|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307 Likes: 2
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307 Likes: 2 |
I think Trubisky also knew this was his best chance of being picked on the 1st round, that's how much confidence he has and his winner spirit.
I would never hire a guy who told me he had nothing more to learn on his last job while not having won anything, individualy or in the team, and that sat on the bench for 2/3rs of the time.
Its not only the small number of starts, but why the small number of stats, and why didn't he stay another year to make sure he was going to be the best QB.
I also don't see any attribute that makes him a sound prospect... he's a project at best and IMHO not even the best project in this draft.. Kizer and Webb have much better measurables.
Last edited by rastanplan; 03/24/17 01:17 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 Likes: 13
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 Likes: 13 |
There's a HUGE difference in what you did in your "last season" verses "your ONLY season"! Actually ... no, there's not ... at least not in Mitch's case ... as there one in the same in THIS CASE ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198 Likes: 1367
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198 Likes: 1367 |
Well, since usually a coaching staff and FO gets four years to prove themselves, ( Well in a normal organization anyway ), and since most highly drafted QB's get at least three years to prove themselves, they had better be right. Because when you do the math, their careers will depend on it.
There's no way I'd put my career at stake on a one hit wonder.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041 |
Because you were the one stating that starting status of a player in college was anedoctal Yes. , so in order to try to understand your line of thinking, I wanted to know what is important to you and how does Mitch Trubisky fare to have an high grade. My line of thinking is that for me, evaluation of a player is about skillset not about circumstances. I never said Mitch had a high grade, that's your assumption. All I said was that the conversation about whether he started or didn't start or didn't beat this person out and why etc...was anecdotal to me whether I have a high grade on him or not. Does Trubisky excel at anything? Hmmnnn...He's an above average athlete. He's got ability to improvise. He throws the ball clean with a consistent and repeatable motion. He's tough. He's got a good frame. He executed his college offense at high level.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,647 Likes: 5
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,647 Likes: 5 |
Well, since usually a coaching staff and FO gets four years to prove themselves, ( Well in a normal organization anyway ), and since most highly drafted QB's get at least three years to prove themselves, they had better be right. Because when you do the math, their careers will depend on it.
There's no way I'd put my career at stake on a one hit wonder. That last part is a big part of what it comes down to. I do find it interesting that some are saying no way to Trubisky because he's only had one year to look at while others are saying go all in for Darnold next year base on - ONE YEAR. (Not saying you are, Pit). What it Darnold's next season is horrible? What if he gets injured and doesn't have a next season? I'm not sure where I stand on that. Just some things to think about, but I do like the potential that I see in Trubisky.
There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do. -Derek Jeter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263 |
They also say he might not come out next year. You can't just think the FO is saying wait till next year on a QB. There might not be a next year. They have to plan now, with what they got and how to use it. As long as they don't use the #1, they can take any QB after that.
Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180 You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow #GMSTRONG
I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 Likes: 1
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 Likes: 1 |
they can take any QB after that. wink That's a terrible thought process.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 Likes: 136
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 Likes: 136 |
Then go back to his HS season...
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 Likes: 906
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 Likes: 906 |
Well, since usually a coaching staff and FO gets four years to prove themselves, ( Well in a normal organization anyway ), and since most highly drafted QB's get at least three years to prove themselves, they had better be right. Because when you do the math, their careers will depend on it.
There's no way I'd put my career at stake on a one hit wonder. That last part is a big part of what it comes down to. I do find it interesting that some are saying no way to Trubisky because he's only had one year to look at while others are saying go all in for Darnold next year base on - ONE YEAR. (Not saying you are, Pit). What it Darnold's next season is horrible? What if he gets injured and doesn't have a next season? I'm not sure where I stand on that. Just some things to think about, but I do like the potential that I see in Trubisky. Here is one that is more amazing. There are people dismissing Trub's lack of starts in college, but many people are dissing Jimmy G because he only has 4 career starts in the NFL, while he had....let me think.....43 career starts in college. Their "logic tells them that Jimmy G is risky because of lack of starts, but Trub's lack of starts is not risky. LOL
Last edited by Versatile Dog; 03/24/17 07:53 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26 |
Who was the last QB who had this little starts? Sanchez?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501 |
Who was the last QB who had this little starts? Sanchez?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 Likes: 136
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 Likes: 136 |
Their "logic tells them that Jimmy G is risky because of lack of starts, but Trub's lack of starts is not risky. LOL
One is talked about utilizing #12. The other is being talked about using a little more than 12 and if you talk to the Pats they want 2-4 first rounders.
There is a difference. Also I can't speak for others but I'm looking at Trubisky...didn't want to say Trib and confuse you. I'm looking at him in what kind of QB he will be 4 years from now putting him at the same age as JG.
I would like either one. On this team...I would feel better with Trubisky at 12.
jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 Likes: 906
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 Likes: 906 |
That's fair. My point is that there is risk w/any pick.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 Likes: 136
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 Likes: 136 |
Thanks for the GRADE of "Fair"...lol later
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums The Archives 2017 NFL Season 2017 NFL Draft Film Breakdown: Mitch Trubisky
|
|