Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 11 1 2 3 10 11
#1925699 02/20/22 12:39 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
Zac Jackson via The Athletic mock draft 1.0 willynilly

I would not be surprised at all to see the Browns go DL on first pick and taking WR in round two.

My later round WR to draft is Dareke Young out of D-II college Lenoire-Rhyne.

Athletic DE to watch in later rounds is Dominique Robinson out of Miami-Ohio Univ. Interesting prospect.

Round 1, Pick No. 13: Travon Walker, DT/DE, Georgia

Round 2, Pick No. 44: David Bell, WR, Purdue

Round 3, Pick No. 78: Josh Paschal, DE, Kentucky

Round 3, compensatory (estimated pick No. 101): John Ridgeway, DT, Arkansas

Round 4, Detroit pick (estimated No. 108): Wan’Dale Robinson, WR, Kentucky

Round 4 (estimated No. 119): Tariq Woolen, CB, UTSA

Round 5 (estimated No. 153): Obinna Eze, OT, TCU

Round 6 (estimated No. 191): Daniel Bellinger, TE, San Diego State

Round 7, Detroit pick (estimated No. 230): Jordan Stout, P, Penn State

Milk Man #1925709 02/20/22 09:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
At this time I can only look at the first round.

Free agency takes place first and once that takes place; the draft is easier to follow.

IMO as things stand today before free agency it probably comes down to two positions WR and DE.

Jermaine Johnson put an exclamation point on his name at the Senior Bowl. He really looks like a great player and would be a great add to Myles.

The playoffs and Super Bowl shows the importance of pass rushing. The playoff teams all had good quarterbacks and dynamic passing attacks. It is imperative to rush the quarterback in waves of pressure. I believe that is what Berry believes.

I actually would not have a problem with signing Clowney and drafting J. Johnson.

On the other the hand the wide receiver room needs new blood. Jarvis returning is a real question mark. Free agency will be explored to bring in a veteran with a track record. Like DE we could bring in a guy or two in FA and still draft a WR at 13.

I would be happy with Wilson, London or Burks. I favor London by a little bit.

I don't see us drafting any other positions with pick 13. Because of the way the draft Board looks and how at 13 BPA should look.

bonefish #1925720 02/20/22 12:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
I agree that free agency is important in determining the draft strategy - but the reverse can also be true. I forget what year it was for the Browns, maybe when we signed Conklin? Maybe it's longer ago and my memory is just bad - but there was a year when a position of need for the Browns was a bad year for players coming out of college. We were very aggressive in free agency targeting the player(s) we couldn't or were less likely to find in the draft. That might also be a factor for our solution at kicker ... if there is not a kicker that might step in ALA Evan McPherson then we might have to be more aggressive in free agency ...

I need to watch me some tape on London and Burks as I have only really seen Wilson. I really love what Wilson brings ... I don't think there is a bad choice to be made, but will be fun to analyze like 2 years ago with the LT class.

* Chris Olave is no slouch either. A probable first rounder himself.

Last edited by mgh888; 02/20/22 12:27 PM.

The more things change the more they stay the same.
mgh888 #1925767 02/20/22 06:42 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,819
Likes: 106
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,819
Likes: 106
I like Olave. Some bigger physical bodies may edge him out a bit. OSU might have some help for us.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Milk Man #1925790 02/21/22 07:48 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,504
Likes: 806
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,504
Likes: 806
I like that draft.

For receivers....Wan Dale Robinson out of Kentucky is a key target for me. I'd probably take him in the 3rd. The kid is going to be a very good NFL receiver. When looking back, he will be considered a steal.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Ballpeen #1925793 02/21/22 09:21 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Milk Man #1925858 02/21/22 05:57 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Likes: 98
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Likes: 98
Round 1 Pick 18 (N.O.): Garrett Wilson, WR, Ohio State (A)
Round 2 Pick 12: Myjai Sanders, DE/OLB, Cincinnati (A-)
Round 2 Pick 17 (N.O.): Phidarian Mathis, DT, Alabama (A+)
Round 3 Pick 14: Channing Tindall, ILB/OLB, Georgia (A)
Round 3 Pick 19 (PHI): Jeremy Ruckert, TE, Ohio State (A)
Round 4 Pick 2: David Bell, WR, Purdue (A+)
Round 4 Pick 13: Travis Jones, DT, Connecticut (A+)
Round 5 Pick 12: Matt Hankins, CB, Iowa (A+)
Round 6 Pick 14: Andrew Stueber, OT/OG, Michigan (A+)
Round 7 Pick 2: Jack Sanborn, ILB/OLB, Wisconsin (A+)


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
mgh888 #1925908 02/22/22 12:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
I've heard reports of his height ranging between 5'7" and 5'11". Also weighing in at about 185.

Seems pretty small to me. Do they measure to the top of the hair?


[Linked Image from playerprofiler.com]


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
FATE #1925998 02/22/22 10:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 14
B
Dawg Talker
Online
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 14
He reads similar to Swartz which I like.

Interesting to see whether both Swartz and Robinson become above-average receivers.

These would not be the answer for this season but a nice pair to build for the future.

I would not be too concerned with height. Let these two work deep and TEs underneath.

bonefish #1926217 02/24/22 09:23 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Drake London caught 88 balls in 8 games.

If he had played the full 12 game schedule his numbers would have been bonkers.

He is expected to run a 4.46 at 6'5". When you watch this guy it is surprising how fluid he is. He is really good after the catch. He has wiggle to get past guys. He plays all over the field.

I really hope we get him.

The best thing would be coming out of the first round with London and a pass rusher.
We might be able to get a shot at Karlaftis at around 27 or so. He would worth trading up for.

We could make that trade with a third and fourth. We have extra picks in those rounds.

1 member likes this: Ballpeen
Milk Man #1926225 02/24/22 09:49 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,504
Likes: 806
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,504
Likes: 806
The combine will be starting in about a week, so soon enough we will be up to our eyebrows with various stats.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Ballpeen #1926246 02/24/22 10:32 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
The combine will be starting in about a week, so soon enough we will be up to our eyebrows with various stats.

Yup. It starts Tuesday.
Stand by to be inundated, lol


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Milk Man #1926301 02/24/22 01:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,225
Likes: 195
F
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
F
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,225
Likes: 195
Christian Watson WR North Dakota St, will be a guy I will be looking at. He’s 6’5” 208lbs, and is expected ro run a 4.4 or less in the 40. They say he also stood out at the Senior.Bowl vs some of the nations top defenders. Will he be at the combine?

Frenchy #1926321 02/24/22 02:19 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,426
Likes: 15
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,426
Likes: 15
Yes , he has been invited ..

bonefish #1926482 02/25/22 08:33 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Every draft season I always pick one guy who I just call "my favorite player."

The only time "my favorite player" was selected by the Browns was JOK.

I have not seen all the first rounders yet.

Right now the two players I would love to end up with are:

Drake London and Jermaine Johnson.

Both these players have that look of core player talents. Guys we could have for two contracts at least.

I like the way these two guys play. I love their effort and game savvyness. Both could fill need areas.

This is a well written article and film review on how London fits the Browns.

https://www.cleveland.com/browns/20...draft-option-for-browns-film-review.html

1 member likes this: Ballpeen
bonefish #1926492 02/25/22 09:08 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Forward to the tape study.



What is impressive is how JJ beats some of the top ranked OT's.

bonefish #1926495 02/25/22 09:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
A lot to like there. Hands, Strength, Burst, Awareness. Good against run and pass. Impressive.


The more things change the more they stay the same.
mgh888 #1926502 02/25/22 10:08 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Jermaine's journey to this point is interesting.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/...state-de-nfl-draft-scouting-report-2022/

I like players who have had to dig there way to becoming a first round talent. A journey like that matures a person.

They learn about their depth to commitment. What you must be willing to do improve.

I wish there was a way to get Jermaine and London but I don't see a path for that.

Maybe London and Karlaftis. Karlaftis is up and down the Board so he may slip to 27 or so where we could make a move.

I like Jermaine better but I would be good with London and Karlaftis

bonefish #1926514 02/25/22 10:47 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
The Athletic have Jermaine going #8 overall ... They have the Browns taking Travon Walker at #13, who is a player they state as being much higher on than most. They like Karlaftis - have him going #17 to the Chargers. He is the last Edge guy they have taken in the first round and they have 3 edge guys going before Jermaine.


The more things change the more they stay the same.
mgh888 #1926526 02/25/22 11:30 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,504
Likes: 806
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,504
Likes: 806
Originally Posted by mgh888
The Athletic have Jermaine going #8 overall ... They have the Browns taking Travon Walker at #13, who is a player they state as being much higher on than most. They like Karlaftis - have him going #17 to the Chargers. He is the last Edge guy they have taken in the first round and they have 3 edge guys going before Jermaine.

It's like any rankings..they can be all over the board...at least inside a reasonable range. Once in a grouping of players, someone is going to end up being the best NFL player, others aren't.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
mgh888 #1926527 02/25/22 11:30 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
This guy is a veteran scout who has an interesting take on this years draft.



He is a guest with Quincy.


bonefish #1926532 02/25/22 11:39 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Likes: 136
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Likes: 136
For those who don't know, in years past I would say NO to drafting WR early. My montra was we need 5 good one who have great hands and run great routes and you can get one anywhere in the draft. Unfortunately we never got a guy like Kupp in the 3rd round. But what I did say the time to invest high in the draft on WR is when we pretty much had everything and we should go for a stud WR then. Well now is "THEN" now is the time to invest in a high impact WR as we see the teams we have to compete against for championships and they all have a GO TO STUD some teams have 2 of them but almost all have 1.

We got none - we got some OK guys but no studs. If this kid Drake has Good Hands and doesn't catch with the body as a habit...I say GO FOR IT!!!...Covid is getting to the stages where our QB Baker can spend a lot of time with his rookie WR and work together like a hand and glove so to say. He needs that guy where we go no huddle as in a 2 minute drill and march down the field and score a quick TD. Right now we got to get Baker's confidence level back up and once he does he is so so accurate combined with our running game and we continue to build that stud Defense. We are there Browns fans "DYNASTY"

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1926557 02/25/22 01:08 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
This draft looks deep at DE/edge and receiver.

It will depend on how picks 1-12 go.

I could see receiver or DE at 13.

Then come back and take the position you passed on at 13.

bonefish #1926570 02/25/22 01:54 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Bleacher Report Brent Sobliski : Number One receiver in the Draft?

Buying.

Drake London is a 6'5", 210-pound wide receiver. Naturally, detractors automatically say he's just another contested-catch marvel who lacks speed and struggles to create separation.

Neither could be further from the truth.

"The 20-year-old already shows polish with his route-running," Bleacher Report scout Nate Tice said. "He also has the athleticism to sink and come out of his breaks, which is even more impressive given his size. London's natural hands and large catch radius allow him to consistently snatch throws that are away from his body. Plus, his ability to genuinely create yards after the catch on underneath routes and screens is another asset."

Is the former college basketball player adept at using his body and length to go up and pluck the ball out of the air? Absolutely. In fact, he led the nation with 19 contested catches even though he didn't play in USC's final four games because of a broken ankle.

But that's not all he is.

The points about his polish and sink are important. London is very fluid for a bigger target. He can drop his hips in and out of his break so that he runs routes like a much smaller receiver. At the time of his injury, the eventual Pac-12 Offensive Player of the Year ranked second overall in yards after the catch, per Pro Football Focus. He was also consistently able to beat man coverage (h/t Feeling Dangerous Podcast's Tyler Johnson). London is effective working either inside or outside the numbers.

On top of the impressive skill set and traits he's already shown, London, who will be 21 through the entirety of his rookie season, will continue to grow and mature. His upside exceeds everyone else's in his position group and places him among the class' best overall prospects.

As long as he's fully healthy by the time of the draft—there's currently no indication he won't be, since the injury didn't involve ligament damage—there's nothing holding London back from being a top-10 draft pick and the first wide receiver off the board.

Verdict: Buying

bonefish #1926573 02/25/22 01:58 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
Really interesting podcast with Qunicy and the scout ... Not sure I entirely buy the lack of faith in the top 3-4 WR's (London, Burks, Wilson). Will be an interesting ride.


The more things change the more they stay the same.
mgh888 #1926586 02/25/22 02:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
PFF now has London as their top receiver in this draft. Ranking him 10th overall.

If he would have played all 12 games in the college schedule. He would be a top five pick.

Plus his only 20.

This is a strange draft. I think we are in a good spot with pick 13. We will have a shot at some excellent players.

In addition we have extra picks in the 3rd and 4th round. This draft looks to have very good talent in rounds 3 and 4.


1 member likes this: FATE
bonefish #1926599 02/25/22 03:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
I *think* this is the draft order, seems like every site has it listed differently...

1st Round – Pick #13
2nd Round – Pick #44
3rd Round – Pick #78
3rd Round – Pick #102 (Compensatory Pick)
4th Round – Pick #114 (Lions Trade)
4th Round – Pick #124
5th Round – Pick #171
6th Round – Pick #218
7th Round – Pick #257

So we have a lot of ammunition to move up between #44 and #78 as well.


Edit to add: Whether we use ammo to move back into 2nd or not, we'll likely be trading a 3rd for a 2nd in 2023 or a 4th for a 3rd in 2023. 2023 already has us with at least one comp pick in the 3rd (Adofo-Mensah sigining).

I like staying "locked and loaded", I'm glad our FO does as well.

Last edited by FATE; 02/25/22 03:44 PM.

HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
FATE #1926615 02/25/22 05:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
Clearly a lot to happen regards free agency - but at this point I would not be surprised to see a trade down from 13 - followed by a trade up from 44. At 13 there is likely to be multiple choices and if we are lucky teams will think about mid teens as a place to go get a QB in this draft.


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Milk Man #1926656 02/25/22 09:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
Originally Posted by mgh888
Clearly a lot to happen regards free agency - but at this point I would not be surprised to see a trade down from 13 - followed by a trade up from 44. At 13 there is likely to be multiple choices and if we are lucky teams will think about mid teens as a place to go get a QB in this draft.
I'm looking at the teams that draft later and the only real possibilities I see are New Orleans (18) and Pittsburgh (20)

No way were trading with Pittsburgh and not sure the premium would be there with New Orleans. Saints pick would also drop us below the Eagles (two consecutive picks) who may be eyeing a top WR as well. Titans and Dolphins are a long-shot. I guess there's a possibility the teams before us will want to move back in, but usually you just draft the QB in the first place.

13. Browns
14. Ravens
15. Eagles
16. Eagles
17. Chargers
18. Saints
19. Eagles
20. Steelers
21. Patriots
22. Raiders
23. Cardinals
24. Cowboys
25. Bills
26. Titans
27. Buccaneers
28. Packers
29. Dolphins
30. Chiefs
31. Bengals
32. Lions

Teams without a first-round pick
49ers
Bears
Colts
Rams
Seahawks


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
FATE #1926666 02/25/22 10:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 825
Likes: 27
O
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
O
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 825
Likes: 27
As I mentioned before, the team I'm hoping we trade back with is the Lions.

1 member likes this: FATE
OrangeCrush #1926673 02/25/22 10:46 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
They've got 32 and 34 (besides the 2nd overall)... plus two picks in the 3rd... plenty of ammo.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
1 member likes this: OrangeCrush
bonefish #1926785 02/26/22 05:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
I couldn't resist - had to see if I could get them both smile

This draft machine seems to have a decent/realistic drafting mechanism ... obviously it doesn't reflect what teams would do, just if the value is about right.
https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/user-mock-drafts/2022/user-mock-654410

Traded down to 18 and got London (in reality I don't think he will be there) - traded up to 22 to get Jermaine (again, doubt he will be there.). Also picked up the North Dakota WR that the Qunicy podcast talked about smile

Cleveland Receives:
2022: Round 1, Pick 18
2022: Round 2, Pick 49
New Orleans Receives:
2022: Round 1, Pick 13
2022: Round 3, Pick 98
2023: Round 4

Cleveland Receives:
2022: Round 1, Pick 22
Las Vegas Receives:
2023: Round 1
2022: Round 4, Pick 105
2023: Round 5
2022: Round 4, Pick 116


18
Round: 1
Browns LogoDrake LondonWR | USC LogoUSCTRADE
22
Round: 1
Browns LogoJermaine JohnsonEDGE | Florida State LogoFlorida StateTRADE
44
Round: 2
Browns LogoDarian KinnardOT | Kentucky LogoKentucky
49
Round: 2
Browns LogoChad MumaLB | Wyoming LogoWyomingTRADE
78
Round: 3
Browns LogoChristian WatsonWR | North Dakota State LogoNorth Dakota State
154
Round: 5
Browns LogoEyioma UwazurikeDL | Iowa State LogoIowa State
191
Round: 6
Browns LogoD'Marco JacksonLB | Appalachian State LogoAppalachian State
220
Round: 7
Browns LogoLogan BrussIOL | Wisconsin LogoWisconsin


Now I just need to resist the temptation to waste my time again until draft week !!

Last edited by mgh888; 02/26/22 05:50 PM.

The more things change the more they stay the same.
mgh888 #1926788 02/26/22 06:45 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
The draft can be shocking at times.

Last year when I first started looking I saw JOK.

If someone would have told me he would be available in the second round. I would have laughed in their face. Even now I have a hard seeing how he got passed up on by so many??

It is so strange how different teams will look at the same player and see something different?

I have watched London and he was unstoppable at USC. They threw it to him over 30% of the time and he caught everything.

Watching Jermaine I see a guy it does it all. He sets the edge. He plays the run. He plays to the whistle. He uses different moves in pass rush.
He steers guys with strong hands. Really like him. You can see his quickness and strength when he engages.

In the end I am confident we will get a good pass rusher and a good receiver. This draft is deep at both.

I hope we get London. I see him as a great fit in our offense. We can use him at slot and X. He is diverse. Big, athletic, young (only 20), great hands, and gets YAC yards. He was second in that category. He has a huge catch radius. High points the ball. Had the most contested catches (19). He had 88 catches in 8 games. What else is there to do?

However, I think they will get a pass rusher first. Then pick a receiver. So, most likely it will not go the way I would like.

bonefish #1926789 02/26/22 07:02 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,616
Likes: 587
For sure. Players will rise players will fall - hopefully we get lucky with how it all breaks. In addition to the athletic freaks who will no doubt rocket up boards after/during the combine ... we are at a spot that I think a QB needy team might just feel is the right place to move up for one of these guys who generally aren't considered Top Tier. Hopefully a GM will decide they see something special that others don't and will be willing to give up just a bit more than normal for the 13th pick. . . . stroll on April !! LOL


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Milk Man #1926816 02/27/22 12:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,063
Likes: 336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,063
Likes: 336
Sadly, there's no way I'm considering London at this point. There's no way to know how well, or even if, the ankle will hold up. He could end up being a great player, but it's a lot of risk to use a first round pick without seeing him plant and cut in pads or take a hit post injury. If the medical appears to check out and he looks great at a pro day, I'd put him in the mix, but he'd still have an asterisk. With our injury luck and the longer season, it'd be tough for me to pick a guy that never played more than 8 games a year in his 3 seasons at USC in the 1st round.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Bull_Dawg #1926827 02/27/22 08:01 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Of course he would be cleared medically.

I have read there was no ligament damage and he will be ready to go. It happened early and he is expected to be ready.

I have not read anywhere that his ankle is a problem.

FATE #1926868 02/27/22 01:19 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Likes: 136
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Likes: 136
correct me if I'm wrong but aren't the Buccaneers looking for a QB possibly in this draft??? If not what did I miss?


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
bonefish #1926894 02/27/22 05:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,063
Likes: 336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,063
Likes: 336
Originally Posted by bonefish
Of course he would be cleared medically.

I have read there was no ligament damage and he will be ready to go. It happened early and he is expected to be ready.

I have not read anywhere that his ankle is a problem.

You've read. Of course that's the message his representation would be spreading. Millions of dollars are at stake. It could even be true. But, it isn't necessarily. Until he shows that he is ready in a football-like environment, He's off my board as far as the first round.

There's also the longevity aspect. He plays hard and fights for every yard, and I love that. But he also takes a lot of hits, and, with respect to his length, there are advantages to durability in compactness. I'll regretfully repeat- He never played more than 8 games a season at USC (per sports-reference, but his USC bio says differently [and the PAC-12s COVID response was the reason for his 6 game 2nd year,] so I'll do some digging,) and availability might be the most important, yet frequently overlooked, ability. To an extent, his build just looks injury prone to me. Some of that might just be youth. There's also the sense that he tends to always have bodies around planted long legs.

I also wish he had more tape against corners that are likely to be drafted before day 3. It's unfortunate that it looks like USC and Washington never played during his collegiate career. I also can't quite figure out how I feel about his production. Yes, the numbers are great. But how do I account for/weight the 5 million bubble screens?


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Bull_Dawg #1926901 02/27/22 06:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 995
The Combine the doctors get to see all medical records so any questions will be clarified.

He is only 20 years old.

GM's get paid to forecast what they will become more so than what they have done.

They can only do so much in a limited space of time.

i like what I see. I spelled why. But I also like Garrett and Burks as well as some others. The separation between them is small IMO.

I hope we get him. But what I hope for rarely happens.




eotab #1926930 02/27/22 10:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,179
Likes: 1809
Originally Posted by eotab
correct me if I'm wrong but aren't the Buccaneers looking for a QB possibly in this draft??? If not what did I miss?
Hmmm, maybe.

The drafted Kyle Trask in the second last year.

They have a lot of FAs on offense and likely a lot of holes. I'd think they would "see what they have in the kid" in an obvious year of flux. Maybe sign a veteran mentor type QB and see if that bridge leads to Trask?

Don't know for sure, what do you think?


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Page 1 of 11 1 2 3 10 11
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2022 NFL Season 2022 NFL Draft Draft 2.0

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5