DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus ICE murdered a US citizen in MN

That injury was not serious to remain in the hospital. They keep people with severe injuries in the hospital unless they are terminally ill. What's hilarious is thinking somebody scored some kind of points by acting like someone needs to be a doctor to know that. Only morons would believe that.

I think anyone knows when a vehicle is no longer in front of them headed towards them and when a vehicle is beside them, heading away from them with the distance between themselves and the vehicle is increasing. My mention of the videos and photos are only designed to be used to show that description of events is accurate.

You're still doing nothing but offering excuses. Officers are supposed to show justification every time a weapon is fired. It was fired three times for sure. There is ample reason to show the first shot was justified. That's not so for the last two shots. All of the excuses in the world won't change that.

I SAID THIS:


YOU RESPONDED WITH THIS:



YOU turned this into an argument as to whether or not he should have been hospitalized.

That's called a Strawman.

The FACT is: You can both have internal bleeding and not be hospitalized.

That is why this is just another in a long line of arguments that make no sense.

Yes and something as slight as bruising is described as internal bleeding. I didn't turn this into "an argument as to whether or not he should have been hospitalized". Doctors already determined that. I reported that doctors didn't find the injury as something serious enough to hospitalize him. That isn't starting an argument. That's telling you what the doctors determined. Claiming otherwise is your Strawman.

I do however understand how pointing out his injury wasn't serious would be so upsetting to you and that somehow you find it offensive I pointed it out.

The description being used could be as simple as bruising. That would make sense since he was looked at and released.

Bruising is a form of internal bleeding where small blood vessels break under the skin, leaking blood into surrounding tissues................

The more you read the more you know.

So, your final answer is he was never taken to the hospital??

Look dude, I have no idea how your brain works but I know it's just wired to create arguments from thin air.

One poster inferred he wasn't really injured because he never even went to the hospital. I simply stated there was nothing about that in the article... because there wasn't. Don't know if he just likes making ish up or what -- don't care.


Your response was that Noem sent him home.


I have no flipping idea what that has to do with the conversation. I've tried to explain that. At this point you must be taking pleasure in wasting my time.

I'm not here to argue the severity of his injuries or what a flipping bruise is. On a scale of 1-10 I care about -4. I never said his injuries were severe, never even hinted at it. I simply stated to a poster -- one that posted what is most likely a lie -- that their article is b.s.

You've tried to move the argument in three different directions since then.

If this were a blind date, I'd already be suing you for harassment. Nothing you have said has made any sense, yet you're still blabbering nonsense.

Shut. Up.

Earlier in this thread, you said the first shot was the "kill" shot.

Later in this thread you said "I understand the first shot".

Once again, reporting the doctors findings is not an argument.



That's just a flat out lie that you are making up out of thin air.

It appears you can't comprehend that clarifying his injuries were not serious helps clear up some of the accusations being launched by both sides of this discussion. And my saying he was injured I'm agreeing with you that he did in fact go to the hospital. Agreeing with you isn't staring an argument.

Yes at some point he was sent to the hospital. There is a video showing him walking away from the shooting scene immediately after the incident. Nothing appeared abnormal. That once again is not an argument. It's a point of fact.

The only thing it seems you are all worked up about is that I brought into question the extent of his injuries. This after Noem trying to dramatize and put his injuries in the worst possible light. After trump claiming she "ran over him". None of which you even offered to comment on.

Now suddenly, even after me agreeing with some your points you act like a child about it. That explains exactly how your brain works.

Now shut up.

You need to find a quote on that. FATE said he was certain the first shot was the kill shot, not me. I said it may have been but we don't know.

And how does that change anything? I do understand the first shot. I've said that all along. Whether or not the first shot killed her or not doesn't change the circumstances of shots two and three. When an officer, or anyone of us for that matter, fires a weapon at someone we are responsible that we shot that weapon in a responsible manner and at the time that weapon was fired we had a reasonable fear for our life. That's whether that person with the shot or not.

And any dumb ass knows you don't continue shooting at someone once there is no longer a threat. Some of you keep trying to make excuses for those second and third shots when there is none.

That's YOU talking. A quote from your post.

And any dumb ass knows you don't continue shooting at someone once there is no longer a threat. Some of you keep trying to make excuses for those second and third shots when there is none.

That's YOU talking. A quote from your post. Post number 2131121