Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#2138604 06/01/26 01:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040

Last edited by MemphisBrownie; 06/01/26 01:26 PM.

At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,422
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,422

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,422
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,422
Now, land the QB in next year's draft or the last several seasons and this one will have been a total waste and disaster from the moment Watson was signed.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
There had been too much smoke the last couple of weeks......


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,814
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,814
So, the Browns young defense now has the 2024 defensive rookie of the year Jared Verse and the 2025 defensive rookie of the year Carson Schwesinger. I like Verse and a 2027 but still would like to know what other picks were included in this trade.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,445
F
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
F
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,445
2027 pick, probably 25 or higher isn't that great of an asset. The Rams are likely finish with a great record and deep PO run. Not sure if this helps us get a QB. Better hope SS figures it out quickly.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
Well, I just wasted a lot of time on a post in the other thread...

On the surface this is a pretty good trade. I am curious what the "other draft compensation" is.

Jared Verse is a viable replacement for an aging Myles. Myles has another couple of stud years in him, but then what? This team is getting themselves propped up for the opening of their new stadium. Verse is more likely to be in his prime when they move 15 miles south than Myles will be.

The most important aspect of this trade is setting themselves up for draft currency to try to get one of the QBs coming out next year. I think this is a telling sign that Monken is not convinced Shedeur Sanders is the QB of the future. He is going to start Watson and Watson will be gone in the 2027 off season. Then the Browns can get another comp draft pick when Watson leaves.

Right now, it comes down to how far down the Browns first pick is. If they are picking top 10, they will have the ammunition to move up to get their guy. If they are picking below 15, it is going to be difficult due to the number of teams needing QBs.

Here's the thing. The best player coming out will probably be Jeremiah Smith.. However, there will be as many as 5 QBs with a top 15 grade on them, which will elevate them all to top 5 draft status. Think about the prospects of a Browns team picking 6th, just outside those parameters. Now, think about a top 5 team that already has their QB of the immediate future in place... They could pick up the Browns pick, the Rams first and probably the Browns 2028 first also and still get Jeremiah Smith.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
Yes, the complete details of this trade will be interesting to see.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
Originally Posted by Milk Man

Ugh.... The "additional compensation" better include another first or multiple 2nd/3rd picks. This guy is the cornerstone of our D, and a lot of our defensive success is because of the attention he commands. I'm also reading that the Rams' base scheme is a 3-4. I'll let someone more informed on the topic expand on that, though.

I do like that we got a plus-level starter in return. That mitigates the usual "now we have to burn much of the draft haul we got to replace the guy we just shipped out". Plus Verse is younger. If we were going to do something like this (ship a vet to stock up on draft ammo to speed up on reloading offensive talent), then our Dline roster was best equipped to handle a blow like this.


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,664
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,664
Wow.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
WOW!

Even though I thought it was possible.

I am shocked for real.


Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,057
I
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
I
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,057
Good trade . How many games did the Browns win with Myles Garrett?
54? Not exactly a locker room leader.
I bet Eotab is melting down now

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
Originally Posted by Iluvmyxstripper
Good trade . How many games did the Browns win with Myles Garrett?
54? Not exactly a locker room leader.
I bet Eotab is melting down now

Good trade for other teams in the AFCN.


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
I'm shocked!! My phone blew up with texts from all my friends!! I'm very interested to see what other draft picks we received.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,422
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,422
Guaranteed J-Dubs is on the phone ordering farewell dinosaur cupcakes and a T-Rex bouncy house for Garrett's Farewell Party.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
How can you say it was a good trade without first knowing the details of the trade?


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
Originally Posted by Milk Man
Guaranteed J-Dubs is on the phone ordering farewell dinosaur cupcakes and a T-Rex bouncy house for Garrett's Farewell Party.
I could use some dude wipes right about now.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by Milk Man

Ugh.... The "additional compensation" better include another first or multiple 2nd/3rd picks. This guy is the cornerstone of our D, and a lot of our defensive success is because of the attention he commands. I'm also reading that the Rams' base scheme is a 3-4. I'll let someone more informed on the topic expand on that, though.

I do like that we got a plus-level starter in return. That mitigates the usual "now we have to burn much of the draft haul we got to replace the guy we just shipped out". Plus Verse is younger. If we were going to do something like this (ship a vet to stock up on draft ammo to speed up on reloading offensive talent), then our Dline roster was best equipped to handle a blow like this.

Yes, the Rams play in the 3-4, but Jared Verse was playing out of position in that system at LB. He played the edge as a DE in college at Florida State. He will be returning to that role with the Browns, while Myles will have to switch to the 3-4 for the first time in his career, I believe. Gregg Williams ran some 3-4 during Myles first two seasons, but he switched back and forth a lot. All his other coordinators were base 4-3.

Shula's defense will benefit from Garrett's ability to line up anywhere. This will allow him to use his dime packages more effectively.

Overall, Garrett wins because he is going to a contender. The Browns are building for the new stadium opening, not 2026. Verse will be right in line to help open it properly.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
Originally Posted by IrishDawg42
Yes, the Rams play in the 3-4, but Jared Verse was playing out of position in that system at LB. He played the edge as a DE in college at Florida State. He will be returning to that role with the Browns [...]

Thank you for the added info!

So Verse earned himself DROY and PB honors while playing out of position?


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,777
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,777
All I can say right now is OMG!!!

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
Colin Cowherd just said we are also getting a 2nd in 2028 and a 3rd in 2029.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,111
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,111
Hard to believe that at least one of the picks isn't a 5th rounder shocked


Is buttcheeks one word?
Or should I spread them apart?
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
The "Other" is a 2028 2nd rounder and a 2029 3rd rounder..

Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,025
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,025
Originally Posted by bonefish
WOW!

Even though I thought it was possible.

I am shocked for real.

Honestly. Are you surprised?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
I think all in all it's a good deal for us. Now we have lots of draft capitol to maneuver in 2027 and a good young player in Verse to boot.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,075
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,075
[quote][Jared Verse, a 2027 first-round draft pick and other draft compensation that is still being negotiated, sources told NFL Network's Ian Rapoport and Tom Pelissero and ESPN's Adam Schefter./quote]

Not enough from the Rams..!!

The Rams 2027 first round pick will likely be closer to a 2nd round pick than a first round pick.

The Rams are closer to drafting at number 30 to 32 in 2027 which equals a high 2nd round pick rather than a 1st round pick that will be the bannered propaganda fed to the Browns fans and Browns media by Berry and Haslam. Not nearly a trade that is fair and equal for a player of Myles caliber.

The Rams will be giving up a #19 first round (Jared Verse value) and a late 1st round pick in 2027...NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

Browns/BERRY...DON'T ALLOW YOURSELVES TO GET SCREWED..!...imo

Last edited by mac; 06/01/26 02:48 PM.

GM strong...

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Those draft picks are going to be very late 2027 1st rd, very late 2028 2nd round and very late 2029 third round. Better start working on trade up packages for a QB next year.


If it's not Chaos, it's not Cleveland.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
At this point, might as well see what you can get for Denzel.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
I hope there is more.

Rams first and a player who has 14 career sacks. The Rams are on the track to win a Super Bowl.

First rounder is pick 32 or close.

So that pick is going to get us to the top pick QB in 2027?

Right now I am not liking this. Berry traded for DW and now traded the best player in football.

How do we trade Myles if we cannot be sure to have the ammo to get the top QB in the draft.

Parsons brought more?

I just read this:
The rest of the compensation includes a 2028 second-round pick and a 2029 third-round pick.

Not enough the way I see it. Not happy.

Last edited by bonefish; 06/01/26 02:48 PM.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
Right now it may look that way, but you don't know how the season will play out. Stafford is older and has had some back issues and there may be other injuries although I hope not. We can also package those picks and move up. We have flexibility and a few options.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
So what in total did the Browns get from the Rams? How do you know it's a bad trade when you don't even know all of the details yet? Oh, never mind, I know.

I asked someone who said it was a good trade the same question.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,814
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,814
So, the Browns got Jared Verse, 2027 1st, 2028 2nd, and 2029 3rd.

I think there are 2 keys here. Will Jared Verse earn a 2nd contract with the Browns in a few years. If he is an all-pro DE that plays for the Browns for 10 years and the Browns either use the draft capitol to find their future franchise QB or use those picks to get 3 more starters that play for the Browns thru a 2nd contract. That will make this trade worth it. Anything short of that if the Rams win a Superbowl will be an "L" for the Browns.

I would expect this next season to end up being the last for Denzil Ward in a Browns uniform. I could see the Browns trading him at the trade deadline now to get more draft capital. They do have the makings of a nice young defense with Verse and Graham up front. Schwesinger at linebacker and hopefully EMW in the secondary. They need to keep Campbell that they have under contract for a few more years and resign Delpit after this season. That move might have just become easier freeing up Garrett cap space.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,809
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,809
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Colin Cowherd just said we are also getting a 2nd in 2028 and a 3rd in 2029.


Even harder to believe Cowhead got one right lol


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
That's the thing about trades. At first it's how they look on paper and even that's subjective from person to person. Not everyone is going to see it the same way.

But who came out the winner and who came out the loser is determined by the end results.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
Originally Posted by DaveyD
Those draft picks are going to be very late 2027 1st rd, very late 2028 2nd round and very late 2029 third round. Better start working on trade up packages for a QB next year.

IMO, that may not be enough ammo for a fQB prospect... but without Garrett one could argue we'll still be picking fairly high.


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 827
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 827
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
That's the thing about trades. At first it's how they look on paper and even that's subjective from person to person. Not everyone is going to see it the same way.

But who came out the winner and who came out the loser is determined by the end results.

It's really going to come down to how bad the Browns suck this year because LA is looking to run deep into the playoffs, at least on paper. So our 2027 first plus the additional first from the Myles trade could put us drafting near the top.

What this confirms to me is that the front office doesn't see a long-term QB starter on the roster right now.


"Let people think this is a dumpster fire," - Mike Pettine
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
Originally Posted by jeepnstein
What this confirms to me is that the front office doesn't see a long-term QB starter on the roster right now.

I believe a lot if people have felt that way all along. It's easy to get caught up in the moment right after the draft and convince yourself every player drafted was a steal and will be some ultimate answer to a great need your team has. But the odds and the history of the NFL show that far times more times than not that's certainly not the case.

Looking at the investment in draft capital the Browns invested when drafting QB's over the past two drafts, they didn't consider them likely to be the long term answer at the QB position either..


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,174
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,174
Just fire Berry now. This trade is horrible. Absolutely horrible. We get a player who doesn't get many sacks. Then we gain picks that are total garbage picks. We didn't even get half the value of Myles. Not even HALF.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
MG didn't want to be here.
MG has - several speeding tickets over 90 mph? After rolling his care a few years ago.
We all know the chance of the Browns having a viable QB on the roster right now is slim to none. And if slim hasn't already left town, he's getting his tack ready.

All that means you get whatever you can for him. I have to believe that whatever the Rams have offered is the best deal out there with a team MG was willing to accept as a trade partner.

I'm more than happy with the trade even if it might appear to some as we got short changed ... MG is 30. He's got 2 elite years in him. Him might be very good for another 4 after that? He's a freak of nature. But see my first comment above, he did not want to be here and I do not blame him one bit.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
The Rams made a great trade.

They have the pieces in place to win and from their perspective keep winning.

They made the move to get Ty Simpson. They have Stafford. Now they have Myles.

So they swapped Verse for Myles. Gave up what should be a low first rounder in 27. A second in 28 and a third in 29.

No real damage but a great shot to win a Super Bowl.

The Browns gave up the best defensive player in football. In return they have a replacement for Myles to play the position. Other than being younger he is good player but he is not Myles.

A second in 28 and a third in 29. We don't know where the picks will be. Most likely the are low in the rounds.

Honestly, I do not think it was enough. The 28 pick should been a first rounder as well.

I wonder if there were other offers?

Obviously, this trade was made to move up in the 27 draft. IMO we did not get enough for Myles.


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,572
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,572
It's a good trade,frees up salary that can be used to resign that perv QB.
Go Browns.


Indecision may,or maynot,be my problem
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,390
F
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
F
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,390
What does do this do for the cap? I thought trading Myles was not in the cards because of his huge salary. Will the Browns be completely free of his contract for the ‘27 season?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,454
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,454
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by DaveyD
Those draft picks are going to be very late 2027 1st rd, very late 2028 2nd round and very late 2029 third round. Better start working on trade up packages for a QB next year.

IMO, that may not be enough ammo for a fQB prospect... but without Garrett one could argue we'll still be picking fairly high.

Maybe, maybe not. We know we will have 2 1st rounders to trade next year. It sounds like we will pick up a 2028 2nd rounder which could allow is to give up that 1st rounder as well.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
Originally Posted by bonefish
IMO we did not get enough for Myles.


I can see why anyone would think that - but at the end of the day it's a bit like selling your house. It doesn't matter what you think it's worth, it matters what someone will offer you for it.

Who knows what commitment/promise was made to go along with the re-signing a couple years ago? And I will maintain, if the guy is steadfast in not wanting to play another losing season for the Browns, then get what you can and let him go. I may not always think highly of Berry's draft picks - but he's shown a good level of competency in his trade negotiations. I would have to believe this is the best deal available and taking it is better than refusing it and keeping an unmotivated player with a penchant for speeding on your roster.

Last edited by mgh888; 06/01/26 04:08 PM.

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
I am getting more pissed by the minute.

Myles was the first pick in the draft. We had to suck to get that pick.

Baker was the first pick. The first pick guarantees nothing. Myles is a Hall of Famer. It's really hard to draft a player of that caliber.

Verse is averaging about 6/7 sacks a year. The 27 first rounder will be near the bottom.

What did we gain to really get a shot at what "may be" a good quarterback in the 27 draft?

We have weakened the team this year and gained little to impact the draft next year.

Our best chance to to get a quarterback in 27 is to lose every game. Or, hope there is quarterback when we pick.

The only thing that is certain is we are worse right now then we were yesterday.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by bonefish
IMO we did not get enough for Myles.


I can see why anyone would think that - but at the end of the day it's a bit like selling your house. It doesn't matter what you think it's worth, it matters what someone will offer you for it.

That parallel only works if you are 100% committed to selling your house. We didn't HAVE to trade the cornerstone of our defense... unless we are attempting a rebuild of some scale. If it's a rebuild, then I say commit to it and trade Ward as well.


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,664
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,664
Originally Posted by Frenchy
What does do this do for the cap? I thought trading Myles was not in the cards because of his huge salary. Will the Browns be completely free of his contract for the ‘27 season?



[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
Originally Posted by Bull_Dawg
Originally Posted by Frenchy
What does do this do for the cap? I thought trading Myles was not in the cards because of his huge salary. Will the Browns be completely free of his contract for the ‘27 season?


Thank you for posting that. I'm reading it now, and that article is stating that the draft comp could be more than the 3 picks disclosed? If so, now we're talking.


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,919
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,919

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,664
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,664
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by bonefish
IMO we did not get enough for Myles.


I can see why anyone would think that - but at the end of the day it's a bit like selling your house. It doesn't matter what you think it's worth, it matters what someone will offer you for it.

That parallel only works if you are 100% committed to selling your house. We didn't HAVE to trade the cornerstone of our defense... unless we are attempting a rebuild of some scale. If it's a rebuild, then I say commit to it and trade Ward as well.

On the other hand, your house can't ask you to sell it. And houses don't have no trade clauses which limit the potential buyers.

From Myles perspective, it may have been LA or bust. His GF was born and raised in Cali, lives, and trains there. Plus, he wanted to go to a contender.

We don't know what we got yet. There's a non-zero chance Verse ascends, Myles descends, and the Rams perform below expectations, and the picks will have to work themselves out wherever they end up landing.

I don't love it, but I don't hate it. I think some people are undervaluing Verse.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
Originally Posted by bonefish
I hope there is more.

Rams first and a player who has 14 career sacks. The Rams are on the track to win a Super Bowl.

First rounder is pick 32 or close.

So that pick is going to get us to the top pick QB in 2027?

Right now I am not liking this. Berry traded for DW and now traded the best player in football.

How do we trade Myles if we cannot be sure to have the ammo to get the top QB in the draft.

Parsons brought more?

I just read this:
The rest of the compensation includes a 2028 second-round pick and a 2029 third-round pick.

Not enough the way I see it. Not happy.

I would argue Parsons did NOT bring more...

Parsons trade brought the Cowboys:
30 year old Kenny Clark(worth about a 3rd round pick), not the same level as Verse. MAYBE worth a 2nd on his own, probably would trade as a 3rd on his own.
2026 first (20 overall)
2027 first

Garrett
25 year old Jared Verse(worth your second 1st round pick, if traded today on his own, I would be shocked if he didn't bring a first round pick. He has lived up to his #19 overall draft pick.
2027 first
2028 second
2029 third

We won't know what the value of the later picks are until the seasons end obviously, but a 2nd and 3rd can obviously = a first.

My point here is, I believe a 25 year old Verse entering his prime is worth a lot more to a defense than a 30 year old Clark who was declining.

Obviously we would then have to debate the value of Parson's vs Garrett as well.. We are probably biased towards Garrett, but it is 30 year old Garrett vs 26 year old Parsons.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,456
Originally Posted by Bull_Dawg
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by bonefish
IMO we did not get enough for Myles.


I can see why anyone would think that - but at the end of the day it's a bit like selling your house. It doesn't matter what you think it's worth, it matters what someone will offer you for it.

That parallel only works if you are 100% committed to selling your house. We didn't HAVE to trade the cornerstone of our defense... unless we are attempting a rebuild of some scale. If it's a rebuild, then I say commit to it and trade Ward as well.

On the other hand, your house can't ask you to sell it. And houses don't have no trade clauses which limit the potential buyers.

From Myles perspective, it may have been LA or bust. His GF was born and raised in Cali, lives, and trains there. Plus, he wanted to go to a contender.

We don't know what we got yet. There's a non-zero chance Verse ascends, Myles descends, and the Rams perform below expectations, and the picks will have to work themselves out wherever they end up landing.

I don't love it, but I don't hate it. I think some people are undervaluing Verse.

I forgot about the no-trade clause. Good point.

I think I'm getting hung up on only 3 picks spread over 3 years. I'm not sure that's enough ammo to go and get yourself a legit QB prospect.


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
The Browns may as well move Denzel.

We are not going to win many games so if you are going to be bad. Be the worst.

As much as I hate this. It probably makes sense.

The only way trading Myles makes any sense is to land the best QB in the 27 draft. They did not assure that with the trade.

They did make the team worse. Trading Denzel gives them more picks and should help worsen the team.

2026 will once again be spent looking at the draft.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by DaveyD
Those draft picks are going to be very late 2027 1st rd, very late 2028 2nd round and very late 2029 third round. Better start working on trade up packages for a QB next year.

IMO, that may not be enough ammo for a fQB prospect... but without Garrett one could argue we'll still be picking fairly high.

With Garrett we have drafted:

2018 1st overall
2019 traded for OBJ (16th overall)
2020 10th overall
2021 26th overall
2022 traded for Watson (13th overall)
2023 traded for Watson (12th overall)
2024 traded for Watson (23rd overall)
2025 2nd overall
2026 6th overall


WITH Garrett, we have finished with top 10 draft picks 4 out of his 9 seasons here. Only twice have they picked in the 20s.

So, if they pick outside the top 10 without him this year, does that make this post a moot point?

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
Originally Posted by bonefish
I am getting more pissed by the minute.

Myles was the first pick in the draft. We had to suck to get that pick.

Baker was the first pick. The first pick guarantees nothing. Myles is a Hall of Famer. It's really hard to draft a player of that caliber.

Verse is averaging about 6/7 sacks a year. The 27 first rounder will be near the bottom.

What did we gain to really get a shot at what "may be" a good quarterback in the 27 draft?

We have weakened the team this year and gained little to impact the draft next year.

Our best chance to to get a quarterback in 27 is to lose every game. Or, hope there is quarterback when we pick.

The only thing that is certain is we are worse right now then we were yesterday.

Verse averaging 6/7 sacks a year? He is only in his 3rd year of his rookie contract. Myles didn't have 23 sacks in his first two years... He had 7 in his first year, then 10.5 his second year.

If Verse turns into a double digit sack player with 20+ QB hits, he will be in the top 5 pass rushers in the NFL. He might not be Myles in his prime, but he will be a cornerstone of the Browns defense.

We will have to see where he ends up.

The part we are all overlooking is that the Browns will continue to be a lower half of the league team searching for a way to make the playoffs every few years or so, with or without Myles. He is now 30, that is going to start declining in the coming few years. He was traded after he got the record for sacks in the entire NFL... which landed us a #6 overall draft position.

At the end of the day, they have to fix the QB spot to become a consistent winner. They will probably need draft capital to be in a position to get one. I don't think they will be bad enough to get the #1 overall pick, with or without Garrett. Berry managed to get Myles replacement AND extra draft capital to help make the move in next year's draft.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by bonefish
IMO we did not get enough for Myles.


I can see why anyone would think that - but at the end of the day it's a bit like selling your house. It doesn't matter what you think it's worth, it matters what someone will offer you for it.

That parallel only works if you are 100% committed to selling your house. We didn't HAVE to trade the cornerstone of our defense... unless we are attempting a rebuild of some scale. If it's a rebuild, then I say commit to it and trade Ward as well.

We don't know that... Myles might have made that "HAVE to trade" reality. I don't think he goes the entire off season without talking to his new head coach if he wanted to be in a Browns uniform in 2026. I think this was probably initiated by him.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Well I am sure Myles is happy.

He will be seen in the playoffs by the whole country. Lots of prime time games to showcase his stuff.

Maybe it was. So what? He said he wanted to be traded before. He signed the contract.

What we don't know is could we have gotten more?

Trading Myles probably had to happen. The timing was bad. By the time we are competitive to win in the playoffs if ever.

Myles most likely would have been past his prime and not worth what we ended up getting.

I was not opposed to trading him. I was thinking two first plus more. Verse, two first rounders, and a 28 third.

I am tired of watching bad Browns teams. There are always justifications. However, the results have not changed a damn thing.

The big swing and miss. I could go on and on. I just get angry.

Oh well, I have the Braves and the Guardians.

Maybe when pigs fly the Browns will have a quarterback and a team that could compete for a Super Bowl like the Rams are going to.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,123
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,123
Originally Posted by BCbrownie
It's a good trade....

I'm liking it, we were not going to the Super Bowl in the time that MG has left. If he was ever to be traded, now was the time. Did we get a fair return? IDK, we can only wait and see...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
1
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
1
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
I’m not going to bother to read any other posts because I’m sitting on a beach in paradise and just read the news.

I think it’s a great trade. It was gonna happen before or after the season regardless, I was confident it would happen and said so multiple times. It was our only move left for securing a QB in next year’s feeding frenzy. Yes, it’s likely to be a low 1st but it likely makes our pick slightly higher than it would have been. Our D may not single handedly win games this year. But who knows, the Verse trade essentially makes it 2 firsts plus the rest. He’s just coming into the start of his prime as Garrett is just going over the top of his peak.

From a strategic standpoint I give it an A+. It’s always a bummer to trade your best player and on the very short list of best ever for the franchise but I really do like where we’re headed. 2 very good drafts and teed up for next year. We very well may be a QB away.

Yea, we’ll likely need to make another move next year but this was a must
To get into position. We now have a team to root against!

So Boo Rams! Suck it!




"Team Chemistry No Match for Team Biology" (Onion Sports Headline)
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,538
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,538
This is about where I'm at. I think it's a solid trade for the Browns...

How would you grade the trade for both sides?

Browns: A

Rams: C-

The Super Bowl-favorite Rams just dealt for the reigning Defensive Player of the Year coming off a season in which he broke the single-season sack record ... and yet it should be Browns fans celebrating this trade. It's a mighty acquisition for Los Angeles, but it's a massive return for Cleveland -- more than should have reasonably been expected, even for Garrett.

Garrett has been a first-team All-Pro in five of the past six seasons, recorded at least 12.0 sacks in each of the past six seasons, won Defensive Player of the Year two out of the past three seasons and ranks second to only Micah Parsons in both pass rush win rate and pass rush wins over the past four years. But critical to this trade grade is the evaluation of Verse, who might go overlooked in this deal but absolutely should not. He has 12.0 sacks and a 15.3% pass rush win rate at edge (62nd percentile) over his two seasons in the league. That pass rushing undersells his impact, though, because Verse is one of the best run-stopping edges in the league; he ranks second in run stop win rate at edge behind only Maxx Crosby in that span.

The Browns are not contenders in 2026 and are probably a stretch to contend even in 2027. It makes sense for Cleveland to take this deal. But I do not think this is good team building for the Rams that will maximize their chances of a Super Bowl over the next several seasons. There is a clear drop-off from Garrett to Verse, but it's not like Los Angeles is filling a hole here. Add in the massive pay disparity between the two players -- even if both are values relative to their worth -- and it makes it even harder to justify.

The 2026 Rams are better today than they were yesterday. But the cost to the 2027-2030 Rams is too much to justify, and the Browns will reap the benefits. -- Seth Walder ESPN



Now I'll point out the rest...

1. Myles was a ticking time-bomb. Psychologically and physically. The last thing we could afford would be for him to have gone off the rails during the season and demanded a trade. The second worse was the other fuse-a major injury. He's 30, he plays a violent sport, and he's never had a major injury. Not only is that bound to happen (eventually), there could be no worse situation for the Browns than for it to happen this season.

2. Myles wasn’t going to bring a Super Bowl to Cleveland. While he might have won one if he stayed long-term, the gap between our team's reality and his individual brilliance as a 'game-wrecker' was becoming too wide to ignore.

3. Lastly, meaning for the 4529th time, Myles is not NASTY. I've been screaming for NASTY for about a decade now. Even some complementary players around him that played with a short fuse would have worked. Myles sacks you and helps you up. He yucks it up with the opposition the entire game. The only time he's ever seemed angry, it cost him a six game suspension.

Jared Verse IS nasty. He plays with violence, he talks trash, he leaves you lying on the field. He's a tone setter. High motor, speed for days, relentless bull rush.


Now, the flowchart for overcoming natural objections:

Myles was gone... if not this season, next season. Many people wanted (2) 1st round draft picks. Those obviously wouldn't have come in the first season. So... you would have a HUGE hole on defense and a first round draft pick two years in a row.

From that standpoint, we basically got Verse for a 2028 1st round pick, right? And no hole on defense.

Also, we can moan that the Rams pick will be a low 1st round pick. ALL picks in a Myles Garrett trade would be low picks. The only teams willing to ante-up are teams that think he puts them over-the-top, right? Did anyone think someone like the Jets or the Cards would ante up that kind of bank for Garrett? That doesn't happen because teams that suck that bad can't afford to take that risk. And oh yeah, Garrett has a no-trade clause.


I love Myles. It was an absolute pleasure watching him play here in Cleveland. I hope he has a ton of success in what remains of his career. I think this was the right move... for Myles and for the future of the Browns.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
1
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
1
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
Couldn’t agree more. Except the Nasty thing. I don’t think it matters frankly, nasty or no, every offensive game plan had to be made around Garrett. I love Verse and agree that he may wear off on his teammates more than Garrett (who seemed to be on a personality island) but Garrett not being nasty was never an issue.

Still, I think this was inevitable and necessary and that they got Verse in return makes this a massive win. Yes, they likely still have to make a move to get up higher in the first round next year but they have most of the hard to get ammo now.

We’re on a 2028-29 dome opening timeline. This aligns perfectly with that. Garrett was never going to be here that long. Plus… there’s a very solid chance a 29yr old phenom who’s never had health issues starts to have health issues riiiiiight about this season. Then what’s the trade value? Pulled the trigger at the right time imo.




"Team Chemistry No Match for Team Biology" (Onion Sports Headline)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
If the picks end up in a package and we select a true franchise quarterback.

All is well. We didn't win with Myles.

I was never opposed to moving Myles. I just wanted max return.

Maybe this is the best we could get in return. I don't know the answer to that.


What I know is another year of around Halloween I will be looking at the draft.

It is depressing to know the season is over before it begins. I guess there is always curiosity about the last draft and a new head coach.

Of course I been through that exercise before.

I wonder what it is like to begin a season with a franchise quarterback and be a favorite to win the Super Bowl?

I will have to dust off my memories of 1986 and 87.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
j/c:

Overall, I think people (in general, not just here) aren't fully realizing the value of Verse in this trade. He is a first rounder who is worth more than where he was selected (Rd. 1, Pick 19), still has years left on his contract plus the fifth year option, is five years younger, and has been to the Pro Bowl every year he has been in the NFL plus was the DROY. There has been so much angst about not getting another first rounder but sometimes getting the known first rounder is better.

From what I gather, LA preferred to give up more draft capital (most likely another first round pick) instead of giving up Verse. I think that says a lot in this deal.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,247
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,247
The person made happiest by this trade is Joe Burrow.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,242
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,242
I dusted off my 64 memories of an NFL Championship when I was 16......sad most Browns fans have never seen them as Champions. At 78 I'd love to see us make a Super Bowl....stinks I've seen them all and never had Browns jerseys playing there.....hope eternal....JMHO, Garrett trade smart business, as a football player he has no peers, as a driver on Ohio streets he was a loser/ poor citizen. Go Browns!!!!


"You've never lived till you've almost died, life has a flavor the protected will never know" A vet or cop
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
Bone I usually see eye to eye with you on the many topics here but this time I have a small disagreement with you. I love Myles and am sad to see him go but I think it was time. We got some good draft picks in return and a very good player who is younger with upside. Myles will be 31 in December and more prone to injuries. We aren't going to contend for a SB in the next 2 years and after that Myles will probably on the downside of his career. Possibly Verse and other players we acquire with those picks will help us get to a SB. This should also help us with our cap space. Right now, we all have an opinion and nobody knows who will be right or wrong. I honestly think it was a solid trade for both teams. It's all a matter of conjecture and will have to play itself out. I wish MG the best and hope he wins a Super Bowl! Best of luck Myles and thanks for the great memories!!

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,664
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,664
Originally Posted by jfanent
The person made happiest by this trade is Joe Burrow.

...Until he gets hit by Jared Verse.

It might actually be Chloe Kim.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
We are the same age.

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 841
T
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
T
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 841
I’m good with this trade. Seems like Myles wanted out, anyway. He was a great player, but tbh, he would get four sacks and then disappear for three games. Yes, I know he was absorbing triple teams. But I think with Verse, we can still have an elite defense. I do not see, at least yet, how we turn those two first rounders into Arch, but we’ll see where the picks land and who has No. 1.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
I get it. I do.

It is not like it is about who won the trade? The motive behind the trade is crystal clear.

It was clear when they traded down in the 2025 and 2026 draft.

They are going after an age group. Myles didn't fit.

DW and or Shedeur have one year to prove beyond doubt that they don't need to draft a quarterback in 2027.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,428
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,428
Thank goodness

You went on national TV putting down your team

It's not about the money

Lol, you resigned to the team you didn't want to be with why ?

O yeah the money

You weren't a leader

You were a selfish player who cared about sack totals that didn't mean anything to winning for the team

Running backs ran around you and receivers caught passes behind your back because you suck as an edge.

You didn't care about stopping runs or batting down passes

You only worried about your selfish personal sack record

Oh by the way.. you never got sacks when it meant winning a game

Enjoy LA

Happy to see you out of Cleveland !!

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,822
S
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,822
While I never wanted to trade Myles, I had a feeling it was coming. They are building a nice young roster, and a different culture is being presented by the young guys. Myles is the best player in the league, but he is not what I call a team leader. Him stating he wanted out last year, and made a big scene trying to make it happen. The guys in the locker room see that. Him working away from the team in a year when a new head coach and staff comes in, doesn't really show leadership to younger players. IMO, it shows entitlement. That being said, if anyone can miss all the off season stuff and come in and dominate, it is Myles. I'm just looking at it as a change in culture. Let these young players set the culture, oblivious to whatever culture prevailed previously. The camaraderie is built in the offseason, Myles would not have been part of that anyway. He wants a championship, and the front office is giving him a chance to get one. I laugh at all the posters who repeatedly claimed they were screwing a hall of fame career by keeping him, are now claiming it was a bad deal. Loved the guy, but he is a Ram now, so I could care less about him.


RIP, Jim
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
Agree with all your post -

I don't know how good Verse is so I can't comment but based on your input I am very encouraged. With MG being able to choose where he goes, your comment about any draft picks being lower order is spot on.

We might not be a better team today with this trade - but the drop off isn't like stepping off a cliff, if by some miracle we find good QB play this year or simply a QB that excels in Monken's offense, the D is still going go be good. While if we don't find a QB this year - we have a lot more leverage for next year and Verse will be still be here and at his peak in 2-3 years time.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,809
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,809
*Well I am now Marked Safe from getting run down by a Porsche going 120 MPH on my way to the Cleveland Clinic now*

One thing to watch over the next few years. Myles left shoulder. Is it OK or is it still giving him trouble???


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Good Luck Myles.

It was fun watching you play. I wish the team would have been better.

In some ways this might be another ramification of what the DW trade did not accomplish.

You cannot be blamed for wanting to win. Careers are short. There is precious time to win when a team is complete.

We could never get there.

You did your job. The Browns have to chase a quarterback and build a team the right way.

Maybe your final act for the Browns is this trade and it will help both you and the Browns reach the goal.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,454
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,454
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by bonefish
IMO we did not get enough for Myles.


I can see why anyone would think that - but at the end of the day it's a bit like selling your house. It doesn't matter what you think it's worth, it matters what someone will offer you for it.

That parallel only works if you are 100% committed to selling your house. We didn't HAVE to trade the cornerstone of our defense... unless we are attempting a rebuild of some scale. If it's a rebuild, then I say commit to it and trade Ward as well.

I think we did. It has been reported that someone with the Rams was quoted as saying they took Simpson because they knew they weren't going to have a 1st round pick in 27. The deal with the Rams was set back around the draft.

Myles has said he wanted to be traded. He obviously still wanted to or he could have voided this trade. We don't know what conversations were made between the team and Myles over the months since the end of the season but it was made clear he still wanted to be traded or it wouldn't have happened. If he was vocal about things during last season, what would have happened this season? Would he have reported to mandatory camps?

I think it was clear to the Browns that a trade was going to be the only resolution.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,454
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,454
Just a general comment here on something that seems to be lost on some. Verse is worth picks. If the rams were to have traded the guy straight up to some team, it would have cost more than a 1st round pick. It would be more like two 1st rounders.

Some need to quit acting like a team could have tossed a 5th rounder at the Rams to get the guy.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
What is the value of Jared Verse?

I asked AI if Verse was to be traded by the Rams what would teams give up?

The answer was multiple picks in the first round. Two top 15 first rounders.

That surprised me because I really did not know his value.

If that is true. Then we did alright.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,454
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,454
Originally Posted by bonefish
What is the value of Jared Verse?

I asked AI if Verse was to be traded by the Rams what would teams give up?

The answer was multiple picks in the first round. Two top 15 first rounders.

That surprised me because I really did not know his value.

If that is true. Then we did alright.
Originally Posted by bonefish
What is the value of Jared Verse?



The answer was multiple picks in the first round. Two top 15 first rounders.

That surprised me because I really did not know his value.

If that is true. Then we did alright.

Thanks


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,244
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,244
Having thought about it yea it sucks to lose Myles but Verse is pretty good and younger. Also, the Browns could use the 1st round pick they got from the Rams, and their own, to try and move up and take one of the top QBs, or another top prospect, in the 2027 draft.

The last couple of drafts have been good. Many NFL pundits like what the Browns did and are saying they are a team on the rise. I hope they are right.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,040
Myles Garrett traded: Making sense of the Rams-Browns deal
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...d-verse-rams-browns-draft-picks-barnwell


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
The dust has settled.

The Browns are all in for the 2027 draft.

The long view is the opening of the new stadium in 29. The Browns will go after a franchise quarterback in the 27 draft.

He may not start the season in 27. That depends on a few other factors. Like who do they draft and will he be ready?

The other factor is what happens in 26?

I can see a world where Arch Manning is the starter. It will be interesting to watch Texas this season.

There are others of course. However, you can bet that the Browns have been scouting hard and will continue.

We have draft capital. We also could lose a lot this year. Wherever the draft order ends? The Browns are plotting a move to the front.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
Isn't it ridiculous. We as Browns fans have already pretty much written off the next 2 seasons. Kind of pathetic but it is the reality. I am hoping that our O-Line gels quickly and we get some decent QB and WR play so we can compete but that may be wishful thinking. The reality of being a Browns fan.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Verse is not Myles but he is no slouch.

Our record will once again be dependent upon QB play.

The team is building a young core with the last two drafts.

I don't do predictions. Honestly I have no idea how we will play. Lots of different parts. Starting with a new head coach.

Losing Myles does mean that we lose. We lost with Myles. It is about the play of the team.

DW may start. Shedeur may finish. Who knows? The fall back is the 27 draft.

Nobody can say who will be the best quarterback in that draft. We will know more as the season unfolds.

I will probably watch more college games than I ever have. I want to really see the QB class.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
Originally Posted by bonefish
What we don't know is could we have gotten more?

Maybe you should ask yourself if they could have gotten more why would they have taken less? Myles had a no trade clause giving him control over what teams he could be traded to. That alone limits the teams Myles could be traded to. I'm not a huge fan of Berry but I am pretty certain he wouldn't have taken less if he could have gotten more.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,025
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,025
Two decisions that look almost identical on paper can lead to completely different outcomes depending on when they’re made and how they’re executed. The ability to accurately assess consequences and understand when the timing is right is often what separates success from failure.

Andrew Berry has probably made plenty of decisions that were logical in isolation. The problem is that his timing has often been catastrophically bad. When you stack that many poorly timed decisions on top of each other over six years, eventually you end up with the Cleveland Browns.

Trading for Deshaun Watson would have been 100% the right move sometime between 2017 and 2020. After that? Every decision connected to acquiring him was wrong. Not just wrong — spectacularly, historically, “future documentary episode” wrong.

Not extending Baker Mayfield was both right and wrong. There were valid football reasons to hesitate. But failing to support him through the 2021 season while he was playing through injury was both morally questionable and economically shortsighted. It showed a complete inability to evaluate the broader consequences of the decision.

What message did that send to the locker room? To the fanbase? To the media?

If Baker had struggled in 2020, the decision would have been much easier to justify. Instead, Berry and Stefanski essentially watched their most important offensive player limp through an entire season and then acted surprised when things got messy. That’s not strategy. That’s timing malpractice.

Now we get to Myles Garrett. Could trading him be justified from a pure asset-management perspective? Maybe. But is the timing right? I have serious doubts. If you’re going to tear down a roster, it usually helps if you’ve already built something worth tearing down first.

Since Berry became GM in 2020, the roster has steadily declined and the results have followed the same trajectory. Today we’re sitting at an all-time low. After six years, the excuses have run out.

A general manager has the ultimate responsibility for the direction of the franchise. At the end of the day, the scoreboard doesn’t care about process, spreadsheets, analytics models, or PowerPoint presentations. Results are the measuring stick.

So here’s the simple question:

How many years are we talking before the Browns are truly competitive again?

One?

Two?


Because if the answer is anything longer than that, we’re basically asking Browns fans to trust a GPS that’s been driving us straight into Lake Erie for six years.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,538
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,538
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
Myles Garrett traded: Making sense of the Rams-Browns deal
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...d-verse-rams-browns-draft-picks-barnwell

Great read. Pretty long so I clipped a few parts:


Where we're at...

And that roster simply wasn't close to competing for a title, even with Garrett on the field. The Browns were another great draft away from being another great draft away. Berry had five top-90 picks in 2026 and added four offensive players, including receivers KC Concepcion and Denzel Boston and left tackle Spencer Fano, but the Browns still don't have any quarterback of note. Watson is a free agent after the season and coming off a season lost to an Achilles injury, and Shedeur Sanders' 18.9 Total QBR was the second-worst mark of any signal-caller in the NFL who threw at least 100 passes last season.


What we got in Verse...

Verse, meanwhile, still has three years of cost control, with two years left on his rookie contract before a potential fifth-year option in 2028. After winning Defensive Rookie of the Year amid a weak class during his debut season with the Rams, Verse was devastating during their brief playoff run in 2024, racking up two sacks and a 57-yard fumble return for a score.

I was one of the many who had hopes that Verse could take a leap and challenge to be among the league's most impactful pass rushers in 2025. That sort of season never really came together. Verse was named to the Pro Bowl for the second time and produced 7.5 sacks, but he was overshadowed at times by Young and Turner. He did lead the team with three tackles for loss and seven quarterback hits during the postseason run, but at first glance, it felt as if Verse left some meat on the bone in his sophomore season.

Under the hood, I'm not sure those concerns are warranted. Verse's 27 quarterback knockdowns were just two short of Young's team-leading 29. Verse matched his fellow edge rusher in terms of pressure rate (just under 14%) and quick pressure rate (4%). And he did that while being double-teamed twice as often as Young. Verse's 4% quarterback pressure over expectation rate (QBPOE) led the team, per Next Gen Stats.

Verse has already been very good, and I'm still quite optimistic that he can be the best player on an elite defense. Garrett's athleticism makes other NFL players look as if they're stuck in quicksand. Verse isn't quite that devastating, but he has to have some of the heaviest hands and rates as one of the most physical edges in the league. He's a hammer on twists, to which Mekhi Becton can attest, and he has the physical strength to manhandle even elite linemen like Tristan Wirfs and Joe Thuney on snaps. (Verse driving Thuney backward is what got Caleb Williams running backward on the Bears' tying Hail Mary touchdown in the fourth quarter of the divisional round classic.)


Verse also has the athleticism to beat linemen into gaps or rush around them. Last season, the Rams even used Verse lined up over the center and saw him destroy Colts pivot Tanor Bortolini. The play was reminiscent, of course, of how Jim Schwartz and the Browns used Garrett as a stand-up rusher to torment interior linemen in years past. Verse was the best player on the field in that game against Indy, soundly beating both Bortolini and left tackle Bernhard Raimann.

In a league in which great pass rushers are going to be commanding a minimum of $30 million per season moving forward, Verse will make just $5 million over the next two years combined before an eventual 2028 fifth-year option, where he probably still will be undervalued. Surplus value doesn't mean quite as much when the Browns don't expect to compete over the next couple of seasons, but Verse represents a building block who projects to be in his peak when the Browns are out from under their cap mess and presumably have a quarterback around whom to build. There's a non-zero chance he's more productive than Garrett over the next three to five years at a fraction of the cost, which would make this an enormous victory for Cleveland.

If the Rams had decided to make Verse available, I believe they would have been able to land a first-round pick and a significant additional selection, potentially a second-round pick, for their young edge rusher. Factor all that in and this return looks pretty strong for the Browns, who land the equivalent of two first-round picks, two second-round picks and a third-round selection for Garrett. If the organization had decided that it was going to trade Garrett, I'm not sure the return was ever going to be richer than this.


Why this was probably a win-win for both teams...

The Browns realized a significant and logical return for a player whose best remaining seasons were going to be wasted alongside a hopeless roster, and they'll be in a better position to build a winner two years from now. The Rams can't guarantee a title by adding Garrett, and it hurts to lose Verse, but this was a chance to bring in what might potentially be the most talented and productive peak player acquired in any trade during most of our lifetimes.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,372
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,372
Just my random 2 cents:

We swapped Myles for a 2x Pro Bowler that has only 2 years in the league so far and is entering his third year of his rookie contract.
We now have the '24 & '25 Defensive Rookies of the Year on the same defense.

It SUCKS to lose Myles, and I wish him the best, but in terms of how this changes games for us, it probably doesn't alter things all that much.
Verse actually has more QB pressures over the last two years than Myles and is 4th in Pass-Rush Win Rate among edge rushers.

Per ESPN "he is one of the best run-stopping edges in the league. In fact, he ranks second in run stop win rate at edge behind only Maxx Crosby in that span (two seasons).”


We got 6 years younger, cleared $8 million in CAP space this year, and added a '27 1st, '28 2nd, and '29 3rd.


Myles wins, Browns win... LA might win. There really aren't any losers in this deal.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
Stop making sense.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 841
T
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
T
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 841
We all know Myles is an athletic alien, and I am not trying to say Verse is or ever will be as good. But I compared their combine performances and it was very interesting. Verse ran a 4.58 40 and Myles a 4.64. Myles did 33 reps on the bench and Verse did 31. Myles had a 41 inch vertical, Verse 35, Verse had a 1.60 10-yard split, Myles a 1.61. Broad jump Verse 10.8, Myles 10.7. The point is, I guess, Verse was also an elite prospect, and his career is off to a great start. He isn’t Myles, but he is a helluva player.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,286
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,286
The burning question we are all holding now: "What does MKC think?" Consider the Cowherd source.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,286
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,286
Good points all, Purp! Statistically, we are talking about trading Myles freaking Garrett. And these stats almost suggest to me that we may have trades up. I will miss playmaking by MG, loved his work. I wish him the best. Get bring! Thanks for your contributions and achievements.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
Could be we traded for the next great edge rusher. Maybe another MG?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,538
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,538
Originally Posted by The Big G
We all know Myles is an athletic alien, and I am not trying to say Verse is or ever will be as good. But I compared their combine performances and it was very interesting. Verse ran a 4.58 40 and Myles a 4.64. Myles did 33 reps on the bench and Verse did 31. Myles had a 41 inch vertical, Verse 35, Verse had a 1.60 10-yard split, Myles a 1.61. Broad jump Verse 10.8, Myles 10.7. The point is, I guess, Verse was also an elite prospect, and his career is off to a great start. He isn’t Myles, but he is a helluva player.

Along those lines, I saw this earlier today...




HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,242
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,242
Agree, 100%.....now Miles gets to test LA cops while driving around the city. Smart play by our GM, he gets younger, gets less expensive for years, and he only loses so much production. We didn't win much with Miles, one player doesn't fix a team. And we pick up several top 100 picks in years to come. We gave up a great, but got better for the future.....GO Browns!!!!


"You've never lived till you've almost died, life has a flavor the protected will never know" A vet or cop
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,486
Myles being traded is not a ringing endorsement for our quarterbacks.

If they thought either had a future with the Browns why trade Myles? His window would fit if the timing and age factor means anything.

Now we have more money a younger team and a lot of draft assets.

This all points to 2029 with the new stadium.

Life will go on as usual. Meaning Monken will try to win with what he has.

Who knows what that will look like? But the baseline plan is to find the quarterback in the 27 draft.


Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
Originally Posted by bonefish
Myles being traded is not a ringing endorsement for our quarterbacks.

If they thought either had a future with the Browns why trade Myles? His window would fit if the timing and age factor means anything.

Now we have more money a younger team and a lot of draft assets.

This all points to 2029 with the new stadium.

Life will go on as usual. Meaning Monken will try to win with what he has.

Who knows what that will look like? But the baseline plan is to find the quarterback in the 27 draft.



I agree 100% that it seems there is no ringing endorsement for the QBs.

I don't think the Browns had a choice on the trade. I believe Myles told them trade me or hear me trash the situation as soon as they didn't hire Schwartz. It immediately told Myles he doesn't have any influence, which as a player, he shouldn't.

Looking forward to the new stadium and new opportunities to win.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,497
2029 would be what, year 8 or year 9 for Berry? I've heard of giving someone a little leash but dear God man you would think at some point there would be a limit. I guess not.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
In no particular order:

OUCH - reading Wirfs (who we did not pick) being considered and elite OT.

Yes - Verse has value whether you equate it to picks or not. He's clearly very good. He fills the void MG left. He's younger and we get the 2027 first rounder. It really is a perfect set up. As Fate said - whoever we traded with was going to be a low first round pick. MG was in control of that.

It can't be a shock to anyone - fan or coaching staff - that the QB situation is not looking favorable. We all saw DW play for 19 games and he was crap for 85% of those games. We say Sanders play and while he flashed a little on some deep balls and showed some ability to be coached ... he did not look like a future FQB.

Suddenly the man in the know mentions MG's shoulder!! Oh My ... watch this space.

When can the Browns be good? The D is in good shape. The draft class of Fannin, Judkins and Schwesinger hopefully only gets better. The rookie draft class has the potential to have a similar impact. The OL has been overhauled with FA's (and a 1st round LT) ... I think we are selling this team short if we think it's 2 years away. I think a top 2 or 3 QB in a deep QB class in next year's draft and we can compete. Hopefully Monken is the guy - that'll be another big factor.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
Irish, none of the QB's we have deserve a ringing endorsement. They have to prove themselves. It is what it is my friend.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,538
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,538
Originally Posted by mgh888
When can the Browns be good? The D is in good shape. The draft class of Fannin, Judkins and Schwesinger hopefully only gets better. The rookie draft class has the potential to have a similar impact. The OL has been overhauled with FA's (and a 1st round LT) ... I think we are selling this team short if we think it's 2 years away. I think a top 2 or 3 QB in a deep QB class in next year's draft and we can compete. Hopefully Monken is the guy - that'll be another big factor.

100%... and a good launch for the point I keep forgetting to make.

We spend waaay too much time as fans thinking we know what's going through the FOs heads. We are not mailing it in for the next couple years. Nobody is trying synchronize "the path" with the new stadium. That would be crazy.

Getting full value for generational talent is not because we need a new QB, the timing just happens to intersect with the fact that we might. I'd say that even if we were 80-90% sure Sanders was the man, and just needed two seasons to make take us to the Promised Land; there's still a great chance this trade would have gone down. jmo


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 841
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Irish, none of the QB's we have deserve a ringing endorsement. They have to prove themselves. It is what it is my friend.

No argument from me, I agree. It would be a huge surprise to me if one of them showed promise this season. I fully expect to get a one year contract year out of Watson.

It's really a no win situation for Sanders. Most QBs get about 3 years to show marked improvement, but he is a 5th round guy that I don't think is franchise material. We need to find the guy in next year's draft if all goes well in the college season.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,372
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,372
Originally Posted by bonefish
Myles being traded is not a ringing endorsement for our quarterbacks.

If they thought either had a future with the Browns why trade Myles? His window would fit if the timing and age factor means anything.

Now we have more money a younger team and a lot of draft assets.

This all points to 2029 with the new stadium.

Life will go on as usual. Meaning Monken will try to win with what he has.

Who knows what that will look like? But the baseline plan is to find the quarterback in the 27 draft.


and Myles had a No-Trade clause he had to agree to waive in order for this to happen, so whatever else there is Myles agrees that we have no QB (which we all know already, though some continue to hold out hope)


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,867
Agreed. If there was a best time to trade Myles it was now after the stellar season he had. I feel he is at his peak right now and barring injuries he has another 2-3 years of top end production. As far as the next couple of seasons I don't think we're mailing anything in, I just feel that no one believes we are legit contenders. IF our O-Line comes together quicker than expected, IF we get decent to good QB play and IF our passing game develops faster we might contend for a playoff spot. A lot of IF's LOL laugh

Last edited by Homewood Dog; 06/02/26 05:09 PM.
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,025
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,025
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
2029 would be what, year 8 or year 9 for Berry? I've heard of giving someone a little leash but dear God man you would think at some point there would be a limit. I guess not.

This is what I just don’t understand.

The culture around sports in America seems completely different from what we’re used to in Europe. No serious organization—what we’d call a football club—would keep a Director of Football or General Manager with a track record like Andrew Berry’s for this long. It’s practically unheard of.

In Europe, managers and sporting directors get fired all the time when results aren’t good enough. Sometimes twice in the same season. Clubs like Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, Barcelona, Juventus, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, or Manchester United would eat an unsuccessful executive like Berry alive. These people are paid millions to improve results, not make them worse.

The Browns have been bad for years.

Most of the major decisions have backfired.

The quarterback situation—the single most important position in sports—is still a massive question mark.

And to make matters worse, all signs point toward several more seasons where we’re nowhere near good enough to compete with the league’s elite.

What drives me crazy is the complete lack of urgency. The results get worse, yet there seems to be almost no reaction from a large part of the fanbase. On this board, the majority still defends a front office that has consistently failed to deliver.

That is absolutely mind-boggling to me.

Andrew Berry earns millions of dollars. He doesn’t deserve loyalty simply because he’s a nice guy or because he sounds smart in press conferences. This is a results business, not a charity organization.

FFS, PitDAWG—even though we’ve disagreed plenty over the years, you deserve better. We all deserve better.

My favorite soccer team just had its best season in years. Honestly, it’s improved my quality of life. I sleep better. I’m more relaxed. I actually look forward to weekends because I know my team has a chance to win.

When I watch the Browns, I go into most games expecting them to lose. Realistically, they’ll probably lose around 75% of their games.

That’s depressing.

So how can anyone still accept this?

His job is to make the Browns better.

If six seasons isn’t enough time to evaluate a General Manager, then I honestly don’t know what is.

At some point, accountability has to matter.

And if Browns fans keep accepting failure, they’ll keep getting more of it.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,633
N
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
N
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,633
Eagles made play for Myles Garrett, but Browns wanted Jalen Carter
By
Mike Florio

Published June 2, 2026 08:00 PM
On Monday morning, before the Browns traded defensive end Myles Garrett to the Rams, Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer flagged the Rams, Cowboys, and Eagles as potential destinations.

Multiple reports have indicated that the Browns wanted defensive tackle Jalen Carter from the Eagles, but that the Eagles weren’t interested in that.

Via Jeff Kerr of SI.com, the Eagles offered Nolan Smith or Jalyx Hunt instead.

The Eagles’ insistence on keeping Carter is a bit confusing, given that the forward-looking Eagles have yet to sign Carter to a second contract. In March, after the Eagles signed defensive tackle Jordan Davis to a new deal, it was leaked that they have gotten calls about Carter, which often is part of a strategy aimed at getting more.

The challenge for the Eagles as to Carter is his fifth-year option salary of $27.1 million in 2027. Given that number, he may be looking for a market-level deal well in excess of $30 million in new-money average.

For 2026, Carter is due to make only $3.723 million in the fourth year of his first-round rookie deal. He shouldn’t set foot on a practice field until he gets his second deal. The team’s refusal to include him in a trade package for Garrett should only strengthen Carter’s resolve in that regard

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,539
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,539
The Rams are 1 Stafford injury away from the Browns picking 2x in the top 10

Plus, Myles hasn't really been able to stay healthy. He's had to play through a lot on injuries in the last 2 years.
Hip, Ankle, Foot, Achilles and 20 yards of KT Tape on his shoulders.


Meh.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,123
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,123
Originally Posted by mgh888
The OL has been overhauled with FA's (and a 1st round LT) ...

IIRC Zion Johnson (OG) was also a 1st round pick in 2022(?). And unless I am mistaken. Howard was another 1st rounder....

Last edited by bbrowns32; 06/02/26 09:41 PM.

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,483
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,483
What I wonder is .. was this trade promised to Garret before he signed his extension last year. Was he given the no trade clause so the Browns could not trade him to Atlanta or Arizona. He wanted approval over any trade, but he wanted to be traded. He obviously agreed to the trade. The Browns wanted to find the best way to get a top draft pick .. two first rounders plus a second should do it.


The Cleveland Browns - WE KNOW QUARTERBACKS ( Look at how many we've had ... )
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,944
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,944
I have held off too much commentary on this trade. I wanted to know what the Browns actually got back.

I admit that I did not like the trade immediately. I didn't feel that we got enough ..... but I also knew nothing at all about Verse. I find myself feeling a lot better as I learned more about him. It is obvious that Myles wanted gone yesterday, and Verse seems really excited to be coming here. Is Verse Myles V2? No. Can he be an effective DE? I believe so.

This might wind up being one of those rare trades that helps both teams. Enjoy LA Taxes Myles. wink lol


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,562
Originally Posted by Halfback32
What I wonder is .. was this trade promised to Garret before he signed his extension last year.

I alluded to this in my first post when I said "Who knows what commitment/promise was made to go along with the re-signing a couple years ago? " - I could easily see a scenario where there was an agreement that if the Browns didn't achieve "X" by 2026 - he would get his trade to a team of his choice.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,286
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,286
We need to be tanking and praying. The MG loss is real immediately. Verse remains to be seen. Our offense will need to improve to win games. May strait a fire sale on vets: If MG can go, market and cash out other assets. Good luck, Myles.!


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Myles Garrett Traded

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5