DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Cuckoo Democrats And What They Have Become Pt 5

I will.

I'll be the first official member of your #TrumpSquad. That way you can quit whining about it.

Hopefully...
Maybe...
Eh, probably not.

Do I get a badge? I want "Charter Member #1" on it -- I'll pay extra.

No you don't get a badge. Instead since you are still in denial you get the consolation prize. The "I Am Still In Denial" home version of our game.

I'm not in denial.

I'm now a Trump supporter.

#TeamTrump
#TrumpSquad
#MakePitifulCryAgain

#triggered #snowflake #haironfire

Not #triggered


#TeamTrump

You have gone totally of the rails this morning and I'm enjoying every minute of it! Most certainly #triggered

I'm not triggered.

I'M VOTING FOR TRUMP.


I've been on the fence for a while. The blatant denial of people, particularly those at DawgTalkers, of the supreme damage this corpse of a (p)resident and administration has done to my country has convinced me that Trump is the only choice.

Priceless! #triggered

He doesn't have to post like a libtard. It's not a requirement for existing, being an American, or anything else. Is this your measure for hatred? People who dont spew libtard lemming BS?

Libtard twice. Miss Nasty just can't help but spread hate. It's all she has.

'Serial squatter' refusing to leave $2M Seattle home escapes eviction for THIRD time after non-profit coughs up another $50K in taxpayer cash to cover his rent

* It takes the total amount of state handouts paid to keep squatter Sang Kim and his family in the five-bedroom home for two years to around $90,000
* Mr Kim's $4,400-a-month rent has been covered by non-profit Housing Justice Project, but his landlord has slammed it as a 'terrible abuse' of taxpayer cash
* The squatter has only paid one month's rent out of his own pocket and has allegedly pulled the same trick at another $1.3million home nearby


A 'serial squatter' refusing to leave a $2million Seattle home has dodged eviction for a third time after a controversial non-profit stepped in with $50,000 of taxpayer cash to cover his rent, DailyMail.com can reveal.

Sang Kim has sparked fury in the upmarket neighborhood of Bellevue after squatting for almost two years in a five-bedroom property owned by Jaskaran Sarao.

But an eviction hearing scheduled for April 5 has been scrapped after the Housing Justice Project (HJP) covered almost a year in unpaid rent to keep him in the property.

A 'serial squatter' refusing to leave a $2million Seattle home has dodged eviction for a third time after a controversial non-profit stepped in with $50,000 of taxpayer cash to cover his rent, DailyMail.com can reveal.

Sang Kim has sparked fury in the upmarket neighborhood of Bellevue after squatting for almost two years in a five-bedroom property owned by Jaskaran Sarao.

But an eviction hearing scheduled for April 5 has been scrapped after the Housing Justice Project (HJP) covered almost a year in unpaid rent to keep him in the property.

HJP gets $4.6million a year from Washington state and another $500,000 more from King County to pay its 32 lawyers and support staff.

The extraordinary row comes as thousands of American property owners struggle with a broken legal system that is allowing squatters to live rent free in upmarket homes without consequence.

Mr Kim, his wife Yougin and their two children moved into Mr Sarao's home in the summer of 2022, but have allegedly only paid for one month's rent out of their own pocket, according to court documents filed by their landlord.

The rest has been covered by the HJP, which provides legal assistance to renters facing eviction in Kings County.

It paid around $24,000 to cover Mr Kim's unpaid rent in February last year, with a further installment of around $13,000 that covered his payments until May 2023, according to Mr Sarao's attorney, Steven Freeborn.

But Mr Sarao had not received a penny since then, forcing Mr Freeborn to file a third notice of eviction.

It also sparked an ugly confrontation between the landlord and tenant, while around 200 protesters turned up to the property to demand the 'con man' cough up or get out.

Mr Kim even took out a restraining order against Mr Sarao after complaining of harassment.

The latest eviction hearing was scheduled for April 5, but was scrapped after HJP last week stumped up another $47,000 to cover the backdated rent, plus a further $4,400 to cover the month of April.

But Mr Sarao has little hope that his tenant will start paying out of his own pocket next month and will either have to file a fourth eviction notice or the taxpayer will keep having to pay.

Ultimately, he just wants Mr Kim out, he said.

Mr Freeborn, added: 'I don't think the good, taxpaying citizens of the state of Washington are going to be too happy about that.'

He said the HJP could go on paying Mr Kim's rent for 'as long as the state puts up with this nonsense'.

'It's ridiculous. They've paid almost $10,000 just to keep a guy in a $2million home in Bellevue.

'For that amount of money, they could move him to a less expensive community where he could live for three years or more.

'Why do the taxpayers need to pay this kind of rent?'

DailyMail.com has previously revealed that Mr Kim and his family are alleged to have moved into Mr Sarao's property from a previous squat nearby, where they used similar delaying tactics to avoid paying rent of around $4,000 a month on a three-bedroom, $1.3million home.

Kim and his wife Yougin were also earning a combined income of $408,000 a year working for medical consultancy SiriusIQ when they moved into Singh's property, according to a proof-of-income letter.

They lost their jobs shortly after.

But Mr Sarao claims the family continues to 'live a lavish life' in his home, 'doing barbecues, buying new cars, living in the best neighborhood and sending his kids to the best schools'.

Mr Kim has previously accused Singh of 'fabricating stories' about him and claims he is simply a Korean national trying to make it in the US.

Washington is the only state in the country that offers the right to counsel for low-income tenants facing eviction.

DailyMail.com contacted HJP for comment, but had not received a response at the time of publication.

Edmund Witter, its managing attorney, has previously said the non-profit keeps 'a lot of households housed that shouldn't be evicted.

In a statement to KIRO 7, the group said: 'If every tenant, just every time they look at somebody wrong or just do one thing wrong, we just throw them out every time, that's how you get a homelessness crisis. That's how you get people dying on the street.'


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13264211/squatter-Seattle-eviction-taxpayer-cash.html

Isn’t there a squatters thread this could go in? But yeah it’s all the dems fault is why you probably put it here.

We're running out of threads, we need a new one every time Trump blows his nose. I'm just saving space for all you with your Trumpy panties on fire by condensing all the brain-dead lib policies into one thread.


It's blue cities that make these ridiculous rules, laws, exceptions, programs.

Seattle is one of the most famous for it's downright stupidity.

They're writing checks for $80,000 of taxpayer money to keep a piece of human trash in an expensive home he doesn't own. They call this taxpayer scam "Housing Justice Project".

If blowing his nose was all he had been doing we wouldn't need any threads about him. The last time I checked you don't face 88 criminal counts for blowing your nose.

So your claim is that squatters rights laws like this only exist in liberal cities? That similar laws don't exist in other places and are not in some cases state laws?

Yep, Pit.

That's what I said.

I think you left the smart pills on the table when you fell out of bed this morning.

Then after saying that you call everyone that disagrees with you brain dead?


Nobody needs smart pills for that stupid crap.

I called everyone that disagrees with me brain dead?

Please show me where I said that, I can't find it.


Is Friday throw $%^ at the wall and see what sticks day? I thought that was Thursday??

That's what you've been doing so far today so I guess you've earned the naming rights.

You said I called everyone that didn't agree with me brain dead.


Where did I say that?

Lying again?

So then you agree with what you call the "brain-dead lib policies"? Or do all of the people that support those policies disagree with you?

Your dodge ball game is weak.

So, if I say playgrounds are dangerous . And others think they aren't. Does that mean I just called all that don't agree dangerous?

Try. Harder.

With you there's no need to try harder. You make it easy.

This version is better...

She is an idiot as well. She will most likely not be in the Senate since she is running as the Green Party candidate.

And idiots like me helped get her elected. My bad.

Me too. Problem is we both believed the only real alternative at that point in history was even worse. I still do, unfortunately.

More proof that there's idiots on both sides.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...n=1490&ito=social-twitter_mailonline

This is gonna rain on pits dream of chemical child castration.

Don't blame your dreams on me. It's not my fault you keep obsessing about children's genitals.Yet another person who doesn't understand the meaning of "could".

I support the protection of children and parents rights. You support the sexualization of children, the castration of children, and giving child sex dolls to pedophiles.

One of us has a problem and its not me.

So you support parents right unless the parents make a choice you disagree with? Do you think someone other than their parents are getting these medications for their children and giving it to them? So if you are telling the truth about "parents rights", do your support parents rights to give their children these medications or do you only really support parents rights when parents do what you agree with?

I have never supported the castration of children. I'm not the one so obsessed with this I spent my Saturday afternoon looking up things that "could happen" and trying to make it sounds like that means something. At least you are being honest enough to admit you feel you have some superior moral right to choose for everyone.

You support all of those things including schools sneaking around behind parents back encouraging gender changes, exposing children to written porn, and exposing them to drag queens. All without informing parents. I support the right of parents to direct and control what their kids are exposed to.

Sorry your dreams of child castration is getting crushed due to them learning (suprise to no one) that its harmful.

Maybe you need to get some kids of your own instead of living vicariously through Faux News.

Its been reported on plenty of media sites. If you dont like the truth, too bad for you. Keep your head in the sand.

The sand would seem to be a better place than where your head is buried. I'll ask you again. Since you seem to be for parents having a choice, who do you think it is getting those medications for their children and giving it to them? Do you support their right to choose?

Wine thirty must have come early for you yesterday.

No, I do not. I am for the protection of children. Any parent who wants to castrate their child should probably see a psychiatrist.

No matter what you think Eve, you cant top Republicans talking about Russia in Glowing terms. Republicans win for dumbest crap.

Name one.