DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Biden's Cognitive ability

I don't think anyone told him to say it.... I honestly think anytime he starts going off script he makes senseless comments like this... I truly think he doesn't really have a clue what's going on... I didn't vote for Joe, but was really hoping that we'd get moderate Joe.... what we got was far left Joe who is being influenced by far lefists because his cognitive ability is failing him...

A word of caution for the Right. If Joe is removed from office, who will replace him and is does that make things better or worse for you?

Kamila is no better.... what I find interesting is who will be on the ticket in 2024... I can't imagine Joe running again... and frankly, while I agree with most of his policies, I pray Trump doesn't run again...

He's not going to be removed short of a major medical episode. We had a guy for four years who was not only the dumbest president in my life time (GWB had that bar set pretty low), but he was also corrupt and full on nuts. Biden is nowhere near that point. And there is no who or what if, we have a chain of command and Kamala would be POTUS.

Sorry for the "is does" part. Sheesh!

no worries - I didn't answer your 'is does'... no... President Harris, IMO, would be no better except I feel that she's at least competent... I just disagree with her historically more than Biden... she's farther left than Biden historically was...

Killery in '24.

I said it six months in to this crapfest.

I think she's trying, but that ain't happening. Progressives won't vote for her and the DNC knows it.

Yeah Jay.........I don't support the Left or the Right. I was just saying that Harris would be a bigger nightmare for the Right than Biden is.

Well, a progressive candidate has no chance of winning the White House (this time) so it looks like something's gotta give.

I'll vote for a dem. But preferably one that didn't ride a dinosaur to grade school. And one that is more intelligent than 3 of the last four. I could even get behind an independent that was slightly right leaning if the policies were on point and about taking care of regular people first. I think someday soon we will have a progressive POTUS, I fully expect the millennials to deliver one to the oval in the next 20 years. Heck, they might even have a progressive majority across the board at that point. Not sure I'll live to see it, but I would like to.

I'm praying for a moderate.... I tend to lean republican... but if it's trump and a moderate democrat... I'm voting democrat...

If it's Trump vs a far left libral... I'd have to vote trump...

I don't mean this to be confrontational, but what do you mean by "regular people?"

Working class, not CEOs, Billionaires, or the 1%. They've had enough tax breaks and special favors. It's time to lift all ships, not just those of the most fortunate. And yes, they are people too, but they are not the common man.

I think he means Joe The Plumber Jean the androgynous Starbucks barista.

I am voting for the person who least screws over my family. My wife has her own business as an Anesthetist even though she works only for one hospital. I own two small businesses. My daughter and son-in-law own a small business. My son manages a chain of an automotive repair business. We are currently getting killed in order to further the "rights" of others.

Tired of rich blanks and free-loaders sucking our blood dry. Give me a candidate that represents the majority of hard-working, honest Americans and stop trotting out scum that feeds the very rich and very lazy.

Lol, I've had starbucks coffee exactly twice in my life. Neither time was my choice. But, the budtenders of America would have been spot on.

We're not that far apart. But I see taking care of the working poor/poor, old, and sick as a necessity to make democracy truly work and improve everything for everybody. I'm not big on tax and spend, but we piss away so many tax dollars on ridiculousness, that we could do all the progressive programs on what is currently being spent. But some major corps and 1%ers would lose out on their handouts and tax loopholes, so it will never happen.

I think education, healthcare, and the basic human essentials needed to function in society should be guaranteed rights. If we spend that money that way, it benefits everyone. And when people are living in constant fear, struggling to make it to the next check, knowing the slightest setback could be devasting; they get mental health issues, physical health issues, become non productive, and fill those leech spots you like to point out. Take the pressure of surviving off their backs and the overwhelming majority become contributors to society instead of takers.

But if your whole world is measured in the wealth you control, an idea like this must seem inconceivable. I'm not pointing fingers at anyone, but they are plain to see and I imagine their lives as the saddest I could imagine from a reflective "quality human being" standpoint. I will never get not striving to better yourself or taking what you have received in life so seriously for granted that you assume all others have exactly the same opportunities or luck, and are just takers if they can't manage without aid. That is a completely out of touch and unrealistic world view IMO, and many tout that view as responsible and conservative. Most old school conservatives I knew and grew up with would give a guy the shirt off his back if he really needed it. You don't see that so much these days.

When someone speaks, and looks around for someone, ANYone to applaud her, then cackles like ............hey, do some research on liars. Kamala is the epitome of a liar, and someone looking for any kind of approval, from anyone in the audience.

That would be exactly the same thing we had in the prior administration and still 75 million people voted for him to be re-elected.

resident Joe Biden’s approval rating has sunk to a new low, with only 36% of Americans saying they approve of his job performance and 59% saying they disapprove, according to the latest polls from Reuters/Ipsos. Biden’s current approval rating is just a few percentage points higher than the 33% low former President Donald Trump hit in December 2017, according to Reuters.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...mp;cvid=f46a0f5a439f4597ae4be1c601cf16c3

So his approval rating still isn't as low as Trump's lowest approval rating. Thanks for the update.

What about Trump.....Trump Trump Trump Trump!

How sad it was the SB Dawg brought his name into the conversation.

It was just part of the article

Just clarifying who it was who brought his name up since people love to accuse the left of doing it. I'm thinking j didn't read the thread and didn't understand it was someone on the right who brought it up and I was simply responding to it. You'll have that from time to time. He loves to cast stones at the left for bringing up Trump's name even while he still leads the Republican party and is always on the campaign trail.

I don't know about that: https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-approval-lower-donald-trump-same-stage-presidency-poll-1668931 That's Jan. 13, 2022.

This one is May 22, 2022: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ing-sinks-below-donald-trumps/ar-AAXxk5G

May 31, 2022: https://www.mediaite.com/uncategori...e-democrats-defending-him-on-television/ Headline: "Biden Reportedly ‘Mystified’ His Approval Rating Is Below Trump’s, Wants More Democrats Defending Him on Television"

I was only commenting on what superbowl posted. But in case you are still wondering......

Quinnipiac poll: President Trump's job approval sinks to 33%

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ps-33-percent-quinnipiac-poll/533370001/

It is true you can pick any pole that favors the point you are trying to make however. Both sides do that.

Biden hasn't done a one on one interview in 117 days as his staff tries to protect him from stepping in it once again.

BUT...

He will be doing an interview with Comedian Jimmy Kimmel this week!

That right there should be hard hitting!

CNN media analyst on Kimmel interview: Biden needs 'exposure' that isn't too 'challenging for him'
President Biden will join Jimmy Kimmel on Wednesday for his first major interview in over 100 days

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-m...ew-biden-needs-exposure-isnt-challenging

My computer is old and slow.
In every other application, that fact is a problem.
In this instance, it.s a benefit.

"Why?" others might ask.

Because in the time it takes for your next inane video to load, I can click out of the thread without even seeing it appear on my screen.



Life is too short to waste even a single minute of it on a cartoonish video submitted by StuporClown©

May I ask why you find it necessary to make fun of a man suffering from an illness? I wonder how you would feel if one of your loved ones suffered from an illness and people were ridiculing them because of it?

Display some sense of dignity.