Davis: "Cleveland had made an enormous investment in Tim Couch years earlier. With the salary cap and the financials at the time, they wanted it to work with Tim Couch. It eventually became apparent we would need to make a change. We had been competitive, so we thought, who could be a potential stopgap for a year or two, an older, experienced veteran guy and a great mentor? That's when we signed Jeff Garcia [in March 2004]."

Williamson: "Butch was the head coach and was infatuated with both [Kellen] Winslow [Jr.] and [Sean] Taylor from the U. Winslow was unbelievably good, too, before his injuries. That draft class was loaded."

Tollner: "We went through the process that Cleveland could be a team drafting a quarterback. Oakland and Arizona were in a similar boat, but they had made pretty clear they didn't want to take a quarterback that high. The Browns never really showed their cards. You're at 6 and it seems to make so much sense. I believe there are certain can't-miss guys, and Ben was one of those guys who would have succeeded anywhere."

Policy: "If we had the opportunity, as I understand that, we would have definitely taken Philip Rivers over Ben Roethlisberger, based on the evaluations of the personnel department. I think that they felt ultimately Rivers wouldn't be there. If he did wind up there, I think we would have taken him. If I'm not mistaken, that was a draft-day effort [to trade up for Rivers]. I did hear that after the fact."

Former Giants general manager Ernie Accorsi wrote in his book "The GM" that the Browns offered a first- and second-round pick for New York's No. 4 pick. Accorsi was unavailable for comment. The way Policy remembers it, all the quarterback reports from team personnel emphasized Rivers, and the sentiment was Roethlisberger would be great value in the late-first or early-second round. That's surprising to hear on the surface, but the truth is scouting evaluations can vary wildly, a reality that deepens the draft intrigue every year.

So, there was Pittsburgh ...

Kevin Colbert, Steelers general manager: "We really didn't know [about Cleveland]. We just knew we had to wait until 11."

Kiper: "Quarterback wasn't a need area for [the Browns]. It just wasn't. They had six other needs before then. The demand wasn't there. They could have at that point said they weren't going after Jeff Garcia."

Policy: "We needed so much."

Jackson: "In the five years I was there, we had five or six guys starting at quarterback. If we had a guy everybody felt good about and be the guy for the next 10 years, it probably would have changed things in Cleveland. We had a really good defense."

Davis: "You want that first-round pick who will be a significant contributor. It can't just be a need pick. You want to get the best player. You just knew [Winslow] was a really good player and we really needed to try to get guys on offense that could help. We were struggling to score points. We needed offensive help quickly. We didn't have any tight ends on the team that would be a real threat. If [Winslow] hadn't gotten hurt, he was the kind of guy like Jimmy Graham, you can place him in different formations and personnel groupings. That would be a three-to-five-time Pro Bowl player."

Winslow, the Browns' first pick that year, wasn't exactly a bust. He finished his career with 469 catches and 5,236 yards in 10 seasons, including five injury-plagued years with Cleveland. Quarterback wasn't the proverbial '"need" that year. Davis was on the Dallas Cowboys staff in the early '90s, and Winslow was supposed to be his Jay Novacek.

Montgomery: "I knew his name was dancing around the Browns, and being an Ohio guy, Ben wouldn't have minded [being drafted by the Browns] at all. He lived closer to the Bengals, though. And [former Miami coach Terry Hoeppner] was convinced the Giants would take him. I think Ben thought that, too. That's where the buzz was, with the Giants."

Policy: "Some of our coaches especially liked [Roethlisberger] a lot. They thought he was tough, he's what Cleveland needed. He would fit the profile of the AFC North. The scouts and Butch Davis' chief personnel guy [Pete Garcia] really tried steering everybody away from Ben, almost putting him in the position where he's not our guy. He didn't have a shot. They made up their minds, he was coming from a less-than-sophisticated program, a smaller school, a program not nearly as competitive as a top-10 pick would be coming from, and that was their position, and they prevailed. Butch had final say. We are picking too high for him. That was the sentiment."

Draft day (and the aftermath)

An oversized figure sat inside Madison Square Garden wearing a three-button pinstripe suit, trying to play it cool with his group. His whole table was confused by the Eli Manning-Philip Rivers swap of top-four picks, considering the interest the Giants had shown. Everyone knew Buffalo at 12 was Roethlisberger's ceiling. But this kid grew up two hours from Cleveland. He played college ball four hours from Cleveland. The state's biggest university, Ohio State, viewed him mostly as a tight end. As if that weren't enough fuel, he watched the Manning name dominate the draft. Paul Tagliabue announced the pick for Cleveland: Kellen Winslow, tight end, University of Miami. Roethlisberger had his own private announcement. He told his agent the team would regret the decision.

Roethlisberger: "Two quarterbacks had already been picked, so as a competitor, I felt underestimated. When Cleveland passed on me, technically my hometown team, that was it. I couldn't wait to have a team and play the Browns at some point. Funny how it works out I'd go to Pittsburgh and play them twice a year."

Jackson: "I remember being at a draft party at Cleveland Browns Stadium, and when we drafted Kellen, there was shock. I remember the fans moaning a little bit with the expectations we were getting a quarterback. That was the expectation -- Jeff would be here 1-2 years, groom a new guy for the future, and the new guy would take the Browns to the Super Bowl."

Tollner: "We believe either Ernie [Accorsi] or Tom Coughlin had told Terry they would take Ben at [No.] 4 if they couldn't get the trade done. So, when they announced there had been a trade, we prepared Ben [and told him] that things could take a while. Then, quietly, once he passed Cleveland, we were sort of in disbelief. If they did their due diligence, they had this kid from Northwest Ohio, they played in the state of Ohio in college, his pro day was lights out, he was a prototypical guy with unusual athleticism."

Davis: "I can't remember [what happened in the draft room], but it was never chaotic or anything. We spent an awful lot of time planning that. There was a concert of people who made their opinions known as to, 'this is what we want to try to do.' ... As much as we fell in love with different quarterbacks, financially, I don't know if we could have pulled it off. We thought let's keep trying to work with [Couch] and Jeff."

Policy: "[The sentiment was] if [Roethlisberger] goes to the second round or the bottom of the first, fine."

Mike Mularkey, former Buffalo Bills head coach: "We were going to take him at 12. Thanks for reminding me."

Colbert: "We couldn't trade up because we knew the cost to trade up was very expensive. ... Tommy Maddox was coming off a pretty good season, and we were looking to shore up our offensive line. If we had the opportunity to add a young quarterback, because Tommy was a little bit older, we were going to do that."

You know the story by now: The Steelers drafted Roethlisberger at No. 11 and are still reaping the benefits. Two Super Bowls later, Roethlisberger, 34, is widely considered a top-three-to-five quarterback in today's NFL. Roethlisberger is 19-2 against the Browns, but that's not the worst of it. Roethlisberger has 5,323 career passing yards against Cleveland. Of the Browns' 20 quarterbacks since that draft, Derek Anderson is the only one to surpass that yardage total in a Browns jersey.

Kiper: "Jeff Garcia was the reason they didn't draft Ben Roethlisberger. History could have been rewritten."

Roethlisberger: "My hometown has always been predominantly Browns fans. When the Steelers picked me, some converted and some refused. As a young guy, it bothered me some. I was very motivated by people who supported me and people who didn't."

Davis: "In retrospect, obviously it would have been a wise decision on our part to take a Rivers or a Roethlisberger. You keep building with pieces, and you feel hopefully, eventually, you'll get the right quarterback. ... I think everybody's come to the realization that you can't coach around the quarterback. They've all got one."

Colbert: "Coach [Bill] Cowher unselfishly made the statement that, for the sake of the organization, if a quarterback is available, we should give it serious thought. Was that the most immediate need? No, because we didn't plan on Ben playing his rookie year. ... Tommy [Maddox] gets hurt in the first game, the rest was history."

Montgomery: "[The Browns] could have used him. Maybe they wouldn't be on the 20th-something quarterback since then."

Roethlisberger: "In my earlier years, I thought about it every time I played them. It served me well. Now, I just want to beat them twice a year because my team needs it."

Sometimes, scouting quarterbacks can be very simple ...

Savage: "Legendary scout Ernie Plank ... introduced the 49ers to [Joe] Montana, and his territory included some AFC North spots. [Plank] scouted Miami (Ohio) one day and saw a freshman and said, 'Boy, we're going to have a quarterback at Miami.' That was at least two years in advance before Roethlisberger was a known NFL prospect. Nobody could even pronounce his name at that point."

Article

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,711
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,711
Originally Posted By: Milk Man
J/c...

Why do we (some, not all) root for the team to lose out so the Browns secure a top draft choice, but when the draft rolls around all of a sudden everyone wants to trade down?

Quantity over quality.

I'm against a trade down.



The 1st pick has the highest value, if you can trade it like Tennessee did you can get even more value.

We need both quality and quantity.

The problem with the top of the Draft is you don't actually know the quality. You only have the perceived quality. For every Andrew Luck, you have Jamarcus Russell and Tim Couch caliber group of players. If you take one of those QBs at the top when you could have had JJ Watt and more at 11, which is the better outcome?

It comes down to picking the right players at the right time.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,587
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,587

Failure to identify talent in the first round should be unacceptable. You are talking about the top 32 players in the country.

You have a massive budget to find players. You have technology and your disposal.

If your GM can not find talent in the first round you have the wrong person.

You can miss on other positions just like you can miss on QB's. See Justin Gilbert or Trent Richardson.

Quantity is only good when your organization has proven it can find talent all through the draft.

The Browns have traded back before. It didn't work out.

The Browns need impact players. If you can not find them at pick 2 and 31; we have the wrong people making the decision.

Even as bad as the Browns have been how often have we picked second?

We need a quarterback. End of story.

If the Browns don't like the quarterback that is there at two then it is a different story. If they like the QB there it would be foolish to trade down.

Let's get one pick right.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,128
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,128
Quote:
#Eagles have agreed to a trade with the Cleveland Browns to acquire the second-overall pick in the 2016 NFL Draft.

https://twitter.com/Eagles/status/722843520655040516


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie
Quote:
#Eagles have agreed to a trade with the Cleveland Browns to acquire the second-overall pick in the 2016 NFL Draft.

https://twitter.com/Eagles/status/722843520655040516


If it's what was outlined, then Hell yeah!

thumbsup

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,711
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,711
Future 1st and a future 2nd. For 6 spots. I'll take it.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,128
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,128


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,427
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,427
We win on paper again!!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
1) Why make this trade now when we don't know who the Rams will take?

2) Why make this trade now when we could really drive up the bidding for it on draft day?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie


#moneyball


Cleveland Browns, Space Browns
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,128
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,128
Originally Posted By: ExclDawg
1) Why make this trade now when we don't know who the Rams will take?

2) Why make this trade now when we could really drive up the bidding for it on draft day?


I thought the Browns should wait until draft day but I'm not upset at all by this haul. This is HUGE.

To answer your questions:

1. I'm pretty sure everyone in the NFL knows who LA is taking.

2. Maybe no one was offering anything close to this?

What really scares me about this is teams now processing who Cleveland may want and moving up if necessary. Still this was a big haul IMO.

E. Elliot anyone? Treadwell? Buckner?


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Let's hope for an 0-16, 1-15 or 2-14 year from the Eagles this year!


If it's not Chaos, it's not Cleveland.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Done deal, Good deal I look for another trade down with Tennessee ... JMHO


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
Seemed like it was inevitable. This group seems to think RG3 is the answer. They better be right. He sure didn't impress me in Washington.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Seemed like it was inevitable. This group seems to think RG3 is the answer. They better be right. He sure didn't impress me in Washington.


Spiritbro I say IF and I do mean IF we trade down again look for us to take Paxton Lynch ... JMHO


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
Originally Posted By: DaveyD
Let's hope for an 0-16, 1-15 or 2-14 year from the Eagles this year!


More like hope we go 0-16. Or we will pass on a QB again next year. Unless we have the first pick in the draft these guys will never take a QB.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
Originally Posted By: PastorMarc
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Seemed like it was inevitable. This group seems to think RG3 is the answer. They better be right. He sure didn't impress me in Washington.


Spiritbro I say IF and I do mean IF we trade down again look for us to take Paxton Lynch ... JMHO


If they want Lynch they better take him at 8. You try to get cute and move down and someone will leap frog us and take him ahead of us.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie

To answer your questions:

1. I'm pretty sure everyone in the NFL knows who LA is taking.


I'm not so sure. Even the media seems to flip their "inside source" news every couple of hours.

Quote:
2. Maybe no one was offering anything close to this?

What really scares me about this is teams now processing who Cleveland may want and moving up if necessary. Still this was a big haul IMO.


I agree it was a decent haul, but who knows how much more we might of got if we had waited it out? Maybe Philly was threatening to pull their offer? (or likely bluffing to do so)

It just seems a little premature to do this deal now considering what might happen on draft day. The QB everyone expected LA to take doesn't go #1? The Niners catch wind that the Eagles will make this trade and offer more? The guy the Browns are targeting at #8 fails a drug test?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Originally Posted By: PastorMarc
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Seemed like it was inevitable. This group seems to think RG3 is the answer. They better be right. He sure didn't impress me in Washington.


Spiritbro I say IF and I do mean IF we trade down again look for us to take Paxton Lynch ... JMHO


If they want Lynch they better take him at 8. You try to get cute and move down and someone will leap frog us and take him ahead of us.


Very possible ... But I think this front Office wants even more picks regardless ... JMHO


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Originally Posted By: ExclDawg
1) Why make this trade now when we don't know who the Rams will take?

2) Why make this trade now when we could really drive up the bidding for it on draft day?


To me, this indicates that the Browns weren't taking a QB at #2 unless they are ABSOLUTELY certain of who the Rams are taking. I don't like the move because RG3 and McCown are both broken QBs and won't last the season. This stinks to high heaven of another ego driven decision in Berea (Jackson believing he can revive RG3's career). The only hope is that the new crew in the draft room can actually identify talent. Having more draft picks and passing on talent hasn't really worked in the past. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt until they prove otherwise. Bad move IMO. Stay tuned.


After 55 years, I'm walking away from this dumpster fire. Good luck to everyone who continues to hang on. You'll need it.
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Seemed like it was inevitable. This group seems to think RG3 is the answer. They better be right. He sure didn't impress me in Washington.


He couldn't beat out Kirk Cousins. Moving back and passing on either QB is a mistake to me. JMO


After 55 years, I'm walking away from this dumpster fire. Good luck to everyone who continues to hang on. You'll need it.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
Originally Posted By: PastorMarc
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Originally Posted By: PastorMarc
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Seemed like it was inevitable. This group seems to think RG3 is the answer. They better be right. He sure didn't impress me in Washington.


Spiritbro I say IF and I do mean IF we trade down again look for us to take Paxton Lynch ... JMHO


If they want Lynch they better take him at 8. You try to get cute and move down and someone will leap frog us and take him ahead of us.


Very possible ... But I think this front Office wants even more picks regardless ... JMHO



Yep. Here's hoping they move out of the first all together. Trade #8 and #32 for a bunch of late round picks. That would be sweet. Sure don't want anyone in the top ten. That would SUCK. We need a lot of average Joes. We sure as hell don't want a top five player at any position. We'd have to PAY him. Can't have that.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,483
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,483
I wanted the Browns to stay in the top 10 if they traded down and the Eagles had the # 8 pick. So I'm happy with the haul. I would have preferred more picks this year, with fewer future picks.. but overall I think this is a good trade.


The Cleveland Browns - WE KNOW QUARTERBACKS ( Look at how many we've had ... )
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Yep. Here's hoping they move out of the first all together. Trade #8 and #32 for a bunch of late round picks. That would be sweet. Sure don't want anyone in the top ten. That would SUCK. We need a lot of average Joes. We sure as hell don't want a top five player at any position. We'd have to PAY him. Can't have that.


If the Browns trade out of the first round, I am done. Stockpiling a bunch of scrubs doesn't make a team better. At some point, you actually have to have talent to win. SMH


After 55 years, I'm walking away from this dumpster fire. Good luck to everyone who continues to hang on. You'll need it.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,916
I will laugh my ass off if Wentz goes to the Eagles at #2 and turns out to be the next tiny ben. That would be funny.

We have to stay at #8. We can still get a decent player there. I hope it's Elliot. With no QB we sure as hell could use a run game. We don't have one now.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Yeah, I'd be pretty happy with Zeke too.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
I support making the deal now. Now, our entire drafting force can focus on our new picks and new potential trade talks.


What doesn't make sense is why "they" did it, unless they were 50/50 on Goff or Wentz and would be happy with either or.

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 595
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 595
This is a great move. I can't believe we stayed in the top 10 and got that many picks...


Last in, first out, the sign of a true champion!
[Linked Image from i301.photobucket.com]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,887
H
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,887
It is a good move but only if we make good choices with all these picks. It's about time for us to make the right moves. thumbsup

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 595
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 595
Originally Posted By: Homewood Dog
It is a good move but only if we make good choices with all these picks. It's about time for us to make the right moves. thumbsup


You're right, we still have to make the correct picks.


Last in, first out, the sign of a true champion!
[Linked Image from i301.photobucket.com]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,191
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,191
Quote:
But I think this front Office wants even more picks regardless



Yup we'll be getting the best mediocre players available. Nothing new.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
We are starting over, we have a new FO and they want to build through the draft soooo they want more picks to do so, makes since to me, I understand the negative thoughts the way things have been but hey maybe things will change for better ... give these guys a chance ...


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,853
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,853
I say the pro to getting the trade done now.. they can prepare for the draft with more certainty, versus what ifs..


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
Originally Posted By: candyman92
Yeah, I'd be pretty happy with Zeke too.


After just watching some of his cut ups: count me in and I normally dislike taking a RB this high, but Zeke is the total package


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Believe me, I hate drafting running backs high, but he's a complete player. He's like Leveon Bell, but not as fluid an athlete.

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
I will laugh my ass off if Wentz goes to the Eagles at #2 and turns out to be the next tiny ben. That would be funny.

We have to stay at #8. We can still get a decent player there. I hope it's Elliot. With no QB we sure as hell could use a run game. We don't have one now.


Even though Dallas needs a QB of the future and help on defense (pass rusher) I can see them taking Zeke at #4. Looks like a WR at #8. Wouldn't be awful.


After 55 years, I'm walking away from this dumpster fire. Good luck to everyone who continues to hang on. You'll need it.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,191
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,191
Originally Posted By: The Beast
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
I will laugh my ass off if Wentz goes to the Eagles at #2 and turns out to be the next tiny ben. That would be funny.

We have to stay at #8. We can still get a decent player there. I hope it's Elliot. With no QB we sure as hell could use a run game. We don't have one now.


Even though Dallas needs a QB of the future and help on defense (pass rusher) I can see them taking Zeke at #4. Looks like a WR at #8. Wouldn't be awful.


Might as well pick up a olinemen at 8 and DE at 32. Until we have that franchise QB, an elite play maker on this offense is a wasted pick.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2016 NFL Season 2016 NFL Draft Trading the #2 pick

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5