Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 8 of 10 1 2 6 7 8 9 10
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Thanks bro. laugh

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Michael Lombardi offers a plan for the Patriots offseason

http://www.patspulpit.com/2017/3/7/14838...agency-nfl-2017

Step 1: Don’t trade Jimmy Garoppolo

Lombardi reasons that even though Brady had one of the best seasons by a QB at Age 39, there is no precedence that a 40+ year old QB will come back and play well. We saw it with Brett Favre in 2010. Brady has a much more different training and nutrition regime than most QBs of his age, but there comes a point where Brady’s age will become an issue. The Patriots have a young QB who in 6 quarters showed he can handle the full offense. Brady’s contract allows for the Patriots to save $8M if cut or Tom retires in 2018 case Father Time wins. In that case, the Patriots can either sign Garoppolo to a long term deal or franchise him.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Originally Posted By: Vambo
Originally Posted By: PDXBrownsFan
If people are willing to use a #1 on an unproven rookie (inc Sam Darnold) why not a guy who has been coached and tutored for a few years by the best? Somebody who only has a few starts, but, has at least seen pro-defensive schemes, pro playbooks and has made that transition from college ball to pro ball.

Again, I only throw this out as devils advocate. I AM NOT advocating we use the 1 for JG. But, it is a valid argument if we are happy to say things like "fail for Cardale", "suck for Luck" and then talk about grabbing an unproven college guy like Watson, Trubisky, Goff, Wentz or Darnold.


Because you know you will have them through their rookie contract JG could refuse to re-sign and you waste your pic on a one year rental.


Whoever trades for him, has him for at least 3 years.

If he's not terrible. He will get franchised.

And if he's successful somewhere. He most likely will work out a long term deal to stay there.

It's not rocket surgery.


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:

It's not rocket surgery.


LOL.........operating on a rocket???

Just kidding man. I think it's called "rocket science?" grin

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
Originally Posted By: Vambo
Originally Posted By: PDXBrownsFan
If people are willing to use a #1 on an unproven rookie (inc Sam Darnold) why not a guy who has been coached and tutored for a few years by the best? Somebody who only has a few starts, but, has at least seen pro-defensive schemes, pro playbooks and has made that transition from college ball to pro ball.

Again, I only throw this out as devils advocate. I AM NOT advocating we use the 1 for JG. But, it is a valid argument if we are happy to say things like "fail for Cardale", "suck for Luck" and then talk about grabbing an unproven college guy like Watson, Trubisky, Goff, Wentz or Darnold.


Because you know you will have them through their rookie contract JG could refuse to re-sign and you waste your pic on a one year rental.


Whoever trades for him, has him for at least 3 years.

If he's not terrible. He will get franchised.

And if he's successful somewhere. He most likely will work out a long term deal to stay there.

It's not rocket surgery.


http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...immy-garoppolo/

" Conversely, if Garoppolo doesn’t want to go to Cleveland (or any other team), he can announce that he will not agree to a long-term contract extension with any team that trades for him without his consent. That wouldn’t prevent him from being traded, but it would make a trade unlikely, as teams don’t want to trade first-round picks for players who are going to leave in free agency a year later."

Nope not rocket surgery.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Rocket surgery is an old joke combining rocket science with neurosurgery


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I can't see the team willing to give up two firsts. For me if you want a franchise QB and you're not in position to get one, which we are not, then you should do whatever it takes.

Lets say its the 12 this year. Then it's a conditional pick next year based on how Jimmy does for us with it being a minimum for a 4th round pick up to a first round pick if say he throws for 4,000 yards and 30 TDs. Those numbers on a team like this say he IS that franchise QB and then he was worth every bit of what we paid for him.

I mean a franchise QB is worth 2 firsts any day of the week. On a show me trade I would do it but I would not for do it strait up.

Of course that is all IF Jimmy was willing to sign a fat contract.


Thorns. That is Exactly what I would do if the 12 pick and something else was stalling a deal.

Escalate that 2018 pick based on performance.

If Polo meets those escalators it means we are WINNING and will have finally turned the corner.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I am an advocate of making the trade for Jimmy G, bro....but, let's make it real:

To me, it's all about skill set when it comes to QBs. We have posters on here who pontificate about production and systems. But, at the end of the day...........you gotta look at a guy's skill set and keep it independent of other variables.

Jimmy G doesn't quite check all the boxes like an Andrew Luck. However, I think he checks a lot of them. I'll provide a run down for whoever is interested:

--Accuracy: Superb. I think this is one of the most important attributes a qb can have. I remember Razor pimping the guy a few years ago when I wanted Teddy....so, I started researching Jimmy G........mostly in order to discredit him. LOL...yeah, I admit it. But man, the guy won me over. I think he has a couple of question marks and I still liked Teddy better, but Jimmy impressed the hell outta me. His accuracy is supreme.

--Quick Release: Again, it's outstanding. Probably the best in that class and that was a great class.

--Reading defenses pre and post snap: I didn't get a good feel of his pre snap reads in college, but in NE, you could see him making the right reads and checking into the right plays. His post snap reads have always been outstanding.

--Arm strength: Above average. Not Rodgers like, but he can make every throw.

--Decision making: This was my concern. I thought he was a bit of a gunslinger. He would trust his arm too much and fire balls into tight windows. It worked in college, but I worried that it might lead to picks in the NFL where the players are faster and more instinctive.

--Size: Adequate. Nothing more, nothing less.

--Pocket presence: Very good. Feels pressure. Will stand in there.

--Leadership: Very strong.

--Anticipation: One of the few younger qbs who has demonstrated the ability to throw before the receiver makes his break. Some concern about anticipating the coverage.


--Intelligence: Very high. One of the smarter qbs you will find. His ability to look off safeties is very impressive.

--Ability to go through Progressions: Linked to intelligence. Very good. You could see the guy go from one target to the next.

Summary: I think Jimmy G checks almost all the boxes. I was really concerned w/his gunslinger attitude......let me clarify that......I like a guy who will take chances.....see Big Ben and hate guys who are afraid to make throws......see Kessler.....but, you can't turn the ball over too much. Make sense? Anyway........I thought Jimmy G took too many chances and trusted his arm too much. I thought that that would translate into picks in the NFL. That still may be true, but perhaps the NE thing changed that attitude because I really didn't see it in his limited time in the NFL. What better team to learn the importance of ball security than NE?

What to do? I know there is a risk w/this guy, but I think he is a safer pick than any other option. I know that sounds crazy, but I say that because I think his chance of success far outweighs anyone else who is available. I would do the deal provided it doesn't take the first overall pick.


We'll put V.

Total agreement here.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Marc Sessler‏Verified account @ MarcSesslerNFL 2m 2 minutes ago

. @ MikeGarafolo: Patriots would 'probably need a first-round pick this year and next year' to get Belichick thinking about a Garoppolo trade.


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
two 1sts (especially our 1sts) is absurd


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
Translation..don't bother asking the Patriots about Jimmy G.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
I would have been wary of giving up #12 for him, but now I'm totally against trading for him

There's no way Bill B will accept just #12 for him now ... that makes him look bad and like he gave in


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Quote:

It's not rocket surgery.


LOL.........operating on a rocket???

Just kidding man. I think it's called "rocket science?" grin


It's mixing "it's not rocket science" and "it's not brain surgery"

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
two 1sts (especially our 1sts) is absurd


I was thinking though, the value of the 12 could be worth two late firsts. So maybe the 12 is something that can be worked with.

We might still have a chance. But like I've said, if Taylor gets released tomorrow, moves are gonna have to be made really quick, because we'll be in that sweepstakes really quick. Bird in hand is better than a bird or two in the bush

Last edited by PeteyDangerous; 03/08/17 10:39 AM.

UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
Originally Posted By: Swish
so who is gonna view this as a FO failure because they aren't willing to trade two 1st for jimmy G...


U mean other than Mac ... *L* ...


Include me in with that - not failure but DISLIKE and we would be had by BB.


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Originally Posted By: eotab
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
Originally Posted By: Swish
so who is gonna view this as a FO failure because they aren't willing to trade two 1st for jimmy G...


U mean other than Mac ... *L* ...


Include me in with that - not failure but DISLIKE and we would be had by BB.


Add me I want nothing to do with giving up 2 1sts
tsktsk

Last edited by PastorMarc; 03/08/17 10:46 AM.

John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Originally Posted By: mac
Translation..don't bother asking the Patriots about Jimmy G.


Ya ... that'd be smart ... don't bother cause of a quote in a newspaper ... BRILLIANT!




Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
two 1sts (especially our 1sts) is absurd


If true, that just means they don't want to trade him. No one is trading two first rounders for him.

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,069
O
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
O
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,069
Originally Posted By: Vambo


"Eric Mangini: Belichick doesn't make bad deals, so if he's willing to trade Garoppolo while he has a 39-year-old Brady, you better beware."


There are a few guys here that respect Nawrocki. I saw some of this on the YouTube, Garoppolo every throw vs. Dolphins. Since the consensus is we should give up a high first rounder and the next 6-10 years of our future on him, let see what he has to say:

Is a tad undersized with small hands and short arms. Uses a three-quarters delivery that could lead to batted balls. Works heavily out of the shotgun in a spread offense and footwork could require adjustment to working from under center. Does not always feel pressure in the pocket. Does not rip the deep out or drive the ball with high RPMs. Undershoots and often hangs the deep ball. Makes receivers work for the ball downfield and deep accuracy could stand to improve. Makes a lot of simple, one-look reads and was not heavily challenged by consistent pressure or complex looks in the Ohio Valley Conference.

-Nolan Nawrocki

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Thay are just bluffing. Nobody is going to trade two first rounders for JG, and in the end Billy and crew are going to want to get something for him.

I offer our last 2nd this year, and 3rd next year in a sign and trade deal.

If he can do better then that, have at it, good for you. Go pound salt. I'd tell him I'll wait and sign him for no picks next year.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
Thay are just bluffing. Nobody is going to trade two first rounders for JG, and in the end Billy and crew are going to want to get something for him.

I offer our last 2nd this year, and 3rd next year in a sign and trade deal.

If he can do better then that, have at it, good for you. Go pound salt. I'd tell him I'll wait and sign him for no picks next year.



No picks next year ... your ASS-U-Ming an awful lot bro ...




Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
No picks next year ... your ASS-U-Ming an awful lot bro ...


Agreed. No reason to out think yourself. If they'll take it, give up the 12 and get ourselves a potential franchise QB. End the speculation


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: Olskool711
Originally Posted By: Vambo


"Eric Mangini: Belichick doesn't make bad deals, so if he's willing to trade Garoppolo while he has a 39-year-old Brady, you better beware."


There are a few guys here that respect Nawrocki. I saw some of this on the YouTube, Garoppolo every throw vs. Dolphins. Since the consensus is we should give up a high first rounder and the next 6-10 years of our future on him, let see what he has to say:

Is a tad undersized with small hands and short arms. Uses a three-quarters delivery that could lead to batted balls. Works heavily out of the shotgun in a spread offense and footwork could require adjustment to working from under center. Does not always feel pressure in the pocket. Does not rip the deep out or drive the ball with high RPMs. Undershoots and often hangs the deep ball. Makes receivers work for the ball downfield and deep accuracy could stand to improve. Makes a lot of simple, one-look reads and was not heavily challenged by consistent pressure or complex looks in the Ohio Valley Conference.

-Nolan Nawrocki


Never heard of the guy and that is perhaps the most inaccurate analysis I have ever read. Seriously.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,427
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,427
Just as a rule, I would not accept anyone from the Patriots who plays on offense. I believe for the most part there are a share of players who are heavily a product of the system and that is the reason they're good and look the way they do. Not that they don't have talent but its hard to judge them on that team.

I also will not trust Belichick in any way. I would not give a way the farm only to get swindled and have a bust at QB and some guy that underachieves. Heck, the guy has hardly played at all.

Reminds me a lot of Matt Cassel from the Pats and that situation which was ultimately bad for KC.


Find what you love and let it kill you.

-Charles Bukowski
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
So............by that "logic," we got fleeced when we made the trade for Collins and when we traded Mingo to NE?

Btw..........what round was Jimmy G drafted in? How about Cassel?

Making idle generalizations is typically not the most intelligent thing to do.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Never heard of him? Every year he publishes one of (if not the) most comprehensive draft previews out there. Retrospectively, his assessments are are spot on. Guys he loves turn into good players. The ones he doesn't tend to be busts. No one hits 100% but he hits way more than he misses.

Last edited by Jester; 03/09/17 12:27 AM.

Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
No, I never heard of him. Sorry if I am not as well read as you are.

But, I still say that his evaluation was about as far off as I have ever seen. EVER!!!!

I get that you don't want Jimmy G here and that is cool w/me. But Jester.................you or whatever his name was aren't going to change my mind and I am going to speak my mind whether you like it or not.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
I never said that i don't want Jimmy G here. I would love him at the right price. And I didn't bother reading that evaluation. I presume that this was his college evaluation which is irrelevant at this time.

You said you never hear of the guy. I was sharing with you who he is.

The past several times you asked a question and I offered an answer you have completely twisted things around. What's up with that? How come you can't accept a simple reply that doesn't have an agenda?


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I apologize if I misinterpreted your intent.

How's that?

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,427
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,427
Hmmmmmmm.

1. I said on offense.

2. You just wait and see with Jimmy. Time will tell but that is the Last team I would use as a gage to interpret if someone plays well. I've seen too many times people get burned on these players or coaches that come from NE. I just don't want it. I'd rather draft a guy ourselves.


Find what you love and let it kill you.

-Charles Bukowski
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
I'm not looking for an apology. I just wish that you would take replies at face value instead of always looking for some ulterior meaning. We just come here to talk football. I hate having to explain everything I post. That's all I'm saying.

Last edited by Jester; 03/09/17 09:07 AM.

Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
What? I could have sworn you replied to me first, saying something like "you never heard of him?"

I was talking football. I totally disagreed w/his analysis on Jimmy G. And no, I never heard of him.

Goodness.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,926
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,926
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
Marc Sessler‏Verified account @ MarcSesslerNFL 2m 2 minutes ago

. @ MikeGarafolo: Patriots would 'probably need a first-round pick this year and next year' to get Belichick thinking about a Garoppolo trade.


It took five threads here to figure that out? rofl


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
The last I heard is the Pats are now talking about a 1st this year and a 1st next year. Is this correct?


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
The last I heard is the Pats are now talking about a 1st this year and a 1st next year. Is this correct?


Those are the reports.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Thanks. Not sure I am good with that.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
Thanks. Not sure I am good with that.


Not a chance in H E double hockey sticks that I'm okay with that.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,926
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,926
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
Thanks. Not sure I am good with that.


Not a chance in H E double hockey sticks that I'm okay with that.


Only Pat's fans would be.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,926
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,926
The Brown's could put a stop to all these rumors and just offer the Pat's the #33 pick which would give the Pat's two picks in a row, #32 & #33. That's like adding another 1st rd pick by having those 2 picks in a row. If they pass they probably aren't trading JG anyways.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
So............by that "logic," we got fleeced when we made the trade for Collins and when we traded Mingo to NE?

tasty distinctly stated Pats "OFFENSE"...nothing to do with his view on the defense.



Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Page 8 of 10 1 2 6 7 8 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Garoppolo Part Five

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5