|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384 |
For Cody he probably held on to the ball too long because the game was too fast for him. RG111 and JM. had a habit of doing it. We have the makings of a good running game with an improved O-line and the RB's that we have but if we can't stretch the field with our QB and our WR's are not that good like it appears right now I agree with Vers our O will not be very good. Somebody in our WR corps has to step up. More like 2 or 3 have to step up. Let's hope they do. I agree that the game was probably too fast for him at times...no sin in that for a 3rd Rd rookie. I'm just advancing the idea that a weak OL, below average WRs, and a brand new offense will contribute to a QBs shortcomings. The only debate is to what degree.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635 |
I'm just advancing the idea that a weak OL, below average WRs, and a brand new offense will contribute to a QBs shortcomings. The only debate is to what degree. IMO, a very deep degree. So many times, regardless who was taking snaps at QB, were defenders in the back field right after the snap. Combine that with being a rookie learning a real NFL playbook and having no weapons that can/could be relied on to throw to in a pinch (or even not in a pinch) had to be a life sucker for our QBs. We made clear efforts to fix the weak OL problems, but WR is still a hefty concern. Hefty...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,078
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,078 |
#1 - Kessler did not have a history of holding on to the ball "too long" in college. All three Browns QBs were awful in the held ball stat. Why was that? I know that RG3 and McCown had a penchant for that...but all 3 of them on the same team in the same year?
Is this a warning for: Be careful who you get to "mentor" your rookies?
The difference between Jesus and religion Religion mocks you for having dirty feet Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
j/c
Very good article by Pluto. Two things stood out to me.
#1 - Kessler did not have a history of holding on to the ball "too long" in college. All three Browns QBs were awful in the held ball stat. Why was that? I know that RG3 and McCown had a penchant for that...but all 3 of them on the same team in the same year? Can you say wide receiver issues in a brand new offense?
I think this is just a problem of our line being too good. None of our QBs have the sense of urgency like Rodgers, Brady or Big Ben. I think our line gives the QB the full 3 secs and those three QBs act like they have half that time to throw.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,436
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,436 |
I have no confidence in him "leading" us to victories or in helping other parts of our offense improve.
You know that I am very much in agreement with the last 4 posts by WSU, Homewood and Dawg_LB - ... my belief is that Cody was given the worst possible set of circumstances to overcome, including being a 3rd round rookie with no 1st team snaps before being thrust into a starting role week 3. I don't think Kessler has it all and was some sort of victim - clearly we all saw the same deficiencies and #1 and #2 being arm strength and willingness to throw the ball deep. As for whether the love for Cody is stats driven - I really don't think so. Firstly I don't think there is "Love" for Cody ... I think there is a healthy amount of "he did better than expected given a truly crappy situation to deal with - what can he do when given a better set of circumstances?" ... that's not a blind love for Cody. That's a very pragmatic approach. I think the same posters who think like that would also have been all for trading for Cousins or Garoppolo. Final comment on the Stats - while they don't prove anything and the common statement is 'stats is for losers' - at the same time they shouldn't be automatically dismissed as being 100% meaningless. I liked what Cody did and was impressed with his moxy way before any of his stats came out. The stat analysis and breakdown has all happened (to my knowledge) during the off-season. I think some of the stats reinforce that Cody is smart. They also reinforce that he wasn't much of a risk taker (no turnovers). OL is improved. I think despite the probable downgrade from Pryor to Britt - the WR core should be a little improved. Coleman has to stay healthy and be "ok" (I'm hoping he is better than that) and a year under the belt for Louis and based on some of the positive PR I don't see he and the other 2nd year WR's and DeValve won't be a little better. Barnidge was below average last year. Njoku might be unproven but I think he's a much bigger threat (and target) than Barnidge ever was. . . . the receiving core may not be a strength but I think we'll see Cody for what he is - if he's destined to be a back up - we'll know by game 5 or 6. If he's performing - I hope he improves every game.
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,375
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,375 |
I think running the football will make it easier to pass.
Even if we don't gain many yards, the fact we will run the ball will freeze the rush, backers, and DB's who want to play run support.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,865
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,865 |
I think that having inexperienced WRs hurt all of our QBs last year.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384 |
#1 - Kessler did not have a history of holding on to the ball "too long" in college. All three Browns QBs were awful in the held ball stat. Why was that? I know that RG3 and McCown had a penchant for that...but all 3 of them on the same team in the same year?
Is this a warning for: Be careful who you get to "mentor" your rookies? It's funny you say that...my season ticket buddy wanted McCown off the team late last year. He thinks McCown is a GREAT guy...but should stay away from advising Cody/anyone about things once the ball is snapped.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384 |
j/c
Very good article by Pluto. Two things stood out to me.
#1 - Kessler did not have a history of holding on to the ball "too long" in college. All three Browns QBs were awful in the held ball stat. Why was that? I know that RG3 and McCown had a penchant for that...but all 3 of them on the same team in the same year? Can you say wide receiver issues in a brand new offense?
I think this is just a problem of our line being too good. None of our QBs have the sense of urgency like Rodgers, Brady or Big Ben. I think our line gives the QB the full 3 secs and those three QBs act like they have half that time to throw. I'm confused here. Are you saying you think that the line gave us plenty of time...our QBs couldn't recognize that and acted like they had precious little time...yet they still held onto the ball too long showing little sense of urgency while acting like they had much less time than they really had? I think I know what you are driving at with my only disagreement being that the line was anywhere near good. When the QBs DID have time - which I think was way too infrequent - they still tended to hold onto the ball and seemed not confident in what to do. The consistency in the QB, offense, and type of supporting cast allows those 3 big-name QBs to play with much better quickness and confidence...plus those guys are really good.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
No, I think they knew they had 3 secs to throw. They just had no sense of urgency to get it out at all. When you have no sense of urgency you hold onto the ball for longer than 3 secs. That's why they get sacked. It's surprising they actually do this because our QBs are so weak armed, that by 3 secs most of our WRs have outran their arm. Besides RG3 who was too injured to count.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384 |
No, I think they knew they had 3 secs to throw. They just had no sense of urgency to get it out at all. When you have no sense of urgency you hold onto the ball for longer than 3 secs. That's why they get sacked. It's surprising they actually do this because our QBs are so weak armed, that by 3 secs most of our WRs have outran their arm. Besides RG3 who was too injured to count. Fair enough...I don't remember it being that way...but that doesn't make me right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
I actually feel like (IMO) it was an idea of trying "too hard" for a "big play"
I think both McCown and RG3 wanted the big play so bad. They held the ball waiting for it. And it either never came or it was far too late.
Griffin had something to prove obviously. And I think McCown felt he did as well. Which is why things like the "helicopter" dive happened.
Sometimes you've just gotta take what you can get and move on.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,051
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,051 |
Browns WRS had issues getting seperaton last year at times But with the lack of a deep ball threat defenses basically condensed All the underneath stuff making the throwing windows that much harder to thread Kessler is a ideal WCO QB He's never gonna put fear in secondaries going vertical
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 |
I think running the football will make it easier to pass.
Even if we don't gain many yards, the fact we will run the ball will freeze the rush, backers, and DB's who want to play run support. I keep asking myself; What has to happen for the Browns to win a game if the run game has a bad day. I think the list is so many that we're doomed.
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,375
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,375 |
I think you can say that about a lot of teams. Some things don't change. You run to set up the pass. You don't pass to set up the run.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,930
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,930 |
I think you can say that about a lot of teams. Some things don't change. You run to set up the pass. You don't pass to set up the run. On some level, I disagree with you here. Do you run to set up the pass? Do you pass to set up the run? Or do you attack the weak point of a defense, in order to set up more of an offensive attack?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Well, I certainly disagree w/you and the other posters you mentioned. In fact, I think all of you are way off base in terms to just how much time our qbs had when the game wasn't out of hand. I also think using certain stats to prove your opinion while ignoring others, such as Cody holding the ball longer than every other qb but one in the entire NFL seems suspect, at best. But, that is the beauty of a message board. We can all disagree and no one will make things personal. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I think you can say that about a lot of teams. Some things don't change. You run to set up the pass. You don't pass to set up the run. Two things, peen: 1. You can pass to set up the run. 2. Did you forget that we were leading the league in rushing after 4 games? Blaming Hue for us not running is wrong. It was about Cody's inability to challenge defenses.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,375
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,375 |
Could be. We did stop running the ball. You are probably right and it had nothing to do with Hue not calling running plays.
Like I said somewhere earlier, you need some of both.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,773
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,773 |
You run to set up the pass. You don't pass to set up the run. IMO you have to do both. In todays NFL I think most defenses can take away one or the other. What has to be done is to keep the defense off guard and honest, They have to have no clue what the offense is going to do next, for the offense to succeed.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,051
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,051 |
No matter what the offense has to find a identity The only identity this offense has had in the last 10 yrs is starting 3 qbs a season struggling to score 18 pts a game
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635 |
You run to set up the pass. You don't pass to set up the run. IMO you have to do both. In todays NFL I think most defenses can take away one or the other. What has to be done is to keep the defense off guard and honest, They have to have no clue what the offense is going to do next, for the offense to succeed. I like this post. Times have changed. Look at the value for RBs these days and compare them to the value of RBs of times ago. If you're a one-sided pony these days, defensive coordinators will shut you down and shut you out.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,348
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,348 |
I think you can say that about a lot of teams. Some things don't change. You run to set up the pass. You don't pass to set up the run. Two things, peen: 1. You can pass to set up the run. 2. Did you forget that we were leading the league in rushing after 4 games? Blaming Hue for us not running is wrong. It was about Cody's inability to challenge defenses. Hue has openly said that he got away from running and got pass-happy due to us getting behind so much, so early, so often. I believe that part of the hope and strategy is that by putting a heavy focus on fixing the defense this year, it will hopefully buy us the ability to be able to stick with the run more - in turn, that should help whomever ends up at QB.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,098
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,098 |
If they use play action it should help more.
I still say they will concentrate stopping the run to try to force us to beat them with the pass. It's what they've pretty much always done against us and it's worked. Why would they stop now?
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,348
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,348 |
We stopped ourselves in the run game more than most any defense did.
I don't recall where it was posted on here, but if you can find it, look at Crowell's numbers for running against a stacked box. He was blowing it UP with nearly 5.0 ypc. Running it when we wanted to, even if they stacked against us, was NOT the problem folks might think it was.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,057
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,057 |
jc...
One of the reasons you run the ball is to set up the play action pass.
Another reason you run is to have a balanced attack, making it much harder for the defense to predict your play calling pattern.
Another reason you run...is because you can and your good at it because your offensive line is dominating the line of scrimmage.
IMO, one of the most beautiful offensive displays to watch is when an offense challenges the defense by running the ball, every time. I've seen the Patriots do that as well as the Cowboys.
Hopefully the Browns will develop their OLine so they can dominate the LOS when needed.
Last edited by mac; 07/10/17 03:46 PM.
GM strong...
Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,388
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,388 |
We stopped ourselves in the run game more than most any defense did.
I don't recall where it was posted on here, but if you can find it, look at Crowell's numbers for running against a stacked box. He was blowing it UP with nearly 5.0 ypc. Running it when we wanted to, even if they stacked against us, was NOT the problem folks might think it was. Crowell had the 2nd highest ypc against a stacked box last season...... 2) Isaiah Crowell, Cleveland Browns (5.88 yards per carry)
Seeing Isaiah Crowell's name on this list might surprise some, as he finished shy of 1,000 yards in his third pro season. However, what this should remind us of is that Crowell is indeed quite a good player, the Browns just so rarely found themselves in a comfortable game script for sticking with the ground game. While the Browns only ranked 19th as a rushing offense this year, that looks a bit more impressive when you note that they ranked 30th in run play percentage.
Crowell faced an eight-plus man box on 23.8 percent of his non-red zone carries and averaged 5.88 yards per carry. He was quite adept at breaking off big plays against stacked fronts with six 15-plus yard runs, two of which went for over 20 yards and one for an 85-yard touchdown against Baltimore. The Browns were primarily a three-receiver offense, with 37.4 plays per game (60.9 percent) run out of the 11-personnel package and Crowell took most of his handoffs (71) out of the shotgun. With Cleveland's subpar quarterback play, it only made sense for defenders to dedicate extra resources to stopping the run. Crowell showed he could step up to that test, despite less than stellar offensive line play for much of the season. Link
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 871
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 871 |
Excellent thought but I will take this 1 further and say we will play 8 teams that the lines blow off the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
IMO, one of the most beautiful offensive displays to watch is when an offense challenges the defense by running the ball, every time. I've seen the Patriots do that as well as the Cowboys. Yes, when you know what you are going to do, and the defense knows what you are going to do... and they still can't stop you, that's when it's fun and it's demoralizing as hell for the other team.
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041 |
...#1 - Kessler did not have a history of holding on to the ball "too long" in college. All three Browns QBs were awful in the held ball stat. Why was that? I know that RG3 and McCown had a penchant for that...but all 3 of them on the same team in the same year? Can you say wide receiver issues in a brand new offense?... I actually feel like (IMO) it was an idea of trying "too hard" for a "big play"
I think both McCown and RG3 wanted the big play so bad. They held the ball waiting for it. And it either never came or it was far too late.
Griffin had something to prove obviously. And I think McCown felt he did as well. Which is why things like the "helicopter" dive happened.
Sometimes you've just gotta take what you can get and move on. My take is length of time the all 3 QBs held the ball is a by product of scheme/playcalling and QB decision making. I think Hue, like the QBs themselves, was also looking for the 'big play' and dialing up longer developing routes in a effort to generate big plays.
Last edited by edromeo; 07/10/17 06:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
j/c: PFT preseason power rankings No. 31: Cleveland Browns--Josh Alper The Browns have taken the bottom rung in plenty of preseason, in-season and postseason power rankings in recent years, but that’s not where they find themselves in PFT’s rankings this summer. They are No. 31, which isn’t where you’d want to be but it’s still a nice change for the Browns to have someone to look down on. Their chances of shooting higher up in the rankings will hinge on finally answering their eternal quarterback question. Cody Kessler, Brock Osweiler and second-round pick DeShone Kizer are this year’s options under center, which offers some intriguing possibilities but little certainty that the search is ending this year. The good news for the Browns is that their stockpiling of draft picks, including three first-round selections this year, has led to more talent around the quarterbacks. Biggest positive change: That increase in talent should be noticeable on both the offensive and defensive lines this year. First overall pick Myles Garrett gives the Browns a major piece to build around at defensive end and the team drafted two other defensive linemen to go with four others drafted in 2015 and 2016. On the other side of the ball, adding right guard Kevin Zeitler and center JC Tretter in free agency and extending left guard Joel Bitonio give the Browns a stronger group to go with left tackle Joe Thomas. Biggest negative change: It’s fair to wonder how much negative change a 1-15 team can experience, but Cleveland spent a lot of time working with Terrelle Pryor as he transitioned to wide receiver over the last two years and his 77 catches for 1,007 yards were a bright spot last season. They won’t reap any other rewards, however, as Pryor jumped to Washington as a free agent and the Browns will lean on Corey Coleman and Kenny Britt at wideout instead. Coaching thermometer: The Browns have not shown much patience with their coaches of late, but Hue Jackson starts his second year without much heat under his seat. That won’t remain the case if the team’s search for a long-term answer at quarterback continues to be a fruitless one, but the Browns have embraced a longer view than they have in some time and Jackson is central to it. We’d like to crack a beer with … Joe Thomas. Thomas has been through 10 seasons of losing with the Browns while playing for six head coaches and blocking for myriad quarterbacks. That’s a lot of fodder for stories and Thomas has the kind of personality that suggests they’d be good ones. How they can prove us wrong: If the offensive line gels as hoped, the Browns should be able to run the ball and take some pressure off that quarterback group. Put that with a defense that follows new coordinator Gregg Williams’ history by improving in his first season with a team and the Browns could be playing a lot of close games in 2017. Get a few to break their way and the Browns would be looking a lot better in the final set of power rankings. https://www.yahoo.com/sports/pft-preseason-power-rankings-no-190043318.html
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,098
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,098 |
We stopped ourselves in the run game more than most any defense did.
I don't recall where it was posted on here, but if you can find it, look at Crowell's numbers for running against a stacked box. He was blowing it UP with nearly 5.0 ypc. Running it when we wanted to, even if they stacked against us, was NOT the problem folks might think it was.
And yet we were always playing from behind and won one game. It's going to take balance on offense and a secondary that can keep our opponents from running up the score. Football is a team game and it takes more than being able to run the ball to win.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
In todays nfl u can pass to set up the run ( see NO, see GB, see SD and there's more) .. theres a bunch of them ... u can also run to set up the pass ... that would be us this year regardless of who our qb is .. *LOL* .. The rule changes over the last 20 years are the reason for that ... the list of teams that run to set up the pass are dwindling ... may actually be relegated to teams like us that are very weak at the QB position and recieving corps ... The rules dictate that airing it out is the new "3 yards and a cloud of dust" ... 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,051
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,051 |
Maybe the Browns should turn the clock back to 1979 and have a 3 man rb committee and just pound the ball .a 55/45 run pass ratio. Zeitler strength was run blocking as a Bengal. Run the ball more defense on the field less. Why not run the ball. Teams are getting away from pure run stoppers at LB anyhow
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,098
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,098 |
Which really is my concern. In the cases you mentioned, they have Brees, Rogers and Rivers. That have the ability at QB to accomplish that.
I'm not sure we have the ammunition to make that happen.
That's why to this point our opponents have focused on stopping the run and force us to beat them through the air. If and when we can move the ball through the air, it will force them to respect the passing game and loosen up the run. We haven't been able to do that. I certainly hope this year is different but I'm going to need to see some evidence to convince me.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,384 |
Which really is my concern. In the cases you mentioned, they have Brees, Rogers and Rivers. That have the ability at QB to accomplish that.
I'm not sure we have the ammunition to make that happen.
That's why to this point our opponents have focused on stopping the run and force us to beat them through the air. If and when we can move the ball through the air, it will force them to respect the passing game and loosen up the run. We haven't been able to do that. I certainly hope this year is different but I'm going to need to see some evidence to convince me. Pit, I agree with your premise here. But it didn't take a lot of focus for opposing Ds to stop our run game last year. It wasn't rocket science. Erving was incredibly bad (I'll play C for the Browns before he will again)...Bailey might actually have been worse (he's out of the league)...Cooper was about as bad (he's off the team) Drango was a pup (he's our 4th G now). The opposing D could have "focused" on the cheerleaders last year and still blown up a run game with Erving, Bailey & Cooper up the gut.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,098
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,098 |
And yet it was shown we were first in the run game after four games.
How many of those games did we win?
It was shown we rated about middle of the pack in rushing for the season.
How many of those games did we win?
Your opposition doesn't have to "stop the run", they merely have to contain it.
My point is that even during the first four games when we were first in the league in the run, with a healthy OL, our opponents kept our running game contained in terms of points.
People can say anything they want, it's been proven season after season with our Browns. With good OL's, poor OL's and everything in between.
The only time we competed enough to back into the playoffs, was when DA was playing out of his mind in the passing game. It spread out the opposing D allowing for the run.
It's why I really don't understand why people wish to isolate last year as some kind of benchmark. We've seen it for a decade and people try to use last year alone as an example.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
He loves Cody and will never admit that teams started playing us different after NE figured him out and other teams started using a similar strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
All I remember in the NE game was Cody having a really impressive TD drive.
Then getting destroyed on the next one when we decided to literally not block someone.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,612
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,612 |
“ …..teams started playing us different after NE figured him out and other teams started using a similar strategy.” Bill Belichick has a comprehension of the game like no one else. He like sees stuff and intuitively knows the best reaction to what he sees. And then yeah, everyone else says “Of course”.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Cleveland Browns have Terry
Talkin' about winning 7 games ...
really? -- Terry Pluto
|
|