Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 11
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,190
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,190

We can dance all around the draft but the reality is the quarterback position has to be solved.

Garrett may be a great player. Elite pass rushers are key to any defense.

The Browns have a large amount of cap space. We also have a large number of draft picks.

The time to address the quarterback position is now.

Everybody says this draft is a bad year for quarterbacks. Sure there is no clear stand out number one quarterback. At the same time plenty of people were not real high on Wentz last year. And nobody saw Dak Prescott coming.

This draft may have a guy. In addition Garoppolo can be had.

We can't count on future drafts like 2018 and beyond. That is like saying: I can't go anywhere until all the traffic lights are green. There are no guaranteed drafts.

Hue knows he has to find an answer to the quarterback position and this is the year.

We have the assets to upgrade the team at a number of positions. But the Browns will accomplish zero if they can not find a quarterback to lead this team.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Drafting a QB in the first round because you need a QB is how you end up with Christian Ponders, and Branden Weedens.

Imagine drafting them at #1.

QBs already get over drafted. Don't make it worse.

Last edited by ThatGuy; 01/31/17 08:27 PM.

Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,190
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,190

I get what you are saying.

I am not saying reach for a guy. I am saying find a guy you believe can lead the team.

If that is Garoppolo. Go get him.

If they really like Kizer, Watson or Trubisky then draft him.

If they don't like the top three in the draft then look at Mahomes, or Chad Kelly and trade for Garopoolo as well.

Every choice made on a quarterback involves risk. That does not mean you don't take a chance.

Hue knows the mission. It remains to be seen if he can get it right.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
#1 Garret
#12 Trade up for Hooker
#33 Garrapolo

Add in 2-3 solid FAs, not too mention the rest of our mid round picks.. and I think you'll see a significant jump next year, not to mention the following..

The crazy thing? It's totally doable.


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
Drafting a QB in the first round because you need a QB is how you end up with Christian Ponders, and Branden Weedens.

Imagine drafting them at #1.

QBs already get over drafted. Don't make it worse.


Agreed...another fail on a first round QB will set this team back once more...Those guys were known to be 3-4th round talents...whom sailed to round 1 for teams needy of a QB...boom...recipe for disaster...We can't afford to keep doing this

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
I think before that was Bruce Smith...if Garrett turns out like Bruce Smith...No brainer the other two...ehhh.


I am not a big comparison guy, but since you brought his name up.......Bruce Smith is the guy that Garrett reminds me of. I am NOT saying he will be as good as Smith, because that dude is one of the best to ever play.

I am just talking about explosion, suddeness, moves, lean, angles, etc

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
bone, I respect your opinions, but I gotta agree w/ThatGuy. I don't see a qb in this draft worth taking w/the first overall pick. I could be wrong. Just voicing my opinion.

I also have a problem w/drafting that qb because we will be married to him for 3 years. That could be a disaster.

I think Garrett is a true stud and the best player in the draft. Trust your board and take the man.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I think Garrett is a true stud and the best player in the draft. Trust your board and take the man.


Can say I disagree with you there.

It's not like there's a Jameis Winston or Andrew Luck this year. I don't see any clear cut high level QB prospect at all.


Garrett is a player worthy of the number 1 overall pick. It's a no-brainer. With the information we have now, you take Garrett and don't look back


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: bonefish
I am not saying reach for a guy. I am saying find a guy you believe can lead the team.


What if that guy does not exist?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Sometimes communication is a little off on a message board. Clowny was a ??? cause its just one year. We have to see his success year after year. Too early for me to judge him correctly.

Note Overall #1 pick not a QB should be a HOFer. If not then they did not reach their expectations. Since 2000 only 5 none QBs have been picked #1 and that would be 2000 with us taking Brown.


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
#1 Garret
#12 Trade up for Hooker
#33 Garrapolo

Add in 2-3 solid FAs, not too mention the rest of our mid round picks.. and I think you'll see a significant jump next year, not to mention the following..

The crazy thing? It's totally doable.


No need to move up for Hooker...he is having surgery and won't be available till July???

Bonefish...I agree we need that QB. Its the beginning of February. QBs are slotted much later this time of year. You don't know who is going to impress the Scouts and coaches with all the Evaluating still to come.

What I don't like is in many Mocks...Trubisky and Kizer go #2 and #3...These aren't Christian Ponders or Weedens of past drafts.

We will see I really, really like Garrett but if we go for the QB early I would not be angry. Of course the deal breaker is for said QB to be a bonafide Franchise QB.

I got a feeling we will go Garrett and Watson. Again this time last year all were saying Watson would be overall #1.

Of course the big money is on Garrett but I don't wish us to make that decision due to perception...I want us to do it cause we know he is Special!!

Oh and DePodesta was in sit back mode in decisions last season. Yes he provided DATA wherever possible. I am curious how this year goes with him more involved!

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,190
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,190

Then a flyer on someone later in the draft.

I can not see a scenario where we do nothing.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
If we didn't take Bosa, Ramsey or Buckner last year, why would we take Garret?

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
If we didn't take Bosa, Ramsey or Buckner last year, why would we take Garret?


Because we traded down and didn't have a shot at them.

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,310
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,310
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
If we didn't take Bosa, Ramsey or Buckner last year, why would we take Garret?


There isn't a QB worth trading up for this year, so we won't see the future firsts to tempt us down?


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Watson is much better than any of the QB's last year. This draft class is much better, IMHO.

People always downplay the QB class, don't know why.

Remember Bridgwater and Carr, Carson Wentz last year

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
If we didn't take Bosa, Ramsey or Buckner last year, why would we take Garret?


Because we traded down and didn't have a shot at them.


And that's what we are going to do this year. Trade down and get some picks and an average CB...

Last year we had 3 impact players on O and 3 impact players on D, any of them good #1 picks, and we traded down.

This year is the same scenario, roughly 3 impact players both on O and on D.

Good teams that can get a shot at any of this 6 players, will propose a trade. They know impact players are hard to find, much harder then midle draft picks.

Last edited by rastanplan; 02/01/17 03:10 PM.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
No one is going to trade as much as we got last year for a non-QB.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
There is always at least 1 team or more that will covet 1 or more QB's in every draft ... JMHO superconfused


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: PastorMarc
There is always at least 1 team or more that will covet 1 or more QB's in every draft ... JMHO superconfused


Are they willing to trade up to get him?

Since 1999 there have been five drafts where a QB didn't go #1 overall (2000 - Courtney Brown, 2006 - Mario Williams, 2008 - Jake Long, 2013 - Eric Fisher, and 2014 - Jadeveon Clowney).

In the other 13 drafts where QBs were selected (Couch, Vick, Carr, Palmer, Manning, Smith, Russell, Stafford, Bradford, Newton, Luck, Winston, and Goff). Of those 13, teams only traded up for three Vick, Manning (because he forced a trade), and Goff.

Furthermore, at this point usually a first overall QB has already been identified. That is not the case.

This is a year without a #1 QB.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
We will see ...


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Wow what is sad is only Clowney from the non QB list isn't deemed a bust, but he was before this year....lol. The bust rate on the QBs is actually much lower, but I just don't see a guy imo who is comparable talent wise to any on this list. A guy like Tribisky could be because of the upside, but man what a gamble that is

I really am hoping for Jimmy G trade and then we are done talking QBs for awhile


Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,310
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,310
When was Mario Williams considered a bust? He hasn't lived up to his later contracts perhaps, but he "earned" the big first post-rookie contract.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Originally Posted By: GrimmBrown
When was Mario Williams considered a bust? He hasn't lived up to his later contracts perhaps, but he "earned" the big first post-rookie contract.


He did great in Buffalo until his last season there. Then he didn't do much this season. I can't see how anyone would call him a bust.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
As a number one pick worthy??? Yeah I would call him a bust. He was never considered a top 5 guy at DE and he was a number one pick. He wasn't a bad player but he certainly didn't prove to be worth the number one draft pick.

Last edited by BigWillieStyle; 02/01/17 05:38 PM.

Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Dude had 96 sacks over 10 years.

That includes transitioning from 43 DE to 34 OLB like halfway through his career.

He may not be a HOF. But he is nowhere near a bust.


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
Dude had 96 sacks over 10 years.

That includes transitioning from 43 DE to 34 OLB like halfway through his career.

He may not be a HOF. But he is nowhere near a bust.


He's #34 on the all-time list. That's playing in a 3-4 AND a 4-3 for two different teams, then playing in a 4-3 on a third team. At least 5 different defensive schemes in 10 seasons.

He's played the same number of seasons tha tJevon Kearse played. And has 23.5 more sacks.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/sacks_career.htm

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
If we didn't take Bosa, Ramsey or Buckner last year, why would we take Garret?


If we didn't take Goff or Wentz last year, why would we take any of the non-#1-pick-worthy QBs coming out this year?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: clevesteve
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
Dude had 96 sacks over 10 years.

That includes transitioning from 43 DE to 34 OLB like halfway through his career.

He may not be a HOF. But he is nowhere near a bust.


He's #34 on the all-time list. That's playing in a 3-4 AND a 4-3 for two different teams, then playing in a 4-3 on a third team. At least 5 different defensive schemes in 10 seasons.

He's played the same number of seasons tha tJevon Kearse played. And has 23.5 more sacks.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/sacks_career.htm

He also played his first 6 seasons in Houston, who was a perpetual 7 or 8 win team and had a defense always ranked in the mid 20s... He wasn't getting a lot of help. He's been to 3 pro bowls and 1 first team all pro selection....

If he had been drafted by the Steelers or Patriots, he would be a HoF candidate..


yebat' Putin
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Originally Posted By: ExclDawg
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
If we didn't take Bosa, Ramsey or Buckner last year, why would we take Garret?


If we didn't take Goff or Wentz last year, why would we take any of the non-#1-pick-worthy QBs coming out this year?


I've been holding to that logic too.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Is Mario Williams playing for the team that drafted him?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
lots of players don't play their whole career on the teams that drafted them....does not make them busts, it that's what you're implying.


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: FL_Dawg
Originally Posted By: ExclDawg
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
If we didn't take Bosa, Ramsey or Buckner last year, why would we take Garret?


If we didn't take Goff or Wentz last year, why would we take any of the non-#1-pick-worthy QBs coming out this year?


I've been holding to that logic too.



But I'm almost sure we won't draft a QB either.

My bet is that. this year we trade down, draft an average CB and a lot of cannon fodder and some picks for next years draft.

And use some of this picks to trade for JG.

Allways expect the unexpected from the Browns.

Last edited by rastanplan; 02/02/17 08:36 AM.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Is Mario Williams playing for the team that drafted him?


No.

Is Drew Brees?

Did Reggie White?


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Is Mario Williams playing for the team that drafted him?


Not sure what you're getting at here... Texans had a terrible cap situation the year Williams hit free agency, a year after they kept him at north of a $13 million cap hit. The Bills payed him big money that the Texans couldn't.

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/houston-texans/cap/2012/

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Is Mario Williams playing for the team that drafted him?

Not sure why that's important but no.. he got hurt in 2010 and missed the last few games.. in 2011 they actually moved him from DE to OLB and he got hurt again and only played in about half the games.

I don't think the Texans worked very hard to keep him when he became a FA..


yebat' Putin
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
Originally Posted By: FL_Dawg
Originally Posted By: ExclDawg
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
If we didn't take Bosa, Ramsey or Buckner last year, why would we take Garret?


If we didn't take Goff or Wentz last year, why would we take any of the non-#1-pick-worthy QBs coming out this year?


I've been holding to that logic too.



But I'm almost sure we won't draft a QB either.

My bet is that. this year we trade down, draft an average CB and a lot of cannon fodder and some picks for next years draft.

And use some of this picks to trade for JG.

Allways expect the unexpected from the Browns.


I agree with your last point. Nobody really knows what to expect. Logical inference would exclude a QB with the 1st selection, because they passed on Wentz, who I believe to be a better option than any QB prospect in this years draft, but who really knows?


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:
Logical inference would exclude a QB with the 1st selection, because they passed on Wentz,

Or maybe the logical inference is that since they passed on Wentz, and got a lot of crap for it when Wentz started out hot, that they will overreact to ensure they don't get accused of that again.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
My only point is that he ended up not being a good pick for the Texans because he no longer plays for them and they didn't receive any compensation for him.

I would imagine that isn't what they had in mind when they drafted him so high.

I am not making a big deal about this, but three of you had to challenge my statement...LOL...I didn't think it was that outrageous. Certainly not as crazy as a few posters arguing demonstratively that NFL QBs can significantly improve their arm strength. laugh

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I am not making a big deal about this, but three of you had to challenge my statement...LOL...I didn't think it was that outrageous.
Well, yeah, we were the ones telling BWS that he was wrong calling Williams a bust. You seemed to be stating that his not being on their team anymore was evidence towards him being a bust.
Quote:
Certainly not as crazy as a few posters arguing demonstratively that NFL QBs can significantly improve their arm strength. laugh
I don't know much about that, so while I've read it, I've kept quiet on it.

Page 4 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 11
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2017 NFL Season 2017 NFL Draft Myles Garrett Discussion

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5