Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Originally Posted By: mac
more changes are coming


I don't know why this keeps playing over and over in my head lol.

Marvin Lewis gets fired at the end of the year.

Marvin comes here and becomes the HC and Hue is back to OC.

we become the bengals...lol idk why but it does


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544
Originally Posted By: bbrowns32
Originally Posted By: GMdawg
Quote:
I would think that Dorsey will have Hue more involved in the talent evaluation process..if he is, it will require more of Hue's time..there is only so much time in a day and we could see Hue hiring a OC, leaving him to focus more time on his primary job as a HC.


I have a different opinion than you on this subject If we take Dorsey at his word he will involve Hue, the assistant coach, the scouting and personel department. Just like Brown did. The difference is that Dorsey has experience with the scouting, drafting, and personal side and is more likely to make his own decisions than to give as much credence to others opinions. Will that be good or bad??? Only time will tell.


I tend to agree with you, GM. People need to read your post closely and absorb what you have written. I expect that while Hue will have as much input as previous, he opinion will perhaps carry less weight...


he opinion will perhaps carry less weight...

i dont believe thats possible...


being a browns fan is like taking your dog to vet every week to be put down...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
It's funny this myth that Sashi didn't bring talent here. Whatever you feel about him, most everyone would agree that going in to next year our needs were QB, WR, CB, and FS. Past that we're looking at adding depth. Those needs are attainable in ONE Draft because of the groundwork he laid.

And when you look at the young talent he did bring in, many key contributors are trending upwards in their development. Who knows how much talent we are going to lose when Dorsey blows this up this off season.


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Sashi sucked. So glad he is gone.

I am so happy that Dorsey is here. I want our GM to work with our HC, rather than undermining him like Sashi did.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,726
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,726
It is obvious that Haslam never fully bought into the idea of a complete teardown.

I wouldn't have either. I would have kept our better free agents. I would have more aggressively pursued top free agents.

However it cannot be disputed that we do have talent on this team, and that Sashi Brown was responsible for adding that talent. A complete teardown/rebuild takes more than 2 seasons though. Brown's biggest problem is that he never solved the QB position, and that he passed on 2 QBs who look like starts in the NFL. However, he did add talent to this team.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I am not really arguing w/you YTown, but I question how much "talent" he drafted considering how high our draft picks were and how many we had.

What I will say is that he left us w/plenty of picks and cap space.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,767
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,767
I am not all that unhappy with the picks actually selected the past couple of years.

But we have to remember this, so many players causes roster turnover. And the new players are getting significant playing time. But because they do not have experience, a lot of mistakes are made. It's not until year 3 that we can make an honest assessment.

The Wentz trade out looks terrible now. Hopefully there is a solution on the way.


Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!…. That did not age well.
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,122
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,122
ytown, our offensive line is considered a strength of our team. every member of that line except jt was either signed or resigned by brown. that group will be our starting line next year for our turnaround.

our defensive front seven is another strength of our team. they will do nothing except get better. every starter except Shelton were either signed or resigned by brown. that group of starters will be the core of our defense next year for the turnaround.

had we drafted wentz this whole conversation would be different. neither I nor anyone else on here know for sure who decided we were not taking wentz but we did not. if kizer or the rookie we pick next April turns out to be “the guy” then we will be pretty good pretty quickly and to a large part it will be due to brown’s moves.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Is our defensive really a strength? How many sacks do they have?

I don't think they suck, but I think many posters overrate them.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I am not really arguing w/you YTown, but I question how much "talent" he drafted considering how high our draft picks were and how many we had.

What I will say is that he left us w/plenty of picks and cap space.


I thought about this for a hot second my friend.

I think to answer the question of how much "talent" he added to our team.

He would have to have been retained and see what he did with those picks and cap space this coming offseason.

lol I do wonder...

Last edited by dawgpound101; 12/15/17 12:47 AM.

I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
He blew too many picks, cut too many players, and let too many players walk. Glad his ass is gone.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
He blew too many picks, cut too many players, and let too many players walk. Glad his ass is gone.


haha Vers I detect absolutely no bitterness in those comments lol

I feel ya man


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
I will tell you this we are getting a QB at #1 finally. I for one hope it is Rosen.


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,333
I hope it is Rosen as long as he is COMMITTED to playing NFL football and being the Browns CEO on the field. He needs to be properly vetted in this regard.


After 55 years, I'm walking away from this dumpster fire. Good luck to everyone who continues to hang on. You'll need it.
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,122
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,122
it is hard to get sacks when offenses can complete short passes easily because our cbs cannot cover. the front seven is primarily responsible for a radical improvement in our run d. that group is a strength of our team and is very young and will only get better imo.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I agree it is hard to get sacks when the other team is only throwing quick passes. However, that is not the case.

Are there quick passes? Yes.

Are there times when the qb has too much time? Yes.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,122
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,122
after years of watching teams gouge our run defense for 100 plus yards and even 200 yards with weekly regularity I am happy as a clam ( not really sure how happy clams are) that we are finally putting the brakes on opponents run game. when we get a couple of cover corners that can actually cover for a few seconds you will see sacks increase.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I wasn't talking about our run defense. I wasn't even complaining. I simply made an observation that our front seven in general and our d-line in particular are not generating enough pressure on opposing qbs.

I don't even think it is debatable.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,112
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,112
Well we lost Shelton and ogbah so thats a lot of power missing from the front 4. It lets them focus on Garrett completely and even he can't beat that many triple teams.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Sashi sucked. So glad he is gone.

I am so happy that Dorsey is here. I want our GM to work with our HC, rather than undermining him like Sashi did.


Can you link where Sashi underminded Hue, it's to often on her peoples opinion are spewed as fact that's why you ask for links also. thank you.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,351
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,351
j/c

I'm not so sure that our front seven is a strength. I'm not going to sit here and claim it's not, but color me not so sure. On paper and in conversations on this board many are sold that it is. Many consider that a lot of talent was brought in by Sashi. But even when they were healthy, there was never consistent pressure brought. We weren't really causing QB's to get out of their element and creating enough pressure to cause a lot of turnovers.

What we do know is that there were a lot of players drafted on the D side of the ball. What we do know is that our players are very young. How they will develop is anyone's guess. What people need to remember is some players develop well and some simply don't. The evidence of that? We've had so many draft picks that if they all developed well, we would have a lot of all pro players. We don't.

I believe you do have to let these young players have the time to either develop or not. I don't believe it's time to panic and start throwing these players away or replace them. But based on the actual evidence of when they were healthy this year, I think it's far too early to talk about greatness from our front seven. The jury is still out on that.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Underminded? No, I can't link that. LOL

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
Well we lost Shelton and ogbah so thats a lot of power missing from the front 4. It lets them focus on Garrett completely and even he can't beat that many triple teams.


I know, Razor. However, our DL hasn't got much pressure all year.

We blitz a ton, yet we only have 25 sacks on the year. That's not very good.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999
jc...

Reading the headlines, I have to smile as I wonder how long it will take before some realize, talking too much can have unintended results.

No fan base in the NFL is more hungry for information about their team than the Browns fan base. Talking just to talk..answering media questions without engaging your brain first and before you know it, you just made yourself look like an idiot.

Dorsey should know better but I guess some lessons must be learned the hard way. He might want to take a class at Belichick University on media relations.

jmho



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Originally Posted By: Vambo
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Sashi sucked. So glad he is gone.

I am so happy that Dorsey is here. I want our GM to work with our HC, rather than undermining him like Sashi did.


Can you link where Sashi underminded Hue, it's to often on her peoples opinion are spewed as fact that's why you ask for links also. thank you.


link..no well sort of, too lazy to get the exact quotes.

But you can't tell me that Hue was not totally surprised by our move on releasing Haden. I think he and GW just didn't not see that coming. I'm pretty sure in a presser just a DAY before praising Haden and what we thought of him...then the next day a surprised Hue trying to tow the line.

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: eotab
Originally Posted By: Vambo
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Sashi sucked. So glad he is gone.

I am so happy that Dorsey is here. I want our GM to work with our HC, rather than undermining him like Sashi did.


Can you link where Sashi underminded Hue, it's to often on her peoples opinion are spewed as fact that's why you ask for links also. thank you.


link..no well sort of, too lazy to get the exact quotes.

But you can't tell me that Hue was not totally surprised by our move on releasing Haden. I think he and GW just didn't not see that coming. I'm pretty sure in a presser just a DAY before praising Haden and what we thought of him...then the next day a surprised Hue trying to tow the line.

jmho


That’s also the listing for cornerback Joe Haden, who has not played since fracturing his fibula in a game against the Colts a little more than a month ago.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...s-for-steelers/

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999




The Browns are currently the youngest team in the NFL, just as they were in 2016. I'm doing a comparison with the Steelers rebuild back when Chuck Noll was hired as their HC.

I'll have more comment to add..just want to get this info posted first.


.................YEAR BEFORE TAKING OVER.....................
.................Steelers................................Browns...............
year...record......age...exp--   --year...record...age...exp..
1968...2-11-1 ...26.4...3.3--   --2015...3-13....25.8...3.2..

.................................FIRST YEAR...................................
year...record.....age....exp--  --year...record...age....exp..
1969...1-13......25.9....3.1--   --2016...1-15....25.3...2.5..

..............................SECOND YEAR...................................
year...record.....age....exp--  --year...record...age....exp..
1970.....5-9......25.6...2.8--   --2017...0-13....24.6....1.9..

................................THIRD YEAR......................................
year...record.....age....exp--  --year...record...age....exp..
...1971...6-8.....25.3...2.6 --  -- 2018.....?..........?........?.....  

.................................FORTH YEAR...................................
year...record.....age....exp--  --year...record...age....exp..
...1972...11-3....25.3...2.7--  --2019........?.........?........?....

.................................FIFTH YEAR......................................
year...record.....age....exp--  --year...record...age....exp..
...1973...10-4....26.0...3.4--  --2020........?.........?........?....





FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,695
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,695
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I wasn't talking about our run defense. I wasn't even complaining. I simply made an observation that our front seven in general and our d-line in particular are not generating enough pressure on opposing qbs.

I don't even think it is debatable.


It's not debatable... but it was. Ogbah, Meder & a healthy Shelton made a world of difference. There was a lot of immediate pressure and pockets breaking down quickly when we were healthy. The defensive improvement (particularly the front 7) is really the biggest bright spot for me this year.

I also agree that recipe changed (especially when you combine injuries upfront with a safety playing with one foot in Lake Erie) so that offenses knew they could exploit us with short passes and screens... which inevitably chops down your sack numbers.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999
jc...

I'm continuing to do more research into "the numbers" and I'm asking Browns fans to identify how these numbers relate to the "failure" of the Browns front office and their overall record of 1-27. What do the numbers tell us?

I'm comparing the Browns record with the record of division rival, the Steelers ... and the record of the Rams, a team rebuilt without the main focus being "analytics".

What do the numbers tell us?

BROWNS Draftees
2013...14 rookies
2014...16 rookies
2015...15 rookies...
2016...23 rookies....
2017...24.rookies..

STEELERS Drafteess
2013...8 rookies
2014...8 rookies
2015...10 rookies
2016...9 rookies

RAMS Drafteess
2013...14 rookies
2014...11 ....".....
2015...14...."....
2016...15...."....
2017...10...."...



Last edited by mac; 12/19/17 09:39 AM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Originally Posted By: mac
jc...

I'm continuing to do more research into "the numbers" and I'm asking Browns fans to identify how these numbers relate to the "failure" of the Browns front office and their overall record of 1-27. What do the numbers tell us?

I'm comparing the Browns record with the record of division rival, the Steelers ... and the record of the Rams, a team rebuilt without the main focus being "analytics".

What do the numbers tell us?

BROWNS Draftees
2013...14 rookies
2014...16 rookies
2015...15 rookies...
2016...23 rookies....
2017...24.rookies..

STEELERS Drafteess
2013...8 rookies
2014...8 rookies
2015...10 rookies
2016...9 rookies

RAMS Drafteess
2013...14 rookies
2014...11 ....".....
2015...14...."....
2016...15...."....
2017...10...."...





It says we're a young team.

I don't understand comparing the record. And I still don't think some fans fully understand what the plan was... We weren't going to win, our goal was player development for two years. Our young players have been phenomenal pick-ups and our front office built a pretty good base to move forward. We're also most likely going to end up with 2 top 5 picks in the draft. We would have taken 2 first rounders anywhere in the draft actually...

The problem with the plan isn't the young players on the roster. The problem is we didn't win anything. That wasn't the plan at all. Some blame Sashi, some blame Hue. However it shook out, Hue is still here and Sashi is gone. I whole-heartedly don't agree with that decision but I'm willing to move on. The front office did exactly what they said they were going to do and Sashi was fired because of it.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
100% we are a young team.

I know in 2016 we had 19 rookies on our roster.
In 2017 currently we have 12 rookies on our roster.

When I say roster I'm talking about the 53...not practice squad.

In comparison...and just doing our Division,

The Ravens have 9 on their roster in 2017
The Bengals have 13 on their roster in 2017
The Steelers have 6 on their roster in 2017

Now obviously the better you are as a team the less need for staffing your roster with rookies.

So Steelers are ready to win now...actually they might get in a little trouble when their studs start to retire.

Bengals are in more of a rebuild mode than people think.

So are the Ravens...

But with our 12 we also have 23 players in their 2nd season.

So that 35 2 thirds of our roster are First or Second year players!

Our futile record is more so not because we don't have Talent on this team....just too too much are still raw and learning talent!

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,231
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,231
Originally Posted By: mac
What do the numbers tell us?


Not a thing.



Side note: I find it comical that you, of all people, are attempting to use an analytical approach to determine something regarding the use of analytics.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,351
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,351
I don't believe that raw numbers are the same as analytics.

"I do not think that means what you think it means."


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,095
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,095
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
I don't believe that raw numbers are the same as analytics.


They're not. Raw numbers by themselves don't tell you anything. Analytics is the manipulation/usage of the raw numbers to form a conclusion...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999
Quote:
Our futile record is more so not because we don't have Talent on this team....just too too much are still raw and learning talent!

jmho


What I see is INEXPERIENCE...

The Browns got too young, too fast and it ended up producing teams that could not compete against veteran teams that have a healthy mix of young and veteran players.

I see this as a fatal flaw in the way Sashi, Depodesta and Berry built the Browns roster. In the end, it cost Sashi his job and may lead to the departure of Depodesta and Berry as well as some of the scouts.

Turning over a roster so quickly can have unintended consequences...



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Purp...........getting on mac and ignoring dudes like Vambo, Dep, device, cfrs, Tony, Rasta, etc is a bit odd.

mac is way more fair than they are and he isn't very fair. LOL

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Purp...........getting on mac and ignoring dudes like Vambo, Dep, device, cfrs, Tony, Rasta, etc is a bit odd.

mac is way more fair than they are and he isn't very fair. LOL
Originally Posted By: PrplPplEater
Originally Posted By: mac
What do the numbers tell us?


Not a thing.



Side note: I find it comical that you, of all people, are attempting to use an analytical approach to determine something regarding the use of analytics.



You're going to great efforts to keep that board war going aren't ya there Vers.

Last edited by DeputyDawg; 12/19/17 10:13 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Actually the plan was pretty sound and needed commitment. The flaw was not taking Wentz pure and simple we had the opportunity and didn't jump at it.

We took Wentz and this team is competing for the division and playoffs.

That is pretty much why Sashi is gone. He should have gotten Hue a QB they would have been a happy couple then. wink

Petey...you keep posting the way you want...


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,999
Originally Posted By: eotab
Actually the plan was pretty sound and needed commitment. The flaw was not taking Wentz pure and simple we had the opportunity and didn't jump at it.

We took Wentz and this team is competing for the division and playoffs.

That is pretty much why Sashi is gone. He should have gotten Hue a QB they would have been a happy couple then. wink

Petey...you keep posting the way you want...


Well Petey, you can count on me continuing to post my thoughts and views.

One win in two years (1-27)...no one expected miracles from this rebuild but just one win..last year..was not enough winning to save Sashi's job.

Not getting a franchise QB in the first two years of the rebuild did play a big part. The fact is, our young, inexperienced management could not recognize QB talent, even if they were staring at it, face to face.

Experience matters..I don't care what job you have, experience does matter.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum The Browns Front Office...cont....

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5