|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,919
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,919 |
You're trying to make it sound like a solution to the QB situation was out there and we chose to pass. With Watson still on the payroll our options were even more limited than usual. We wouldn't have even been able to afford the likes of Darnold or Geno Smith.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471 |
You said he is a reach not me.
I don't care if he was selected in the third round.
I don't think myself or anyone else is saying he is savior.
He is going to play. Period. That is all we know.
I am glad you are not making decisions. Not that I would do better or that the current regime has not made mistakes.
I don't know how long it will take. Bills, Ravens, SF, SD, Lions and many others have not figured it out as well. And they have good quarterbacks.
We are years away. I don't care who is running the show.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,502
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,502 |
j/c:
Just let Gabriel play. If he's not very good so be it. Don't forget we have Sanders waiting in the wings! lol Oh, I just read that Flacco is now behind Gabriel, not Sanders. Doesn't lend much confidence in him. Which again shows the incompetence of this FO. They drafted him but have 0 confidence in him. Why did they trade Pickett instead of cutting Sanders. Makes no sense. Unless they're not trying to win games. Are you hinting at they might be tanking this season? Not that far-fetched. I don't know. Regardless, let's see what Gabriel can do. Who knows, we might have a decent QB here. With a bad offense line. And questionable receivers... And....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,717
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,717 |
Interested to see what our poor man's Baker Mayfield can do.
If it's not Chaos, it's not Cleveland.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,505
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,505 |
So why did they trade Pickett? Sounds like excuses are already being made for Stefanski and his QB before he ever takes the field. Because they knew what they had in Picket and he wasn't the answer, while Dillon and Sanders futures are still a possibility.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,257
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,257 |
So why did they trade Pickett? Sounds like excuses are already being made for Stefanski and his QB before he ever takes the field. Because they knew what they had in Picket and he wasn't the answer, while Dillon and Sanders futures are still a possibility. So, you would rather see what the future of two drafted QBs are than the team actually winning or losing. Talk about losing culture. The QB of the future is not on this team right now. Gabriel is a pop warner sized QB and Sanders certainly is not the adult in the room. The AFC North is as open at the top as it has been since the Browns returned but instead of trying to win, they want to play a reached for 3rd round pick and more than likely later the QB that fell the furthest in draft history. I have grown very tired of these idiotic moves and fans accepting each move and making excuses for every move. Berry and Stefanski both need fired. There are 32 teams in the NFL, and none are replacing a veteran with a 3rd round career back up at best to tank the season for a better draft pick to find a QB. Let's face it that is what is happening. 6 years into this regime and they have to tank to find their QB. Sad.
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money." Margarat Thatcher
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471 |
What proof do you have on how Pickett has performed?
Or how Pickett will perform?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,257
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,257 |
In his career he has a winning record 15-10. Thrown more TDs to INTs. Was a past 1st round draft pick. Would be a very competent backup QB. If the Browns were really trying to win would be on the team. Instead, the Browns do not care if they win or lose so let's just see what a couple draft picks can do. The future QB of the Browns is not on this team. Once the trade was made, they determined that QB is coming in next year's draft. This is a waste of a year now. The AFC North is as open at the top to win than any time since the Browns came back and we want to see what we have instead of trying to win. pathetic. I am not interested to see if either of these rookies can ever be a competent back up. I follow a team I want to see win and right now I see a team not trying to win.
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money." Margarat Thatcher
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471 |
Pickett is playing for his fourth team. If he was highly thought of that would not be the case.
"Instead, the Browns do not care if they win or lose"
If that is your opinion. I suggest find another team. Why watch or follow a team if that is how you feel?
If I felt that way. I would not watch them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,257
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,257 |
Pickett is playing for his fourth team. If he was highly thought of that would not be the case.
"Instead, the Browns do not care if they win or lose"
If that is your opinion. I suggest find another team. Why watch or follow a team if that is how you feel?
If I felt that way. I would not watch them. So, you don't have a legit argument against this FO is not trying to win so you tell me to find a different team. Dude, I have been following the Browns since Brian Sipe was under center. I am disgusted that Berry and Stefanski in year 6 are not trying to field a winner. They need fired. Promote Schwartz. He is the only coach on that team that is producing. I do not believe Gabriel has a snowballs chance to be any good in the NFL. I saw that game in the rose bowl. You think Ohio had him rattled. Wait until he gets to Pittsburg.
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money." Margarat Thatcher
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471 |
Not that it really matters but I have followed the Browns since 1960.
IMO there is no NFL organization that is not trying to win. Period.
You have your opinion. I have mine.
I disagree with you. I will leave it at that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,505
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,505 |
So, you would rather see what the future of two drafted QBs are than the team actually winning or losing. In case you didn't notice we are already losing. Nobody in their right mind sees that changing right now with Joe starting (no they wouldn't see it with Picket either) Dillon has a shot and so does Sanders. But as much as you and some others cry about it's the Truth. Did you really think we were winning the Superbowl this year 
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,388
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,388 |
So, you would rather see what the future of two drafted QBs are than the team actually winning or losing. At this point, yes. This was always going to be the case at some point this season, but Flacco's performance has expedited the change. If either Gabriel or Sanders work out (a long shot) then we have two first rounders to use on positions outside of QB. If they don't, it most likely means they've failed and we're probably in a good position to take a QB early or use both first rounders (and perhaps more) to move up to get one. But we have to find out either way and this was a plan I think everyone could see once the draft was over. It was just of matter of when it was going to commence..... .....and here we are.
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,681
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,681 |
Ryan Leaf was a former first round draft pick too. Would you like a list?
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,257
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,257 |
Ok Gabriel is the man he was the perfect pick. The next Tom Brady. We will see!!!!
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money." Margarat Thatcher
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,408
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,408 |
If they had more time with Pickett, he probably would have beaten out Flacco and they would have traded Flacco.
Because Pickett wasn't healthy, he got traded because they knew what they had in Flacco + he was having a good camp/ pre-season.
Meh.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,681
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,681 |
Ok Gabriel is the man he was the perfect pick. The next Tom Brady. We will see!!!! Yet again, you are the only one who has said that. Nobody else has. Dear Lord man.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,351
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,351 |
Ok Gabriel is the man he was the perfect pick. The next Tom Brady. We will see!!!! Yet again, you are the only one who has said that. Nobody else has. Dear Lord man. Can I go ahead and say it so at least someone has? Dillon Gabriel will be a HOFer. He will rewrite the record books., Fans will be saying Otto Who? Now he can be speaking truth to power.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 322
2nd String
|
2nd String
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 322 |
So why did they trade Pickett? Sounds like excuses are already being made for Stefanski and his QB before he ever takes the field. Because they knew what they had in Picket and he wasn't the answer, while Dillon and Sanders futures are still a possibility. So, you would rather see what the future of two drafted QBs are than the team actually winning or losing. Talk about losing culture. The QB of the future is not on this team right now. Gabriel is a pop warner sized QB and Sanders certainly is not the adult in the room. The AFC North is as open at the top as it has been since the Browns returned but instead of trying to win, they want to play a reached for 3rd round pick and more than likely later the QB that fell the furthest in draft history. I have grown very tired of these idiotic moves and fans accepting each move and making excuses for every move. Berry and Stefanski both need fired. There are 32 teams in the NFL, and none are replacing a veteran with a 3rd round career back up at best to tank the season for a better draft pick to find a QB. Let's face it that is what is happening. 6 years into this regime and they have to tank to find their QB. Sad. Kyler Murray1 QB 28 5' 10" 207 lbs 7 Oklahoma Dillon Gabriel8 QB 24 5' 11" 205 lbs R Oregon
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,276
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,276 |
Pickett is playing for his fourth team. If he was highly thought of that would not be the case.
"Instead, the Browns do not care if they win or lose. There was a QB picked in Cleveland at the number one overall pick in 2018 who Also is on his 4th team and is currently 3-1 You might be right, the Browns didn't care if they won or loss by putting a 40 year old vet out on the field instead of a younger player who can move the pocket
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,276
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,276 |
I would also like to point out
It was said on this board that no rookie QB ever won the Super Bowl
That's true
Some have gotten their team to a conference championship
who ?
Joe Flacco
Ben Roetheslberger
Brock Purdy
Mark Sanchez
Shaun King
Do the Browns have a rookie who can take the Browns from the bottom to
A play-off win or more ?
Try and find out
Old boy isn't ,when thankfully he did
But didn't do well
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,471 |
I didn't say make that quote about not caring.
that is the quote of Day of the dawg.
I wish Pickett would have been able to compete. That was why we traded for him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,229
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,229 |
That bodes well for him...
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,120
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,120 |
Extremely good with our O line
Joe Thomas #73
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,511
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,511 |
We've got ourselves another Nick Chubb! We all know what else we need on O. A QB, 2 OT, and a # 1 WR.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,919
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,919 |
That bodes well for him... Damn! He's definitely been effective, now I'm wondering how much we can increase his workload. https://www.footballguys.com/stats/snap-counts/teams?team=CLE&year=2025&type=snap-countsPer this, his snap count is still going up, but could be starting to level out. Now we just need to get Sampsons snaps to eat into Ford's.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,846
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,846 |
Just shooting from the hip - Judkins is 3 times the player Ford ever was. And he's certainly more effective as a runner than Simpson even if Simpson has flashed quicks.... I'd hope Judkins gets 60-65% of the snap total and 20-25 touches a game. More if we are grinding out a win. The less time Ford gets the better. . . . Ford feels a bit like Schwartz, no real need for him to be on the roster other than what feels like the FO not wanting to admit an error.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,919
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,919 |
I hated keeping Ford and letting Chubb walk. Whether the timing of Ford's paycut was just bad optics or not, I still don't like it.
That said, you still need a backup, and Ford is it. Sampson has some sort of issue with his game (I think folks said he's gotta upgrade his blocking?), and that needs to get ironed out so we see less of Ford. I think it would take a bad case of fumble-itis to get Ford off the roster prior to the off-season.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,669
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,669 |
Sampson (and the coaches using him) might find a rhythm behind Judkins as the alt back. He's not your primary runner and he wasn't great as a spell for Ford because Ford isn't enough that defenses have to change up their focus at all for Sampson. Does that make sense? I think Judkins' dominance will provide dividends for other players, maybe Sampson chief among them. That's why real playmakers matter, they draw enough gravity and attention from the opposing team that other players around the playmakers start to get some breathing room.
"Team Chemistry No Match for Team Biology" (Onion Sports Headline)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,502
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,502 |
Just shooting from the hip - Judkins is 3 times the player Ford ever was. And he's certainly more effective as a runner than Simpson even if Simpson has flashed quicks.... I'd hope Judkins gets 60-65% of the snap total and 20-25 touches a game. More if we are grinding out a win. The less time Ford gets the better. . . . Ford feels a bit like Schwartz, no real need for him to be on the roster other than what feels like the FO not wanting to admit an error. Like!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,505
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,505 |
Just shooting from the hip - Judkins is 3 times the player Ford ever was. And he's certainly more effective as a runner than Simpson even if Simpson has flashed quicks.... I'd hope Judkins gets 60-65% of the snap total and 20-25 touches a game. More if we are grinding out a win. The less time Ford gets the better. . . . Ford feels a bit like Schwartz, no real need for him to be on the roster other than what feels like the FO not wanting to admit an error. Ford is great if he has a huge hole to run through. He is the opposite of Judkins. Ford runs weak, and has no shiftiness. I believe a 20MPH wind knock him on his butt 9 times out of 10.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,318
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,318 |
Just shooting from the hip - Judkins is 3 times the player Ford ever was. And he's certainly more effective as a runner than Simpson even if Simpson has flashed quicks.... I'd hope Judkins gets 60-65% of the snap total and 20-25 touches a game. More if we are grinding out a win. The less time Ford gets the better. . . . Ford feels a bit like Schwartz, no real need for him to be on the roster other than what feels like the FO not wanting to admit an error. Like! I've read a lot of opinions that Sampson has shown poorly in pass protection - not unusual for a rookie RB who isn't very big. Because of this issue, teams key on the probability that the Browns won't run a pass play when Sampson is in the huddle. He was crazy-effective catching the ball week one though. Not surprised that we don't go back to what was working...kind of a KS staple.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,940
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,940 |
How big is Sampson? Everyone talks about how short Gabriel is, but a while back I saw a picture of Sampson and Gabriel standign next to each other and Gabriel looked bigger. Could have just been the camera angle but does Sampson not understand the pass blocking scheme or is he just getting run over?
Last edited by Jester; 10/04/25 10:02 AM.
The difference between Jesus and religion Religion mocks you for having dirty feet Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,543
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,543 |
From what I’ve noticed is that he’s a hesitant blocker, unsure and probably needs to be more aggressive. Blocking is an attitude thing.
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns News 5.0
|
|