It has to be a "reasonable" fear for your life. For someone who touts the law you seem to have no idea what the law is. If someone in that church actually started shooting these people there would be lot of questions asked and a basis of "reasonable fear" for those actions would have to be justified.
Questions would be asked like "Were they armed?" "Did they verbally threaten you with violence?"
The problem with your hyperbole is nobody "kicked down the door" of that church.
Questions like this would also probably be asked in this situation. "Were your doors locked"? "Do you have a no trespassing sign or members only sign posted?" "Do you or don't you allow uninvited guests to attend your church services?"
Standards must be met to show you had "reasonable fear" for your life. Not that you just "felt some kind of way".
Like I said, what they did was wrong. But claiming it gave anyone the right to just shoot them is some figment of your own imagination.
And this?
Those are all baseless claims.
That's just pure BS.
The American citizen they drug out of his house? He was doing interviews just a few hours later because they had to let him go.
That police chief of Minneapolis wears a uniform too. In your world he is just lying about what his officers are experiencing when they're off duty? And they wear a uniform too. It seems it's not really about wearing a uniform. It's about who is paying for that person to be wearing which uniform.
Sticking your fingers in your ears screaming "La, la, la, la, la, la" doesn't mean these things aren't happening.
Any time you have a large number of people in a group you will have both good and bad. Thinking that changes just because those people are wearing a uniform is a fools dream. Not all ICE agents are bad but some are. The same goes for cops, plumbers or any other profession. Surely you can't be that naive. But on the other hand......