|
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 470
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 470 |
I'd be shocked if the 49ers don't try to work out a long term deal with Garrapolo after giving up what will be a high 2nd rounder,unless some team blows them away with a offer and they get Cousins in FA.
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059 |
I'd be shocked if the 49ers don't try to work out a long term deal with Garrapolo after giving up what will be a high 2nd rounder,unless some team blows them away with a offer and they get Cousins in FA. Who knows? Maybe they're taking a page out of the Browns "playbook" and auctioning him off during the off-season. They should be able to get more than they paid for him...
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
Hyde is a FA. I'll bet SF is look at Barkley.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635 |
I'd be shocked if the 49ers don't try to work out a long term deal with Garrapolo after giving up what will be a high 2nd rounder,unless some team blows them away with a offer and they get Cousins in FA. Yeah, I mean seriously... you'd only imagine after given up that capital - they will get him long term. Otherwise they look like goofs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
It seems like the 49ers are already trying to bring down Garoppolo's value for his inevitable extension.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002 |
They could have also traded for JG as insurance in case they could not sign Cousins. If they can also sign Cousins then they could have a camp battle and auction off the loser.
I'd give them a first round pick in a heartbeat for JG or Cousins.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
They could have also traded for JG as insurance in case they could not sign Cousins. If they can also sign Cousins then they could have a camp battle and auction off the loser.
I'd give them a first round pick in a heartbeat for JG or Cousins. That would be very strange and unprecedented.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986 |
They could have also traded for JG as insurance in case they could not sign Cousins. If they can also sign Cousins then they could have a camp battle and auction off the loser.
I'd give them a first round pick in a heartbeat for JG or Cousins. Cousins is going to sign for huge guaranteed money, so they couldn't trade him for several years.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002 |
It's not Cousins they would trade. It would be JG. Unless JG just blows them away or something.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986 |
It's not Cousins they would trade. It would be JG. Unless JG just blows them away or something. Right, but what if Garoppolo won? The 49ers aren't signing Cousins without letting Jimmy walk. They couldn't afford both contracts and be remotely competitive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002 |
Cousins is easily tradeable with whatever contract they sign him to. It's a win win for them.
I'm hoping we can land cousins if we can't finagle something for JG.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Cousins is easily tradeable with whatever contract they sign him to. It's a win win for them.
I'm hoping we can land cousins if we can't finagle something for JG. Cousins would obviously only sign a contract with them that would make it nearly impossible to trade him. They aren't signing Cousins. This is posturing to try and get a better deal for Garoppolo.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Report: 49ers may not ink Garoppolo to long-term deal, could sign or draft QB https://www.thescore.com/news/1414713Having given up a second-round pick for Jimmy Garoppolo, most assumed the San Francisco 49ers viewed him as their long-term option under center. However, that might not be the case. The 49ers could still use their potential top-2 pick in the 2018 NFL Draft to select a quarterback or a significant portion of their $60 million in cap space to sign a free-agent quarterback such as Kirk Cousins, sources told ESPN's Adam Schefter. If San Francisco takes either of those routes, they could franchise tag Garoppolo and then attempt to trade him. There would be interest in Garoppolo and the 49ers could get more than the second-rounder they gave up for him, added Schefter. Garoppolo is set to be active in Week 9, but C.J. Beathard will continue as the starter until the newly acquired pivot is ready to take over. Who are Schefter's sources? It doesn't say if they are team sources, league sources, etc. Also, the article uses the word "could..." I'm not buying this rumor. If anything, I would think that SF is hoping a team falls in love w/one of this year's college QBs and makes a huge move to trade up w/SF if they end up w/the first pick in the draft or maybe even the second.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,201
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,201 |
That would be my guess as well. They're just priming things for the Silly Season.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
It would make sense.
Look at the haul Washington got from the Rams to move out of #2.
Then, look at the haul the Titans got to move out of #1.
Finally, look at the haul we got to move out of #2.
If the 49ers think they have their guy in Garoppolo, they could get a lot of picks to help him. Right now, their roster is terrible. They need so much help. Getting a bevy of picks in a trade might escalate their rebuilding process.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189 |
Report: 49ers may not ink Garoppolo to long-term deal, could sign or draft QB https://www.thescore.com/news/1414713Having given up a second-round pick for Jimmy Garoppolo, most assumed the San Francisco 49ers viewed him as their long-term option under center. However, that might not be the case. The 49ers could still use their potential top-2 pick in the 2018 NFL Draft to select a quarterback or a significant portion of their $60 million in cap space to sign a free-agent quarterback such as Kirk Cousins, sources told ESPN's Adam Schefter. If San Francisco takes either of those routes, they could franchise tag Garoppolo and then attempt to trade him. There would be interest in Garoppolo and the 49ers could get more than the second-rounder they gave up for him, added Schefter. Garoppolo is set to be active in Week 9, but C.J. Beathard will continue as the starter until the newly acquired pivot is ready to take over. Who are Schefter's sources? It doesn't say if they are team sources, league sources, etc. Also, the article uses the word "could..." I'm not buying this rumor. If anything, I would think that SF is hoping a team falls in love w/one of this year's college QBs and makes a huge move to trade up w/SF if they end up w/the first pick in the draft or maybe even the second. I read it as an opinion/speculation piece. Just an idea of what could happen in the future.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
I know I put this on another thread.
1. 49ers got great value for JG...it would be absurd for them not to keep him. This is a negotiating ploy for his long term contract.
2. Trading JG and pick a QB "PROSPECT"...absurd also A bird in the hand is worth more than two in the bush comes to mind. 3. Schefter maybe was told all these possible options but not reality in their choices or that complicated.
4. I wonder (no source just wondering) if part of the trade with BB was to not play him right away to make the 2nd round pick more valuable of course also their first round pick for the 49ers as well.
5. We were told Ummm no, when we inquired with the Pats prior to trade deadline. 49ers above and also below.
6. Hoyer was a big part of this a competent backup for the next 4-5 years...very valuable.
7. I found out yesterday the Pats do not play the 49ers until 2020.
jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
Report: 49ers may not ink Garoppolo to long-term deal, could sign or draft QB https://www.thescore.com/news/1414713Having given up a second-round pick for Jimmy Garoppolo, most assumed the San Francisco 49ers viewed him as their long-term option under center. However, that might not be the case. The 49ers could still use their potential top-2 pick in the 2018 NFL Draft to select a quarterback or a significant portion of their $60 million in cap space to sign a free-agent quarterback such as Kirk Cousins, sources told ESPN's Adam Schefter. If San Francisco takes either of those routes, they could franchise tag Garoppolo and then attempt to trade him. There would be interest in Garoppolo and the 49ers could get more than the second-rounder they gave up for him, added Schefter. Garoppolo is set to be active in Week 9, but C.J. Beathard will continue as the starter until the newly acquired pivot is ready to take over. Who are Schefter's sources? It doesn't say if they are team sources, league sources, etc. Also, the article uses the word "could..." I'm not buying this rumor. If anything, I would think that SF is hoping a team falls in love w/one of this year's college QBs and makes a huge move to trade up w/SF if they end up w/the first pick in the draft or maybe even the second. Yeah, a quick look and the math just doesn't add up. JG is going to point out that he is worth a lot more than Glennon signed for and he's right. He is also going to ask for a lot of guaranteed money. They can say no and franchise him but that takes away half of that $60 million of cap room that they have and Kirk Cousins is going to be the highest paid QB in the NFL and will want the guaranteed money that goes with that. JG may be tradeable if he is only franchised tagged, but his trade value automatically goes down because not a lot of teams will have the cap room and there is no certainty that he will sign long term with them and they would have to use a second franchise tag. I am more worried about Jacksonville signing Cousins than I am about the 49ers signing him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
I am more worried about Jacksonville signing Cousins than I am about the 49ers signing him. Worried because the Jaguars would be very good if he is their QB or worried because then we wouldn't have a chance to sign him? (I have a secret. . . we have no shot at signing Kirk Cousins.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,575
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,575 |
Cousins on the Jags - and a WR added to their roster would make them a SB contender in my opinion.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
Worried that Jax would look a lot more attractive to a FA QB than this team. They are a QB away from being a Super Bowl team in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Worried that Jax would look a lot more attractive to a FA QB than this team. They are a QB away from being a Super Bowl team in my opinion. I think they'd be the best team in the league if they had a good QB.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
j/c:
Garrapolo got his first start w/SF today. I watched the majority of the game.
He had a pick, but the defender ripped the ball out of the WRs hands.
Otherwise, JG looked very, very good! Very poised. Quick decisions. Going through progressions when needed. Accurate throws most of the time and a ton where he led the guys perfectly so they could get YAC. He made a bunch of 3rd and long conversions and led his team on an 80 yard winning FG drive.
People on here were making fun of Lynch being hired in SF, but he was able to trade for JG while our Harvard brain[sic] trust was not.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313 |
I watched the game too. He looked excellent. SF has their franchise QB. Sadly, the Browns do not...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I forgot to mention how quick his release is.
I kept thinking he was going to throw picks because SF has very little talent and they kept getting penalized and were facing terrible down and distance situations. But somehow, he kept making plays.
And the announcers kept saying stuff like this "blank" stat is the highest it's been all year. LOL.......it was getting comical.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002 |
Just imagine if JG was throwing to JG ... that would have been sick ... sigh
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Yep.............w/the way Garrapolo leads receivers, Josh would still be running.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288 |
People on here were making fun of Lynch being hired in SF, but he was able to trade for JG while our Harvard brain[sic] trust was not. Which backup QB should we have given up to the Pats? You are intentionally leaving out THE most important detail of that situation in an effort to advance your agenda. You aren't lying, but you ARE intentionally deceiving.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
I was at the game and I left impressed. SF didn't score any TDs, but he moved the ball with accurate short passes, especially on his "2-minute" drive to win the game.
WSU Willie is right. We didn't have a QB the Pats wanted, so they didn't bother talking to us. Sucks, but if they wanted Hoyer in return (via a free agent contract), how can we offer a better deal? "Take more draft picks from us and then you can sign Colin Kaepernick."
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818 |
People on here were making fun of Lynch being hired in SF, but he was able to trade for JG while our Harvard brain[sic] trust was not. Which backup QB should we have given up to the Pats? You are intentionally leaving out THE most important detail of that situation in an effort to advance your agenda. You aren't lying, but you ARE intentionally deceiving. This is correct.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197 |
The Garoppolo boat has sailed.
Why on earth would the 49'ers sign Cousins for the money he will want?
They got JG for next to nothing. (while the Browns sang and played).
JG is every bit as good as Cousins.
They solved their problem. The Browns have not.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307 |
The Garoppolo boat has sailed.
Why on earth would the 49'ers sign Cousins for the money he will want?
They got JG for next to nothing. (while the Browns sang and played).
JG is every bit as good as Cousins.
They solved their problem. The Browns have not.
Honestly regarding JG, I saw too much risk taking for low reward in some (many) plays.... Still too early, but he sure looks like a good backup QB, lets see if he can handle the starting job....
Last edited by rastanplan; 12/04/17 12:15 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313 |
That is some funny S@#^t. A backup QB. Looks like a franchise QB to me. SF will auction off their 2nd or 3rd pick in the draft to recoup the pick given to NE and more. They will draft some quality OL and skill players and that team will be on its way. Bank on it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
People on here were making fun of Lynch being hired in SF, but he was able to trade for JG while our Harvard brain[sic] trust was not. Which backup QB should we have given up to the Pats? You are intentionally leaving out THE most important detail of that situation in an effort to advance your agenda. You aren't lying, but you ARE intentionally deceiving. This is correct. It's not that simple. What if the Browns had offered more than just a 2nd round pick? What if they would have offered two second round picks? Does anyone think that Hoyer is worth a second round pick? LOL Maybe you guys ARE trying to deceive people.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307 |
That is some funny S@#^t. A backup QB. Looks like a franchise QB to me. SF will auction off their 2nd or 3rd pick in the draft to recoup the pick given to NE and more. They will draft some quality OL and skill players and that team will be on its way. Bank on it. Honestly, and from the Chicago game only, the number of risky throws was alarming, not just that, but the type of throws... few yards and Int potential of the throws, its more of a boom or bust, backup QB mentality....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288 |
People on here were making fun of Lynch being hired in SF, but he was able to trade for JG while our Harvard brain[sic] trust was not. Which backup QB should we have given up to the Pats? You are intentionally leaving out THE most important detail of that situation in an effort to advance your agenda. You aren't lying, but you ARE intentionally deceiving. This is correct. It's not that simple. What if the Browns had offered more than just a 2nd round pick? What if they would have offered two second round picks? Does anyone think that Hoyer is worth a second round pick? LOL Maybe you guys ARE trying to deceive people. The Pats are in the running for another Super Bowl. We could have offered them two 1sts and the Pats would STILL be without a backup QB...on a Super Bowl-bound team. No way BB would do that. Well..wait...I think Clipboard Jesus is still out there. The only thing more ridiculous than your constant agenda-posting is you trying to deflect and cover it up. You are so hell-bent on protecting Hue and criticizing the FO - which is fine - but you criticize the FO all-to-often (and repeatedly at that) for things that DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN. You can blame the FO for a lot of things, but the biggest booger on their record - finding the right QB - has Hue's fingerprints all over it. That's too much of an inconvenient truth for you to broach. Your agenda veil is as thin as your skin.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,984
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,984 |
The Pats are in the running for another Super Bowl. We could have offered them two 1sts and the Pats would STILL be without a backup QB We could have offered the pats the moon and the pats still would have traded JG to the 49rs to get Hoyer as their backup, that's what sealed the deal for BB. Hue can only play the players the FO get's for him, and they've proven over and over again the FO is inept at judging and acquiring true QB talent here.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,203
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,203 |
Does anyone think that Hoyer is worth a second round pick? LOL
Maybe you guys ARE trying to deceive people. Well according to most Browns fans it was worth over 15 mil for the second round pick we got by signing BO. So no, Hoyer isn't worth 15+ million. I mean they can't have it both ways can they? Or can they? lmao
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850 |
Honestly, and from the Chicago game only, the number of risky throws was alarming, not just that, but the type of throws... few yards and Int potential of the throws, its more of a boom or bust, backup QB mentality....
You won't win this argument. I actually agree with you, but I'm sure we'll be in the minority.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341 |
Honestly, and from the Chicago game only, the number of risky throws was alarming, not just that, but the type of throws... few yards and Int potential of the throws, its more of a boom or bust, backup QB mentality....
You won't win this argument. I actually agree with you, but I'm sure we'll be in the minority. I'm with you guys ...
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum More Garrapolo
|
|