|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,831
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,831 |
Another stupid comment by haslam....the kid cant be trusted...he has been busted for drugs what....6 times now counting college? trade the punk....dont give him a slap on the back and your word of support! haslam should have said..."hey, we are very disappointed in josh. This was a selfish act and we have no room for that on this team". Instead he babies him...lets him off the hook...which is why josh keeps doing this over and over because someone always tells him he is a good little boy.
Honestly....i wouldnt even be surprised if josh doesnt care he is getting suspended. More time for him to lay around and smoke weed with his homies.
" Now here you are running these dirty old streets tattoo on your neck fake gold on your teeth, got the hood here snowed but you can't fool me, we both know who you are"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 433
1st String
|
|
1st String
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 433 |
Quote:
How is a 7th rounder any good?
Odds are, that player wouldn't work out or contribute at all.
Even if Gordon is suspended for half a year, every year, he still helps the team better than 99% of 7th roud picks.
I'm raising the question because the odds are,based on his history of doing this,that he will do it again.And he won't be playing for half a year the next time either.They will suspend him for a full year..ect. So I'm wondering what the options are for CLE. I love the guys talent,and wish he could play...but he just hasn't been able to keep it together.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 165
Practice Squad
|
|
Practice Squad
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 165 |
I can't help think there's more to this report that all parties are letting on.
As one poster said earlier, why did ESPN release the info right at the time of the draft, just smacks of editorial drama-hype. According to the story, everyone was well aware in advance. Why not release the story earlier?
And Rosenhouse (sp), was very quick to respond to in a negative way to the report, calling the report false. You can bet he'll pursue every possible avenue. He's got way too much to lose if this goes south.
And why are / did the Browns react in such a calm fashion? I know league rules, but still.
Why have we heard about 2 or 3 other finalized suspensions from the league, and not a word or even the predictable leek from an "league insider"? Yes I have considered the appeal angle, that will take time to run it's coarse.
And why would Josh be so out there in the media knowing he was toast for a long period of time, weird. I mean if I just screwed up ROYALY, I wouldn't be more public than I've ever been.
I could just be P ing in the wind here, but things are just not adding up. how can you smoke a joint after the best yr. of your life & kiss off millions....can it be that cut & dry?
Maybe, stay tuned..... I'm sure there more to come soon.
Leg breaking news......
- Browns
ESPN's Dan Graziano reports the NFL is expected to revamp its marijuana policy in the league's new drug agreement, instituting a higher threshold for positive tests and lessening the penalties.
It's unclear how much the penalties will be lessened, but at the very least, it means players will no longer be subject to a four-game ban for a first-time offense. Per Graziano, haggling over the arbitration process is the only roadblock to a new drug agreement. The move comes too late for Josh Gordon, but it appears marijuana will no longer be treated as a more serious offense than issues like drunk driving and assault.
Source: ESPN.com
Last edited by Demo44; 05/13/14 05:57 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465 |
Quote:
how can you smoke a joint after the best yr. of your life & kiss off millions....can it be that cut & dry?
It baffles me that people are still applying common sense to Josh Gordon's thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
Quote:
ESPN's Dan Graziano reports the NFL is expected to revamp its marijuana policy in the league's new drug agreement, instituting a higher threshold for positive tests and lessening the penalties.
It's unclear how much the penalties will be lessened, but at the very least, it means players will no longer be subject to a four-game ban for a first-time offense. Per Graziano, haggling over the arbitration process is the only roadblock to a new drug agreement. The move comes too late for Josh Gordon, but it appears marijuana will no longer be treated as a more serious offense than issues like drunk driving and assault.
Source: ESPN.com
Might need a link.
Anyway, I would be shocked if they suspend Josh for one full year WHILE rewriting the policy to lessen the penalty. It's no coincidence these two things come out within days of each other.
If true, no way he's out all year.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/Punchsmack/punch.gif) “...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
How is a 7th rounder any good?
Odds are, that player wouldn't work out or contribute at all.
Even if Gordon is suspended for half a year, every year, he still helps the team better than 99% of 7th roud picks.
at best we get half a year this year from him. druing offseason he will get caught and be out forever. that's if he can stay clean for the 8 weeks and bye week lol.
Exactly my point. There's a decent chance he may never be clean enough to play again. Five failed drug tests tell that tale. A 7th rounder is going to play assuming you keep him in your roster.
Josh isn't out of chances in the NFL for sure. He'll keep getting chances, but they'll all be very low risk chances. I think teams in the NFL value a 7th round selection more than what you can rely on Josh for right now.
I need some help here,, When did he fail 5 drug tests?
I know of the one coming out of college... I know of the one that cost him a couple of game last year. I know of this one now. that's three! I don't know where the other two are?
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 433
1st String
|
|
1st String
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 433 |
Quote:
I can't help think there's more to this report that all parties are letting on.
As one poster said earlier, why did ESPN release the info right at the time of the draft, just smacks of editorial drama-hype. According to the story, everyone was well aware in advance. Why not release the story earlier?
And Rosenhouse (sp), was very quick to respond to in a negative way to the report, calling the report false. You can bet he'll pursue every possible avenue. He's got way too much to lose if this goes south.
And why are / did the Browns react in such a calm fashion? I know league rules, but still.
Why have we heard about 2 or 3 other finalized suspensions from the league, and not a word or even the predictable leek from an "league insider"? Yes I have considered the appeal angle, that will take time to run it's coarse.
And why would Josh be so out there in the media knowing he was toast for a long period of time, weird. I mean if I just screwed up ROYALY, I wouldn't be more public than I've ever been.
I could just be P ing in the wind here, but things are just not adding up. how can you smoke a joint after the best yr. of your life & kiss off millions....can it be that cut & dry?
Maybe, stay tuned..... I'm sure there more to come soon.
Leg breaking news......
- Browns
ESPN's Dan Graziano reports the NFL is expected to revamp its marijuana policy in the league's new drug agreement, instituting a higher threshold for positive tests and lessening the penalties.
It's unclear how much the penalties will be lessened, but at the very least, it means players will no longer be subject to a four-game ban for a first-time offense. Per Graziano, haggling over the arbitration process is the only roadblock to a new drug agreement. The move comes too late for Josh Gordon, but it appears marijuana will no longer be treated as a more serious offense than issues like drunk driving and assault.
Source: ESPN.com
If that's the case,then I say screw it!! Let them all play stoned...no sense in having a soft approach to it.You either allow it or don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165 |
I agree with that.
Remove pot from the testing altogether.
The purpose of the testing is (should be) to look for PED's. With marijuana becoming legal in more and more places, it makes little sense to test for it as if it were illicit (actually, it never made sense except from a public relations viewpoint).
If the guys want to drink, they can drink. If they want to smoke, let them smoke. If they get in trouble while doing either... hammer them hard, but if they aren't harming anyone and aren't breaking any laws where/when they do it, then why care at all?
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
Quote:
I need some help here,, When did he fail 5 drug tests?
I know of the one coming out of college... I know of the one that cost him a couple of game last year. I know of this one now. that's three! I don't know where the other two are?
I thought there were multiple failed tests in college too.
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
October 2010, during his sophomore year, he and teammate Willie Jefferson were found asleep at a local Taco Bell. Police found marijuana in Jefferson’s car. Jefferson, who was driving, was kicked off the team due to it being his second violation, but Gordon was only suspended.
In July 2011, Gordon was suspended indefinitely by head coach Art Briles, for later failing a drug test and testing positive for marijuana.
In August 2011, Gordon transferred to Utah, where he sat out the 2011 season declaring too late for the 2011 Supplemental Draft.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,831
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,831 |
Quote:
Quote:
how can you smoke a joint after the best yr. of your life & kiss off millions....can it be that cut & dry?
It baffles me that people are still applying common sense to Josh Gordon's thinking.
" Now here you are running these dirty old streets tattoo on your neck fake gold on your teeth, got the hood here snowed but you can't fool me, we both know who you are"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,069
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,069 |
Gordon will be suspended this year UNTIL Manziel gets the starting nod. After all the NFL is a business....
I think I'm only about half joking...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
Quote:
Right. Gordon must be as dumb as a stump.
Not news, proven, and verified.
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235 |
Quote:
ESPN's Dan Graziano reports the NFL is expected to revamp its marijuana policy in the league's new drug agreement, instituting a higher threshold for positive tests and lessening the penalties.
It's unclear how much the penalties will be lessened, but at the very least, it means players will no longer be subject to a four-game ban for a first-time offense. Per Graziano, haggling over the arbitration process is the only roadblock to a new drug agreement. The move comes too late for Josh Gordon, but it appears marijuana will no longer be treated as a more serious offense than issues like drunk driving and assault.
They must have read the argument I made in the other thread.
Cleveland Browns, Space Browns ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/iVP5Po2.png)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
So if this won't be as serious as drunk driving and assault now, how many cases of assault or drunk driving do you need to be suspended for the year?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
Quote:
So if this won't be as serious as drunk driving and assault now, how many cases of assault or drunk driving do you need to be suspended for the year?
It would depend on what you were drinking, and who you hit..
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
See ya later, Eric Wright. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064 |
So we are watering down consequences for the "victims" of discipline by the NFL. This should do it for him. Not to sidetrack here, but what does a player have to do to get thrown out of the NFL for a time, or even for life? I mean short of conviction and imprisonment. The NFL seems to have a pretty forgiving track record. 
"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887 |
Quote:
So we are watering down consequences for the "victims" of discipline by the NFL. This should do it for him.
Not to sidetrack here, but what does a player have to do to get thrown out of the NFL for a time, or even for life? I mean short of conviction and imprisonment. The NFL seems to have a pretty forgiving track record.
That Linebacker for St. Louis (Little???) killed someone while DUI and was still allowed to play. As did Stallworth. Smoking Weed isn't going to be a lifetime ban.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
Report: New NFL drug policy would reduce marijuana punishments By John Breech | CBSSports.com
May 13, 2014 6:54 pm CT
The NFL's drug policy could be undergoing a change in the near future, a change that would,involve more lenient punishments for playg wh_ test positive foÜhÎ juDndHœccJra
Ò tÜ@7ì:.com.
Renegotiations in thi žr‡g.polƒc} `aše beeˆ ioong onÈsonwe 2 19,Æbwt*tˆeÒlaaƒuq ƒnl the NFLPA ha’V6beeR unable to come tÝYœ¤Ñxa)ÜÛ«– ee'Í•¾ßRTh×Yž¢ ges to theBvot policy would not only ihcˆecsi th… hšeshold Œo| g pouišie.tesŒ,(bqtÆi| soslb eruee&the punishmen‘ 4givwn to players who ^U:Ï-e ¤…6ƒ!
riº˜2Í-LpoDU6ÚbL
Houezed,$theÈE_Pº eport pci‚ts ou” œhit tŠeeÈc€aˆgos.wuˆdn'j lelp players w@Ô*havk already violatedÛÖv—Ö@olÔ5gÞÖ\ikØv\€™GnsÛÕw–“receiver JÕgh Gordon, "/’ontÌ Êbx />Thƒ ”easonÔt„eÈnww pkl}cw ’a•n-t.g“n‡ nfoamenT to test for HGH.¶È‰H, P#ÿÍ›O tQ2ÿΟOtiW0ÿןHhod; then ëp was the population studw;ÎnwÈit's co‰mosyioner.aitborivyÆ Uup coym‹tme‚tÈtq ’e›tƒno osÚclear. The sa•Ê8canNot be said of the/…×WT."3™žto players wh'liolete the NFL's drugÄÛ±Guy MÚ”¼eitQÕÀ´Ax wLÑƸbhe league Pydn't test the player.
Nb( ¥>×oDbscélàyN lçyér ™o)l® ©e½ a ~Lxe lcn$e_t marÛ‡wana"p›
m»à€êlÔl½¹Îæc†FbíÕñgØFfí€÷m Get it,Mnhey're`going t; ‘ieBuô oe¬pëwïrza dNarezt *G( øe)tn.J ¢<{-¥c lãrG-R<]f n>H<rN/¶<˜r|/ôS¯c³s to see thE pavt in bold, but we'll see.
Do the players want their HGH or pot? Can't have both.
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418 |
I bet that any agreement contains a "get out of jail free" for players already in a program due to pot.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Cool, so they renegotiate the pot punishments before investigating the Steelers issue, but Gordon's out for the season.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857 |
Quote:
Cool, so they renegotiate the pot punishments before investigating the Steelers issue, but Gordon's out for the season.
Have we confirmed that he is actually out for the season yet? Or is that still strong speculation?
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189 |
What is the "Steelers issue"? Did I miss something?
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Ryan Clark publicly calling out a bunch of Steelers for smoking pot.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189 |
Tanks. I'd forgotten about that.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643 |
So if someone called my boss and said they saw me smoking pot I should be investigated?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189 |
You should be investigated regardless. 
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887 |
Quote:
So if someone called my boss and said they saw me smoking pot I should be investigated?
If a co-worker went to my HR department and said they saw me smoking pot I would have her in my office very shortly telling me I have been selected for a random drug screen. Our company does random screening all of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643 |
Quote:
Quote:
So if someone called my boss and said they saw me smoking pot I should be investigated?
If a co-worker went to my HR department and said they saw me smoking pot I would have her in my office very shortly telling me I have been selected for a random drug screen. Our company does random screening all of the time.
Really with no proof or anything? I bet that gets old in a hurry. If they already do random testing why would they send you again just because someone said so. How do they know that the person reporting you isnt just angry about something else?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850 |
Quote:
Quote:
So if someone called my boss and said they saw me smoking pot I should be investigated?
If a co-worker went to my HR department and said they saw me smoking pot I would have her in my office very shortly telling me I have been selected for a random drug screen. Our company does random screening all of the time.
and imagine if that co-worker went to a national media outlet that ran a bunch of stories that depicted your usage in a negative light.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550 |
Quote:
Cool, so they renegotiate the pot punishments before investigating the Steelers issue, but Gordon's out for the season.
Gee man....you can't have a bunch of Steelers in trouble. 
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong ![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/small-gator-chomp.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So if someone called my boss and said they saw me smoking pot I should be investigated?
If a co-worker went to my HR department and said they saw me smoking pot I would have her in my office very shortly telling me I have been selected for a random drug screen. Our company does random screening all of the time.
Really with no proof or anything? I bet that gets old in a hurry. If they already do random testing why would they send you again just because someone said so. How do they know that the person reporting you isnt just angry about something else?
Well obviously the HR dept. would have to deem it credible, but what would sending me for a random drug screen and me passing do for someone who is just angry with me? I got hit with a random three quarters in a row, takes only a few minuets of my day, it's not like it's an inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,731
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,731 |
j/c
When someone is targeted for a drug screen based on accusations, it's not random. Nothing about that is random. Categorizing it as such is a blatant lie and not at all forthcoming. I wonder at what point does the accused get any disclosure and honesty?
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887 |
Quote:
j/c
When someone is targeted for a drug screen based on accusations, it's not random. Nothing about that is random. Categorizing it as such is a blatant lie and not at all forthcoming. I wonder at what point does the accused get any disclosure and honesty?
That's what HR's do many times. Obviously they would not come in and say "So and So accused you of smoking pot so we are sending you for a Random,", they would take the information, if they deem it credible then they would just inform me that I have been selected for a random screening. Even though it's not random I would have no idea that they are sending me because someone said something.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,731
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,731 |
Oh I agree that's what they do. But saying that it's a random drug test based on being accused is an out and out lie.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418 |
If the NFL votes to relax its pot policy, then this is my prediction as to what will happen with Gordon.
He will face a penalty similar to last year, with a 2 game suspension, and a loss of 4 game checks. (assuming that his sin was pot, and that his test falls within the new policy) They can't let him off altogether, and the union isn't going to let them ban him for a year over an offense that has been changed to a non-offense.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
Quote:
Oh I agree that's what they do. But saying that it's a random drug test based on being accused is an out and out lie.
Random in that sense just means "not a regular schedule", it doesn't mean they pull a number out of a hat and if it's yours you go. It just means they pick and choose when you go for whatever reason.
Maybe they saw you get 2 bags of chips from the vending machine instead of the usual one. Sign of the munchies.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Josh Gordon Faces Year-Long
Suspension Part 2
|
|
![[Linked Image from mypsn.eu.playstation.com]](http://mypsn.eu.playstation.com/psn/profile/Letherface.png)
