|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
It's not that CHS can't see it, It's that CHS just can't see it!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
It's not that CHS can't see it, It's that CHS just can't see it! CHS is too busy working on his obnoxious passive-aggressiveness to see anything (hey, I can do it too!)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Are you a master troll like that Dilbert guy? Or does reality just not work with you? Are you aware that video is edited audio wise? You can literally hear the beeps. So no wonder you can't hear it. But do you really not see the dude fire, realize no bullet was in the chamber and then [censored] his gun again and fire? Do you not see that? The dude has been caught and he turns out to be an Imperial Wizard or w/e DnD name they give themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
Are you a master troll like that Dilbert guy? Or does reality just not work with you? Are you aware that video is edited audio wise? You can literally hear the beeps. So no wonder you can't hear it. But do you really not see the dude fire, realize no bullet was in the chamber and then [censored] his gun again and fire? Do you not see that? The dude has been caught and he turns out to be an Imperial Wizard or w/e DnD name they give themselves. The fact that you actually think the Dilbert guy is a troll is interesting. He does come up with a lot of unique takes but some people don't understand the difference. I can't decipher the audio but as you are a gun enthusiast yourself, you must admit that video shows an encounter where lethal force in defense of an innocent might be justified. It's hard to say without further context (e.g. if there was any instigation-- I have a hard time imagining a scenario where it would be justified to aim a flamethrower or "improvised torch" at somebody, but you never know.) Warning shots are severely frowned upon in the legal code. However, if lethal force would be justified (because an improvised flamethrower that shoots flames several feet could result in serious bodily harm), wouldn't a warning shot be justified as well? That's something for the lawyers and justice system to figure out, but in any case, the video shows a very different sequence of events than what you initially described. In fact, I'm still not convinced that this was the event you initially referenced... can you clarify that?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
Are you a master troll like that Dilbert guy? Or does reality just not work with you? Are you aware that video is edited audio wise? You can literally hear the beeps. So no wonder you can't hear it. But do you really not see the dude fire, realize no bullet was in the chamber and then [censored] his gun again and fire? Do you not see that? The dude has been caught and he turns out to be an Imperial Wizard or w/e DnD name they give themselves. Another question, because this is the first I've heard of him being an "Imperial Wizard" (or DnD, whatever that means.) Does that change the what happened, or the legal status? I mean, here's a guy shooting a flamethrower at somebody. Why won't you condemn the person who initiated the violence?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
Are you a master troll like that Dilbert guy? Or does reality just not work with you? Are you aware that video is edited audio wise? You can literally hear the beeps. So no wonder you can't hear it. But do you really not see the dude fire, realize no bullet was in the chamber and then [censored] his gun again and fire? Do you not see that? The dude has been caught and he turns out to be an Imperial Wizard or w/e DnD name they give themselves. Another question, because this is the first I've heard of him being an "Imperial Wizard" (or DnD, whatever that means.) Does that change the what happened, or the legal status? I mean, here's a guy shooting a flamethrower at somebody. Why won't you condemn the person who initiated the violence? Since he is a Wizard that means the Wiccans must have been there too! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
Since he is a Wizard that means the Wiccans must have been there too! I used to have a girlfriend who practiced that stuff. Creepy as #*%$ (I was in middle school-- cut me some slack.)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
I call the Dilbert guy a troll because of when he responded to someone on twitter with a pic of his 60 year old 4 pack. I think that you're so overwhelmed by persuasion and trying to figure it out, that you follow trolls and may even be one. You can't decipher the audio because you literally posted a bleeped out version of the audio. I still can't believe you're contorting yourself to defend the KKK member. Except I can, because you said that the KKK never committed an act of murder in 50+ years, another BS lie. Also, you're framing this in the alt-right narrative. The people you are describing are not innocent bystanders but also criminals of assault. I think we've all seen the image of the dude wielding a Confederate flag as a weapon against the man with an aerosol spray and a lighter. If not, here you go:  Again, you can clearly see two people fighting or one dude fighting a crowd. Either way, their is no innocent person in this photo. This photo was taken at the exact same time the guy fired his gun. So, no, there was no defense of an innocent person here. However, since you love rhetoric and probably wish you were a lawyer, let's take a look at this. So the dude says "hey " and approaches the black man and pulls his trigger (00:08), the gun having no bullet in the chamber, doesn't fire and the man begins to fiddle with the slide, takes a few steps back and then re-approaches the dude and fires a bullet towards his feet. What do you see here? A knight-esque hero coming to save his princess who is draped in the confederate flag?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
slack cut. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Are you a master troll like that Dilbert guy? Or does reality just not work with you? Are you aware that video is edited audio wise? You can literally hear the beeps. So no wonder you can't hear it. But do you really not see the dude fire, realize no bullet was in the chamber and then [censored] his gun again and fire? Do you not see that? The dude has been caught and he turns out to be an Imperial Wizard or w/e DnD name they give themselves. Another question, because this is the first I've heard of him being an "Imperial Wizard" (or DnD, whatever that means.) Does that change the what happened, or the legal status? I mean, here's a guy shooting a flamethrower at somebody. Why won't you condemn the person who initiated the violence? You mean the two dudes literally fighting with weapons? Why are you making the flag attacking protester a victim? They were clearly both in the wrong and neither of them had to brandish a weapon. I think everyone knows that and I have stated that in the past. What's your excuse for victimizing a criminal?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
Perfect has set me straight on the number of murders committed by the KKK in the last 50 years and indeed there have been a few. I regret the error.
This is also the first I've heard about the shooter in this instance being in the KKK. As I've repeatedly said, I do not like or condone what the KKK does. It's just not my thing and hopefully you will forgive my lack of knowledge on the details as it's a group that I do not follow. I follow them so closely that I did not even know they were active until earlier this year. If you make more thinly veiled accusations that I'm some supporter then what you're really saying is that I'm a liar.
I'm not framing this as anything and most especially not as an 'alt-right' narrative because I do not even read any alt-right websites! At most I've dabbled here and there just to get an idea of what they stand for but even that has been a while and my opinions on this event were largely just from surfing YouTube and social media and trying to piece together what happened. I have zero faith in mainstream media to report on these things fairly. Actually that's not quite accurate-- I have less than zero faith in mainstream media to report on these things fairly.
About the actual event, what you described is quite a bit different than your initial explanation of what happened: "as well as the KKK Imperial Wizard who was charged with attempted murder after shooting his gun at a black guy". It seems like there's quite a bit more to it, no? Why did the guy assault a group with an aerosol spray can and a lighter? It seems like he is trying to cause blistering injuries to other people.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Perfect has set me straight on the number of murders committed by the KKK in the last 50 years and indeed there have been a few. I regret the error.
This is also the first I've heard about the shooter in this instance being in the KKK. As I've repeatedly said, I do not like or condone what the KKK does. It's just not my thing and hopefully you will forgive my lack of knowledge on the details as it's a group that I do not follow. I follow them so closely that I did not even know they were active until earlier this year. If you make more thinly veiled accusations that I'm some supporter then what you're really saying is that I'm a liar.
I'm not framing this as anything and most especially not as an 'alt-right' narrative because I do not even read any alt-right websites! At most I've dabbled here and there just to get an idea of what they stand for but even that has been a while and my opinions on this event were largely just from surfing YouTube and social media and trying to piece together what happened. I have zero faith in mainstream media to report on these things fairly. Actually that's not quite accurate-- I have less than zero faith in mainstream media to report on these things fairly.
About the actual event, what you described is quite a bit different than your initial explanation of what happened: "as well as the KKK Imperial Wizard who was charged with attempted murder after shooting his gun at a black guy". It seems like there's quite a bit more to it, no? Why did the guy assault a group with an aerosol spray can and a lighter? It seems like he is trying to cause blistering injuries to other people. I don't follow the KKK either. I do know they exist however. I also know that they are not a 1st amendment advocacy group, no matter what the ALCU says  (That's a joke. Just like the DnD comment was a joke. DnD is short for Dungeons and Dragons. Something I thought you'd be pretty well versed in. Oh well). I would never think that have committed zero murders. Although Antifa has committed zero murders (so far). Of course you're framing things. And I'm sure the social media stars you get your news from are too. That's what Dilbert's blog is all about. Framing narratives. That's why he loves Trump. Those social media stars happen to be on the alt-right, probably. Can you at least see the common narratives you and the alt-right share? What changes? Because the dude was defending himself against a bunch of neonazis it becomes more or less acceptable to shoot him while yelling a racial slur? There's more to it. But I'm not typing out a saga on a cellphone. That's not my job. I wonder how you feel knowing the black man wielding a torch, and his friend, were chased to a parking lot where they were both beaten badly. To the point where the police actually arrested two of the men who beat his friend in the head with metal poles. Is that karma enough for you? You seem to think that violence is acceptable if violence is already there. When violence is truly never acceptable. Proof he is a Nazi: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2017...x-klan-imperial
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
There's a large ecosystem of right-wing websites, social media, etc. The alt-right makes up a very small minority of that. I've seen insinuations on here that Brietbart and even Donald Trump are alt-right and that's just laughable. People really should get a better grasp of what terms actually mean and who is involved before they start labeling people.
The Dilbert guy is all about persuasion. I actually haven't read him a whole lot since the election although I do check in from time to time. Interesting guy for sure. I admire his outside the box thinking even if I disagree with his conclusions a fair amount.
I am curious as to what the explanation is for how a guy was defending himself by taunting people with an improvised flamethrower (or torch, or aerosol can+lighter or whatever you want to call it). I'm having a hard time coming up with a scenario where that would be an acceptable self-defense weapon, although it's getting late and maybe my imagination is suffering.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
I don't follow the KKK either. I do know they exist however. I also know that they are not a 1st amendment advocacy group, no matter what the ALCU says  Also, this is an astute observation. I'm glad I'm not the only one sticking up for first amendment rights for groups whose message I abhor. The reality is-- and as the ACLU surely knows-- that rights are often lost at the margins. Take away rights for extremists groups that you hate, and somewhat lesser extremist groups lose them next. Then some not-so extreme groups. Then eventually they're turned against the other side. That's how rights are lost, which was really the crux of my original argument.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
Liberals sick of the alt-left are taking 'the red pill'The mainstream media failed to see the rise of Donald Trump in 2016. Now it’s overlooking another grassroots movement that may soon be of equal significance— the growing number of liberals “taking the red pill.” People of all ages and ethnicities are posting YouTube videos describing “red pill moments”—personal awakenings that have caused them to reject leftist narratives imbibed since childhood from friends, teachers, and the news and entertainment media. You might say that those who take the red pill have been “triggered.” But instead of seeking out “safe spaces,” they’re doing the opposite, posting monologues throwing off the shackles of political correctness. Their videos can feature the kind of subversiveness that was once a hallmark of the left—before the movement lost its sense of humor. Candace Owens, a charismatic young African American, posts commentaries on her YouTube channel whose titles seem expressly designed to make PC heads explode. A sample: “I Don't Care About Charlottesville, the KKK, or White Supremacy.” The commentary calls out liberal fearmongering over white supremacists. “I mean there are, what, 6,000 Klansmen left in our nation. You want me to actually process that as a legitimate fear every day when I wake up?” Not insignificantly, her video got nearly 500,000 views and overwhelmingly enthusiastic comments. (“you rock, girl!” “this woman is awesome.”) A later episode about Black Lives Matter got nearly 700,000 views and had the distinction of being briefly taken down by YouTube. Unapologetic, Owens responded with a follow-up commentary — “What YouTube and Facebook REALLY Think of Black People.” She declared, “There was only one version of a black person that these platforms are willing to help propel towards fame and notoriety—and that is an angry black victim.” Owens calls her channel “Red Pill Black.” It invites viewers: “Sick of the alt-left. Welcome, I prescribe red pills.” The term “taking the red pill” derives from the movie "The Matrix," the trippy sci-fi classic. Morpheus, the resistance leader played by Laurence Fishburne offers Neo, the movie’s hero played by Keanu Reeves, a choice: He can take the blue pill and remain in the repressive artificial world known as the Matrix where “you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.” Or he can take the red pill and tumble down the “rabbit hole” where he will come to realize that everything about his life was a lie. The left’s intensifying war on free speech has produced a surge of red pill videos. Some take Owens’ in-your-face approach. Others are meandering, hipster confessionals delivered with the wordy earnestness of characters in a Duplass brothers movie. In his YouTube Channel, Dissent Report, a young, one-time “Bernie Sanders supporting progressive Democrat” admits from behind large sunglasses that he’s made “a pretty hard turn to the right.” He took the red pill after seeing friends “moving …towards an authoritarian sort of Progressivism.” He explains, “They were just standing up for a divisive brand of politics that would tolerate no dissent whatsoever.” Not surprisingly, the mainstream media has largely dismissed the red pill phenomenon. Coverage has mainly stressed the connection to men’s rights activists —the Red Pill forum on Reddit and the documentary, “The Red Pill,” are both about men’s rights. This narrow focus, however, misses the larger story. Those who have been “red pilled” may start out questioning feminism. But that’s often just the beginning. A red pill blogger who calls himself “Pat Riarchy” (“also known as the patriarchy”) recalls that his journey down the rabbit hole began when a Facebook friend derisively called him a “cis male.” He came to recognize that, “it's been one narrative pretty much.” He concluded, “I have my own objective view…I didn't want a bigger government. I realized I didn't like the universal healthcare plan…I realized I didn't really have an issue with guns.” Several books and discussions later, he emerged as a libertarian. Red pill bloggers are increasingly characterizing PC culture as a first step on a slippery slope towards authoritarian socialism. One who articulates this best is Dave Rubin, a married gay man and former left liberal whose show, The Rubin Report, has explored the red pill phenomenon. In his commentary, “The left is no longer liberal”, he explained his own disillusionment with the “regressive left,” whose “backward ideology” of identity politics “puts the collective ahead of the individual. It loves all of its minority groups to behave as a monolith. So if you're a true individual—meaning you don't subscribe to the ideas that the groupthink has attributed to you based on those immutable characteristics—you must be cast out.” Rubin calls this mindset “the biggest threat to freedom and Western civilization that exists today.” One of his recent guests was Cassie Jaye, producer of the The Red Pill” documentary, which chronicled her personal journey away from feminism. Jaye had intended to make a feminist film about the men’s rights movement. But her perspective began to change upon interviewing activists, who were anything but the angry women-bashers so often portrayed by the mainstream media. Instead they were men—and also women—concerned about issues such as unfair child custody laws, pregnancy fraud, and even domestic violence. It turned out that men are also victims of domestic abuse perpetrated by women with surprising frequency. Jaye’s film met with immediate resistance from radical feminists, who trolled her online while she was fundraising for the film. Her documentary has been largely ignored by most of the mainstream media. But it has had widespread impact on the Internet. Laci Green, one of YouTube’s best known personalities whose left-leaning videos about sex and gender have an immense following, posted “Taking The Red Pill?” Green’s relatively tame confession of discomfort with feminists who shut down opposing views, as well as the revelation that she was dating an anti-SJW YouTuber, enraged her fans. They waged an online campaign against her and reportedly “doxxed” her — published her personal information on the internet. Many who proclaim themselves “red pilled” express a yearning for traditional values. “Pat Riarchy” wants to see a return to an era where comedians can “attack everyone,” not just Trump. “PC culture is going down,” he says. “A lot of people want this to stop.” Kirsten Lauryn, a 20-something hipster sitting amidst empty church pews, worries that, “A lot of our society has drawn away from religion as an important way of instilling values.” She observes, “The pendulum is swinging back to a more traditional lifestyle. I see this with my generation Generation Z.” The media has very likely ignored red pilling for the same reason it underestimated support for Donald Trump: An entrenched establishment always resists disrupters, especially those who reject its worldview. That said, red pill bloggers are not necessarily Trump supporters—in many cases, quite the reverse. What they do share, however, is their questioning of mainstream media tropes. Not all their videos would pass muster with Reagan conservatives or even libertarians. But, taken together, they give hope to those worried about the future of capitalism and free speech in America. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/13/liberals-sick-alt-left-are-taking-red-pill.html-The Awakening Begins. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
Interesting article, not exactly something you'd expect to see on FoxNews but it has a lot of truth in it nonetheless.
A lot of people are tired of the alt-left. Their behavior has led many to defend the rights of groups whose messages they don't even believe in. An interesting dilemma to be sure.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,563
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,563 |
j/c
To think that a woman was killed and many injured by an alt right protestor running over them with a car and people seem so outraged by the other side.
#bodycountsmatter
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
j/c
To think that a woman was killed and many injured by an alt right protestor running over them with a car and people seem so outraged by the other side.
#bodycountsmatter I am outraged by that as well. That individual is currently in jail on charges of second degree murder along with various other felonies e.g. grievous bodily harm. I've seen enough videos to know that what he did was awful, and he will most likely not be a free man anytime soon, if ever. I do wonder why you brought that up in this thread but the Charlottesville discussion is approaching its third thread and I and everybody else in it condemned that person's actions. What else is there to say about that? Maybe your hashtag about body counts leads to a question about whether the actions of a rogue or disgruntled member should be pinned on a group, for example James Alex Fields on whatever group he belonged to, or Micah X Johnson and Gavin Long (Dallas and Baton Rouge police killers, respectively) on theirs? Curious to hear other opinions on that, but you're right that a young woman needlessly lost her life and we should all be mindful of that. We should also be mindful to not let the violence escalate. Words, and passionate debate are fine but violence is not the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,171
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,171 |
A lot of people are tired of the alt-left. Their behavior has led many to defend the rights of groups whose messages they don't even believe in. An interesting dilemma to be sure.
Nobody is forcing anyone to defend hate groups, or any other group. And frankly that's a horrifying reflection of character.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
A lot of people are tired of the alt-left. Their behavior has led many to defend the rights of groups whose messages they don't even believe in. An interesting dilemma to be sure.
Nobody is forcing anyone to defend hate groups, or any other group. And frankly that's a horrifying reflection of character. That is not what I said. I said that many have defended the rights of groups whose messages they don't believe in. Words mean things. You can defend somebody's right to say something while disagreeing-- perhaps vehemently-- with what they say or what they stand for.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
JC
I've found it very interesting that over the past decade, Republicans and the people who flock to the right, have had the same narrative of why they joined the Right. For the past decade, it hasn't been because conservative values are right. It's more that they have been ostracized in some way to join the right. They are victims of PC culture, like in the article above, or victims of crony capitalism and the federal government, like wonky libertarians. They frame themselves as victims who have found a strong hold in the viewpoints. I mean, the comedian literally says he just wants to make fun of someone else besides Trump. That's the sign of an alliance built on ideology and not of one of convenience and victimhood.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,563
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,563 |
I guess maybe it's needed for me to show you all of the violence and deaths that have occurred by the alt right for you to understand what the body count actually is? So what violence are you outraged by the most? Which is at the top of your priority list? Fighting among both sides of a demonstration or people being plowed over and harmed with a car? I know you're pointing out the body count from the other side, but how many of those attackers you mentioned belonged to Antifa? Here ya go if you're interested. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/14/us/charlottesville-nazi-kkk-attacks.htmlAnd let's not forget Dylann Roof. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-dylann-roof-sentencing-20170110-story.htmlI don't uphold Antifa but I'm smart enough to know who started this war. And I know how high the body count is on both sides. I think people should keep that in perspective when displaying their outrage.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,165
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,165 |
j/c Lawmakers force Trump to formally condemn white supremacistsCongress is putting a bipartisan squeeze on President Donald Trump to condemn white supremacists and commit his administration's resources to combating domestic terrorism by neo-Nazis and other racist groups. A day after the Senate easily passed legislation condemning last month's violent white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, the House passed it on a voice vote Tuesday evening. The House version was introduced last week by Rep. Tom Garrett (R-Va.), a conservative freshman who represents Charlottesville, and Rep. Gerald Connolly (D-Va.). It has the backing of Virginia's entire delegation of seven Republicans and four Democrats. Now that the House has cleared the Senate measure, it will land on Trump's desk to sign or veto. Though resolutions are often passed to offer the sense of the House or Senate on various issues, they rarely head to the president for consideration. But backers of this measure structured it as a "joint resolution," a move ensuring that passage would require Trump to weigh in on an issue that has dogged his presidency for weeks. The resolution urges Trump to "speak out against hate groups that espouse racism, extremism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, and White supremacy." It also calls on the administration to "use all resources available to the President and the President’s Cabinet to address the growing prevalence of those hate groups in the United States." The resolution also urges Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate any acts of violence or domestic terrorism perpetrated by white supremacists. Trump sparked an uproar last month when he responded to the Charlottesville rally by condemning "hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides" rather than taking aim more explicitly at white supremacists. He also argued that some "very fine people" were among the white nationalist marchers. Though Trump later issued more forceful condemnations of white supremacists, he made clear at an Arizona rally in August that he preferred his initial response to the incident. A White House spokeswoman did not respond to requests for comment on the measure. http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/12/trump-charlottesville-white-supremacists-242624________________ With every minute that passes without speaking out, the optics for this admin worsen. I just don't get it. These organizations were founded on some of our species' worst traits- and rely on terror, violence and sick rhetoric to promote their cause. And yet, it's been like pulling teeth to get Rogaine 45* to do the right thing- a total no-brainer. WTF's the holdup? Why the reluctance? Why the resistance? Why does it take actual congressional legislation to force this- "person" to do what every other POTUS would do without hesitation on Day One? I have my own theories, but I'd like to hear others' opinions first. Now that the House has cleared the Senate measure, it will land on Trump's desk to sign or veto. Well, this will be interesting- and very telling. Just 2 weeks ago, alt/idiots "trumpeted" a victory because 1600 Foolsylvania Ave. was silent on the condemnation front. If this dude vetoes this resolution, it will be the end of any cooperation he can expect. He'll be marginalized by both sides, leaving him to be supported only by the alt/community and the most avid of his shrinking flock. And that would be a very lonely (and powerless) political island indeed. Good luck with 2020. .02
"too many notes, not enough music-"
#GMStong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
I guess maybe it's needed for me to show you all of the violence and deaths that have occurred by the alt right for you to understand what the body count actually is? So what violence are you outraged by the most? Which is at the top of your priority list? Fighting among both sides of a demonstration or people being plowed over and harmed with a car? I know you're pointing out the body count from the other side, but how many of those attackers you mentioned belonged to Antifa? Here ya go if you're interested. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/14/us/charlottesville-nazi-kkk-attacks.htmlAnd let's not forget Dylann Roof. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-dylann-roof-sentencing-20170110-story.htmlI don't uphold Antifa but I'm smart enough to know who started this war. And I know how high the body count is on both sides. I think people should keep that in perspective when displaying their outrage. Every time something like this comes up, I condemn them. I don't know what else to say. You read my posts. I'm a debater. I understand that there are some loonies on the right and every once in a while one of them will snap and commit an atrocity. What I witness from the left is more of a mob mentality of people who are not crazy in the medical sense, but have a crazy/bullying mob mentality nonetheless. Check the title of the thread. You'll have to excuse me for focusing on Antifa and similar anarchist groups in the Antifa thread. The far right already gets an enormous amount of attention. The events of Charlottesville were front page news for like two weeks, which is an eternity in modern politics. We've had 20 pages of discussion on it. The guy committed a murder and injured many more. I find that disgraceful and it is not what I stand for. What more do you want me to say about that? I condemn violence on both sides.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
Was the shooter at the baseball practice ever condemned by anyone here?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Was the shooter at the baseball practice ever condemned by anyone here? No. We gave him a parade.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,165
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,165 |
Oh, for sure.
Who in his right mind would be in favor of something like that?
Dude was a str8t-up deranged terrorist.
"too many notes, not enough music-"
#GMStong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
Oh, for sure.
Who in his right mind would be in favor of something like that?
Dude was a str8t-up deranged terrorist. Phil Montag. I think we're all better than that on here, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
I just think its funny that you attack people and accuse them of being Nazi sympathizers or skin heads because some loon ran over someone in his car, yet I don't see anyone calling you guys names or accusing you of being scum because the actions of someone else. Believe or not, the vast majority on both sides, are not violent or racist or bigots or commies Maybe your arguments would carry more water if you didn't instantly play your cards the same on every subject...."bigot" "racist" "Nazi" "white supremacist" I have seen over the last week or so just about every one of you hint at or flat out call someone one of these things, simply because they disagree with you. Get a life, get an argument, then come back to the big boys table and discuss.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
Congress is putting a bipartisan squeeze on President Donald Trump to condemn white supremacists and commit his administration's resources to combating domestic terrorism by neo-Nazis and other racist groups.
Wow! But don't we already have laws against domestic terrorism and not just against racist groups??? Or are they suggesting we pull resources away from fighting domestic terrorism to put it all into only domestic terrorism by racist groups???
Last edited by 40YEARSWAITING; 09/13/17 02:47 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
I'm actually a communist though. And we used to have discussions, but not anymore. This is the outhouse. And not all discussions, especially over a week's time, happen in a vacuum. We all know who everyone is. Funny how I'd never insinuate someone like DC, Ballpeen, Arch and many others as being alt-right. However, for the members who read Breitbart on the reg, I can't do that.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,171
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,171 |
A lot of people are tired of the alt-left. Their behavior has led many to defend the rights of groups whose messages they don't even believe in. An interesting dilemma to be sure.
Nobody is forcing anyone to defend hate groups, or any other group. And frankly that's a horrifying reflection of character. That is not what I said. I said that many have defended the rights of groups whose messages they don't believe in. Words mean things. You can defend somebody's right to say something while disagreeing-- perhaps vehemently-- with what they say or what they stand for. Yeah sure. Like everyone defended Kap's right to freedom of speech. Hypocrites.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
A lot of people are tired of the alt-left. Their behavior has led many to defend the rights of groups whose messages they don't even believe in. An interesting dilemma to be sure.
Nobody is forcing anyone to defend hate groups, or any other group. And frankly that's a horrifying reflection of character. That is not what I said. I said that many have defended the rights of groups whose messages they don't believe in. Words mean things. You can defend somebody's right to say something while disagreeing-- perhaps vehemently-- with what they say or what they stand for. Yeah sure. Like everyone defended Kap's right to freedom of speech. Hypocrites. You can disagree with him and that does not mean you are saying its not his right. I think hes a moron, but its his right to do so and kneel. Just like its the NFL's right to not employ him (even tho he was going to be signed and was not because 1 he couldn't pick up the phone and 2 his GF is an idiot likes to post pictures on social media)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,165
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,165 |
Congress is putting a bipartisan squeeze on President Donald Trump to condemn white supremacists and commit his administration's resources to combating domestic terrorism by neo-Nazis and other racist groups.
Wow! But don't we already have laws against domestic terrorism and not just against racist groups??? Or are they suggesting we pull resources away from fighting domestic terrorism to put it all into only domestic terrorism by racist groups??? Please re-read the paragraph you quoted, my friend. This legislation has nothing to do with parsing resources to fight terror of any sort, race-based or otherwise. Those initiatives will most likely continue as they have. THIS legislation's sole purpose is apparently to force the President of the United States of America to renounce the activities of these groups. Nothing more/nothing less. It's a shame that these Reps and Dems felt it necessary to legally force the Hairpiece-In-Chief to what what every other decent POTUS would automatically do out of his own general principles.
"too many notes, not enough music-"
#GMStong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,563
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,563 |
Maybe your arguments would carry more water if you didn't instantly play your cards the same on every subject...."bigot" "racist" "Nazi" "white upremacist"
Then just how would you describe neo nazis and the KKK? They were the ones with shields, torches and weapons you know... Do you have politically correct terms you would prefer to be used?
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,909
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,909 |
We all know who everyone is. Funny how I'd never insinuate someone like DC, Ballpeen, Arch and many others as being alt-right. However, for the members who read Breitbart on the reg, I can't do that. Zoinks!!! So, I have that going for me, right? (edited to add "me" )
Last edited by archbolddawg; 09/13/17 03:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,165
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,165 |
"too many notes, not enough music-"
#GMStong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
Maybe your arguments would carry more water if you didn't instantly play your cards the same on every subject...."bigot" "racist" "Nazi" "white upremacist"
Then just how would you describe neo nazis and the KKK? They were the ones with shields, torches and weapons you know... Do you have politically correct terms you would prefer to be used? they already have a term for them. They call them "patriots".
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
Congress is putting a bipartisan squeeze on President Donald Trump to condemn white supremacists and commit his administration's resources to combating domestic terrorism by neo-Nazis and other racist groups.
Wow! But don't we already have laws against domestic terrorism and not just against racist groups??? Or are they suggesting we pull resources away from fighting domestic terrorism to put it all into only domestic terrorism by racist groups??? Please re-read the paragraph you quoted, my friend. This legislation has nothing to do with parsing resources to fight terror of any sort, race-based or otherwise. Those initiatives will most likely continue as they have. THIS legislation's sole purpose is apparently to force the President of the United States of America to renounce the activities of these groups. Nothing more/nothing less. But the article says for Trump to "commit his administration's resources to combating domestic terrorism by neo-Nazis and other racist groups." Also, are they trying to get Trump to repeat himself as he has already said, ""Racism is evil -- and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans,"??? What exactly does this bill want that hasn't already been done???
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,773
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,773 |
Liberals sick of the alt-left are taking 'the red pill'The mainstream media failed to see the rise of Donald Trump in 2016. Now it’s overlooking another grassroots movement that may soon be of equal significance— the growing number of liberals “taking the red pill.” People of all ages and ethnicities are posting YouTube videos describing “red pill moments”—personal awakenings that have caused them to reject leftist narratives imbibed since childhood from friends, teachers, and the news and entertainment media. You might say that those who take the red pill have been “triggered.” But instead of seeking out “safe spaces,” they’re doing the opposite, posting monologues throwing off the shackles of political correctness. Their videos can feature the kind of subversiveness that was once a hallmark of the left—before the movement lost its sense of humor. Candace Owens, a charismatic young African American, posts commentaries on her YouTube channel whose titles seem expressly designed to make PC heads explode. A sample: “I Don't Care About Charlottesville, the KKK, or White Supremacy.” The commentary calls out liberal fearmongering over white supremacists. “I mean there are, what, 6,000 Klansmen left in our nation. You want me to actually process that as a legitimate fear every day when I wake up?” Not insignificantly, her video got nearly 500,000 views and overwhelmingly enthusiastic comments. (“you rock, girl!” “this woman is awesome.”) A later episode about Black Lives Matter got nearly 700,000 views and had the distinction of being briefly taken down by YouTube. Unapologetic, Owens responded with a follow-up commentary — “What YouTube and Facebook REALLY Think of Black People.” She declared, “There was only one version of a black person that these platforms are willing to help propel towards fame and notoriety—and that is an angry black victim.” Owens calls her channel “Red Pill Black.” It invites viewers: “Sick of the alt-left. Welcome, I prescribe red pills.” The term “taking the red pill” derives from the movie "The Matrix," the trippy sci-fi classic. Morpheus, the resistance leader played by Laurence Fishburne offers Neo, the movie’s hero played by Keanu Reeves, a choice: He can take the blue pill and remain in the repressive artificial world known as the Matrix where “you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.” Or he can take the red pill and tumble down the “rabbit hole” where he will come to realize that everything about his life was a lie. The left’s intensifying war on free speech has produced a surge of red pill videos. Some take Owens’ in-your-face approach. Others are meandering, hipster confessionals delivered with the wordy earnestness of characters in a Duplass brothers movie. In his YouTube Channel, Dissent Report, a young, one-time “Bernie Sanders supporting progressive Democrat” admits from behind large sunglasses that he’s made “a pretty hard turn to the right.” He took the red pill after seeing friends “moving …towards an authoritarian sort of Progressivism.” He explains, “They were just standing up for a divisive brand of politics that would tolerate no dissent whatsoever.” Not surprisingly, the mainstream media has largely dismissed the red pill phenomenon. Coverage has mainly stressed the connection to men’s rights activists —the Red Pill forum on Reddit and the documentary, “The Red Pill,” are both about men’s rights. This narrow focus, however, misses the larger story. Those who have been “red pilled” may start out questioning feminism. But that’s often just the beginning. A red pill blogger who calls himself “Pat Riarchy” (“also known as the patriarchy”) recalls that his journey down the rabbit hole began when a Facebook friend derisively called him a “cis male.” He came to recognize that, “it's been one narrative pretty much.” He concluded, “I have my own objective view…I didn't want a bigger government. I realized I didn't like the universal healthcare plan…I realized I didn't really have an issue with guns.” Several books and discussions later, he emerged as a libertarian. Red pill bloggers are increasingly characterizing PC culture as a first step on a slippery slope towards authoritarian socialism. One who articulates this best is Dave Rubin, a married gay man and former left liberal whose show, The Rubin Report, has explored the red pill phenomenon. In his commentary, “The left is no longer liberal”, he explained his own disillusionment with the “regressive left,” whose “backward ideology” of identity politics “puts the collective ahead of the individual. It loves all of its minority groups to behave as a monolith. So if you're a true individual—meaning you don't subscribe to the ideas that the groupthink has attributed to you based on those immutable characteristics—you must be cast out.” Rubin calls this mindset “the biggest threat to freedom and Western civilization that exists today.” One of his recent guests was Cassie Jaye, producer of the The Red Pill” documentary, which chronicled her personal journey away from feminism. Jaye had intended to make a feminist film about the men’s rights movement. But her perspective began to change upon interviewing activists, who were anything but the angry women-bashers so often portrayed by the mainstream media. Instead they were men—and also women—concerned about issues such as unfair child custody laws, pregnancy fraud, and even domestic violence. It turned out that men are also victims of domestic abuse perpetrated by women with surprising frequency. Jaye’s film met with immediate resistance from radical feminists, who trolled her online while she was fundraising for the film. Her documentary has been largely ignored by most of the mainstream media. But it has had widespread impact on the Internet. Laci Green, one of YouTube’s best known personalities whose left-leaning videos about sex and gender have an immense following, posted “Taking The Red Pill?” Green’s relatively tame confession of discomfort with feminists who shut down opposing views, as well as the revelation that she was dating an anti-SJW YouTuber, enraged her fans. They waged an online campaign against her and reportedly “doxxed” her — published her personal information on the internet. Many who proclaim themselves “red pilled” express a yearning for traditional values. “Pat Riarchy” wants to see a return to an era where comedians can “attack everyone,” not just Trump. “PC culture is going down,” he says. “A lot of people want this to stop.” Kirsten Lauryn, a 20-something hipster sitting amidst empty church pews, worries that, “A lot of our society has drawn away from religion as an important way of instilling values.” She observes, “The pendulum is swinging back to a more traditional lifestyle. I see this with my generation Generation Z.” The media has very likely ignored red pilling for the same reason it underestimated support for Donald Trump: An entrenched establishment always resists disrupters, especially those who reject its worldview. That said, red pill bloggers are not necessarily Trump supporters—in many cases, quite the reverse. What they do share, however, is their questioning of mainstream media tropes. Not all their videos would pass muster with Reagan conservatives or even libertarians. But, taken together, they give hope to those worried about the future of capitalism and free speech in America. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/13/liberals-sick-alt-left-are-taking-red-pill.html-The Awakening Begins. The link says it all (almost): Fox News + opinion... then I'll add the 'almost' bit that 40 always buys hook, line and sinker: PROPAGANDA! lmao ewww, ohhh, the awakening begins... gmab lol #40-TROLLS-A-LOT
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Antifa Terror Group?
|
|