Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: PrplPplEater
Originally Posted By: rastanplan


Just cut/end any relations with the guy, and let Gordon be somebody else's problem


He isn't anyone's problem.
He isn't a problem, issue, distraction, or a factor in anything. He's a non-entity that isn't in the league.

We merely own his rights & contract at this point, but it pretty much looks like that will never play out to completion.
He doesn't count toward anything - not the roster, nor the salary cap. He doesn't count, period.

Basically, it isn't worth the ink or effort to file the paperwork to release him, and it doesn't hurt or impact us in any way to not do so.
There is literally no point in even giving it any thought.


I don't think its that simple, and that the shadow of Gordon returning has conditioned the WR's decisions...

That's the only reason I find for not having drafted/signed a prototypical #1 WR since the problems with Gordon started.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,201
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,201
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
Originally Posted By: PrplPplEater
Originally Posted By: rastanplan


Just cut/end any relations with the guy, and let Gordon be somebody else's problem


He isn't anyone's problem.
He isn't a problem, issue, distraction, or a factor in anything. He's a non-entity that isn't in the league.

We merely own his rights & contract at this point, but it pretty much looks like that will never play out to completion.
He doesn't count toward anything - not the roster, nor the salary cap. He doesn't count, period.

Basically, it isn't worth the ink or effort to file the paperwork to release him, and it doesn't hurt or impact us in any way to not do so.
There is literally no point in even giving it any thought.


I don't think its that simple, and that the shadow of Gordon returning has conditioned the WR's decisions...

That's the only reason I find for not having drafted/signed a prototypical #1 WR since the problems with Gordon started.


I don't think that's remotely true. Simplest reason is that it doesn't matter how deep we are at WR, there is no #6 WR that Gordon wouldn't be able to supplant.... and there is no #6 WR that we'd be heartbroken to lose to an upgrade in talent. Based on that alone, I cannot for a second believe that it has affected those decisions.

The far more likely reason is simply that we drafted what... three or four WR's last year as well as a few TE's between last year and this one? We're growing guys into the positions, and I believe that we're expecting the combination of Britt & Coleman to cover that "#1 WR" role.


Sure, having a guy with Gordon's type of talent back would be great, but it is also highly unlikely and cannot be counted on or planned around. IF it happens, then it is a bonus, and I fully believe this FO is intelligent enough to have looked at it that way.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

GMdawg #1300341 08/18/17 11:24 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Originally Posted By: GMdawg
Originally Posted By: Dawg_LB
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
Josh Gordon's Reinstatement not "Under Consideration" right now

http://scout.com/nfl/browns/Article/Josh...et-pe-106246565



Not sure anyone is really considering JG these days. Bonified loser material.



A quote from Sashi "But at the NFL Combine in March, Browns head of football operations Sashi Brown left the door open a crack for Gordon's possible return.

"Josh, assuming that he'd play at the level we started to see glimpses of last preseason, and certainly when he was in the league before, would be a talent I think no team in the NFL would turn down if he got back in," said Brown. "We're not in a position at wide receiver to turn down a guy like Josh if we feel like he's settled himself.''

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ss...art_river_index



I think this is the smart way to handle it .. 100% ..

The more i see what he's doing and the more he talks ... the more i think we have a chance ... i was not high on him when we hired him ...

His actions more than anything but also what he says .... i am starting to believe i was WRONG about him ...

He stil has more to prove and there has been a few inconsistencies .. but these guys are starting to grow on me ... thumbsup

I think the way there handling this is 100% the correct thing to do at this point ...

Good job men ... KEEP IT UP ... thumbsup

I'm sure mac will be along soon to tell my how wrong i am .. *LOL* ..




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
He can apply for reinstatement in Sept. and has a strong chance to be given another opportunity. The bad for Gordon is that Marijuana use is about to become a bargaining chip for the CBA.

Mourgrym #1300381 08/18/17 01:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Originally Posted By: Mourgrym
He can apply for reinstatement in Sept. and has a strong chance to be given another opportunity. The bad for Gordon is that Marijuana use is about to become a bargaining chip for the CBA.
yeah, marijuana will be a big bargaining chip ... that's why the owners havent budged on it yet


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
DiamDawg #1300585 08/19/17 09:52 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
I'm sure mac will be along soon to tell my how wrong i am .. *LOL* .


diam...actually, concerning Gordon and how the Browns are handling his situation now, WE NOW AGREE!

A couple of weeks after Sashi failed to sign Pryor, allowing him to sign with the Redskins, Sashi made a comment concerning the reinstatement of Gordon and the Browns situation at WR...Sashi said that the Browns were not in a position to turn down a guy like Gordon.

I had to grin at Sashi's comment because it was Sashi and Haslam who created the Browns WR situation that virtually forces them to give Gordon another shot. It's kind of like shooting yourself in the foot, then complaining that your foot hurts and you don't know why it hurts.

My position on Gordon returning from suspension...if he is going to play in the NFL, it should be with the Browns.

The Browns are the team that has been hurt by Gordon's suspensions and as long as Gordon is under contract with the Browns, the Browns should reap any benefit that might come from his return. If the Browns were to cut Gordon, there would be a bunch of NFL teams trying to sign Gordon, willing to give him a shot at renewing his NFL career.

The Browns have nothing to lose by doing all they can to help Gordon become the WR he once was.



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
mac #1300615 08/19/17 12:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
LOL.........you're something else, mac.

mac #1300645 08/19/17 02:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Quote:
It's kind of like shooting yourself in the foot, then complaining that your foot hurts and you don't know why it hurts.


Remember it was someone on this board who said,

" It's not like we shoot ourselves in the foot now and then; we unload the clip, reload, and start on the other foot."
rofl Ah, ya gotta love being a Browns fan!


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
General Reply.

Jordan Leslie, vs Jordan Payton.

Jordan Leslie has been on 3 teams offseason rosters and failed to make a team, between August and January, and really looked the part in pre-season game 1.
Would you as any given Dawgtalker advocate giving him a roster spot ahead of Jordan Payton.?

Jordan Payton was a mid rounds draft pick who made the team last sesason but saw little playing time and almost no production. He was However, on the team during the season, meaning he's actually made a team.
Would you as any given Dawglalker advocate giving him a roster spot ahead of Jordan Leslie.?

I guess I'm for whomever makes the most "real" catches and shows abilities like, getting open, blocking, having hands, knowing what to do, and speed, and actually making plays too.

If there were only One spot. Today I'm leaning toward Jordan Leslie, because what do we have to lose; Payton has shown No reason why anybody would miss him, yet! thumbsup


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
I'm thinking;

WR; 5-6
Coleman
Britt
Louis
Higgins
Payton
Leslie, Hall, Mullaney, Boyce, other?


[Linked Image]

FL_Dawg #1300781 08/19/17 10:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Originally Posted By: FL_Dawg
I'm thinking;

WR; 5-6
Coleman
Britt
Louis
Higgins
Payton
Leslie, Hall, Mullaney, Boyce, other?
I'm not sure Higgins/Payton both have a spot locked up, especially with the emergence of Leslie, Hall, and Mullaney .. itll be interesting


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Payton is a lock.

The only drafted WR who may get demoted is Hollywood Higgins. I don't think he's standing out enough.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
Payton is a lock.


A question.

When people make statements like this.........is it their opinion or do you have some sort of inside information?

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
Originally Posted By: FL_Dawg
I'm thinking;

WR; 5-6
Coleman
Britt
Louis
Higgins
Payton
Leslie, Hall, Mullaney, Boyce, other?
I'm not sure Higgins/Payton both have a spot locked up, especially with the emergence of Leslie, Hall, and Mullaney .. itll be interesting


Louis and Higgins have been with the 2's since OTA's and Payton has been getting some reps there of late too.

So it's just an educated guess, but one that I feel has a high probability.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,622
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,622
I think you better add Duke into your WR calculations. I have a feeling we'll see him more than everyone under Coleman and Brit. That probably means we free up a spot for the line, RB or a TE.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Quote:
Payton is a lock.


A question.

When people make statements like this.........is it their opinion or do you have some sort of inside information?


Without a 53 man roster being released, it's all opinion.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,448
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,448
Give a pressie route runner like Mullaney !

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,285
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,285
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
Originally Posted By: FL_Dawg
I'm thinking;

WR; 5-6
Coleman
Britt
Louis
Higgins
Payton
Leslie, Hall, Mullaney, Boyce, other?
I'm not sure Higgins/Payton both have a spot locked up, especially with the emergence of Leslie, Hall, and Mullaney .. itll be interesting


After Louis, I see those other guys as all being in the same boat. I think we keep 5 total. Two guys make the team and two guys go to the PS. The separation between them seems minimal.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
with Duke and Devalve as basically WRs, 5 might be the number

Coleman
Britt
Louis
Payton
Leslie

Hall, Mullaney, Higgins possibly on PS?


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
Originally Posted By: FL_Dawg
I'm thinking;

WR; 5-6
Coleman
Britt
Louis
Higgins
Payton
Leslie, Hall, Mullaney, Boyce, other?
I'm not sure Higgins/Payton both have a spot locked up, especially with the emergence of Leslie, Hall, and Mullaney .. itll be interesting


After Louis, I see those other guys as all being in the same boat. I think we keep 5 total. Two guys make the team and two guys go to the PS. The separation between them seems minimal.


Thats how I see it shaking out. We Have Johnson and the TE's who will be involved in many 2 TE packages.

Thats why I leaning toward us keeping 4 TE's, because if Telfer was to be lost to injury, then we would have Devalve and Njoku that would have to play inline. Holtz can play there so I put his chance at making the 53, pretty high. I don't think that Njoku will be ready to play inline most of the time, perhaps in the future. Even McNamara has had a good camp. I hope that we can get him on the PS.


[Linked Image]

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
with Duke and Devalve as basically WRs, 5 might be the number

Coleman
Britt
Louis
Payton
Leslie

Hall, Mullaney, Higgins possibly on PS?


I don't think that Higgins is in jeopardy off being of that list. He is the best route runner of all the sophomores and has good hands too.


[Linked Image]

FL_Dawg #1300933 08/20/17 12:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Originally Posted By: FL_Dawg
I'm thinking;

WR; 5-6
Coleman
Britt
Louis
Higgins
Payton
Leslie, Hall, Mullaney, Boyce, other?


If you go by putting the best 11 players on the field.

I think others have gotten to this, but Pretty Sure we're going to have to include Duke Johnson in the discussion, and open a spot for one of the 4 Rb's not named Crowell, Duke, or Vitale.
It would be nice to keep 4 tight ends, but Rannel Hall is easier to cut than keep if he's going to look like pre-season game #1, Plus I don't think he's the bigger threat as an athelete, (blocking/or playmaking).

I agree 6, ish

Kenny Britt,
Corey Coleman,
Ricardo Louis, ----- ------ ------seems to be in the plans, and
Duke Johnson, ----- ------ ------to count against the wideout spots.
(open spot)---( Rashard Higgans, or ?)
( open spot)---(Jordan Leslie, or ?)
(Jabrill Peppers,------ ------ ----- in spotwork)

Given that Duke, was talked as still the #2 RB, that's technically only 5 Wr's, but 7 decent options.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
I think you have to include Payton in that group. I just read where Hue was asked if Payton has moved up in the WR group and Hue said probably that he has good alot of good things.


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,506
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,506
I believe that we will keep 2 RB, plus Duke, however he is classified .... 6 WR, 1 FB, and 3 TE. Along with 9 OL and 3 QB, this gives us 25 on offense. That will allow us to keep 3 specialists, and 25 on defense. (probably 8-9 DL, 10 DB, and 5-6 LB)


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
I say we keep 6, bc chances are Coleman won't last a full 16.

Britt
Coleman
Louis
Higgins
Payton

Unsure of who would be 6, but I think it would be to our benefit to keep Alford to help with special teams. Dude is a beast.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,506
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,506
I think that Hall might have been one of the WR we kept last year if not for his being injured. I think that he could well make it this year.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Originally Posted By: YTownBrownsFan
I believe that we will keep 2 RB, plus Duke, however he is classified .... 6 WR, 1 FB, and 3 TE. Along with 9 OL and 3 QB, this gives us 25 on offense. That will allow us to keep 3 specialists, and 25 on defense. (probably 8-9 DL, 10 DB, and 5-6 LB)


We're basically in agreement except for if the next Runningback, (Terrance Mcgee/Brandon Wilds currently) or if the next Wr, (Rannell Hall/Jordan Payton/Mario Aford currently), is going make the Browns a better football team by staying.

Which is harder to replace? Maybe we'll find another teams waived, or practice squad player.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I think that if the Steelers cut Justin Hunter, the Browns should bring him in. He's pretty impressive.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I think that if the Steelers cut Justin Hunter, the Browns should bring him in. He's pretty impressive.
He looks the part (and always has) .. but I'm not sure if he'll ever be able to put it together. I thought he'd be a stud in TEN


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Does anyone know Britt's salary implications? What's he guaranteed? What would his dead money be?

Is it possible that we cut him? Maybe we just deem it more important to keep younger guys. It's not like he looks to be a major factor ... or like he's interested in being one


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Our WRs are terrible.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Britt is in no way getting cut. I don't know what you all are watching but he is not playing bad in his short stints out there. Coleman is the real deal hopefully he stays healthy. Out of the rest I really like Hall a lot.

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Our WRs are terrible.
worst in the NFL .. I've said it since last season, but I'd take any other team's skill guys. MAYBE not Jets, Niners .. MAYBE


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Our WRs are terrible.


Tru dat. Overall, the offense is not good.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Our WRs are terrible.


Did you expect anything different?

Until we start having real appreciation for WR's and stop thinking finding good Wr's is easy, our receiver group will be bad.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Its easy to find WRs...


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,341
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,341
I think judging the receivers is an incomplete till we get more consistent QB play. Not saying we have any great shakes but we need to see the ball getting out there and more accurately and I don't even mean deep. Jerry Rice out there wouldn't have made a difference to some of the passes ...it's like blaming your garage for bad parking. It might leak but that's not the immediate issue...

eotab #1302219 08/22/17 04:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Our front office's ability to judge WR talent is going to be on full display this season. These are the WRs they wanted in free agency and in the draft of 2016.

Time for the 4 wr drafted in 2016 to produce and the free agency wrs will need to step up and prove their worth...


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
drobs #1302220 08/22/17 04:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
There is truth in that.

Then again, there is truth in that the receivers are so bad that it is hard to accurately gauge the QBs.

Gonna be a fun year on offense. smirk

eotab #1302222 08/22/17 04:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Originally Posted By: eotab
Its easy to find WRs...


The tried and tested Ray Farmer mantra.

Dwayne Bowe's a free agent, isn't he?

Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum The WR Thread

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5