Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
mgh888 #2136459 04/21/26 05:57 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,078
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,078
Originally Posted by mgh888
I would be okay with Love too - but there is work to be done shoring up the #1 WR position and LT. . . . . in the video if Downs and Love are there, he's taking Downs. I think Downs is more likely to be there.

Agree with all that but I don't feel that there is a #1 receiver in the draft
Questionable if there is a future top LT. in this draft


The difference between Jesus and religion
Religion mocks you for having dirty feet
Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,078
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,078
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by PREACHER1
We need WR's not RB's
A combination of Love and Judkins in the backfield would be a killer combo.

If used creatively/aggressively
Can Monkin? I don't know
Wrong question.
Can Monkin? Absolutely
Would he? Unsure

Last edited by Jester; 04/21/26 06:01 AM.

The difference between Jesus and religion
Religion mocks you for having dirty feet
Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
Jester #2136461 04/21/26 06:03 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,435
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,435
I agree ! LOL... Having said that - I think there are probably 4 OT's - possibly 5 that can be plugged in at LT and you would improve the OL compared to what we have today. And all of them could, if needed flip to RT next year if you felt it was an urgent need to upgrade LT again. Which means - draft BPA at #6 ... or trade down to mid teens if you can find a trade partner.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 693
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 693
I think some are missing the point when it comes to Love and Judkins.

We need to understand who Judkins is.. I know some of this falls on the offensive line, but Judkins was a 3.6 ypc RB.

Monken was able to get 5.9 and 5.2 ypc out of an aging Derrick Henry. Before you say Henry is the man and that isn't out of the ordinary, I agree 100%. Henry has never had a season below 4.2 ypc and has a 10 year career ave of 4.9 ypc.

This is my point. It is JUST about the two headed monster, it is about improving the position from an above average RB to a possible generational one. Similar to what we are always trying to do at QB.

So, while I am still on the Carnell Tate or bust at #6, move down for the right compensation.. If both are off the table and Love isn't, I am a very strong believer in Love being able to elevate this offense to another level.

Last edited by IrishDawg42; 04/21/26 09:03 AM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,095
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,095
I live in the Nashville area. I know that the draft talk is crazy and often times unreliable. But there is a lot of buzz coming from all directions around here that the Titans will be taking Love at #4. With having Henry all of those years they know what a premiere back like that can do to change an offense and help out a young QB like they have in Cameron ward who will be going into his second season as a starter.

I don't know if Ward is the answer at the QB position although I saw some good signs from last year as the season progressed. But I would say it makes a lot of sense they would draft Love. They went out and got their QB first and now wish to help support him with a strong running game. I actually hope the Titans draft him so our FO isn't tempted to draft him themselves.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk NFL Draft 2026 Favorite Player

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5