|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
I think the only permanent ban was for Syrian Refugees. The reason I haven't read into this as much is because it's easily reversible and at least at face value, falls under the purview of the main job of the POTUS. My concern with this admin deals with stuff that isn't as easily reversible, like court appointments and starting trade wars with countries we aren't at war/sanctioned against. Well SCOTUS once again ruled that the United States can go after entire nationalities under the guise of public safety. They finally had a chance to overturn Korematsu vs US, which gave us interment camps, but decided not to.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259 |
Well SCOTUS once again ruled that the United States can go after entire nationalities under the guise of public safety. They finally had a chance to overturn Korematsu vs US, which gave us interment camps, but decided not to. Korematsu was overturned by the majority opinion actually. However, you could argue it was replaced with this ruling. I'm not going to say I've taken a deep dive and read the EO extensively, but I do know there is a difference between what is written and what is said, and it seems the Supreme Court took the tact of saying that what is said is not important against what is written (considering Trumps lawyers had to rewrite it 3 times).
#gmstrong
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Supreme Court Backs Trump Travel
Ban
