DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2017 NFL Season 2017 NFL Draft Film Breakdown: Mitch Trubisky

I don't care if he's worth it.

If that is the direction they go, QB at #1.

Then he and the Coaching staff better be here his entire Rookie contract.

I don't care if everyone sucks.

At least we can say we tried for once.

Myles Garrett.
We gotta get that guy.

Every time I see this thread bumped I get excited that people actually going to talk football talk about the plays from some game break down some of the x's and o's dot dot dot dot dot everytime I Come Away disappointed

Repeating the same ideas and expecting different results.

How very Browns of you.

I actually agree with that even if it sounds stupid. These guys get to ride the glory if he makes it, or they get to sleep in that uncomfortable bed for 4 years.

This could all be posturing to get the Bears or Niners to trade up to take Mitch, and we are still in position to get either Garrett or Allen.

To help this along, we don't have to demand a gold mine of picks. Say this years 2nd. That's it. Then we have enough picks to trade up from 12 to get the guy I think Hue really likes, D. Watson.

The Titans want to trade down from 5. Seems we could move to their spot with out 12th selection and whatever else it might take. It's not like we don't have picks to offer, both this year and next.

did you mean to address that post to yourself? After all this is the X's and O's film breakdown thread. But thanks anyway for trolling

It was a joke. I'm sure that all he meant was an ironic joke.

As with just about any thread, once the original specific topic has been exhausted, the thread becomes a catch-all for any discussion about that topic generally.

Maybe I am missing the context, did this clown really ask to be called Mitchell? lmao you have earned nothing MITCH

It's his name.

Yes it is.. He also told Mooch that Mitch was fine as well. Coach had him on the white board today and had him wear a Browns helmet. Lmao. He took it all in good spirit.. He looked pretty good in it actually.....

Right I'm sure Matt Ryan told people to call him Mathew when he came out, Tom Brady told people to call him Thomas. Don't be daft.

If he prefers to be called Mitchell, I don't see a problem with that. I'm glad we have so little to complain about as Browns fan.

I know a guy named Ray who doesn't like Raymond, another guy who grew up as a Johnny but now wants to be called John.
Not a biggie.

Just like with the Myles Garret thing, it's a maturity issue. Who gives a [censored] if people call you Mitch. Really? If I was about to make 20 million dollars you could call me idiot and I wouldn't care.
I don't like premadonnas and MITCH isn't even close to having the prospect clout to get away with it.

If the worst thing about him is that he wants to be called by his proper name ... well ... that's really not bad at a

I write my full name what I sign up for classes or volunteer work. Initially they call me "Christopher", and no one makes a fuss when I ask them to call me "Chris". I am sure that if I wanted to be called Christopher, and I wrote "Christopher" as my name, then it would not be out of line to ask that I be called by that name either.

Man, no wonder so many people dislikes Mitchell Schwartz.

*LOL* ... there's that "keep your eyes on the bouncing ball thing" ...

U know lamp .. I think Niner fans would have been just fine calling someone Joseph if that's what he wanted ...

Who cares. People get to choose what they want people to call them.

I think I'll call him Mtrub.

I just watched the Stanford game ... if u wanna watch it and break it down let me know ... I'll go first ...

He does lock his front leg on throws down the middle ... couldn't tell if he did it on throws,tomhis right ... he's fine on throws to his left ...

I have more film to watch on both of them ... the more I watch of MITCH the more comfie I am with him at #1 ...

I may even end up preferring him by April ... depends on the rest of the film I watch on both of them ... for me ... this has moved from no-brainer territory ...

I'm up for discussing the game, I'm proly not gonna do write out a full breakdown though. I'll keep it in my head as always but its too much work to write out the breakdown when its just us that even bothers to watch the all the plays lol

“Trubisky is polished, even though he’s only [started one season at North Carolina], which bothers me. But even though he’s only [started] one year, you can see the quick feet. Three step, five step, ball comes out. Quick feet, quick release and accurate. I really like him.”--Mayock

http://www.ohio.com/sports/browns/browns...k-says-1.751375

I wonder why Trub could not beat out Marquise Williams?

While Williams isn't necessarily a high level NFL prospect, he was considered a very good college QB. I know it was a close competition two years ago, and they might have gone with what they knew instead of what they didn't.

Maybe had to do with the offense that UNC was running and hte personnel in it? Just some ideas.


When Conn played UNC a couple years ago, the commentators kept on raving about Williams. I wasn't overly impressed, but the ESPN folks seemed to love him

Isn't Williams a lot more mobile - a scrambling QB which is so "sought after" by college teams nowadays??? I am pretty sure I heard that as one of the possible reasons.

I think experience was the key factor. However......just think about it for a moment.

And people wanna draft him w/the first overall pick?????

Lots of possible reasons, many were already mentioned.

Is the UNC head coach any good?Perhaps he just isn't very good at judging talent?
Willie Parker barely played for his college team.
Kizer didn't come into this year as the starter at ND, why is noone asking why he couldn't beat out Zaire?

Sorry Ed, but that's not my strength. I'm simply a journeyman, not a technician...

Any film study of the guy must be that we feel he will drop to #12.

On the contrary. Film breakdown is the goal in and of itself. No agenda. No bias.

Hypothesizing or soeculating where he might be drafted isn't film breakdown.

True, but film study does help to establish potential which cascades into building your "big board"...

And that speculation or draft board ranking convo can be done in any number of threads that aren't film breakdown threads.

but it doesnt matter, film breakdown is dead, afterall why discuss the actual plays lol

Yes, we are diverging from the intent of the thread...

Maybe because no one is suggesting that the Browns pass on Garrett for Kizer.

And are you suggesting my question was lame? Seriously?

....sigh.

And he's back...

Back? Nah, I've always been here. I just don't know why your ass has to get chapped when someone responds to something that you asked.

Relax. It's their opinion and no one said your question was lame. People just answered it. That's all. I'd suggest stopping the need to immediately go towards unnecessary, aggressive commentary when someone provides a legitimate response.

No one cares about your suggestions. Crawl back to your hole.