DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum What Now

That may be true. As you said it's pretty much a guessing game. I think much of that decision will rest with who it was making a huge push to land watson. Someone initiated and pushed for that move. While I agree nobody most likely applied pressure in the opposite direction to any degree, someone was so determined to land him they made s second trip to sign him after he had already said Cleveland was off the list. In doing so they gave an arm and a leg to get that deal done.

I think most would agree at least in large part this is what has culminated since that trade to be a major factor in where they find themselves now.

I don't think we'll ever know the answer to that question for sure.

Haslam may have been the one making that push and will be looking for a fall guy. He may think that even with the constraints they faced after making this trade the results should still have been better in maintaining a competitive roster from Berry. It may have been Berry making that push and Haslam will hold him responsible. It may be both Berry and Haslam feel Stefanski should be producing better results with the roster he has been given.

Or, Haslam may realize by him insisting on and giving up so much for watson it was he who created this situation and give this FO and HC a chance to rebuild.

One thing is pretty much a certainty. It's almost unheard of to get a new GM who would retain the current HC. If in fact Haslam places the majority of the watson deal on Berry, it's a very rare case where a new GM doesn't insist on his own HC. And if you get a new GM who will keep the existing HC, I doubt that would be a highly regarded candidate.

Time will tell I suppose.

"Three wins is not going to cut it"
Said jimmy haslam in August.
With Pauli D gone,the GM position is slightly more appealing,but still it would be a very hard sell to any candidate worth a damn.
No worthwhile coach will take the HC position with Berry as GM,except maybe that fat guy that coached the Cowboys.

I haven't seen anything but media opinions indicating Stefanski will be fired. That's the same media that said Sanders would be a first round pick. Rumors are nothing more than that. Rumors.

I have no idea either way and won't lose any sleep over it whether Stefanski stays or goes. It wouldn't be the first time I've seen a HC get held accountable for the crappy roster he has been given. We haven't been on the HC roller coaster ride for a while now. I'm sure some are missing the nostalgia.

I say keep KS, if next year is atrocious, clean house.

After the Watson debacle, Ski deserves one more year to keep his job.

To put it quite simply I've never heard of a team or its fans complain because they have two good QB's. But as we have seen for years now they certainly complain when they have none.

I agree with almost everything you said with one caveat'. All lottery tickets give you the same odds of winning or losing. First round QB's have a much high success rates than either 3rd or 5th round QB's do. So to that degree it is different.

My question is ; what on earth makes you think THIS organization is CAPABLE of drafting a franchise QB ?

I guess the question should be why don't you think Berry can draft a franchise QB? He had an excellent draft last year and I understand why people may ask that question. I mean this franchise has a terrible record at drafting first round QB's. Sometimes that stands out above anything else in our minds.

But the fact of the matter is Berry has never drafted a QB in the first round. I have no idea if he can or not. And since he has never drafted a first round QB before there's really no evidence or track record to base whether he can or not.

I suppose people could use the watson deal as some sort of evidence if they choose to. But none of us really have any idea who the driving force was behind getting watson. It's true it may have been Berry. It's also true it may have been Haslam. If it was Haslam, Berry wasn't responsible for that. He would have simply been following his bosses orders. Since we have no idea how that all went down behind closed doors it's hard for me to place the blame for that on Berry. I'm just not one of those, "well he may have done that" kind of guys.

You and many others have said that you can't judge a draft for at least 3 years,but in this case you are.
Setting that aside,1 good draft out of what 5 0r 6,doesnot a good GM make.His drafts up to last year have been flat out horrible.But,tackles are tackles,which is true it's just some are much better than others.

You can only judge what you see. Since you include every other draft he has ran you too are judging at least two of them before three years have passed. I see you really provided nothing of substance that disputes my post.

I think as the season plays out the solution becomes clearer. Actually, Sanders has the ball in his court. Win and the Browns will be out of the 2026 QB class. Lose out and either Mendoza or Moore will be the Browns QB next year. I do not see the Browns using both #1's on a QB. Not this year. I think both Mendoza and Moore are better prospects than Cam Ward, so they are both worthy of picks 1 and 2. Simpson is good, but he is not top of the draft good. Maybe an option with the 2nd 1st but not the Browns 1st pick. At picks 1 or 2 whether or not Berry and/or Stefanski are back or not or is someone else is picking the Browns will be taking one of those 2 QBs. If they are picking around 10 because they won a game or 2 then they will probably take a WR or LT.