DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Neo-Nazi group's leader is black man who vows to dissolve it

You sure seem to know a lot about those nazi groups.

Rather than make it up, I actually read the information posted in this thread. I understand this is a process you are unfamiliar with.

But that's OK. Just make accusations and point fingers with nothing to back it up. That's why I keep the crazy loons on ignore in the first place.

I'm pretty sure Swish knows how to read. Why are you replying to Swish saying he doesn't know how to read?

Well, let's see there, Rocket old boy.

If YOU were able to both read and comprehend better you would know that your contention was neither suggested nor implied. But then, you do not seem to understand how percentages, statistics, or probability works, do you? Do you recall angrily insisting that a stat compiled over decades and millions of people could not possibly be correct because of your own, singular, individual experience? Also including an incorrect evaluation of your own outcome due to single parenting. Hate to break it to you, but you are just not that important.

As for Swish, while he can in fact read, at least somewhat, the number of times he has completely failed to understand simple statements in plain English and stated that they mean something completely different than what was said strongly indicates a fairly severe comprehension problem. Also, either there is something wrong with his keyboard or their are clear pointers to a dyslexia issue.

No, sonny, the response was clearly and obviously to OCD who apparently missed the simple fact that the numbers quoted did not come from some separate, intensive study of the indicated subject matter, which in itself is something he seems to have an objection to, despite referencing the very same subject himself on numerous occasions, but instead were simply and obviously derived from reading the very thread he is posting in. That, moreover, would be the failure referenced, not at all indicating a total failure on his part at reading as a general skill but instead a lack of thoroughness and effort in general which some might refer to as lazy and stupid.

Rather than engage in childish insults and name-calling, you might be better off actually putting effort into reading and comprehending, then making an attempt to respond with adult, intelligent, rational thoughts of your own, but then, you have demonstrated a remarkable propensity to avoid such courses of action in the past and have given little indication of any ability to do so.

Carry on. Cry Havoc, and let slip the kittens of your indignation!

I think our self anointed genius once more was challenged by the concept of "quick reply" ... Ironic that someone that cannot grasp such a simple concept over and over and over again no matter how diligently posters explain it to him likes to lecture everyone else and question their intelect. If only we could draw pictures here, I think he might finaly get it

At the end of a post that is basically one long childish rant! thanks for my Saturday morning laugh.

lol Nelson stays being wrong all the time.

Using exceptions to the rule doesn't change the rule.

Why do you come in here calling everybody names? You know it's just going to get you banned again... smh

I for one would enjoy having a rational intellectual conversation with you... if you were remotely capable.

Uhm, no. You replied to Swish's initial post. Not my fault you still lack the understanding to hit reply to the person you're responding to.



I don't recall this. Maybe you can show me.

I do remember you trying to educate this board about turkey basters, though.



Why'd you bother dedicating 6 paragraphs to me if I'm not that important?



Wow, so we're going to insult people insisting they have an intellectual disability. You're classy.



You're not my father. Don't call me son.



Actually, it's clear that you replied to Swish. "Re:" comes from the days of email, and it means you are replying to that subject or person. Your insintuations would hold merit if it said "Re:OldColdDawg" but alas it does not.

Here's the receipt for you.

Link to larger