|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001 |
I think they sign a front loaded contract and then 2 years from now when he sees we can win with him they will rework it be more cap friendly so he can have the wins he craves continue similar to how NE got Tom Brady to do it. Tom takes a huge pay cut so that the team can afford to surround him with talent to win.
Cousins already has a net worth of over 100 million so he is not worried about being poor.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
Kirk Cousins - QB - Redskins Impending free agent Kirk Cousins implied he'd have interest in signing with the Broncos this offseason. "I'm going to keep my eyes and ears open to anything and everything. I’m in the information-gathering stage," said Cousins. When asked specifically about the Broncos, Cousins said he'd "love it if Denver is interested." Von Miller and C.J. Anderson have both publicly advocated for Cousins to join the Broncos, who have been plagued by subpar quarterback play the last few seasons. With the Redskins now committed to Alex Smith, Cousins should have no shortage of suitors on the open market. The Broncos, Browns, Cardinals, Jaguars, Jets and Vikings should all be in the mix. Related: Broncos Source: Mike Klis on Twitter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
Eli Manning - QB - Giants
Eli Manning confirmed he'll be back with the Giants in 2018.
"Yeah, obviously knowing I will be a New York Giant, that helped. Been told that, so that’s a starting point," said Manning. The Giants are committed to Manning for next season, though the veteran said he'd understand if the team selected a quarterback early in the upcoming draft. "Hey, whatever they draft I’m fine with," said the 37-year-old. "It’s about me doing my job and that’s playing quarterback." USC's Sam Darnold and UCLA's Josh Rosen could be in play for the Giants at No. 2 overall.
Source: northjersey.comFeb 2 - 1:22 PM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805 |
Eli Manning - QB - Giants
Eli Manning confirmed he'll be back with the Giants in 2018.
"Yeah, obviously knowing I will be a New York Giant, that helped. Been told that, so that’s a starting point," said Manning. The Giants are committed to Manning for next season, though the veteran said he'd understand if the team selected a quarterback early in the upcoming draft. "Hey, whatever they draft I’m fine with," said the 37-year-old. "It’s about me doing my job and that’s playing quarterback." USC's Sam Darnold and UCLA's Josh Rosen could be in play for the Giants at No. 2 overall.
Source: northjersey.comFeb 2 - 1:22 PM You can have ROSEN. Seem less transition. You're welcome.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
I prefer Darnold, thanks ..  ... Not as big a fan of Cousins as most .. i like him and think he’s above average ... just not sure I wouldn’t rather have Darnold, Rosen or Mayfield ... One thing i do know ... if we sign him ... NO WAY WE GO QB at 1 or 4 ... NO WAY IN HELL!!! Those that think thats a possibility are KIDDING themselves ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
"If" signing Cousins means not drafting a QB with the first pick; I don't want him.
Cousins is a solid quarterback. He is going to get max money which will sque team salary structure.
In addition I seriously doubt that he would sign with the Browns.
There are better options that fit where the Browns are.
It is rare that you pick first. And there are good QB prospects that are worth the top pick.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189 |
I've been trying to look at it as though Cousins is not an option. I want to pick our own QB and train him up in our way, our system, our coaches.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550 |
"If" signing Cousins means not drafting a QB with the first pick; I don't want him.
Cousins is a solid quarterback. He is going to get max money which will sque team salary structure.
In addition I seriously doubt that he would sign with the Browns.
There are better options that fit where the Browns are.
It is rare that you pick first. And there are good QB prospects that are worth the top pick.
You just never know who those guys are going to be. People can point to Wentz. Denver drafted Paxton Lynch in the first round. In this draft it is said they are seeking a QB.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805 |
"If" signing Cousins means not drafting a QB with the first pick; I don't want him.
Cousins is a solid quarterback. He is going to get max money which will sque team salary structure.
In addition I seriously doubt that he would sign with the Browns.
There are better options that fit where the Browns are.
It is rare that you pick first. And there are good QB prospects that are worth the top pick.
You just never know who those guys are going to be. People can point to Wentz. Denver drafted Paxton Lynch in the first round. In this draft it is said they are seeking a QB. Bad comparison, Peen. Lynch went where again? 20's. Darnold and Rosen are FAR and away Better talent than Lynch. I'm not looking this up, but who was the last QB taken at 1 or 2 that FAILED? Outside of Russell? Maybe I will look it up, I'm curious lol.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805 |
Russell and Griffin. Lotsa success rate.
And Bortles at 3 should never have been top 10.
It's Darnold all the way!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550 |
"If" signing Cousins means not drafting a QB with the first pick; I don't want him.
Cousins is a solid quarterback. He is going to get max money which will sque team salary structure.
In addition I seriously doubt that he would sign with the Browns.
There are better options that fit where the Browns are.
It is rare that you pick first. And there are good QB prospects that are worth the top pick.
You just never know who those guys are going to be. People can point to Wentz. Denver drafted Paxton Lynch in the first round. In this draft it is said they are seeking a QB. Bad comparison, Peen. Lynch went where again? 20's. Darnold and Rosen are FAR and away Better talent than Lynch. I'm not looking this up, but who was the last QB taken at 1 or 2 that FAILED? Outside of Russell? Maybe I will look it up, I'm curious lol. I don't think you can limit it to the first or second pick. I have some time. All first round QBs since 1999 2017 Trubisky, Mahomes, Watson 2016 Geoff, Wentz, Lynch 2015 Winston, Mariota 2014 Bortles, Manziel, Bridgewater 2013 EJ Manuel 2012 Luck, Tannehill, Weeden 2011 Newton, Locher, Gabbert, Ponder 2010 Bradford, Tebow 2009 Stafford, Sanchez, Freeman 2008 Ryan, Flacco 2007 Russell, Quinn 2006 Young, Leinert, Cutler 2005 Smith, Rodgers, Campbell 2004 Manning, Rivers, Burger, Loesman 2003 Palmer, Leftwich, Boller, Grossman 2002 Carr, Harrington, Ramsey 2001 Vick 2000 Pennington 1999 Couch, McNabb, Smith, Culpepper, McNown That goes back to our return. 52 QBs selected. Less than half have had what I would call a really good career, and i am including a few of the young guys. That can turn around and simply be flash in the pan seasons, but I will give the benefit of the doubt.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
Of course there is risk.
However, you have to trust your evaluation process.
When the Eagles traded up to get Wentz everybody said they got the bad end of the deal.
There are legit QB prospects. The Browns don't have to make a trade.
I totally get that Cousins is a proven guy. And that has merit. He going to get close to $30 mil. He is not that good. You give him thirty how are you going to be able to sign all these young guys when their second contracts come up?
The Browns are at this point where they are assembling a load of young talent. In a year their top pick quarterback will be ready.
Cousins would help short term. He could then become an anchor.
It is a risk. I grant that. But for me I believe Darnold will be better than Cousins is now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,351
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,351 |
Was just listening to WFAN New York and they were interviewing someone from I believe was Pro Football Weekly and he said He felt Cousins is going to the Jets with the Broncos as 2nd choice. He said the Jets have a good O-line and are ascending with some of their moves while the Broncos are on the way down. No mention of the Browns at all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693 |
I will not feel like we missed out on something great if we do not land Cousins. I would have rather had Smith, but will go with any number of veteran QBs who will allow us to draft a QB #1. My fear with Cousins is that we get stuck in 7-9, 9-7 hell for five years with no franchise QB sitting behind him.
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/hfMNC7T.jpg) "I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski "Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield #gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
That is exactly the scenario I see with Cousins. Stuck in mediocrity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,538
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,538 |
I like Cousins more than that - I think he is good enough to take a team deep into the payoffs and win the SB. But I do agree that if we sign Cousins there won't be a QB taken in the first couple rounds which means that for anyone that covets one of these QB's coming out in the draft, we'd be missing out.
Question for anyone that knows - has Cousins ever had a really legit running game to help him? I had a quick look and in 2015 they averaged just 3.7 yards a carry. In 2016 that was up to 4.5 with Robert Kelley and Matt Jones ....
The more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001 |
Cousins is putting up top 10 numbers. That is not mediocrity. We would be fools not to grab him. It leaves us open to draft weapons that make our offense deadly no matter how the QB is.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
Interesting that Washington who drafted Cousins and had him all this time said not interested.
They picked Smith over him.
Maybe they are wrong. Then again maybe they are right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732 |
I don't believe trying to grab him will be the issue. I think the odds of him actually signing here will be the issue.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001 |
Interesting that Washington who drafted Cousins and had him all this time said not interested.
They picked Smith over him.
Maybe they are wrong. Then again maybe they are right. It's Cousins that didn't want to play for them. They offered him a LOT of money to sign long term. He refused them. They just finally got tired of pursuing a guy that didn't want to be there.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041 |
Jay's scheme emphasizes the passing game at the sacrifice of the running game.
Jay unquestionably runs a QB friendly scheme that creates nice schematic advantages for the QB to attack.
This year the run game was hit with injuries but in the years prior the lack of 'big' rushing numbers was by choice of scheme.
Last edited by edromeo; 02/03/18 02:08 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248 |
Was just listening to WFAN New York and they were interviewing someone from I believe was Pro Football Weekly and he said He felt Cousins is going to the Jets with the Broncos as 2nd choice. He said the Jets have a good O-line and are ascending with some of their moves while the Broncos are on the way down. No mention of the Browns at all. I wouldn't listen to anything home-cooked radio says, especially big-city based radio. They're always trying to convince themselves that top free agents are coming to them, and will find anyone that shares that opinion to put on. LA radio is the worst. They've had Lebron going to the Lakers Pretty much every years since he's been drafted. Kevin Love and Kyrie going there when they were free agents, and pretty much every other big-name free agent. They've been talking Lebron to the Lakers all year, until it became apparent that the Lakers weren't really good and Lavar Ball was a colossal douche. Now suddenly, Lebron wants to go to the Clippers. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205 |
My fear with Cousins is that we get stuck in 7-9, 9-7 hell for five years with no franchise QB sitting behind him. 7-9, 9-7 looks like heaven from where we sit. Nobody goes from bad to great; gotta get good first. Hell, simple competence would be a huge upgrade for Browns' fans.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739 |
My fear with Cousins is that we get stuck in 7-9, 9-7 hell for five years with no franchise QB sitting behind him. 7-9, 9-7 looks like heaven from where we sit. Nobody goes from bad to great; gotta get good first. Hell, simple competence would be a huge upgrade for Browns' fans. I would kill for a .500 team...You know how much interesting and fun it would be to root for a competitive team again...This board would be joyous again
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
No, the board would be fighting. Some would say that it proved Hue can coach given some talent and that new FO deserves a lot of credit. Others would say the only reason we are winning is because of the great plan that Sashi had and how it's a damn shame that Hue got him fired. And bro..........I'm only half-kidding. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550 |
Interesting that Washington who drafted Cousins and had him all this time said not interested.
They picked Smith over him.
Maybe they are wrong. Then again maybe they are right. It's Cousins that didn't want to play for them. They offered him a LOT of money to sign long term. He refused them. They just finally got tired of pursuing a guy that didn't want to be there. Exactly. He never felt respected by Washington. When they finally wanted him, it was to late.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064 |
Just to be playing for something for a change, that would be nice. rather than be eliminated ASAP. I could be giddy with .500 ball for a wee bit.
"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,796
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,796 |
Getting Cousins gives you a franchise QB. The need to try and get one in the draft is unnecessary. Drafting a QB is to get a franchise guy, it doesn't always work out that way. Not saying it couldn't, but there still is a learning curb.
This team has won one game in two years. If a franchise guy who is proven is available, IMO, screw trying to hit it with the draft. You still take a QB somewhat high, but adding playmakers in the top of the first round would make this team competitive out of the gate. Drafting a guy could lead to a couple more years of development. Does anyone here really want to wait a couple more years? I don't.
Even if we can't get Cousins, a proven vet who has some success is what the doctor ordered. I'm tired of "developing" QBs. Get a proven guy, so the development guys can actually develop before we need them to play.
RIP, Jim
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
Interesting that Washington who drafted Cousins and had him all this time said not interested.
They picked Smith over him.
Maybe they are wrong. Then again maybe they are right. SF did the same thing with Smith. He was disrespected. They chose to move on and he went to KC. Before all the political hoopla with Kap his playing took a nosedive. Meanwhile, Smith went east to KC, won a lot of games and stabilized that franchise for five years. SF got it wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693 |
And there it is. The willingness to accept mediocrity as good enough. Well, I'm sorry but it's not.
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/hfMNC7T.jpg) "I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski "Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield #gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818 |
I like to look at it this way... I'd rather have these quarterbacks over Cousins:
Brady Roethlisberger Rivers Carr Luck (healthy) Mariota Prescott Manning Wentz Wilson Garopollo Goff Stafford Rodgers Brees Ryan
That's what...16? That's like half the league. I still might include Newton or Flacco but probably not. Smith might be in the same boat and I'd probably even take the chance on Mahomes or Watson before I'd choose Cousins.
Cousins is light years better than what we have now, but why upgrade to mediocrity when you should be able to have something better in the draft?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001 |
I like to look at it this way... I'd rather have these quarterbacks over Cousins:
Brady Roethlisberger Rivers Carr Luck (healthy) Mariota Prescott Manning Wentz Wilson Garopollo Goff Stafford Rodgers Brees Ryan
That's what...16? That's like half the league. I still might include Newton or Flacco but probably not. Smith might be in the same boat and I'd probably even take the chance on Mahomes or Watson before I'd choose Cousins.
Cousins is light years better than what we have now, but why upgrade to mediocrity when you should be able to have something better in the draft?
No offense but your list is horrible. Kirk cousins ranks #8 in TD #9 in completion % #7 in passing yards #9 in Passing yards per attempt That makes him a top 10 QB in this league who was just barely being a top 5. He did all of that while behind a bad offensive line. If he comes here then he will definately play much better behind our o-line especially since Joe T. would play another couple of years. Half the people on your list will retire in the next 3 seasons and the other half put up worse numbers with teams that were a lot better talent wise. You give me Cousins, Saquan, and Sutton added to this team and our offense will freaking explode.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550 |
I agree. Some people are kidding themselves if they think that Cousins in a mediocre QB. Heck, they are just making stuff up to fit their agenda.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Furthermore, when signing a FA QB to a multi-year contract, one must consider the age of each particular FA. Guys like Brees, Ben, Brady, etc are nearing the ends of their careers. I think Cousins is 28. That's a big factor.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
this team is not a QB away and has many areas that need to be addressed with all that cap space.
Actually this team is A QB away from being a contender. Ummm you still have 80 mil in cap space and draft picks to build. Of course we don't stop building the team. But my reference to a team that is 1-31 is that we have to start winning. 1. The young talent have to get it in their system. 2. Hue will not last with another 3-4 win season.
FA Starting QBs just do not make the FA market often. There is no NEED greater for our team than QB. We will not sign more than approx. 3-5 stud FA. We will build from the 30 or so young players that we got in the draft n UDFA the last two seasons. We cannot ignore or simply pass up legitimate NFL Starting QB talent. I don't understand your reasoning there. So if you don't agree fine but the statement of why just doesn't make sense. Sorry.
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 518
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 518 |
We make the playoffs if we cut Kizer, keep Hogan, sign Cousins, draft Barley#1, Fitzpatrick#4, sign Rudolph QB#33... Go Browns!!
Exciting football will be back in Cleveland this fall!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,468
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,468 |
Redskins consider tagging Kirk Cousins to recoup money By ADAM SCHEFTER via ESPN Feb 4, 2018, 7:39 AM ET ESPNAPI_IMG_NO_ALTEXT_Value In what sets up as an offseason game of chicken that would markedly influence the quarterback market, the Washington Redskins will consider placing their franchise tag on quarterback Kirk Cousins so they can trade him and recoup some of the compensation they are sending to Kansas City for quarterback? Alex Smith, per league sources. Tagging Cousins would prevent him from becoming a true unrestricted free agent, able to sign where he wants once the new league year opens March 14, and could impact how other teams approach free agency and the draft. Without a franchise tag, Cousins would be considered the NFL's top available free agent, expected to draw interest from Arizona, Denver, the New York Jets and other quarterback-needy teams. Cousins would still have leverage with franchise tag But Washington might want a say in where Cousins winds up, which would enable the Redskins to try to extract compensation in the 2018 draft rather than having him walk away for nothing this year. However, Cousins still would be able to wield some control of the situation and could force Washington into a challenging if not uncomfortable situation. Washington could not trade him until he signs the franchise tag, and if Cousins wanted, he could delay signing it for weeks or even months, with the Redskins having to count his approximate $34.5 million against their salary cap. Cousins also could tell any of Washington's potential trade partners that he is unwilling to sign a long-term deal there, dampening that team's enthusiasm for surrendering a top draft pick for his services and holding up any potential trade. If Washington decided to pull the franchise tag to get Cousins' contract off its salary cap, it would lose the right to recoup a 2019 compensatory draft pick that it would get if Cousins were able to leave right away as a free agent. So tagging Cousins would undoubtedly carry risk. Redskins coach Jay Gruden did not give Cousins a sense that the team would use its franchise tag on him when the two spoke this week, but others connected to the team insist that Washington is considering it. They believe it is nothing more than a business decision, a way for the team to try to get back at least the third-round pick it is trading to Kansas City for Smith. It is a decision that Washington will have to make in the coming weeks. Teams can begin designating franchise players on Feb. 20. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/redskins-tagging-kirk-cousins-recoup-money/story?id=52826741
The Cleveland Browns - WE KNOW QUARTERBACKS ( Look at how many we've had ... )
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,538
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,538 |
I like to look at it this way... I'd rather have these quarterbacks over Cousins:
Brady Roethlisberger Rivers Carr Luck (healthy) Mariota Prescott Manning Wentz Wilson Garopollo Goff Stafford Rodgers Brees Ryan
That's what...16? That's like half the league. I still might include Newton or Flacco but probably not. Smith might be in the same boat and I'd probably even take the chance on Mahomes or Watson before I'd choose Cousins.
Cousins is light years better than what we have now, but why upgrade to mediocrity when you should be able to have something better in the draft?
Sorry - Eli hasn't been a good QB for at least a couple years. Adding him to that list undermines everything immediately. As others have also said - we're building for the future - suggesting we can lay a foundation for winning over the next 5 years by having Rivers, Big Ben, or Brees (and Eli) as a better 5 year plan than Cousins is flat wrong. Even the GOAT is a huge question mark past the next season. . . but I think for the GOAT we'd all give up the farm even if it was for 1 year. So simply using your list and removing the old and infirm - we have 12 QB's that include a 40+ year old Brady and a injury question over Luck. . . . So you don't want a top 13 QB starting for the Browns? And that's based on your opinion - because as others have highlighted - on a somewhat dysfunctional team he's put up some great numbers. And instead you would want to roll with an unproven rookie QB - where there is very real risk that whoever we take ends up as a (comparative) bust. I think that's some some skewed logic because regardless of your opinion of guaranteed success of whichever rookie QB you like (and I think it's Mayfield) statistically there is a much higher probability the rookie will not be a top 13 QB in the NFL than that he will be in the top 13. . . . . and that's without even trying to debate the merits of some of the younger QB's on your list like Prescott where it comes down to pure personal opinion to claim they are better NFL QB's than Cousins.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Cousins Part II
|
|