Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
A lot of talk of tanking. We will not tank the season, we don't have to. We will have the worst record in the league while trying our best. We don't have to try to lose. It's the natural by product of less talent than all of your opponents.

Not all is lost, though. From what I saw in week 1, outside of talent on offense, talent on defense, talent on special teams, and coaching ... we were right there.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
in my mind, the two teams who are very bad who also would draft a QB are Chicago and SF (the Bills might as well, but they'll at least win 5-6).

Well, SF won last week. Every win by them should make us happy.


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I have never prescribed to playing for draft picks. Building a winning culture is far more important.

Heck, we had the 2nd overall pick last year and we ended up w/Corey Coleman. blush

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
jc...

Speculating...the Browns two year plan could be drafting Watson with the Browns pick next year. McCown could screw that up if the offense becomes more productive with him at QB.

The odds might be against McCown proving to be much of an upgrade at QB...but to insure the odds stay in favor of the front office...McCown could be traded with Kessler taking over.

A move such as that could be passed off as taking advantage of the opportunity to gain draft picks and giving valuable playing time to our young QBs.

The Boys wouldn't do that...would they?

I could see that happening...


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: mac
jc...


The Boys wouldn't do that...would they?

I could see that happening...


Of course that is a possibility, mac. It can't be ruled out. But forget the speculating, how would YOU handle the current QB dilemma?


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
It doesn't matter how big of a boost Josh will/could be to the offense when the defense is what ours is.

It just simply doesn't matter. Having a competent Qb though could help the younger people, especially Erving with the line sliding and protections.

Last edited by Dawg_LB; 09/14/16 10:33 AM.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Originally Posted By: mac
jc...

Speculating...the Browns two year plan could be drafting Watson with the Browns pick next year. McCown could screw that up if the offense becomes more productive with him at QB.


IMO, if the Browns plan is to draft Watson next year, then the performance of McCown this year will not change that one bit.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: Dawg_LB
It doesn't matter how big of a boost Josh will/could be to the offense when the defense is what ours is.

It just simply doesn't matter. Having a competent Qb though could help the younger people, especially Erving with the line sliding and protections.



LB...given the condition the roster is in after one Moneyball draft..being gutted, there is no going back now!

The #1 priority for this franchise continues to be QUARTERBACK.

The Boys didn't fill that need in 2016 and now the QB position continues to be this franchises #1 priority in the next draft.

IMO, the franchise must do whatever it takes to draft the best QB prospect in the 2017 draft.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: CapCity Dawg
Originally Posted By: mac
jc...

Speculating...the Browns two year plan could be drafting Watson with the Browns pick next year. McCown could screw that up if the offense becomes more productive with him at QB.


IMO, if the Browns plan is to draft Watson next year, then the performance of McCown this year will not change that one bit.

I believe his thought was that a competent QB could win games, thus not giving us the opportunity to draft Watson.. not that they would think McCown was some how the long term solution.

I personally would love to have Watson but I also want to win as many games as we can this year, if that number is 5 or 6 or 3.. doesn't matter, win as many as you can. the Rams had the #1 pick last year and their QB selection was in jeans on Sunday while the #2 QB taken is the talk of the NFL right now..


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: Dawg_LB
It doesn't matter how big of a boost Josh will/could be to the offense when the defense is what ours is.

It just simply doesn't matter. Having a competent Qb though could help the younger people, especially Erving with the line sliding and protections.



LB...given the condition the roster is in after one Moneyball draft..being gutted, there is no going back now!

The #1 priority for this franchise continues to be QUARTERBACK.

The Boys didn't fill that need in 2016 and now the QB position continues to be this franchises #1 priority in the next draft.

IMO, the franchise must do whatever it takes to draft the best QB prospect in the 2017 draft.


Oh yeah, we've dug the hole already. There's no going back. Can you imagine had we released or traded Josh, what situation we'd be in? Making a bad situation worse.

The priority is and will always be Qb. Look at Oakland, Carr comes in and now look.

The good news is, with our schedule and our "team" - we will be in the top five and we'll get a good crack at the high level Qb prospects. It would be great to see a Qb here earn a big fat contract and playing solid ball. That would just be fantastic.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Quote:
"Josh McCown...might be the Browns best QB."


Then we should have drafted Wentz. End of Thread.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
The good news is, with our schedule and our "team" - we will be in the top five and we'll get a good crack at the high level Qb prospects.


LB..."top five" ?

No, we need the top pick so there is no need to make a deal to move up.

After we take a QB, we need to address defensive needs and any OL issues. The Browns do not want to be in a position where they are forced to use up valuable draft picks to move up to draft a QB.

If this franchise is going to unofficially tank...then do it right, with one more loss than the nearest loser.

I never want to go through another season like this one is shaping up to be..never!


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Quote:
"Josh McCown...might be the Browns best QB."


Then we should have drafted Wentz. End of Thread.


Perfect...once the Browns signed RG, drafting a QB in the 2016 draft did not fit their plan.

Hopefully The Boys and Hue have seen enough of RG to know that no matter how good he may be, staying on the field will always be an issue for him and the team.



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Quote:
I never want to go through another season like this one is shaping up to be..never!


We've been thru seasons like this one is shaping up to be for 15 years.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,256
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,256
j/c

I guess all of this talk about tanking is subjective.

When the FO gets rid of a ton of veteran players and keeps 16 rookies plus a lot of second year players on the roster, are they trying to win or trying to develop talent?

I don't believe anyone can honestly say this FO put winning over development. Now that doesn't mean they don't want to win, just that winning has been made very difficult based on the plan that's in place.

With that much youth, it's the future you're building for, not the now. We simply don't have the experience and developed talent on the field to win at this time.

The FO knows it, the coaching staff knows it and objective fans know it. I can see how some can see that as tanking the season.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
I didn't want to sound even more negative, but I believe we truly are on deck for #1 overall selection. I really and seriously do. And I'll even take the negativity one step more, and say it'll come on the premises of just legit loses and not even trying to "tank", we're just really that bad in my eyes.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Quote:
I never want to go through another season like this one is shaping up to be..never!


We've been thru seasons like this one is shaping up to be for 15 years.


Like I said, what ever it takes to secure the top pick..that should be the goal.

If that means going 0-16, so be it!

I believe the worst season the Browns have had is 1999...2-14..this season could be a record breaker!


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Sad the only records on deck for being feasible to break includes the amount of loses the season will have.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
I don't believe anyone can honestly say this FO put winning over development.


pitt...when The Boys said all the right things about signing our free agents, then didn't follow through...IT SENT A MESSAGE TO THE LOCKERROOM.

Some of the veterans may have slacked off, hoping they would be traded or cut..because they were just fed up this franchise and how poorly it was being run. Who would blame them if they wanted to get out?

The Boys built this franchise to "lose" with the hope that tanking will bring a winner at "some point" in the future...where "that point" in future is...depends on how cheap Haslam will be.

...if Haslam refuses to re-sign (in 4-5yrs) the talent that is now being drafted, what we are experiencing over the next few years will simply repeat.


Last edited by mac; 09/14/16 12:58 PM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
Quote:
because they were just fed up this franchise and how poorly it was being run.


Couldn't this mindset of veteran players on the roster been the same for the vet players that were heading for free agency?


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Quote:
"Josh McCown...might be the Browns best QB."


Then we should have drafted Wentz. End of Thread.


Perfect...once the Browns signed RG, drafting a QB in the 2016 draft did not fit their plan.

Hopefully The Boys and Hue have seen enough of RG to know that no matter how good he may be, staying on the field will always be an issue for him and the team.



One game as QB, and with this Defense that gave up 29 points and we should throw RG under a bus?

Honestly, I don't know if he's the answer, I tend to thing not, but hey, what do I know.

Except, I think it takes more than one game.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Quote:
I never want to go through another season like this one is shaping up to be..never!


We've been thru seasons like this one is shaping up to be for 15 years.


Like I said, what ever it takes to secure the top pick..that should be the goal.

If that means going 0-16, so be it!

I believe the worst season the Browns have had is 1999...2-14..this season could be a record breaker!


There are no QB's IMO worthy of the #1 pick unless someone comes out of the wood work which could happen. Besides what makes you believe this FO won't trade high picks away for a bunch of meaningless later picks like they usually do?


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Quote:
One game as QB, and with this Defense that gave up 29 points and we should throw RG under a bus?


RG threw himself under that bus when he forgot to protect himself.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,622
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,622
Originally Posted By: mac
Quote:
The good news is, with our schedule and our "team" - we will be in the top five and we'll get a good crack at the high level Qb prospects.


LB..."top five" ?

No, we need the top pick so there is no need to make a deal to move up.

After we take a QB, we need to address defensive needs and any OL issues. The Browns do not want to be in a position where they are forced to use up valuable draft picks to move up to draft a QB.

If this franchise is going to unofficially tank...then do it right, with one more loss than the nearest loser.

I never want to go through another season like this one is shaping up to be..never!


See mac we can agree on stuff! I said something just like this the other day.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Quote:
Perfect...once the Browns signed RG, drafting a QB in the 2016 draft did not fit their plan.


And that plan didn't fit the Brown's. Someone should be accountable. They could have still taken Wentz for backup. But Nooooo!...we have McCussion and a rookie 4th rounder to try and develop over the next few years.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie
Quote:
because they were just fed up this franchise and how poorly it was being run.


Couldn't this mindset of veteran players on the roster been the same for the vet players that were heading for free agency?


NO...do you remember the message that was being sent by the Browns front office?

I'm positive some of those free agents thought the Browns would re-sign them. Once none of the free agents were re-signed, the future plan for the franchise became much clearer for the veterans that remained on the roster.

Last edited by mac; 09/14/16 01:06 PM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG

With that much youth, it's the future you're building for, not the now. We simply don't have the experience and developed talent on the field to win at this time.


Kudos, Pit. That is likely the most objective, non-partisan statement that I've read on here in quite a while...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie
Quote:
because they were just fed up this franchise and how poorly it was being run.


Couldn't this mindset of veteran players on the roster been the same for the vet players that were heading for free agency?


NO...do you remember the message that was being sent by the Browns front office?

I'm positive some of those free agents thought the Browns would re-sign them. Once none of the free agents were re-signed, the future plan for the franchise became much clearer for the veterans that remained on the roster.


That's fair. I just wanted to be clear that you didn't think the vets on the squad before FA weren't already upset with the franchise's losing ways.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Quote:
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG

With that much youth, it's the future you're building for, not the now. We simply don't have the experience and developed talent on the field to win at this time.


Then why didn't they draft a youthful QB with their 2016 1st rd pick? Everyone knew RGIII was a reach and they still passed on Wentz. Pfft.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
The Browns have publicly said that they did not view Wentz as a top 20 qb. It was a moronic thing to say in public, but I guess that doesn't matter much.

What will matter is whether or not Wentz turns out to be good or not. At this point, we don't know either way.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
We could've had our choice between Carr and Teddy.....


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
There isn't a week that goes by w/out me thinking about that.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hope for a Vikings Superbowl run with Bradford, then you probably get Teddy in a Browns uni.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,231
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,231
I really wanted Teddy... I thought he could be an upgraded Alex Smith type QB.


Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,363
H
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,363
I think about that all the time too. Dereck or Teddy AND Odell. It makes me sick. frown

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Me too. Isn't it amazing to think if had one of those two qbs and OBJ?

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Originally Posted By: DCDAWGFAN
Originally Posted By: CapCity Dawg
Originally Posted By: mac
jc...

Speculating...the Browns two year plan could be drafting Watson with the Browns pick next year. McCown could screw that up if the offense becomes more productive with him at QB.


IMO, if the Browns plan is to draft Watson next year, then the performance of McCown this year will not change that one bit.

I believe his thought was that a competent QB could win games, thus not giving us the opportunity to draft Watson.. not that they would think McCown was some how the long term solution.

I personally would love to have Watson but I also want to win as many games as we can this year, if that number is 5 or 6 or 3.. doesn't matter, win as many as you can. the Rams had the #1 pick last year and their QB selection was in jeans on Sunday while the #2 QB taken is the talk of the NFL right now..


Ah, that makes sense. Apologies to mac for misunderstanding his point.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
You're a good soul, Cap.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
The Browns have publicly said that they did not view Wentz as a top 20 qb. It was a moronic thing to say in public, but I guess that doesn't matter much.

What will matter is whether or not Wentz turns out to be good or not. At this point, we don't know either way.


Wentz and many others that we could have drafted went on the fast track for their teams and have done well and we're still waiting to draft a top QB after trading down from top picks again. Not a very smart way to rebuild/build in a QB dependent league.

Just saying not drafting a QB with our top pick is still haunting us after 15 years in this league. That's insanity in it's purest form.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
Ah, that makes sense. Apologies to mac for misunderstanding his point.


cap...No apology necessary.



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Josh McCown...might be the Browns best QB.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5