Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
A
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
The #Browns are signing WR Kenny Britt, source said (as @caplannfl reported). 4 years, $32.5M.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Bring Pryor back as well.

Trade for Jimmy G.

Not a bad offense.


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
If this means we don't sign Pryor, then this is a horrible, horrible signing and we are doomed (not joking).

If we re-sign Pryor, Britt is a very legit second or third receiver and we got him for [relatively] cheap.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
Bring Pryor back as well.

Trade for Jimmy G.

Not a bad offense.


That is not going to happen if this is true...Pryor is gone.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
I don't think this shuts the door on Pryor.

Coleman, Britt and TP would be a decent WR core.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
I've said it before...don't know why...but Cleveland front office would rather sign some other teams leftovers than pay their own players.

...they've done it again...



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
If this means we don't sign Pryor, then this is a horrible, horrible signing and we are doomed (not joking).

If we re-sign Pryor, Britt is a very legit second or third receiver and we got him for [relatively] cheap.


Okay I'll bite.....Why is this a horrible signing? I think Coleman is our #1 and both Britt and Pryor would be #2 and #3.
I just think Pryor is still to new to be our #1.


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739
Lmao I called this a few days ago on the board

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: bleednbrown
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
If this means we don't sign Pryor, then this is a horrible, horrible signing and we are doomed (not joking).

If we re-sign Pryor, Britt is a very legit second or third receiver and we got him for [relatively] cheap.


Okay I'll bite.....Why is this a horrible signing? I think Coleman is our #1 and both Britt and Pryor would be #2 and #3.
I just think Pryor is still to new to be our #1.


Read what I wrote again.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
BLAHHHH


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted By: mac
I've said it before...don't know why...but [color:#FF0000]Cleveland front office would rather sign some other teams leftovers than pay their own players.

...they've done it again...

[/color]


Nothing could be further from the truth. Did Pryor sign for 8.5 mil? Or did he bulk at 8-9 mil? Rumor had it that he wanted 12-13 mil. Should we just pay our FA's what ever they want? This is a two way street, if he does not budge for under 12 then what? See ya!


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
Originally Posted By: bleednbrown
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
If this means we don't sign Pryor, then this is a horrible, horrible signing and we are doomed (not joking).

If we re-sign Pryor, Britt is a very legit second or third receiver and we got him for [relatively] cheap.


Okay I'll bite.....Why is this a horrible signing? I think Coleman is our #1 and both Britt and Pryor would be #2 and #3.
I just think Pryor is still to new to be our #1.


We just found out how much power Hue Jackson has within this franchise...ANALYTICS AND CHEAP, CHEAP RULE IN CLEVELAND.

The Havard boys did not want their draft pick over shadowed by a better wr...so they went out and got a guy with miles on his legs who fill the #2 or #3 wr position.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
How do you place Coleman as the number 1 WR over either of those guys? Seriously?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
Bring Pryor back as well.

Trade for Jimmy G.

Not a bad offense.


Please let it go about Jimmy G ... superconfused


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
blush
Okay I get it now. Sorry


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: mac
The Havard boys did not want their draft pick over shadowed by a better wr...so they went out and got a guy with miles on his legs who fill the #2 or #3 wr position.


This is legit crazy person talk.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
If the Browns sign Britt, keep Pryor, and trade for Jimmy G.....man, we could have a pretty darn good offense. angel

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
If this means we don't sign Pryor, then this is a horrible, horrible signing and we are doomed (not joking).



rofl


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,554
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,554
JC

I don't think the news about Britt means Pryor can't still sign here. There is room for Pryor, Britt, and Coleman.

But, it does help provide insurance if Pryor decides to sign elsewhere.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
easy, thats why we drafted him. I think he can and will develop into one. I don't think it happens over night. I hope I'm right. We need a break.


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,985
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,985
j/c:

Britt made me money on the DFS landscape because of the times he was targeted for the Rams. Not sure what that means in actual games.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,468
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,468
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
JC

I don't think the news about Britt means Pryor can't still sign here. There is room for Pryor, Britt, and Coleman.

But, it does help provide insurance if Pryor decides to sign elsewhere.


does that mean we might look at a WR in the 2nd round though?

and i hope to god they aren't hoping on a JG return. the FO better not be making any sort of moves with that loser in mind.

Last edited by Swish; 03/09/17 10:58 AM.

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
Bleed...really...not true?

What did the Harvard boys do when faced with re-signing Mitch Schwartz?

...they went out and signed Alvin Bailey, telling Schwartz they had already gone a different direction.

Now tell me I'm wrong again...


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Big fat 'meh' if this means Pryor is gone.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Swish
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
JC

I don't think the news about Britt means Pryor can't still sign here. There is room for Pryor, Britt, and Coleman.

But, it does help provide insurance if Pryor decides to sign elsewhere.


does that mean we might look at a WR in the 2nd round though?


It means we desperately need another wide receiver. Britt has been consistently underwhelming his entire career.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BritKe00.htm

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,554
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,554
Originally Posted By: Swish
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
JC

I don't think the news about Britt means Pryor can't still sign here. There is room for Pryor, Britt, and Coleman.

But, it does help provide insurance if Pryor decides to sign elsewhere.


does that mean we might look at a WR in the 2nd round though?

and i hope to god they aren't hoping on a JG return. the FO better not be making any sort of moves with that loser in mind.


If we lose Pryor, we could look to draft 1 in the 1st round, so sure, a 2nd round receiver is clearly a option.

And round 2 maybe even if Pryor stays. I don't know what they are thinking about Gordon. I will say there seems to be a viable movement to address Pot in a different way. If this happens, JG might be back in play. He just can't pass the P test. It's not like he is a creep doing crazy things.



Lots of leaks going on, yet nothing about TP. Wonder what that means?


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847
Originally Posted By: mac
Bleed...really...not true?

What did the Harvard boys do when faced with re-signing Mitch Schwartz?

...they went out and signed Alvin Bailey, telling Schwartz they had already gone a different direction.

Now tell me I'm wrong again...


comparing that situation to this one isn't accurate...Britt vs Pryor is alot better situation than Schwartz vs Bailey.. Britt is atleast servicable. Bailey..no idea what they were thinking


Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: bleednbrown
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
If this means we don't sign Pryor, then this is a horrible, horrible signing and we are doomed (not joking).

If we re-sign Pryor, Britt is a very legit second or third receiver and we got him for [relatively] cheap.


Okay I'll bite.....Why is this a horrible signing? I think Coleman is our #1 and both Britt and Pryor would be #2 and #3.
I just think Pryor is still to new to be our #1.


Read what I wrote again.


you wrote that as if Pryor was our #1..which isn't true and he won't be..if healthy Coleman is the #1, that's what he was drafted for


Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: leadtheway
Bailey..no idea what they were thinking


Bailey didn't cost them a compensatory pick to sign because he was not tendered a contract by the Seahawks.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Swish
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
JC

I don't think the news about Britt means Pryor can't still sign here. There is room for Pryor, Britt, and Coleman. Agreed



But, it does help provide insurance if Pryor decides to sign elsewhere.
Agreed

does that mean we might look at a WR in the 2nd round though?
Maybe the 1st

It means we desperately need another wide receiver. Britt has been consistently underwhelming his entire career.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BritKe00.htm


Come on man 2016 was pretty good ... 2016 Games 15 Rec. 68 Yds. 1002 TD 5


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: leadtheway
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: bleednbrown
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
If this means we don't sign Pryor, then this is a horrible, horrible signing and we are doomed (not joking).

If we re-sign Pryor, Britt is a very legit second or third receiver and we got him for [relatively] cheap.


Okay I'll bite.....Why is this a horrible signing? I think Coleman is our #1 and both Britt and Pryor would be #2 and #3.
I just think Pryor is still to new to be our #1.


Read what I wrote again.


you wrote that as if Pryor was our #1..which isn't true and he won't be..if healthy Coleman is the #1, that's what he was drafted for


It doesn't matter who the number one is, we need Pryor AND someone like Britt.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
JC

I don't think the news about Britt means Pryor can't still sign here. There is room for Pryor, Britt, and Coleman.

But, it does help provide insurance if Pryor decides to sign elsewhere.


Exactly. What was it we had after Pryor and Coleman last year? No one replaceable?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
Fine with this signing. Britt is a solid WR. Big target who can beat the press. He's always been productive - just not a consistent 1000 yd a year guy.

Makes me wonder what we offered Pryor. Is Britt's contract what we approached Pryor with? The fact that there's no early news about Pryor only seems to reinforce that perhaps he's overestimated his value on open market. Still hoping the Browns can bring him back as a Pryor, Britt, Coleman set sounds pretty damn good.

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-2017-nfl-free-agency-news-updates/

Originally Posted By: PFF
Browns start crucial offseason by signing Kenny Britt

09:49 a.m. ET, Thurs., March 9

Wide receiver Kenny Britt is expected to sign with the Cleveland Browns, according to ESPN’s Adam Caplan. While the former first-round pick has never lived up to his draft position, Britt surpassed 1,000 receiving yards in 2016 for the first time in his career – even if only by two yards. While Britt’s numbers are not overwhelming, the fact that he played in one of the least productive offenses over the past three seasons needs to be taken into account here. Still, he managed to earn precisely 2.0 yards per route run, which ranked him 16th among wide receivers, while quarterbacks had a passer rating of 96.2 when targeting him, which was by far the highest on the LA Rams. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen how much of an upgrade, if any, Britt represents over wide receiver Terrelle Pryor as all signs point to the latter not returning to Cleveland. The spotlight will be on Cleveland this entire offseason; however, unless Britt was a significantly cheaper option than Pryor, prioritizing him over the incumbent No. 1 wide receiver seems to be a questionable decision at this point. — Zoltan Buday, @PFF_Zoltan

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: CapCity Dawg
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
JC

I don't think the news about Britt means Pryor can't still sign here. There is room for Pryor, Britt, and Coleman.

But, it does help provide insurance if Pryor decides to sign elsewhere.


Exactly. What was it we had after Pryor and Coleman last year? No one replaceable?


I think they signed Britt in case they lose Pryor, not because they will lose Pryor.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
We still need a Vet at WR. Pryor is not a vet at WR.


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
If Mr and Mrs Haslam and their Harvard boys fail to sign Pryor, it will mean THEY FAILED FOR THE SECOND YEAR IN ROW, TO RETAIN OUR BEST PLAYERS.

The Browns will never win a damn thing with this owner and his beloved Harvard lawyer running his front office.

The front office has no problem giving Jamie Collins a $5,000,000 signing bonus, $26,400,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $12,500,000...

...but they could not get one of their own, Pryor resigned.

What kind of message is Sushi sending to the locker-room?...Haslam and Sashi are cheap with comes to resigning our own players...that is the message.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
Originally Posted By: bleednbrown
We still need a Vet at WR. Pryor is not a vet at WR.


Brit is your "vet at wr"...


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,985
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,985
Quote:
The front office has no problem giving Jamie Collins a $5,000,000 signing bonus, $26,400,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $12,500,000...


Because he has a larger sample size of success?


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Originally Posted By: mac
If Mr and Mrs Haslam and their Harvard boys fail to sign Pryor, it will mean THEY FAILED FOR THE SECOND YEAR IN ROW, TO RETAIN OUR BEST PLAYERS.

The Browns will never win a damn thing with this owner and his beloved Harvard lawyer running his front office.

The front office has no problem giving Jamie Collins a $5,000,000 signing bonus, $26,400,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $12,500,000...

...but they could not get one of their own, Pryor resigned.

What kind of message is Sushi sending to the locker-room?...Haslam and Sashi are cheap with comes to resigning our own players...that is the message.


We didn't fail, if Pryor doesn't Re-Sign that's on him and his agent, we offered him significant money ...


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns to sign Kenny Britt WR

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5