|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307 |
If RAC was a leader, he would take control of his future.. HE HAS TO STEP UP..
Thats all I'm going to say.. He isn't doing the things he should be doing..
Funny thing is, I like Ammo's insight.. If I had to pick a staff from this board, Ammo would be there, along with Shep, I like that kat to, Dawgpound17, youd be there, Pit, you comin with me, LOL....
There, thats my coaching staff Coach, you like that?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
I misread your rant. Apparently, you misread a few things yourself. I never said I coached in college YET. I did say I was offered a position with a Division 2 school. I am still considering it. As for my name, I don't give out that information. I had someone on the board before that asked what school I coached at that was as immature as you. I was naive enough to give it to him. He then proceeded to call the school to verify that I coached there. Then he continued to call and harass and even went far enough as to call screaming that I "sucked" as a coach and other things. I'll never go through that nightmare again. There is only one person that knows where I coach and all that info you are asking for. That is GM and I trust him. Sorry, I'm not stupid enough to post that on the internet. Bottom line is that like I said, you don't know what's going on but comment on it. You aren't the only person I've called on it. I call Peen and Pit on it constantly. Too many think they have a clue and don't. I could care less what you think or say. I just don't want others thinking you have a clue as to what you are posting when it's pure crap. I'm not quite the same as you. I have posted information on things that actually go on in the locker room and on the team and later had them verified in the media and by Danielle (Hank Fraley's wife). That's the difference. I have a clue as to what I'm talking about.  
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
Quote:
If RAC was a leader, he would take control of his future.. HE HAS TO STEP UP..
Thats all I'm going to say.. He isn't doing the things he should be doing..
Funny thing is, I like Ammo's insight.. If I had to pick a staff from this board, Ammo would be there, along with Shep, I like that kat to, Dawgpound17, youd be there, Pit, you comin with me, LOL....
There, thats my coaching staff Coach, you like that?
The team now has a winning record and is in the hunt for the playoffs, but RAC hasn't "stepped up"? 
Great coaching staff.  Too bad you missed out on quite a few people that have actually coached that are on here.
I'm glad you like Ammo's insights. Not too many people in the NFL, on the board, or ANYWHERE outside of Glenville agreed with him on taking Troy Smith with the #3 pick. Guess you would have a great team if you enjoy those kind of insights.
Now, feel free to continue your rants, I won't clutter the board with any more of your ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790 |
Quote:
Ammo, what I said, and you continue to twist things, is that when someone does something classless, and you have done so on many occassions like making fun of physical disabilities)
You got a link? It's not that I doubt you but this is a pretty severe accusation.
Quote:
that is a reflection on the parenting someone received
C'mon, you don't think people do things their not taught? Your comment bight be true in general terms but to apply it to one persons parents isn't right.
I have given Ammo a lot of crap, but his parents shouldn't be involved.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
P, what happened was that Ammo made a post making fun of Lou Holtz' lisp. Many people, and I thought you were one, called it classless. He continued to do so and defended his actions. What I said was that his parents should have taught him not to do that. From there, Ammo went on with his years of vast experience to tell me how parenting wasn't important in how a kid turns out (paraphrasing).
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790 |
I just don't remember that. He has said a lot of crap so it's hard to remember it all.
I won't post anymore on the subject because we are in pure football, where it doesn't belong.
My apologies to all.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
Hall of Famer
|
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531 |
Quote:
P, what happened was that Ammo made a post making fun of Lou Holtz' lisp. Many people, and I thought you were one, called it classless. He continued to do so and defended his actions. What I said was that his parents should have taught him not to do that. From there, Ammo went on with his years of vast experience to tell me how parenting wasn't important in how a kid turns out (paraphrasing).
Are you serious? Are you freaking KIDDING ME????
I tried taking the high road here but this is ridiculous. I said that parenting isn't important in how a kid turns out? That right there is proof that you can't comprehend most of the stuff I write because I NEVER would write something like that, especially because family is THE most important structure in my life. I wouldn't be who I am today without them, I wouldn't have been class Vice President, I probably wouldn't have stayed away from drugs without them setting a good example for me.
Some parents can be good parents and have rotten kids, I understand that as I know several good parents who have problem children. But at the same time there's usually a pattern that bad parents = bad children.
For you to say I don't think parenting and family are important is a COMPLETE fabrication.
You remind me a lot of a guy I hated in high school. The jock Republican who insisted he was always right and insisted on doing things his way, and if someone thought differently and refused to back down (me) he'd pick you out and try to make your life miserable.
Fast forward 3 years later, I'm having the time of my life while he's miserable.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,639
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,639 |
Quote:
I have played ball to, for your info, and I blocked so well, that my RB in high School, Went to play in the NFL.
Eat it Phil...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
As I said, I was paraphrasing. You took offense to me saying your parents should have taught you better than that. I stand by that statement.
I don't think I'm always right. I just think some people are so absurd that they can't possibly believe the crap their spewing. It's called immaturity. When you grow up a little more (not an insult, just fact), you'll understand. Now, as I stated before (an P as well), this is pure football. Take it to PMs if you have more to say.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307
All Pro
|
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307 |
Quote:
Quote:
If RAC was a leader, he would take control of his future.. HE HAS TO STEP UP..
Thats all I'm going to say.. He isn't doing the things he should be doing..
Funny thing is, I like Ammo's insight.. If I had to pick a staff from this board, Ammo would be there, along with Shep, I like that kat to, Dawgpound17, youd be there, Pit, you comin with me, LOL....
There, thats my coaching staff Coach, you like that?
The team now has a winning record and is in the hunt for the playoffs, but RAC hasn't "stepped up"?
Great coaching staff. Too bad you missed out on quite a few people that have actually coached that are on here.
I'm glad you like Ammo's insights. Not too many people in the NFL, on the board, or ANYWHERE outside of Glenville agreed with him on taking Troy Smith with the #3 pick. Guess you would have a great team if you enjoy those kind of insights.
Now, feel free to continue your rants, I won't clutter the board with any more of your ignorance.
Ok great, dont care who you are anyway.. So now, you are the mind maker for people here? Your nuts dude.. The more you continue this, the more I know you.. And you have no clue.. I dont care who you know either.. Because you know a players wife, your Mr. Insider, LOL.. I can see RAC, " OK guys, coach B said to run to the left" , lOLOLOL
No RAC hasn't really stepped up, honestly.. For One, he had to flip a coin to decide who starts the muti-million business. Then Frye fails, and has no other option but to get the next guy on the depth chart, which he made, which was Anderson..
Anderson looked promising last year.. Frye has never looked promising.. Then the big arguemnet of Frye not playing well in Practice, but plays good in games, WAS BS.. He just always played bad.. So In camp, you have 2 guys, ( im not going to throw Brady in this ) battling for the start.. Both looked like crap, but Frye always did look like crap" during non-game action".
Then the pre-season rolls around.. Frye couldn't produce ANYTHING, HORRIBLE, but Anderson did better, but still didn't start the season.. THAT way I feel Frye was set up to fail, so he can get booted away from Cleveland.. Just to end it..
Anderson now has no-one looking over his should, competeing.. Anderson blows up.. Savage built the Oline, not RAC.. Anderson throws the TD's for the points, Not RAC... Savage brought Anderson in... RAC just looks good, because of the success of his players..
BUT when it comes down to decisions that the coach is to make, like time-outs, challanges, MOTIVATION, depth chart, he's off base.. WAYYYYY off.. Your telling me he could tell that Willie was inmobile? He was running like Forest Gump with braces.. Terrible.. If he would have made THAT change alone, this was a win...
RAC didn't make the QB change, the front office did..
RAC is not a head coach..
![[Linked Image from i37.photobucket.com]](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e52/rusrious/choke.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790 |
Quote:
Because you know a players wife, your Mr. Insider
Coach B, Maverick and Vers have all given inside info for a while. Never to my knowledge has anything come from anyones wife.
You can chose to take it or leave it, since links are never provided. All I can say is these three have written stuff on this board before it was common knowledge.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307
All Pro
|
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307 |
I dont doubt it,
It's over, I'm finished with it..
I'm sure players have been here before.. It's public, LOL..
Im thinking Coach B should maybe try to get in and coach the Defense, why not? Right?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790 |
I am not a big supporter of RAC, but some of what you said I take issue with... Quote:
Anderson looked promising last year.. Frye has never looked promising..
I think you are flat out wrong. DA looked good for one half. The same game where he came in after Frye played extremely well.
Quote:
He just always played bad..
No, he didn't. If he did we would never have started him over Dilfer.
Quote:
Then the pre-season rolls around.. Frye couldn't produce ANYTHING, HORRIBLE, but Anderson did better, but still didn't start the season.. THAT way I feel Frye was set up to fail, so he can get booted away from Cleveland.. Just to end it..
You've got to be kidding me. DA was the player who everyone wan't to start. He flat out was bad. He didn't out preform Frye. If he did, he would have been the starter. RAC stuck with Frye because DA didn't do anything to win the job, Frye got the start because of it.
Quote:
Anderson now has no-one looking over his should, competeing.. Anderson blows up.. Savage built the Oline, not RAC.. Anderson throws the TD's for the points, Not RAC... Savage brought Anderson in... RAC just looks good, because of the success of his players..
Isn't this the way it always works? GMs get the players, coaches coach them. If players play well, the team wins.
Savage has the say in all personnel decisions. My question is why did he even keep Frye in the off season when he hired Chud? It was quite obvious that Frye doesn't possess the skill set to be effective in this type of offense.
Romeo blew it on the whole QB competetion but Savage set him up for it by keeping Frye.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
For One, he had to flip a coin to decide who starts the muti-million business. Then Frye fails, and has no other option but to get the next guy on the depth chart, which he made, which was Anderson..
Had to slap someone around for a week on that issue.. HE DIDN'T have to use a coin ..he did in jest to see how both would react to it..neither QB was or is a huge investment..but clearly Frye wasn't showing them enough to just hand him a starting job..or is that obvious to you? I saw no flaw in that coin flip ..in fact it was quite funny to me like the posts I continue to read in this board.. Frye IMPLODED ..then they inserted DA..nuff said.. Then the pre-season rolls around.. Frye couldn't produce ANYTHING, HORRIBLE, but Anderson did better, but still didn't start the season.. THAT way I feel Frye was set up to fail, so he can get booted away from Cleveland.. Just to end it..
Where did U get this notion that Anderson played better than Frye in preseason??? When did that happen? He never outplayed Frye..he never showed a ounce of anything special...so he didn't BEAT Frye OUT.. If you did your reading you'd know that Phil said they wanted Anderson to beat Frye out because they had a offer on the table but IT NEVER HAPPENED.. Anderson now has no-one looking over his should, competeing.. Anderson blows up.. Savage built the Oline, not RAC.. Anderson throws the TD's for the points, Not RAC... Savage brought Anderson in... RAC just looks good, because of the success of his players..
Rac doesn't miss tackles..the players do...Rac doesn't get out of position..the players do...etc etc... Using that theory ..it means every coach looks good or bad according to the success of his players..not that he has a brain and can run a team..far be it If U guys gonna debate use some solid facts not made up stuff.. 
Last edited by Attack Dawg; 11/13/07 01:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
Wow, the more you post, the more I laugh. Frye was set up to fail? Frye couldn't do anything in the pre-season? Here's some information for you. Frye outplayed DA in the pre-season. Everyone saw it. In fact, DA had a "leg up" on Frye before camp because of OTAs. Frye was given every opportunity to succeed here. He didn't fit Chud's system. The reason Frye was sent to Seattle was because they wanted to ramp up Quinn getting ready. Frye was the only QB that had any trade value. Both were put on the market, Frye and DA, and the only takers were for Frye. Many in the league think Frye can still succeed including people in the Browns organization. This all is coming from Charlie himself, not from other people. That's how it went down. RAC doesn't motivate people? Really? According to ever published report, the player respect RAC and play hard for him. The players themselves, again this is coming from Frye, ARE motivated by RAC. You, again, have no idea what you're talking about. Frye not being a practice player was "crap"? Nope, it has been that way since high school. At Akron he has the same situation. It's only crap if you don't know what you're talking about. Where is your proof that the FO made the QB change. I'll be waiting for the link. I KNOW what happened with the QB change because CHARLIE HIMSELF told me. So, provide your link. You are clueless.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790 |
Quote:
Where is your proof that the FO made the QB change. I'll be waiting for the link. I KNOW what happened with the QB change because CHARLIE HIMSELF told me. So, provide your link.
Have you seen him recently? How is he doing mentally? I always liked Charlie and think he is a classy kid. He is not the QB I hoped he would become, but there is no need to through him under a bus.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
I haven't seen him, but I did talk to him a couple of weeks ago. He's doing fine. He is working with Zorn to learn the offense there and thinks it is a good fit.
Frye continues to show his class. He is still rooting for his beloved Browns and is in constant contact with DA. They talk all the time and Frye has tried to help him as much as possible. I am very proud of Charlie no matter how it ended here. He is a class kid, a hard worker, and a true Brown.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307
All Pro
|
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307 |
My point was, if you practice like crap, you play like crap.. Practice is a term or doing something over and over and over, and eventually, you get better.. So if you practice like crap, you play like crap, because you didnt grasp the concpt in practice.. Which inturn is going to prove on the field.. It's not rocket science..
It goes for any your practice, dont matter.. Free throws, pitching, what ever.. If you dont get it in practice, your most likely going to fail when it comes time to prove what you where working on.. This is rediculause.. And you know I'm right..
NOW, that you fell into my little trap of pre-season, Quinn should have started, because he looked 200% better then all his compition.. I didnt throw that in there before for a reason.. So, again, inturn, RAC doesn't follows talent skills, because Brady was great in the pre-season, reguarless of the compition..
I speak for myself on this, Anderson last year showed good points of being a QB, which out weighed Frye in many ways.. His release, his arm, his height.. EVERYTHING..
So, pre-season, Brady did everything near perfect.. Hit his check-down, hit the corner of the end zone, and a run and throw laser pass for his first TD, but he still sat, because why? He didnt know the 2 page play book that Frye had? LOL.. No, It was because RAC thought he was sticking it to Quinn, for holding out.. He clowned Quinn... If Quinn was here day 1, he had the job, right? So he was late, BUT caught up come game 1..
Your a jokester Coach F.
Since your Chucks boy, tell him to practice..
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
NOW, that you fell into my little trap of pre-season, Quinn should have started, because he looked 200% better then all his compition. Looks like U trapped your own self bud..  Doesn't matter how good he looked the Browns wanted to let him develop slowly.. If you try to call me on that go listen to the pressers before you open your mouth.. I speak for myself on this, Anderson last year showed good points of being a QB, which out weighed Frye in many ways.. His release, his arm, his height.. EVERYTHING..
Glad U are speaking for yourself..it was already stated and debated about his physical attributes..the problem was and is his mind ..his decision making.. If you can't put it together in your head your physical stature means ..SQUAT... So, pre-season, Brady did everything near perfect.. Hit his check-down, hit the corner of the end zone, and a run and throw laser pass for his first TD, but he still sat, because why? He didnt know the 2 page play book that Frye had? LOL.. No, It was because RAC thought he was sticking it to Quinn, for holding out.. He clowned Quinn... If Quinn was here day 1, he had the job, right? So he was late, BUT caught up come game 1..
Brady didn't know the playbook..not the way he would have if he'd been in camp on time..wasn't about Rac clowning him..it's known he doesn't like holdouts..he wants players to earn their keep..plus the real thing U keep forgetting or pushing aside..THEY didn't want him starting early.. That was the logical thing thing to do, and it's played out just right so far. Don't really care about your tiff with Coach but it looks to me like you post on how U feel rather than what the facts are..
Last edited by Attack Dawg; 11/13/07 02:20 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
Again, you don't know what you're talking about. There are many players that aren't great practice players that can get it done in the game. Funny thing is, Frye really turned it on in camp once he got familiar with the system. Everyone was commenting on it. Again, don't let facts get in the way of your rants. Yeah, Quinn looked great....against 3rd teamers in a prevent D. LOL, too bad your "little trap" was built on a display of complete football ignorance. You know what, Cade McNown looked great in pre-season against 3rd teamers, too. That turned out well, huh? Keep sharing that vast football knowledge, though. Quinn is the future of the franchise but to say he should have started the year shows how little football you know. Thanks for exposing it. Your posts don't tell me "who you are", but it does show your lack of football knowledge. Oh, I'm not Frye's "boy". He's a class guy, someone you could learn from. He is practicing, as he always does. There's no one in the league that works harder. Again, you post about crap you're clueless about. Now, run along turn on the XBox and play some Madden. That's much more your speed.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
Quote:
Don't really care about your tiff with Coach but it looks to me like you post on how U feel rather than what the facts are..
Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577 |
Quote:
Funny thing is, Frye really turned it on in camp once he got familiar with the system. Everyone was commenting on it.
I was? I remember everyone commenting that neither of them distanced themselves from the competition.. Frye won by default. Everything else sounds about right.
SaintDawg™
Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753 |
Quote:
Yep, look objectively and admit it. You said that you judge the head coach by consistent improvement. The Browns now have a winning record and looks like a worst case scenario of 9 wins and vying for a playoff spot. That is consistent improvement.
Instead of looking at things OBJECTIVELY, you choose to claim with absolutely ZERO EVIDENCE (something you do in any debate actually) that RAC is incompetent and has his hands tied and doing nothing to make this team better. Funny how it was all RACs fault when they lost but now that they're winning it's because of everyone and everything BUT RAC.
That's not what I've stated at all. Yes, we are improving on O. Does RAC have anything to do with that? I'm quite sure he does. How much or how little, neither of us know for sure.
But I would certainly feel he helps break down film of oposing D's to show their strengths and weaknesses to Chud in preparation for games. Outside of that, I'd say it's anyone's guess, yours included, as to how much more he actually does have his hands in the O.
Quote:
You were wrong about RAC. The team is BECOMING one of the better in the league.
Excuse me? How many .500+ teams have we beaten again? One of "the better" teams in the league? Please back away from the kool-aid!
Quote:
They have made VAST improvements.
You're almost half right. Our O is vastly improved in the passing game but our D may actually be slightly worse. So since all we can do is pass successfully, even the O still lacks any consistancy in running the ball.
Let's break that down. We can pass, but we can't run. We can't stop the pass or the run. Yep, that's "overall improvement" all-right!  Out of "four major areas" we've improved in one of them. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to see it. But I'm not fooled into thinking it's more than it really is. And you being a Coach and all, I'm rather shocked that the euphoria is clouding your better judgement about these facts. But you'll have that from time to time.
Quote:
RAC took all the heat from you for the team being bad. Therefore, to be consistent, he should get all the credit for them doing well. You won't do it because, as I said, you'll twist your arguement any way possible to keep from admitting you're wrong.
As I said "half of the team" is much better. Well, not "quite half". Actually our passing is much improved. And just an FYI Coach, if you think a team who can't consistantly run, nor consistantly stop the run is one of the "better teams in the league" you really need to search your inner self for truth. I think you're "coaching ability" is being clouded by your homerism.
Let's recap....................
Can we stop the run better? Nope.
Can WE run better? Nope.
Is our secondary doing better? Nope.
Can we pass now? Yes
So this qualifies us as "one of the better teams in the league"? Surely you jest?
Quote:
Yep, pretty simple math....we're 5-4, that's improved from last year with another 7 games left to play. End of discussion.
See, before this year started, most people agreed that overall team improvement would not be measured by wins and losses. But underneath it all, that's really all you have. Our passing game is better. Say it with me Coach...............
The ONLY REAL improvement from last year is our OL can protect the QB in the passing game and the passing game is vastly improved because of it.
Because that's reality Coach.
We still can't run. We still can't stop the run. Our secondary is poor. Other than that, what are these improvements you speak of? Oh that's right. Now that we can pass better, we can outscore crappy teams most of the time. Bravo!
Since you seem to think the "team overall" has improved so much, why don't you explain how? Because you can't.
It was agreed by many that wins and losses weren't nearly as important than overall team progress as the year went on. Our passing game has. Anything else you can think of Coach?
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753 |
Quote:
I find it funny that a guy sitting on a messageboard GUESSING about what is going on and what isn't is talking about someone not "knowing anything". Oh, the irony.
Pot meet kettle!
Quote:
Funny how so many that are in the NFL and/or have actually played the game and have actually SET FOOT in a NFL locker room totally disagrees with your assessments. 
Yeah Coach, when they talked bad about the Browns they were idiots, now that they agree with you, you use them as a refrance.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
LOL, I see you still choose to sidestep and back pedal an rework your arguements. Typical Peen. Keep going, though. The more you bash RAC as the team BECOMES (have someone look up that word for you since you apparently can't understand the meaning) one of the better teams in the NFL, the more foolish your stances look. Of course, once they do arrive at that status, you'll then change your stance and claim you were behind RAC from the beginning.
Oh, and provide a link where I called those experts idiots before. I'll be waiting, but as usual, you won't be able to back it up with anything other than you saying so.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307
All Pro
|
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 307 |
Post deleted by Referee 3
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753 |
Nice sidestep. I'll try again. Other than our passing game, what improvements have we made? Our running game? Our ability to stop the pass? To stop the run? That's okay Coach. Really not much to say to that is there? One half of our O is better, the passing game. Anything else? That's what I thought..................................... Carry on.....................
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
LOL, yeah facts are nonsense while your babblings without knowing anything about a subject is worth anything. In other words, you won't admit you're full of crap even though everything you just posted was proven wrong. Got it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
I guess being 5-4 isn't any improvement over the last 4 years either..even against weaker opponents...
Eh? whats that?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577 |
Quote:
LOL, I see you still choose to sidestep and back pedal an rework your arguements. Typical Peen.
Uh, Who ya'll responding to there? Peen or Pit? You clicked on Pit..
SaintDawg™
Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
Oops, Peen must have been thining of me LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
So, we are still the same team that only had 4 wins last year except for our passing game? We aren't a better team this year than last year? You wanted improvement. We have improved. We will have a WINNING RECORD this year and be vying for the playoffs. What will your excuse be then, Pit? What will you find fault in RAC for then? You'll have to come up with SOMETHING. Maybe you'll be able to say that you hate the type of athletic tape they use and that proves RAC is a terrible coach. The bottom line is we're a better team than last year. At the end of the year, we will be in the playoff hunt and have a winning record. THAT is improvement. Period. End of discussion. Any other rant you try is just you ignoring reality to pretend your right, as usual.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577 |
Quote:
Oops, Peen must have been thining of me LOL
Otay.. I'm confuzzled.. no matter. Carry on your argument.. As you were Gents..
SaintDawg™
Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
I was replying to Pit. The old saying when you use the wrong name is the person whose name you used must be thinking about you. Sorry I confused you more. Sometimes my senility gets in the way.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 19
Rookie
|
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 19 |
A problem with Romeo is he is too loyal to his own guys..and he is still growing as a head coach...I know he had a total brain fart with the whole timeout/challenge thing but at least you know he wont ever do it again....hopefully
But lets look at some of the things RAC has done to show he may not be the best head coach
He is way to loyal to his guys....Keeping Mo Carthon as coordinator for that long was rediculous...even tho he was not producing RAC stuck with him.....Willie Mac and Ted Washington although seasoned vets and supposedly coaches on the field, they were playing terrible and RAC stuck with them instead of giving other guys a shot to show that this defense is capable of more than the 32nd ranking in the league
Also he is very indesisive...look at the challenge..called a timeout to decide what to do or not
also look at our QB situation....he flipped a freaken coin...that just shows he cant make important decisions like that
I say the reason our team is any good at all is because of Phil Savage
he brought in DA and he is lighting up competition for the most part...he brought in Jamal...even thought dissapointing at times he did win the Seattle game for us....Braylon Edwards has 10 Td catches..and look at our offensive line he brought us...Thomas Shaffer Fraley Steinbach....0 sacks in the last couple games..amazing after finishing 2nd last year just behind detroit.
He also brought in Chud...is gameplan is amazing with the motions..and the attacking style is really playing to our strengths as a team.....
I'm not saying fire RAC or anything..but he needs to improve to get this team over the hump and into the playoffs..I think he can improve..and he will learn from his mistakes...he has to in order to keep his job
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189 |
Quote:
So is Joe Pa, dosen't mean he should!
Ok, that WAS funny.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,556
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,556 |
Quote:
LOL, I see you still choose to sidestep and back pedal an rework your arguements. Typical Peen.
I wasn't even a part of this for a long time until now.
Sorry bubba...you have never met a coach you didn't like.
I suspect that if you ever make head coach, you too are going to have a hard time in identifying a quality assistant.
If you ever get there, give me a call....I will clue you in.....really, I am serious. I really don't want to see you sucked down the drain.
B....Romeo isn't a good head coach. We will never win a Superbowl with him at the helm. I will bet a steak dinner on that if you like.
The odds can be the dinner you buy is at one of those middle of the road joints like Outback. The dinner I buy is anywhere you like in the city or area of Cleveland......and there are several places way better than Outback.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong ![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/small-gator-chomp.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,802 |
Just clickin'
Just because we have a winning record doesn't mean Romeo isn't indispensible. The question comes down to "Will we be better with ______ as our head coach?" I think the answer to that is yes. When it comes to just what we're doing defensively as far as not blitzing, I am concerned. Stopping the run? The handling of the QB situation and flippng a coin? I am concerned. But a big thing for me is clock and timeout management. Our HC has to be game-day savvy and have presence, and I just don't feel that with Romeo.
He's not that bad, but if we brought in Cowher, a young up and coming assistant, or even an old guy like Marty who just wins, we get better and can win more.
Politicians are puppets, y'all. Let's get Geppetto!
Formerly 4yikes2yoshi0
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
Peen, as I said, I had a brain fart when talking to Pit. Sorry I used your name. Slip of the tongue...er.....keyboard. As you now know, I am a head coach and have quality assts.  In fact, I have groomed many that are now head coaches. That's neither here nor there. I think RAC will be fine as a head coach. He still has some learning to do, but every new coach does. Oh, and as I told you in PMs, I hated Butch Davis
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
Why apologize to Peen , when we know when it comes to Rac Blame , he and Pit are interchangable?? They both want him gone..right Peen?
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Maybe Romeo ain't so bad
afterall...
|
|
